| تعداد نشریات | 282 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 80 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,251 |
| تعداد مقالات | 35,917 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 54,569,391 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 93,692,197 |
بررسی جایگاه چغندر قند در بخش زراعی استان خراسان رضوی از دیدگاه بهره برداران و سیاستگذاران بخش کشاورزی | ||
| چغندرقند | ||
| مقاله 10، دوره 40، شماره 1، شهریور 1403، صفحه 123-138 اصل مقاله (549.76 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: کامل علمی - پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/jsb.2024.366168.1362 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| شجاعت زارع* | ||
| بخش تحقیقات اقتصادی، اجتماعی و ترویجی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خراسان رضوی، مشهد، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| با ادامه خشکسالیها و کاهش شدید منابع آبی کشور از یک سو و نوسانات گاها بسیار شدید در قیمت محصولات کشاورزی از سوی دیگر، توجه به الگوی کشت محصولات کشاورزی به صورت خاصی مورد توجه دولت مردان قرار گرفته است. با ابلاغ برنامه الگوی کشت از سوی وزارت جهاد کشاورزی و اجرای آن در کشور، اجرای موفقیت آمیز آن در گرو سیاستهایی است تا بتواند منافع کشاورزان را به عنوان تصمیم گیر نهایی تامین نماید. با توجه به اهمیت چغندر قند در تامین شکر مورد نیاز کشور و همچنین تامین خوراک کارخانجات چغندر قند، رقابت پذیری این محصول در بین محصولات دیگر جهت ورود به الگوی کشت اهمیت خاصی پیدا کرده است. لذا در این پژوهش وضعیت چغندر قند در استان خراسان رضوی بین محصولات زراعی از نظر شاخصهای مزیت نسبی و درآمدی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. اطلاعات مورد نیاز از سیستم هزینه تولید محصولات زراعی وزارت جهاد کشاورزی بین سالهای 1395 تا 1398 استخراج شد. نتایج مطالعه نشان داد که در 60 درصد از شهرستانهای استان خراسان رضوی که کشت چغندر قند انجام میشود، این محصول دارای مزیت نسبی است. درجه این مزیت در 40 درصد از شهرستانها پایدار و قابل قبول(بیش از7) است. در اکثر شهرستانها با اختلاف زیاد، رتبه شاخص درآمد خالص چغندر قند بین محصولات زراعی، بهتر از رتبه مزیت نسبی میباشد از این رو، در شرایط آزادسازی و ایجاد تجارت آزاد و حذف حمایتهای داخلی، این محصول در برخی مناطق قادر به رقابت نیست و از چرخه تولید حذف میگردد. بنابراین لازم است با افزایش بهره وری از طریق افزایش عملکرد و کاهش هزینهها، توان رقابتی این محصول با سایر محصولات زراعی افزایش یابد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| مزیت نسبی؛ هزینه فرصت؛ درآمد خالص؛ شاخص هزینه منابع داخلی؛ الگوی کشت | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Investigating the position of sugar beet in the agricultural sector of Khorasan Razavi province from the point of view of agricultural sector policy makers and users | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| shojaat zare | ||
| : Assistant Professor and Faculty Member of Economic, social and extension Research Department, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Extended Abstract Introduction One of the important indices in preparing the national cultivation pattern is comparative advantage. Social profit demand production based on comparative advantages, but the indices that growers consider when choosing a crop to cultivate are profit and income, restrictions as well as available resources. Difference in viewpoint creates significant problems in the implementation process of this program, and by the greater difference between these two indices, the success in the implementation of the national cultivation pattern program will decrease. This study examined these two indices over a period of 4 years to provide the necessary suggestions for reducing their differences. Materials and Methods The required information was obtained from the cost of production system of the Ministry of Agriculture Jihad during 2016 to 2019. In order to compare sugar beet with other crops, these indices were used for the most important crops of the province including wheat and barley (irrigated and rainfed), rapeseed, potatoe, onion, tomatoe, cotton, sugar beet, cucumber (Cucumis sativus), watermelon (Citrullus lanatus, irrigated and rainfed), fodder corn, alfalfa, chickpeas, and lentils (irrigated and rainfed), and red kidney bean. In order to calculate the comparative advantage index, the domestic resource cost (DRC) method was used. The result of this index is that a country decides to produce or import a product economically. Activities whose DRC is between zero and one have a comparative advantage. Calculations were made based on shadow prices (opportunity cost) of inputs and outputs as well as exchange rate. The highest prevailing wage was extracted as the opportunity cost of labor from the statistical bulletin of the Statistical Center of Iran. Average land rent with 85% coefficient, water rental price in each region, the FOB price for exportable products, and CIF price for import-substituting products, chemical fertilizers and pesticides, the cost, insurance and freight were used.,. For animal fertilizers, the average price of local purchase was considered, , 36% of the cost of foreign machinery and 64% of domestic resources were used for machinery, and the relative purchasing power parity (RPPP) method was used for currency. For converting sugar beet into sugar, the following equation was used: percentage of sugar extraction/(1-imported sugar refining waste coefficient). Results and Discussion The results of this study showed that among the 15 counties where sugar beet cultivation is carried out, nine counties had a comparative advantage (first category) and six counties showed no comparative advantage (second category). Among the first nine counties, the highest and the lowest degree of comparative advantage belonged to Jovein and Mashhad, respectively. The degree of comparative advantage of Jovein shows that this county was more resilient to factors affecting the reduction of comparative advantage in sugar beet production (such as decreasing yield per hectare, increasing opportunity cost of production inputs, decreasing world sugar price, and increasing value of national currency) and Mashhad was more fragile to these factors. The average yield per hectare of the first and second categories was 51,775 and 44,772 kg ha-1, respectively, however this does not mean that the yield of the second category was lower than all members of the first category. Fifty percent of the counties in the second category had a yield higher than the minimum yield of the first category. Among the factors affecting comparative advantage, the price of sugar, the opportunity cost of inputs, and the value of the national currency were same for all counties. Therefore, what causes a county to lack comparative advantage despite its optimum yield is production cost. Increasing production costs is acceptable provided that it can generate more income than costs. Any input that has a higher opportunity cost can help improve comparative advantage with a smaller percentage reduction in consumption. For example, chemical pesticides can help increase the degree of comparative advantage compared with fertilizers with a smaller percentage reduction in consumption. In some counties that have comparative advantage, despite their high degree of comparative advantage, they are ranked better in terms of net income than other products in the county. For example, in Jovein, where the degree of comparative advantage of sugar beet is eight, its comparative advantage rank was eighth and its net income rank was third, so it is of interest to the growers. This situation is also observed in Roshtkhar, Joghatai, and Chenaran counties. The gap between income rank and comparative advantage in the cities of Torbat-e Heydariyeh, Torbat-e Jam, and Mashhad was small and acceptable. In other words, in these cities, production was almost aligned based on social benefits and growers' benefit. However, in the two cities of Sabzevar and Fariman, which lack comparative advantage, sugar beet ranks first and second in terms of income. Conclusion Considering that the comparative advantage index simulates the conditions of liberalization of input and product prices and its effect on the survival or elimination of the product from the cultivation pattern, the results of this study showed that sugar beet is unable to compete in some areas and is eliminated from the production cycle. Therefore, it is necessary to increase productivity by increasing yield and reducing costs to boom the competitiveness of this product. It is also necessary to conduct comparative advantage studies for new methods as well as changes in planting dates, such as autumn planting, so that the final outcome of changes in costs and income of new methods can be measured on these two indicators. Keywords Comparative advantage, Cultivation pattern, Domestic resource cost index, Net income, Opportunity cost References Kotchoni R, Adoho FM. Comparative Advantage and Growth Potential of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire :African Development Bank; 2021; Oct.39 p.Working Paper Series. No.: 35 Mohammadi H, Kaikha AA, Dehbashi V, Khaloee A. Study of Comparative Advantage for Sugar beet Production in Iran.Journal of Sugar Beet. 2012; 28(1):93-81. (In Persian with English abstract) Doi:https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2012.660 | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Comparative advantage, opportunity cost, net income, domestic resource cost index, cultivation pattern | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Gonzales LA, Kasrino F, Peres ND, Rosegrant MW. Research report on the Economic incentives and comparativeadvantage. in Indonesian food production. washington (D.C): International Food Policy Research Institute (US); 1993; Feb. 112 p. Report. No.: 93 Haji Rahimi M, Economic incentives and relative advantage of crop production in Fars province. (MSc thesis). Shiraz, Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University; 1996 (In Persian with English abstract) Jafari AM. Economic incentives and relative advantage of horticultural production in Hamadan province. Hamedan (HD):Hamedan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center(IR); 2000; Apr. 180 p. Report. No: 21/80. (In Persian with English abstract) Kotchoni R, Adoho FM. Comparative Advantage and Growth Potential of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire :African Development Bank; 2021; Oct.39 p.Working Paper Series. No.: 359 Liefert WM. Comparative (dis?) advantage in Russian agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2002; 84(3):762-767. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00334 Lingard JA. Comparative advantage analysis of Kosovan agriculture. Post-communist economies. 2003; 15(3):417-434. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1463137032000139089 Mohammadi H, Kaikha AA, Dehbashi V, Khaloee A. Study of Comparative Advantage for Sugar beet Production in Iran.Journal of Sugar Beet. 2012; 28(1):93-81. (In Persian with English abstract) Doi:https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2012.660 Mokhber I, Keramatzadeh A, Joolaie R, Shirani Bidabadi F. The effect of water price increase on the comparative advantage of sugar beet production in Golestan province Journal of Sugar Beet. 2022; 38(2):269-282. (In Persian with English abstract) Doi:https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2023.359112.1307 Mousanijad MG, Zarghami M, Ahmadi M, Suri D, Karkon M, Khaksar G. Measurement of comparative advantage and the influence of the government on major crops in 1992. Tehran: Agricultural Research, Education and extentionOrganization(IR); 1994; Aug. 157 p. Report.No.: 14137. (In Persian) Nemati A, Jafari AM, Basati J. Investigation comparative advantage of sugar beet in Kermanshah province.Journal of agricultural economics.2011; 5(1):187-208. (In Persian with English abstract) Ricardo D. On the principles of political economy and taxation, John Murray, London, UK. 1817; pp. 603. Saeidi Far A, Aghakhani Z. Determining the relative advantage of agricultural and horticultural crops in the provinces of the country. Economic Journal (bimonthly review of economic issues and policies). 2013; 13(11 , 12), 47-64. (In Persian with English abstract) Saptana, Sayekti AL, Perwita AD, Sayaka B, Gunawan E, Sukmaya SG, Hayati NQ, Yusuf, Sumaryanto, Yufdy MP, Mardianto S, Pitaloka AD. Analysis of competitive and comparative advantages of potato production in Indonesia. PLoS One. 2022; 17(2), 1-21. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263633. Sepehrdost H, Imami S. Investigating the comparative advantage and the effects of government policy in potato production in Hamadan province. Agricultural Economics Research. 2017; 9(1), 51-70.(In Persian with English abstract) Doi:https://doi.org/20.1001.1.20086407.1396.9.33.3.8 Smith adam. The Wealth of Nations, translated by Siros Ebrahim Zadeh, Tehran, Payam Publications, 2017; pp. 372. (In Persion) Zare S. Comparative advantage of agricultural products in Khorasan province. Mashhad (KH): Khorasan Agricultural Research Center (IR); 2002; July.71 p. Report. No.: 81/235.( In Persian with English abstract) Zare S, Yaghoobi V, Mansourian N. et al. Analysis of crops comparative advantage and profitability in Iranian provinces from 2016 to 2019. Mashhad (KHR): Razavi Khorasan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center (IR); 2024; Mar. 910 p. Report. No.: 65132. (In Persian with English abstract)
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 404 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 450 |
||