| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,944 |
| تعداد مقالات | 33,229 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 43,864,085 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 20,369,975 |
تعیین نیاز آبی و تأثیر تغییرات آن بر برخی صفات کمی و کیفی محصول چغندرقند | ||
| چغندرقند | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 27، شماره 2، اسفند 1390، صفحه 167-153 اصل مقاله (171.65 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: کامل علمی - پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/jsb.2012.705 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| حمید زارع ابیانه* 1؛ الهام فرخی2؛ مریم بیات ورکشی3؛ محمود احمدی4 | ||
| 1دانشیار مهندسی آب، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان- ایران. | ||
| 2دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد آبیاری و زهکشی دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان- ایران | ||
| 3دانشجوی دکترای آبیاری و زهکشی دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان- ایران | ||
| 4کارشناس ارشد مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی همدان- همدان، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| بهمنظور تعیین نیاز آبی گیاه چغندرقند و تأثیر تغییرات آب مصرفی بر برخی مؤلفههای تولید، آزمایشی بهمدت چهار سال (1373 الی 1376) در ایستگاه تحقیقات کشاورزی اکباتان همدان اجرا گردید. بدین منظور، نیاز آبی بهینه، عملکرد ریشه و قند، کارایی مصرف آب بر پایه عملکردریشه، درصدقند و بازده مصرف آب براساس عملکردقند در شرایط عدم محدودیت آب و مواد غذایی به روش بیلان آبی طی چهار دوره رشد 130، 134، 152 و 162 روزه اندازهگیری و مقایسه شدند. همچنین بهطور همزمان نیاز آبی گیاه مرجع (چمن) با استفاده از لایسیمتر اندازهگیری گردید تا روند تغییرات ضریب گیاهی چغندرقند بررسی گردد. نتایج بررسیها، حجم آب مصرفی چغندرقند را طی چهار سال به ترتیب 8427، 7328، 10256 و 9026 مترمکعب در هکتار با میانگین 8759 مترمکعب در هکتار نشان داد. میانگین چهار ساله حداکثر ضریب گیاهی در مرحله میان فصل 04/1 و حداقل آن در مرحله آغازین برابر 42/0 بهدست آمد. بیشترین عملکردریشه، قند و درصد قند با طول دوره رشد 162 روزه، به ترتیب 8/116، 36/20 تن در هکتار و 43/17 درصد بهدست آمد. کمترین مقدار عملکردهای ریشه، قند و درصد قند در دوره رشد 130 روزه به ترتیب برابر 21/52، 5/8 تن در هکتار و 26/16 درصد اندازهگیری شد. نتایج نشان داد که در دوره رشد 130 روزه ضمن کاهش عملکردریشه، کارآیی مصرف آب برای عملکردریشه و عملکردقند نیز بهترتیب به 1/7 و 2/1 کیلو گرم به ازای هر مترمکعب آب مصرفی کاهش یافت. در دوره رشد طولانیتر مقدار کارآیی مصرف آب برای عملکردریشه و عملکردقند به ترتیب 4/11 و دو کیلوگرم بر مترمکعب آب مصرفی بدست آمد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| چغندرقند؛ ضریب گیاهی؛ عملکرد؛ کارآیی مصرف آب؛ لایسیمتر؛ نیازآبی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Determination of water requirement and the effect of the changes on some quantitative and qualitative characteristics of products of sugar beet | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| H. Zare Abyaneh1؛ E. Farrokhi2؛ M. Bayat Varkeshi3؛ M. Ahmadi4 | ||
| 1Associate Professor of Water Engineering, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran | ||
| 2Msc. student for Irrigation and Drainage of College of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran. | ||
| 3Ph.D. student for Irrigation and Drainage of College of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran. | ||
| 4Master of Hamedan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, AREEO, Hamedan, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| To determine sugar beet water requirement and the effect of changing the quantity of applied water on some production components, a study was carried out in Ekbatan Agricultural Research Station of Hamedān, Iran in four years (1994-1997) during which optimum water requirement, root and sugar yield, water use efficiency on the basis of root yield, sugar percentage and water use efficiency on the basis of sugar yield under no water and nutrients limitation conditions were measured and compared by water balance method for four growth periods of 130, 