Socio-economic and environmental impacts assessment of the watershed plan of the Imamzadeh Jafar plain in the Gachsaran County | ||
| پژوهش های آبخیزداری | ||
| Article 3, Volume 38, Issue 2 - Serial Number 147, July 2025, Pages 20-37 PDF (1.45 M) | ||
| Document Type: Research | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/wmrj.2025.363070.1594 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Ayatollah Karami* 1; Mostafa Ahmadvand1; Fatemeh Alipanahiyan2 | ||
| 1Professor, Department of Rural Development Management, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran | ||
| 2Ph.D. Student of Agricultural Development, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Introduction and Goal The targeted watershed management activities serve as a comprehensive solution to reduce the negative impacts of floods and combat climate change, play a vital role in ensuring water security, improving livelihoods and the quality of life of communities. In the near future, these approaches can help improve the resilience of communities to environmental challenges and facilitate sustainable development. Also, climate change and increase in the intensity and frequency of floods directly affect food security, public health and social development. To reduce the impacts of these phenomena, it is necessary to study climate change and plan appropriately for watershed management and apply climate adaptation methods. And with proper groundwater recharge, it increases water security and agriculture. Improving ecosystem services through watershed management activities, on the one hand, ensures water resources and a healthy environment, and on the other hand, improves the sustainable economic and livelihood development of local communities. Additionally, Watershed management plays an important role in the management of water and soil resources and is very effective in sustainable rural development, and assessing its effects is essential. This study was conducted to investigate the socio-economic and environmental effects of the Imamzadeh-Jafar watershed management project from the perspective of the beneficiary villagers. The present research is applied in purpose, field-based in terms of variable control, and descriptive-analytical in nature. Materials and Methods Data collection was conducted through a survey and a questionnaire was used to gather data. The statistical population of the study included farmers and ranchers from the villages of Naserabad, Mohajerin, and Imamzadeh Jafar in Gachsaran County, totaling 120 individuals. According to the Krejcie and Morgan table, a suitable sample size for this population is 90 people, chosen through simple random sampling. The data was analyzed using SPSS software. The Cronbach's alpha for social factors was 0.86, for economic factors was 0.87, and for environmental factors was 0.80. The components of the questionnaire consisted of personal characteristics, as well as economic, social, and environmental indicators. Additionally, the questionnaire was structured using a five-point Likert scale (1 = very low, 2 = low, 3 = moderate, 4 = high, and 5 = very high). To analyze the data, both descriptive and inferential methods were employed. In the descriptive method, after calculating the mean and standard deviation, the coefficient of variation was obtained, and the indicators for each factor were prioritized based on the coefficient of variation. Then, the correlation coefficient was used to determine relationships, a post-hoc test was employed to interpret the significance of mean differences among groups, and cluster analysis was utilized for grouping. Results and Discussion According to the results of the follow-up test, there is no significant environmental difference between the villages of Mohajerin and Naserabad; But between Imamzadeh-Jaafar and Naserabad, as well as Imamzadeh-Jaafar and Mohajerin, a significant difference is observed at the level of one percent. In the analysis of social factors, there is no significant difference between the immigrants and Naserabad, but between Imamzadeh-Jaafar and both villages, a significant difference can be seen at the level of 0.99%. From the economic point of view, there is no significant difference between the villages of Mohajerin and Nasirabad, and between Imamzadeh-Jaafar and Mohajerin, but there is a significant difference between Imamzadeh-Jaafar and Naserabad at the level of one%. Finally, the correlation coefficient between cultivated area and economic factors is 0.39, which shows a significant but relatively weak relationship. Conclusion and Suggestions Given the results from the follow-up tests (Dependent) and (Tamhane), Imamzadeh Jafar village is in a better environmental, social, and economic condition compared to the other two villages. Additionally, the status of Naserabad village was also better in all perspectives compared to Mohajerin village. Cluster analysis results indicate that overall, Imamzadeh Jafar village is better across all dimensions compared to the other two villages. Also, from an environmental perspective, Imamzadeh Jafar and Mohajerin have the best conditions. One of the most important aspects that any watershed management project should consider is its environmental impacts. As shown by the results of this study, the Imamzadeh Jafar watershed management project has been successful in addressing environmental issues. It is recommended that during various stages of planning and implementing watershed projects, the logical opinions and requests of watershed residents should be considered, and local community inputs should be used. Also, considering the increase in tourism following the project’s implementation, necessary funds for expanding or improving the region’s connectivity and amenities infrastructure should be increased. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Flood; assessment; farmers; basin; groundwater | ||
| References | ||
|
