| تعداد نشریات | 284 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 82 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,046 |
| تعداد مقالات | 34,077 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 46,494,654 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 77,553,876 |
ارزیابی پایداری عملکرد دانه و تنوع ژنتیکی در ارقام و لاین‌های امیدبخش گندم نان متحمل به شوری | ||
| نهال و بذر | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 35، شماره 1، خرداد 1398، صفحه 1-25 اصل مقاله (1.16 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/spij.2019.123759.1074 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| حبیب اله قزوینی* 1؛ مهدیه مرندی2؛ اشکبوس امینی سفید آب3 | ||
| 1معاون بخش تحقیقات غلات- موسسه اصلاح و تهیه نهال و بذر- سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی | ||
| 2دانشجوی سابق کارشناسی ارشد، گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اسلامشهر | ||
| 3استادیار، مؤسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه نهال و بذر، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی | ||
| چکیده | ||
| پایداری عملکرد دانه و تغییرات ژنتیکی 17 ژنوتیپ امیدبخش گندم نان متحمل به شوری به همراه سه رقم شاهد ارگ، بم و افق در دو آزمایش مزرعه‌ای و مولکولی بررسی شد. در آزمایش مزرعه‌ای، مقایسه عملکرد ژنوتیپ‌ها در اراضی شور ایستگاه‌های میلیشبار یزد، امیرآباد بیرجند، رودشت اصفهان، اختیارآباد کرمان و زهک زابل در دو سال زراعی 92-1391 و 93-1392انجام شد. برای ارزیابی تنوع ژنتیکی ژنوتیپ‌ها از 18 نشانگر ریزماهواره (SSR) مرتبط با تحمل به شوری استفاده شد. تجزیه واریانس مرکب عملکرد دانه تفاوت معنی‌دار برای اثر رقم، اثر متقابل سال × مکان و اثر سال × رقم و همچنین اثر متقابل سه‌گانه رقم × سال × مکان نشان داد. مقایسه میانگین ژنوتیپ‌ها با استفاده از آزمون حداقل تفاوت معنی‌دار (LSD) نشان داد که لاین‌های 14، 16، 11 و 5 به ترتیب با عملکردهای 649/4، 517/4، 441/4 و 300/4 تن در هکتار دارای عملکرد دانه بالا بودند. با استفاده از روش‌های مختلف تجزیه پایداری ژنوتیپ‌های 11، 15، 16 و 20 (افق) پایداری عملکرد دانه بالایی داشتند. تجزیه خوشه‌ای داده‌های مولکولی به روشUPGMA و تجزیه به بردارهای اصلی (PCoA)، ژنوتیپ‌های مورد مطالعه را در چهار گروه مختلف قرار داد. در مجموع نتایج حاصل ازگروه‌بندی ژنوتیپ‌ها بر اساس داده‌های مولکولی مطابقت کمی با نتایج حاصل از ارزیابی مزرعه‌ای داشت. نتایج آزمون مانتل نشان داد که همبستگی بین عملکرد دانه ژنوتیپ‌های گندم نان در محیط‌های شور با تنوع آللی ژنوتیپ‌ها حدود 13/0 و غیرمعنی‌دار بود. علی‌رغم این همبستگی ضعیف، نشانگرهای SSR به خوبی توانستند تغییرات و تفاوت موجود میان ژنوتیپ‌های گندم نان مورد ارزیابی را آشکار سازند. این تنوع ژنتیکی می‌تواند به طور موثری در برنامه‌های ملی به‌نژادی تحمل به شوری گندم نان به کارگرفته شود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| تنش شوری؛ سازگاری؛ نشانگرهای مولکولی؛ تجزیه خوشه‌ای؛ میزان اطلاعات چندشکلی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Evaluation of Grain Yield Stability and Genetic Variation in Salt-Tolerant Bread Wheat Promising Lines and Cultivars | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Habibollah Ghazvini1؛ Mahdeieh Marandi2؛ Ashkbous Amini Sefidab3 | ||
| 1Deputy, Head, Cereal Research Dept., SPII, AREEO | ||
| 2Former Masters student, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University of Islamshahr, Islamshahr, Iran. | ||
| 3Assistant professor, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Yield stability and genetic variation in 17 salt-tolerant bread wheat promising lines and three cultivars; Arg, Bam and Ofough were evaluated in field trials as well as by molecular assay. In field, yield trials of genotypes was carried out in saline soils of Melishbar (Yazd), Amirabad (Birjand), Roudasht (Isfahan), Ekhtiarabad (Kerman) and Zahak (Zabol) agriculturar research stations, Iran, in 2012-13 and 2013-14 cropping cycle. To evaluate genetic variation among genotypes, 18 SSR markers that were previously mapped on salt-tolerant quantitative trait loci (QTLs) were used. Combined analysis of variance revealed significant differences for genotype main effect and year × location, year × genotype and year × location × genotype interaction effects. Grain yield comparison of genotypes using least significant difference(LSD) test showed that lines 14, 16, 11 and 5 with grain yields of 4.649, 4.517, 4.441 and 4.300 tha-1 had higher grain yields among genotypes. Different methods of stability analysis revealed that genotypes 11, 15, 16 and 20 (cultivar Ofough) had higher yield stability compared to the other genotypes. Cluster analysis of molecular data using UPGMA method and principal component analysis (PCoA) classified studied genotypes into four major groups. Results of cluster analysis based on molecular data were not in agreement with the results of field experiments. Results of Mantel’s test indicated that correlation between grain yield under salinity stress conditions and their allelic diversity was about 0.13 and not-significant. Despite this weak correlation, SSR markers could greatly reveal genetic variation among wheat genotypes. This genetic variation can effectively be used in wheat breeding programs for salt tolerance in Iran. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Salinity stress, adaptation, molecular markers, cluster analysis, polymorphism information content | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aghaee Sarbarzeh, M., Dastfal, M., Farzadi, H., Andarzian, B., Shahbazpour Shahbazi, A., Bahari, M., and Rostami, H. 2012. Evaluation of durum wheat genotypes for yield and yield stability in warm and dry areas of Iran. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal 28 (2): 315-325 (in Persian).
Ahmad, M., Shahzad, A., Iqbal, M., Asif, M., and Hirani, A. H. 2013. Morphological and molecular genetic variation in wheat for salinity tolerance at germination and early seedling stage. Australian Journal of Crop Science 7 (1): 66-74.
Anderson, J. A., Church, J. E., Autrique, S. D., Thanksley, S., and Sorrells, M. E. 1993. Optimizing parental selection for genetic linkage map. Journal of Genome 36 (1): 181-188.
Ashraf, M., and T. McNeilly. 1991. A potential source of variation for salt tolerance in spring wheat. Hereditas-Landskrona 115: 115-120.
Byrt, C. S., Platten, J. D.,Spielmeyer, W., James, R. A., Lagudah, E. S., Dennis, E. S., Tester, M., and Munns, R. 2007. HKT 1;5-like cation transporters linked to Na+ exclusion loci in wheat, Nax2 and KNa1. Plant Physiology 143:1918-1928.
Clay, H., and Dombek, D. 1995. Comparing soybean cultivars ranking and selection for yield with AMMI and full–data performance estimates. Crop Science 35: 1536-1541.
Eberhart, S. A., and Russell, W. A. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science 6: 36-40.
Esmaeilzadeh Moghaddam, M., Jalal Kamali, M. R., Pena, R. J., and Najafian, G. 2017. Genetic diversity for high and low molecular weight glutenin subunits in local and commercial bread wheat cultivars released since 1951 in Iran: I- Irrigated. Crop Breeding Journal 7: 1-7.
Esmaili, K., Mehrabi, A. A., Etminan, A. R., Azizian, E., Mansoury, S., Hossein Abadi, M., and Haidarnezhadian, M. 2013. Study of genetic diversity in Aeghilops tauschii accessions using SSR marker. Modern Genetics Journal 7 (4): 333-242 (in Persian).
Etminan, A. R., Mehrabi, A. A., Shooshtari, L., and Moradkhani, H. 2018. Applicability of CBDP markers to study of genetic diversity among some of the cultivated wheat accessions and their ancestral species. Modern Genetics Journal 13 (1): 79-89 (in Persian).
FAO. 2018. FAO soils portal, salt-affected soils. FAO/AGL Rome. Retrieved from: http://www.fao.org/soils-portal/soil-management/management-of-some-problem-soils/salt-affected-soils/more-information-on-salt-affected-soils/en/ (Accessed on: October 1, 2018).
Francis, T. R., and Kannenberg, L. W. 1978. Yield stability studies in short-season maize. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 58: 1025-1034.
Gauch, H. G. 1992. Statistical analysis of regional yield trials: AMMI analysis of factorial designs. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 277 pp.
Ghazvini, H., and Yousefi, A. 1998. Evaluation of adaptability and yield comparison of advanced barley lines in warm zones. Iranian Journal of Crop Science 1 (4): 29-41 (in Persian).
Haghnia, G. H. 2004. Plant tolerance to salinity. Mashhad University Publishers. 32 pp. (in Persian) Jaradat, A. A., Shahid, M., and Al-Maskri, A. 2004. Genetic diversity in the Batinin barley landrace from Oman: II. Response to salinity stress. Crop Science 44: 997-1007.