134, 152 and 162 days. At the same time, the water requirement of reference crop - poa - was measured by lysimeter in order to study the pattern of the variations of sugar beet crop coefficient. It was found that the amount of applied water for sugar beet was 8427, 7328, 10256 and 9026 m3.ha-1 in the four studied years, respectively with the average amount of 8759 m3.ha-1. Average four-year maximum crop coefficient was 1.04 at mid-growing season and the minimum one was 0.42 at early-growing season. The highest root yield, sugar yield and sugar percentage was obtained from 162-day growth period (116.8 t.ha-1, 20.36 t.ha-1 and 17.43%, respectively). The lowest ones were obtained from 130-day growth period (52.21 t.ha-1, 8.5 t.ha-1 and 16.26%, respectively). Results revealed that in 130-day growth period, root yield decreased and meanwhile, water use efficiency on the basis root yield and sugar yield was decreased to 7.1 and 1.2 kg.m-3 applied water, respectively. In the longer growth period, water use efficiency on the basis of root yield and sugar yield was 11.4 and 2 kg.m-3 applied water, respectively. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| crop coefficient, Lysimeter, sugar beet, Water use efficiency, Water requirement, yield | ||
| اصل مقاله | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aghaee M, Vali Zadeh M, Moghaddam M, Kazemi H, Banaee A. Study of the interaction of genotype*year, number of barley varieties in Tabriz. Journal of Agricultural Science. 1993; 4(2, 1): 29-45. Amjadi P. Effects of harvest time ant variety on qualitative and quantitative characters of root sugar accumulation in sugar beet. Ms Theses. Karaj. University of Tehran. 2003. Benz LC, Doering EJ, Reichman GA. Water table and irrigation effects on corn and sugar beet. CAB Abstract. 1985. 1984-1986. Cassel F, Shamasarkar S, Miller D. Assessment of drip and flood irrigation on water and fertilizer use efficiencies for sugar beets. Agricultural Water Management. 2001. vol. 46:24-251. Doorenbos J, Pruitt D. Crop water requirement. FAO irrigation and drainage paper. 1977. No. 24, Rome. Dunham RJ. Water use and irrigation. In: the sugar beet crop, science into practice: Cook, D.A. and Scott, R.K. Chapman and Hall, London. 1993. Vol. 279. Faberio C, Santa Olalla M, Lopez R, Dominguez A. Production and quality of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivated under controlled deficit irrigation condition in semiarid- climate. Agricultural Water Management. 2003. Vol. 62:215-227. FAO. Sugar: International Analysis and Production Structures within the EU, European Commission, September. 2009, p. 19. Fortune RA, Burke JI, Kennedy T, O’sullivan E. Effect of early sowing on the growth, yield and quality of sugar beet. End of project report, Teagasc, Oak Park. 1999. Vol. 20: 25. Fotoohi K, Ahmad Ali H, Noorjou A, Pedram A, Khorshid A. Irrigation management based on allowed water depletion at different growth stages of sugar beet in Miyandoab region. . Journal of sugar beet. 2008; 24 (1): 43-60. (in Persian, abstract in English) Fotoohi K, Mesbah M, Sadeghian SY, Ranji Z, Orazi Zadeh MR. Evaluation of salinity tolerance in sugar beet genotypes. Journal of sugar beet. 2006; 22(2): 1-18. (In Persian, abstract in English) Ghaemi AA, Mehdi-Hoseinabadi Z, Sepaskhah AR. Water use efficiency and yield of sugar beet under conventional and alternate tape and furrow irrigation. Water and Soil (Ferdosi University). 2008; 22(2): 85-94. Ghalebi S. Optimize water use in sugar beet using the production functions of water in Karaj. Journal of Soil and Water, Irrigation Supplement. 2000; 12 (1): Gifford RM, Evans LT. Photosynthesis, carbon partitioning, and yield. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiology. 1981. Vol. 32:485-509. Groves SJ, Bailey RJ. Strategies for the sub-optimal irrigation of sugar beet. Aspects of Applied Biology. 1994. Vol. 38: 201-207. Hanks RJ, AshcroftGL. Applied soil physics. Springer- Verlag, Berlin. 1980. 159 p. Hosein Pour M. Soroosh Zadeh A, Agha Alikhani M, Khoramian M, Fathollah Taleghani D. Evaluation of quantity and quality of sugar beet under drip and furrow irrigation methods in north of Khuzestan. Journal of sugar beet. 2006.22 (1): 39-57. (In Persian, abstract in English) Karimi A, Naderi M. Different levels of irrigation and nitrogen effects on quantitative and qualitative yield and water use efficiency of Sugar beet. Science and agricultural industries (particularly water and soil). 2008.22 (1): 235-246. Kirda C. Deficit irrigation scheduling based on plant growth stages showing water stress tolerance, in FAO, Deficit irrigation practices, Rome. 2002. 3-10. Mirzaee MR, Rezvani SMA. Determine of sensitivity to dehydration in four stages of the growth of sugar beet. Abstract, Ninth Article Congress Iran. Tehran University. 2006. Pp. 563. Mirzaee MR, Rezvani SMA. Effects of water deficit on quality of sugar beet at different growth stages. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2007. 23: 29-42. (in Persian, abstract in English) Orazizadeh MR, Hosseinpour M, Ghanbari D, Sharifi H. Integrated weed management of sugar beet using planting date and cultivation in Dezful. 2008. Journal of Sugar Beet 23(2) 123-134. (in Persian, abstract in English) Panahi M, Aghdaee M, Rezaee M. Determination of sugar beet standard evapotranspiration by lysimeter method in Kabotar-Abad, Esfahan. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2006.22: 25-37. (In Persian, abstract in English) Richter GM, Qi A, Semenow MA, Jaggard KW. Modeling the variability of UK sugar beet yields under climate change and husbandry adaptations. Soil Use and Management. 2006. Vol. 22(1):39-47. Sahin U, Kiziloglu FM, Anapali O, Okuroglu M. Determining crop and pan coefficients for sugar beet and potato crops under cool season semiarid climatic conditions. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 2007. Vol. 193(2):146-152. Shahabi Far M, Rahimian MR. Measurement of sugar beet water requirements by lysimeter method in Mashad. Journal of sugar beet. 2008.23: 177-184. (In Persian, abstract in English) Soltani A, Gassemi-Golezani K, Rahimzad-khooie F, Moghaddam M. A simple model for chickpea growth and yield. Field Crop Res. 1999. Vol.62:213-224. Soltani A, Torabi B, Zarei H Modeling crop yield using a modified harvest index-based approach: application in chickpea. Field Crop Res. 2005. Vol 91:273-285. Stanhill G. Water use efficiency. Adv. Agron. 1986. vol. 39:53-85. Taleghani D, Gohari G, Tohidloo V, Roohi A. Study, water and nitrogen use efficiency, optimum conditions and stress, in two sugar beet planting pattern. Final Report of Research Institute of Sugar Beet.2008. Tognetti R, Palladion M, Minnocci A, Delfine S, Alvion A. The response of sugar beet to drip and low- pressure sprinkler irrigation in southern Italy. Agricultural Water Management. 2003. Vol. 60:135-155. Ucan K, Gencoglan C. The effect of water deficit on yield and yield components of sugar beet. J. Agric. For. 2004. Vol. 28:163-172. Utset A, Velicia H, Rio BD, Morillo R. Calibrating and validation of an agro-hydrological model to simulate sugar beet water use under Mediterranean conditions. Agricultural Water Management. 2007. Vol 94(1-3):11-21. Vafadar L, Ebadi, A, Sajed K. The effects of planting date and plant density on yield and some traits of sugar beet genotypes. Electronic Journal of Crop Production.2008. 2: 103-120. Zare Abyaneh H, Gasemi A, Marofi S, Bayat Varkeshi M. Determination of Water Requirement, Single and Dual Crop Coefficients of Garlic in Cold Semi-Arid Climate. Water and Soil Science. 2010. 20(1): 111-122. Zare Abyaneh H, Kazazi, M, Soltani H. Effect of sprinkler and furrow irrigation methods on piercing-sucking pests and yield in potato. Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh & Sazandegi). 2009.84: 42-48. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 5,569 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3,322 |
||