Aghili K, Aghaei-Moghadam A, Aghili M, Haqparest S. 2020. Evaluation of the social-economic effects of raising rainbow trout in golestan dam cages. Scientific Journal of Aquaculture Development. 14(3): 71–85. (In Persian). Anderson R. 2010. Systematic reviews of economic evaluations: utility or futility? Journal Health Economics. 19(3): 350–364. https://doi. org/10.1002/hec .1486 Anulika NP, Osaze O, Abiola AH, Ignatius EO. 2015. The role of environmental impact assessment in environmental sustainability of onitsha metropolis in anambra state. Nigeria. International Journal of Technology Enhancements and Emerging Engineering Research. 3(11): 109–114. Ayivi F, Jha MK. 2018. Estimation of water balance and water yield in the Reedy Fork-Buffalo Creek Watershed in North Carolina using SWAT. International Soil and Water Conservation Research. 6(3): 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is wcr.2018.03.007 Brouwer WB. 2019. The inclusion of spillover effects in economic evaluations: not an optional extra. Pharmacoeconomics. 37(4):451– 456. https://doi. org/10.1007/ s40273-018-0730-6 Castro AJ, Vaughn CC, Julian JP, García‐Llorente M. 2016. Social demand for ecosystem services and implications for watershed management. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 52(1): 209–221. https://doi. org/10.1111/1752-1688.12379 Esteves AM, Franks D, Vanclay F. 2012. Social impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 30(1): 4–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.660356 Hamel P, Bremer LL, Ponette-Gonzalez AG, Acosta E, Fisher JR, Steele B, Brauman KA. 2020. The value of hydrologic information for watershed management programs: The case of Camboriú, Brazil. Science of the Total. Environment. 705(1): 1- 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135871 Hasni H, Maliki M. 2020. Economic and social analysis of the effects of watershed operations on watershed residents (Case study: Hasan Abdal Watershed-Zanjan Province). Watershed Management Journal. 11(21): 143–153. (In Persian). Heydari H. Shakiba A. Thuqe-Nairy K. Haj Alizadeh A. 2013. Clustering the capacity and potential of development of villages in Malekshahi County based on socio-economic indicators. Quarterly Journal of Rural Development Strategies. 10(1): 125-143. (In Persian). Ibrahim AA, Sani A, Gado AM, Ibrahim MA, Sulaiman MS, Zungum IU. 2020. Environmental impact assessment in Nigeria-A review. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 8(3): 330-336. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2020.8. 3.0487 Jamali AA, Hassanzadeh-Nafouti M, Raisi N. 2013. The impact of watershed management activities on socio-economic issues of Metesang watershed of Nikshahr city. 9th National Conference of Iran Watershed Science and Engineering. Yazd. October 30. (In Persian). Jay S, Jones C, Slinn P, Wood C. 2007. Environmental impact assessment: Retrospect and prospect. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 27(4): 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. eiar .2006.12.001 Kalantari Kh. 2006. The book of data processing and analysis in social and economic research. 388 p. (In Persian). Karimi M. 2015. Easy guide to statistical analysis with spss. publishing when First Edition. Tehran Iran. 318 p. (In Persian). Katusiime J, Schütt B. 2020. Linking land tenure and integrated watershed management-A review. Sustainability. 12(4):1667. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041667. Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. 1970. Determinig sample size for research activies. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 30:607-610. Kumar GS, Kurothe VC, Pande Rao AK, Vishwakarma Bagdi1, Mishra PK. 2014. Watershed impact evaluation using remote sensing. Current. Science. 106(10): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv106%2Fi10%2F1369-1378 Maddi A, Maleki M. 2018. Assessing the socio-economic effects of implemented natural resources projects from the point of view of the beneficiaries (Case study: Andabil Watershed-Khalkhal City) Marte' Scientific Research Journal. 12(3): 267–280. (In Persian). Mehrdost Kh, Shams A, Karmidehkordi A. 2013. Factors affecting the participation levels of rural people in watershed projects (Case study: Darood Faraman and Lalabad Watersheds of Kermanshah City). Economic Research and Agricultural Development of Iran. 44(3): 409–399. (In Persian). Nargesi Z, Fatahi M, Sheikhi, H. 2017. (Identifying the economic, social, cultural and environmental consequences of dam construction from the perspective of residents (Case study: Kangir Dam, Ivan County: Upper and Lower Sartang Village). Applied Research in Management and Accounting. 8(2): 106-126. (In Persian). Nowacki J, Viliani F, Martuzzi M, Fehr R. 2014. Health in Impact Assessments–Opportunities not to be missed. The European Journal of Public Health, 24(suppl2): cku166–136. https://iris.who.int/handle/ 10665/137369 Ohno T, Tanaka T, Sakagami M. 2010. Does social capital encourage participatory watershed management? An analysis using survey data from the Yodo River watershed. Society and Natural Resources. 23(4): 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 08941920802078224 Palanisami K, Kumar DS. 2009. Impacts of watershed development programmes: experiences and evidences from Tamil Nadu. Agricultural. Agricultural Economics Research Review. 22(1): 387-396. Reddy VR, Saharawat YS, George B. 2017 Watershed management in South Asia: A synoptic review. Journal of hydrology. 551: 4-13. Sýs V, Fošumpaur P, Kašpar T. 2021. The impact of climate change on the reliability of water resources. Climate. 9(11):1- 15. Tanaka T, Tachikawa Y, Ichikawa Y, Yorozu K. 2018. Flood risk curve development with probabilistic rainfall modelling and large ensemble climate simulation data: A case study for the Yodo River basin. Hydrological Research Letters. 12(4): 28–33. https://doi.org/10.3178/ hrl.12.28 Uniyal B, Jha MK, Verma AK, Anebagilu PK. 2020. Identification of critical areas and evaluation of best management practices using SWAT for sustainable watershed management. Science of the Total Environment, 744:1-41. Van Liew MW, Veith TL, Bosch DD, Arnold JG. 2007. Suitability of SWAT for the conservation effects assessment project: comparison on USDA agricultural research service watersheds. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. 12(2):173–189. https://doi. org/10.1061/(ASCE)10840699 Vanclay F. 2002. Conceptualising social impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 22(3): 183–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0 1959255(01)00105-6 Wang G, Mang S, Cai H, Liu S, Zhang Z, Wang L, Innes JL. 2016. Integrated watershed management: evolution, development and emerging trends. Journal of Forestry Research. 27)1):967–994. Yazdani M, Jalalian H, Pari-Zanganeh A. 2009. Evaluation of socio-economic and environmental effects of watershed management projects (Case study: Zanjanrud Management Plan). Geography (Scientific-Research Journal of the Iranian Geography Association). 21(20): 81–96. (In Persian). | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 639 PDF Download: 379 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb