اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات287
تعداد نشریات سازمان85
تعداد شماره‌ها3,159
تعداد مقالات35,108
تعداد مشاهده مقاله50,530,145
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله90,478,642
Semsarzadeh, Mahdieh, Sayfzadeh, Saeed, Darvishi Zeidabadi, Davood, Zakerin, Hamidreza, Hadidi Masuleh, Ismail. (1404). The Role of Zeolite in Mitigating Physiological and Biochemical Stress Responses and Enhancing Seed Yield of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) under Drought Conditions. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 15(2), 188-195. doi: 10.22034/jmpb.2025.369791.1996
Mahdieh Semsarzadeh; Saeed Sayfzadeh; Davood Darvishi Zeidabadi; Hamidreza Zakerin; Ismail Hadidi Masuleh. "The Role of Zeolite in Mitigating Physiological and Biochemical Stress Responses and Enhancing Seed Yield of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) under Drought Conditions". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 15, 2, 1404, 188-195. doi: 10.22034/jmpb.2025.369791.1996
Semsarzadeh, Mahdieh, Sayfzadeh, Saeed, Darvishi Zeidabadi, Davood, Zakerin, Hamidreza, Hadidi Masuleh, Ismail. (1404). 'The Role of Zeolite in Mitigating Physiological and Biochemical Stress Responses and Enhancing Seed Yield of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) under Drought Conditions', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 15(2), pp. 188-195. doi: 10.22034/jmpb.2025.369791.1996
Semsarzadeh, Mahdieh, Sayfzadeh, Saeed, Darvishi Zeidabadi, Davood, Zakerin, Hamidreza, Hadidi Masuleh, Ismail. The Role of Zeolite in Mitigating Physiological and Biochemical Stress Responses and Enhancing Seed Yield of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) under Drought Conditions. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1404; 15(2): 188-195. doi: 10.22034/jmpb.2025.369791.1996

The Role of Zeolite in Mitigating Physiological and Biochemical Stress Responses and Enhancing Seed Yield of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) under Drought Conditions

Journal of Medicinal plants and By-products
مقاله 5، دوره 15، شماره 2، فروردین و اردیبهشت 2026، صفحه 188-195    اصل مقاله (756.24 K)
نوع مقاله: Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/jmpb.2025.369791.1996
نویسندگان
Mahdieh Semsarzadeh1؛ Saeed Sayfzadeh* 1؛ Davood Darvishi Zeidabadi2؛ Hamidreza Zakerin1؛ Ismail Hadidi Masuleh1
1Department of Agronomy, Tak.C, Islamic Azad University, Takestan, Iran
2Forests and Rangelands Research Department, Agriculture Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Kerman, Iran
چکیده
Zeolites, with their dual capacity for water retention and nutrient provision, offer a promising solution to enhance crop resilience under moisture-deficient conditions. To evaluate the effects of zeolite on biochemical traits, chlorophyll fluorescence, and coriander seed yield under water-limited conditions, a two-year (2018–2020) factorial experiment was conducted at the Zendeh Rooh research station in Jopar, Kerman Province, Iran. The study followed a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The first factor comprised three irrigation levels: 100% (non-stress), 75% (moderate stress), and 50% (severe stress) of the crop’s water requirement, applied via drip (tape) irrigation. The second factor included five zeolite application rates: 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 tonnes per hectare (t/ha). The results indicated that all traits studied were significantly affected by the main effects of moisture regimes and zeolite, as well as their interaction effects. Water deficit significantly reduced photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/Fm, ΦPSII), chlorophyll content (Chl C), photochemical quenching (qP), relative water content (RWC), and seed yield (SY), while increasing non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), proline content (PC), and relative membrane permeability (RMP). Zeolite application mitigated these adverse effects by enhancing Chl C, RWC, Fv/Fm, qP, and ΦPSII, while suppressing NPQ, PC, and RMP. Maximum yields occurred at 100% irrigation with 8 t/ha (1,109 kg/ha) and 6 t/ha (1,095 kg/ha). Under 75% and 50% irrigation, 8 t/ha zeolite yielded 893 kg/ha and 608 kg/ha respectively—outperforming 6 t/ha by 6.6% and 4.9%. For optimal coriander productivity in semi-arid regions such as Kerman, Iran, we recommend 6 t/ha zeolite under non-stress or moderate water stress (75–100% irrigation). Under severe drought (50% irrigation), 8 t/ha zeolite is advised to maximize seed yield. These findings highlight zeolite’s potential as a sustainable strategy for water-scarce agroecosystems in Iran and climatically similar regions globally.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Water deficit؛ Fv/Fm؛ NPQ؛ Proline؛ Relative Water Content
مراجع
  1. Juenger T.E.,Verslues P.E. Time for a drought experiment: Do you know your plants’ water status. Plant Cell. 2023; 35(1): 10-23. doi:10.1093/plcell/koac324.
  2. Akbarimehr S., Sayfzadeh S., Shahsavari N., Valad Abadi S.A., Hadidi Masouleh E. Cycocel, iron and zinc effects on yield and physiological characteristics of wheat under drought stress conditions. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2021;45(5):664-673. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2021.1936029
  3. Fakhri K., Sayfzadeh S., Sarajooghi M., Valad Abadi S.A., Hadidi Masouleh E. The Effect of Biochar Application and Planting Pattern on the Physiological and Biochemical Traits of Garden Thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) at Different Levels of Irrigation. Journal of Medicinal Plants and By-products. 2024; 13(4): 999-1015. doi: 22034/JMPB.2023.363598.1610
  4. Veena A.S., Savitha M.G.M., Anusha J., Sharanya A., Prasobh G.R. Evaluation of antispasmodic activity of coriander oil in isolated chick ileum: an in-vitro study. International Journal of Research Publications and Reviews. 2024; 5(4): 5381-5384.
  5. Khan M.T., Ahmed S., Sardar R., Shareef M., Abbasi A., Mohiuddin M., et al. Impression of foliar-applied folic acid on coriander (Coriandrum sativum) to regulate aerial growth, biochemical activity, and essential oil profiling under drought stress. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2022; 13: 1005710. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.1005710.
  6. Song X.Y., Zhou G.S., He Q.J., Zhou H.L. Stomatal limitations to photosynthesis and their critical water conditions in different growth stages of maize under water stress. Agricultural Water Management. 2020; 241: 106330-106357. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106330.
  7. Bashir N., Athar H.U.R., Kalaji H.M., Wróbel J., Mahmood S., Zafar Z.U. Is photoprotection of PSII one of the key mechanisms for drought tolerance in maize? International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22: 13490. doi:10.3390/ijms222413490.
  8. Ghassemi M., Arzani K., Yadollahi A., Hokmabadi H. Effect of drought stress on chlorophyll fluorescence, chlorophyll contents and chlorophyll index in four pistachio seedling rootstocks. Water Research in Agriculture. 2014; 27(4): 475-485.
  9. Habibi G. Effect of salicylic acid on photochemistry and antioxidant capacity in Salvia nemorosa plants subjected to water stress. Iranian Journal of Plant Physiology. 2017; 7(3): 2075-2082.
  10. Barutcular C., Yildirim M., Koc M., Akinci C., Toptas I., Albayrak O. Evaluation of SPAD chlorophyll in spring wheat genotypes under different environments. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin. 2019; 25(1): 1258-1266.
  11. Bouremani N., Cherif-Silini H., Silini A., Bouket A.C., Luptakova L., Alenezi F.N. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): a rampart against the adverse effects of drought stress. Water. 2023; 15: 418. doi:10.3390/w15030418.
  12. Cai K., Chen X., Han Z., Wu X., Zhang S.H., Li Q. Screening of worldwide barley collection for drought tolerance: the assessment of various physiological measures as the selection criteria. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2020; 11: 1159. doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.01159.
  13. Hazrati S., Khurizadeh S., Sadeghi A.R. Application of zeolite improves water and nitrogen use efficiency while increasing essential oil yield and quality of Salvia officinalis under water-deficit stress. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2022; 29(3): 1707-1716. doi:10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.10.059.
  14. Mahrokh A., Ghotbi V., Azizi F., Moghadam A., Gholamhoseeini M. Application of natural zeolites as a strategy to optimize input consumption for sustainable agriculture. Research Findings in Crop and Horticultural Plants. 2019; 8(1): 77-89. https://doi.org/10.22092/rafhc.2019.116848.1110
  15. HabibiSharafabad Z., Abdipour M., Hosseinifarahi M., Kelidari A., Rashidi L. Integrated humic acid and vermicompost changes essential oil quantity and quality in field-grown Lavandula angustifolia L. intercropped with Brassica nigra L. Industrial Crops and Products. 2022; 178: 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114635.
  16. Kennedy D. Cation exchange modification of clinoptilolite zeolite for applications in nitrogen rejection (Doctoral dissertation). University of Ottawa, Canada. 2020. Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Faculty of Engineering.
  17. Ghassemi-Sahebi F., Mohammad-Rezapour O., Delbari M., Khashei-Siuki A., Ritzema H., Cherati A. Effect of utilization of treated wastewater and seawater with clinoptilolite-zeolite on yield and yield components of sorghum. Agricultural Water Management. 2019; 234: 106117. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106117.
  18. Tsintskaladze G., Eprikashvili L., Urushadze T., Kordzakhia T., Sharashenidze T., Zautashvili M. Nanomodified natural zeolite as a fertilizer of prolonged activity. Annals of Agrarian Science. 2016; 14: 163-168. doi:10.1016/j.aasci.05013.
  19. Rambabu B., Padma V., Thatikunta Ramesh, Sunil N. Effect of drought stress on chlorophyll content and antioxidant enzymes of green gram genotypes (Vigna radiata L.). Nature Environment and Pollution Technology. 2016; 15(4): 1205-1208.
  20. Shamili M., Dehghanpour S., Atrash S. Zeolite alleviates physiological and defense responses in drought stressed carrot (Daucus carota L.). Journal of Plant Processes and Functions. 2020; 9(37): 27-35.
  21. Aucique-Perez C.E., Román Ramos A.E. Chlorophyll a fluorescence: a method of biotic stress detection. In: Bahadur A., editor. Challenges in Plant Disease Detection and Recent Advancements. IntechOpen. 2024. doi:10.5772/intechopen.1004830.
  22. Swoczyna T., Kalaji H.M., Bussotti F., Mojski J., Pollastrini M. Environmental stress—what can we learn from chlorophyll a fluorescence analysis in woody plants? A review. Section Plant Abiotic Stress. 2022; 13: 2022. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.1048582.
  23. Park B., Wi S., Chung H., Lee H. Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging for environmental stress diagnosis in crops. Sensors. 2024; 24(5): 1442. doi:10.3390/s24051442.
  24. Mohammadi-Cheraghabadi M., Modarres-Sanavy S.A.M., Sefidkon F., Mokhtassi-Bidgoli A., Hazrati S. Effects of water-deficit stress and putrescine on performances, photosynthetic gas exchange, and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Salvia officinalis in two cutting times. Food Science and Nutrition. 2022; 10(5): 1431-1441. doi:10.1002/fsn3.2741.
  25. Sperdouli I., Andreadis S., Moustaka J., Panteris E., Tsaballa A., Moustakas M. Changes in light energy utilization in Photosystem II and reactive oxygen species generation in potato leaves by the pinworm Tuta absoluta. Molecules. 2021; 26(10): 2984. doi:10.3390/molecules26102984.
  26. Afshar-Mohamadian A., Omidipour M., Jamal-Omidi F. Effect of different drought stress levels on content and chlorophyll fluorescence indices of two bean cultivars (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Iranian Journal of Biology. 2018; 31(3): 511-525.
  27. Hesse P.R. A Text Book of Soil Chemical Analysis. John Murray Ltd, London. 1971; Pp 520.
  28. Akbarinia A., Daneshian G., Mohammadbeighi F. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer and plant density on seed yield, essence and oil of coriander. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. 2006; 22: 410-419.
  29. Olsen S.R., Sommers L.E. Phosphorus. In: Page A.L., Miller R.H., Keeney D.R., editors. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties. American Society of Agronomy Inc., Madison. 1982; 403-427.
  30. Horwitz W. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 18th edn. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, Maryland. 2005; 2200+ pp.
  31. Raes D., Munoz G. The ETo Calculator. Reference Manual Version 3. 2009.
  32. Allen R.G., Pereira L., Raes S., Smith M.D. Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop requirements, irrigation and drainage. Paper No. 56, FAO, Rome, Italy. 1998; 300 pp.
  33. Farshi A.A., Shariati M.R., Jarallahi R., Gaemi M.R., Shahabifar M., Tavalaii M.M. Estimated water requirements for major agronomic and horticultural plants of the country. Ministry of Agriculture (TAT), Soil and Water Research Institute, Iran. 1997.
  34. Seif F., Paknejad F., Azizi F., Kashani A., Shahabifar M. Effect of different irrigation regimes and zeolite application on yield and quality of silage corn hybrids. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences. 2016; 4(VIS): 721-729. doi:10.18006/2016.
  35. Afrazand Company. 318-Semnan University Science & Technology Park, Javan Blvd. Estandard Sq., Semnan, Iran. 2022. http://afrazand.com
  36. Ebrahimi A., Moosavi S.G., Seghatoleslami M.J. The response of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) in different plant densities to the using of nitrogen fertilizer. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology. 2017; 11(3): 637-652.
  37. Barrs H.D., Weatherley P.E. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences. 1962; 15(3): 413–428.
  38. Yang G., Rhodes D., Joly R. Effects of high temperature on membrane stability and chlorophyll fluorescence in glycinebetaine-deficient and glycinebetaine-containing maize lines. Functional Plant Biology. 1996; 23: 437-443. doi:1071/PP9960437.
  39. Bates I.S., Waldren R.P., Teare I.D. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil. 1973; 39: 205-207. doi:10.1007/BF00018060.
  40. Lichtenthaler H.K. Chlorophyll fluorescence signatures of leaves during the autumnal chlorophyll breakdown. Journal of Plant Physiology. 1987; 131(1-2): 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(87)80271-7
  41. Zhao X., Chen T., Feng B., Zhang C., Peng S., Zhang X. Non-photochemical quenching plays a key role in light acclimation of rice plants differing in leaf color. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017; 7: 2016. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01968
  42. Saeidi M., Abdoli M. Effect of drought stress during grain filling on yield and its components, gas exchange variables, and some physiological traits of wheat cultivars. Journal of Agricultural and Technology. 2015; 17(4): 885-898.
  43. Meloni D.A., Gulotta M.R., Silva D.M., Arraiza M.P. Effects of salt stress on germination, seedling growth, osmotic adjustment, and chlorophyll fluorescence in Prosopis alba G. Revista Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. 2019; 51(1): 69-78.
  44. Guidi L., Piccolo E.L., Landi M. Chlorophyll fluorescence, photoinhibition and abiotic stress: does it make any difference the fact to be a C3 or C4 species? Frontiers in Plant Science. 2019; 10: 174. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00174.
  45. Liang G., Liu J., Zhang J. Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic and physiological parameters of tomato. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 2020; 145(1): 12–17. doi:10.21273/JASHS04725-19.
  46. Bano H., Athar H.U.R., Zafar Z.U., Ogbaga C.C., Ashraf M. Peroxidase activity and operation of photo-protective component of NPQ play key roles in drought tolerance of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.). Physiologia Plantarum. 2021; 172: 603-614. doi:10.1111/ppl.13337.
  47. Jia Y., Xiao W., Ye Y., Wang X., Liu X., Wang G. Response of photosynthetic performance to drought duration and re-watering in maize. Agronomy. 2020; 10(4): 533. doi:10.3390/agronomy10040533.
  48. Rostamabadi A., Jalilvand H., Nematzadeh G., Goodarzi M., Sayad E. Gas exchange parameters and chlorophyll fluorescence yield in Iranian oak (Quercus macranthera F & M) seedlings under drought stress in Golestan Province. Ecology of Iranian Forests. 2017; 4(8): 41-50.
  49. Terzi R., Saglam A., Kutlu N., Nar H., Kadioglu A. Impact of soil drought stress on photochemical efficiency of photosystem II and antioxidant enzyme activities of Phaseolus vulgaris cultivars. Turkish Journal of Botany. 2010; 34(1): 1-10. doi:10.3906/bot-0905-20.
  50. Zlatev Z. Drought induced changes in chlorophyll fluorescence of young wheat plants. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment. 2012; 23: 438-441. doi:10.1080/13102818.2009.10818458.
  51. Belviso C., Satriani A., Lovelli S., Comegna A., Coppola A., Dragonetti G. Impact of zeolite from coal fly ash on soil hydrophysical properties and plant growth. Agriculture. 2022; 12(3): 356. doi:10.3390/agriculture12030356.
  52. Lauterberg M., Tschiersch H., Zhao Y., Kuhlmann M., Mücke I., Papa R., et al. Implementation of theoretical non-photochemical quenching (NPQ(T)) to investigate NPQ of chickpea under drought stress with high-throughput phenotyping. Scientific Reports. 2024; 14: 13970. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-63372-6.
  53. Beis A., Patakas A. Relative contribution of photoprotection and anti-oxidative mechanisms to differential drought adaptation ability in grapevines. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2012; 78: 173-183. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.12.038.
  54. Oukarroum A., Bussotti F., Goltsev V., Kalaji H.M. Correlation between reactive oxygen species production and photochemistry of photosystems I and II in Lemna gibba L. plants under salt stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2015; 109: 80-88. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.08.005.
  55. Wang Z., Li G., Sun H., Ma L., Guo Y., Zhao Z. Effect of drought stress on photosynthesis and photosynthetic electron transport chain in young apple tree leaves. Biology Open. 2018; 7: bio35279.
  56. Moustakas M., Bayçu G., Sperdouli I., Eroğlu H., Eleftheriou E.P. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis enhances photosynthesis in the medicinal herb Salvia fruticosa by improving photosystem II photochemistry. Plants. 2020; 9: 962.
  57. Roach T., Na C.S., Stöggl W., Krieger-Liszkay A. The non-photochemical quenching protein LHCSR3 prevents oxygen-dependent photoinhibition in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2020; 71: 2650-2660.
  58. Bahador M., Tadayon M.R. Investigating the role of zeolite in modifying the effect of drought stress in hemp: antioxidant enzymes and oil content. Industrial Crops and Products. 2020; 144. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.112042.
  59. Kanash E.V., Sinyavina N.G., Rusakov D.V., Egorova K.V., Panova G.G., Chesnokov Y.V. Morphophysiological, chlorophyll fluorescence, and diffuse reflectance spectra characteristics of lettuce under the main macronutrient deficiency. Horticulturae. 2023; 9(11): 1185. doi:10.3390/horticulturae9111185.
  60. Sommer S.G., Han E., Li X., Rosenqvist E., Liu F. The chlorophyll fluorescence parameter Fv/Fm correlates with loss of grain yield after severe drought in three wheat genotypes grown at two CO2 concentrations. Plants. 2023; 12: 436. doi:10.3390/plants12030436.
  61. Ranjbar-Fordoei A. Variation characteristics of chlorophyll fluorescence of a typical eremophyte Smirnovia Iranica (Sabeti) during phenological stages in the sand drift desert (Case study: In Kashan Region). Desert. 2015; 21(1): 35-41. doi:10.22059/JDESERT.2016.58316.
  62. Zhuang J., Wang Y., Chi Y., Zhou L., Chen J., Zhou W. Drought stress strengthens the link between chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and photosynthetic traits. PeerJ. 2020; 8: e10046. doi:10.7717/peerj.10046.
  63. Baghbani-Arani A., Modarres-Sanavy S.A.M., Mashhadi-Akbar-Boojar M., Mokhtassi-Bidgoli A. Towards improving the agronomic performance, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and pigments in fenugreek using zeolite and vermicompost under deficit water stress. Industrial Crops and Products. 2017; 109: 346-357. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.08.049.
  64. Salehifar M., Rabiei B., Afshar Mohammadian M., Asghari J. Effect of IAA and Kinetin application on plant characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in rice seedlings under drought stress condition. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 2014; 16(4): 293-307. http://agrobreedjournal.ir/article-1-23-fa.html
  65. Rasti Sani M., Ganjeali A., Lahouti M., Mousavi-Kouhi S.M. Morphological and physiological responses of two common bean cultivars to drought stress. Journal of Plant Processes and Functions. 2018; 6(22): 37-45.
  66. Naeemi M., Ali-Akbari G., Shirani-Rad A.H., Hassanloo T., Abbas-Akbari G. Effect of zeolite application and selenium spraying on water relations traits and antioxidant enzymes in medicinal pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) under water deficit stress conditions. Journal of Crop Improvement. 2012; 14(1): 67-81. doi:10.22059/jci.2012.25045.