Jia, Q. J., Zhu, J. H., Wang J. M., and Yang, J. M. 2010. Fusarium head blight evaluation and genetic diversity assessment by simple sequence repeats in 88 barley cultivars and landraces. pp.: 298-311. In: Ceccarelli, S. and Grando, S., (eds.). Proceedings of the 10th International Barley Genetics Symposium.
Kimura, M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge Cambridge shire, New York, NY, USA. 384 pp.
Lin, C. S., Binns, M. R., and Lefcovitch, L. P. 1986. Stability analysis: where do we stand? Crop Science 26: 894-900.
Loss, S. P., and Siddique, M. K. H. 1994. Morphological and physiological traits associated with wheat yield increased in Mediterranean environments. Agronomy Journal 25: 224-276.
Ma, L., Zhou, E., and Hou, N. 2007. Genetic analysis of salt tolerance in a recombinant inbred population of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica 153: 109-117.
Maghsoudi Moud, A. A. 2009. Physiological, morphological and anatomical bases of drought tolerance in wheat. Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman Publication, Kerman, Iran. 240 pp. (in Persian).
Mahfoozi, S., Amini, A., Chaichi, M., Jasemi, S. Sh., Nazeri, M., Abedi Oskooie, M. S., Aminzadeh, G., and Rezaie, M. 2009. Study on grain yield stability and adaptability of winter wheat genotypes using different stability indices under terminal drought stress conditions. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal 25(1): 65-82 (in Persian).
Mantel, N. A. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research 27 (2): 209-220.
Megan, P., Evans, S., Ray, A., and Munns, R. 2004. Locus for sodium exclusion (Nax1), a trait for salt tolerance, mapped in durum wheat. Functional Plant Biology 31: 1105-1114.
Munns, R., Hare, R. A., James, R. A., and Rebetzke, G. J. 2000. Genetic variation for improving the salt tolerance of durum wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51 (1): 69-74.
Nikkhah, H. R., Yousefi, A., Mortazavian S. M., and Arazmjoo, M. 2007. Analysis of yield stability of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 9 (1): 1-13.
Pazira, E., and Sadeghzadeh, K. 1999. Optimizing soil and water use in Iran. pp. 37-53. In: van Duivenbooden, N., Pala, M., Studer, C., and Bieders, C. L. (eds.) Efficient soil and water use: the key to sustainable production in the dry areas of west Asia, and North and Sub-Saharan Africa. Aleppo, Syria and Patancheru, India, ICARDA; ICRISAT.
Pinthus, M. J. 1973. Estimate of genotypic value: A proposed method. Euphytica 22:121-123.
Powell, W., Morgante, M., Ander, C., Hanafey, M., Vogel, J., Tingy, S., and Rafalaski, A. 1996. The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Journal of Molecular Breeding 2 (3): 225-238.
Quereshi, A. S., Qadir, M., Heydari, N., Turral, H., and Javadi, A. 2007. A review of management strategies for salt–prone land and water recourses in Iran. IWMI Working paper 125. International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo, Sri Lanka. 30 pp.
Roemer, T. 1917. Sind die ertragsreichen sorten ertragssichers? Mitt. DLG. 32: 87-89 (in German).
Roustaii, M., Sadeghzadeh Ahari, D., Hesami, A., Soleymani, K., Pashapour, H., Nader, Mahmoudi, K., Pour Siah Bidi, M. M., Ahmadi, M., Hassanpour Hosni, M., and Abediasl, G. 2003. Study of adaptability and stability of grain yield of bread wheat genotypes in cold and moderate-cold dryland areas. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal 19 (2): 263-275 (in Persian).
Saghai-Maroof, M. A., Soliman, K. M., Jorgensen, R. A., and Allard, R. W. 1984. Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphism in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 81: 8014-8019.
Shiferaw, B., Smale, M., Braun, H. J., Duveiller, E., Reynolds, M., and Muricho, G. 2013. Crops that feed the world 10. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by wheat in global food security. Food Security 5 (3): 291-317.
Shukla, G. K. 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity 29: 237-245.
Shuorvazdi, A., Mohammadi, S. A., Norozi, M., and Sadeghzadeh, B. 2013. Molecular analysis of genetic diversity and relationships of barley landraces based on microsatellite markers. Journal of Plant Genetic Research 1 (1): 51-64 (in Persian).
Vahab Zadeh, M., Amini, A., Ghasemi, M., Nazeri, M., and Koohkan, Sh. A. 2006. Study of adaptation and grain yield stability in promising lines of Triticale. Journal of Agriculture 8 (1): 69-83.
Wricke, G. 1962. On a method of understanding the biological diversity in field research. Z. Pflanzenzucht 47: 92-46.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 594 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 646 |
||