  67. Rostami Z., Sayfzadeh S., Valad Abadi S.A., Shahsavari N., Zakerin H.R. The effect of different concentrations of salicylic acid on the biochemical-physiological characteristics and essential oil yield of basil under various moisture regimes. Journal of Medicinal Plants and By-products. 2025; Published online. doi:10.22034/JMPB.2025.368872.1921
  68. Moitazedi S., Sayfzadeh S., Haghparast R., Zakerin H.R., Jabari H. Mitigation of drought stress effects on wheat yield via the foliar application of boron, zinc, and manganese nano-chelates and supplementary irrigation. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2022; 46(9): 1988-2002. doi:10.1080/01904167.2022.2105719.
  69. Zhao W., Liu L., Shen Q., Yang J., Han X., Tian F. Effects of water stress on photosynthesis, yield, and water use efficiency in winter wheat. Water. 2020; 12(8): 2127. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12082127
  70. Valadabadi S.A., Yousefi M. Effect of zeolite and biofertilizers on the essential oil yield and some physiological characteristics of Satureja hortensis L. under water deficit stress. Journal of Medicinal Plants and By-products. 2023; 4: 349-356. doi:10.22092/jmpb.2022.353488.1327.
  71. Ouji A., El-Bok S., Mouelhi M., Ben-Younes M., Kharrat M. Yield and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as influenced by supplemental irrigation under semi-arid region of Tunisia. World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2016; 4(5): 153-157. doi:10.12691/wjar-4-5-5.
  72. Tadayon M.R., Karimzadeh-Soureshjani H. Effect of zeolite on physiological and biochemical attributes of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) in deficit irrigation conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 2017; 48(2): 443-452. doi:10.22059/ijfcs.2017.141846.654032.
  73. Dastborhan S., Ghassemi-Golezani K. Influence of seed priming and water stress on selected physiological traits of borage. Folia Horticulturae. 2015; 27(2): 151-159. doi:10.1515/fhort-2015-0025.
  74. Wang X., Liu H., Yu F., Hu B., Jia Y., Sha H. Differential activity of the antioxidant defense system and alterations in the accumulation of osmolyte and reactive oxygen species under drought stress and recovery in rice (Oryza sativa L.) tillering. Scientific Reports. 2019; 9: 8543. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-44958-x.
  75. Rahemi M., Karimi S., Sedaghat S., Rostami A.A. Physiological responses of olive cultivars to salinity stress. Advances in Horticultural Science. 2017; 31(1): 53-59. doi:10.13128/ahs-20726.
  76. Noorzad S., Ahmadian A., Moghadam M. Investigating the amount of proline, chlorophyll index, carbohydrates and absorption of nutrients in coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) under the effect of drought stress and fertilizer treatment. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 2015; 13(1): 131-139.
  77. Vinila J.E.A., Paramaguru P., Arunkumar K., Vaidehi G. Studies on biochemical parameters of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) genotypes under drought condition. Journal of Pharmacy Innovation. 2020; 9(8): 265-272.
  78. Heidari M., Karimi Nezhad M.T. Effects of different levels of zeolite application on some physical and chemical properties of soil and growth parameters of corn under drought stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 2008; 171(5): 682–691. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200700230
  79. Shahgholi S., Sayfzadeh S., Hadidi Masouleh E., Shahsavari N., Zakerin H. Assessment of zinc, boron, and iron foliar application on wheat yield and yield components under drought stress. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2022; 54(9): 1283-1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2022.2141772
  80. Mottaghi S., Mottaghi L., Shiranirad A., Lotfifar O. Study the efficiency of zeolite in reducing the effect of drought stress on agronomical traits and seed yield of rapeseed in Karaj region. Journal of Plant Ecophysiology. 2017; 11(36): 256-271.
  81. Mahmoud A.W.M., Rashad H.M., Esmail S.E.A., Alsamadany H., Abdeldaym E.A. Application of silicon, zinc, and zeolite nanoparticles—a tool to enhance drought stress tolerance in coriander plants for better growth performance and productivity. Plants. 2023; 12(15): 2838. doi:10.3390/plants12152838.
  82. Shin Y.K., Bhandari S.R., Jo J.S., Song J.W., Lee J.G. Effect of drought stress on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, phytochemical contents, and antioxidant activities in lettuce seedlings. Horticulturae. 2021; 7(8): 238. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7080238
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 203
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 108


counter
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب