| تعداد نشریات | 282 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 80 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 3,168 |
| تعداد مقالات | 35,197 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 50,944,193 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 90,949,644 |
مقایسه تراکـم جمعیـت برگخوار "Spodoptera exigua (Hübner)" و خرطوم بلند "Lixus incanescens Boh."، در کشت بذری و نشایی چغندرقند | ||
| چغندرقند | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 39، شماره 2، مهر 1402، صفحه 223-232 اصل مقاله (721.14 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: کامل علمی - پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/jsb.2024.365239.1350 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمد جواد ارده* 1؛ سمیه اله ویسی2؛ مریم فروزان3؛ ولی اله یوسف آبادی4؛ محمدتقی توحیدی5؛ حیدر عزیزی6 | ||
| 1Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection No. 1, Yaman (Tabnak) St., Chamran Highway, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2استادیار پژوهش مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان همدان، سازمان تحقیقات آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی همدان، ایران همدان | ||
| 3استادیار پژوهش مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان آذربایجان غربی، سازمان تحقیقات آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ارومیه، ایران | ||
| 4استادیار پژوهشی مؤسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه بذر چغندرقند- سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران | ||
| 5بخش تحقیقات گیاهپزشکی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان کرمانشاه، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرمانشاه، | ||
| 6استادیار مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی آذربایجانغربی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ارومیه، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در سالهای اخیر تغییر الگوی کشت در چغندرقند، از بذری به نشایی، با هدف صرفهجویی در مصرف آب آبیاری، مورد توجه قرار گرفته است. در این تحقیق تراکم جمعیت برگخوار "Spodoptera exigua (Hübner)" و خرطومبلند"Lixus incanescens Boh.” ، در کشت بذری و نشایی چغندرقند در شهرستانهای سه استان همدان، آذربایجانغربی و کرمانشاه مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. نمونهبرداریها از مرحله شش برگی، برای کشت بذری و یک هفته بعد از انتقال نشاها به مزرعه، برای کشت صورت گرفت. برای این منظور از هر نوع کشت10 نقطه بهطور تصادفی انتخاب و وجود آفات فوق با روش کادراندازی بهطور هفتگی (طی هشت هفته)، ثبت شد. مقایسه دادهها با روش غیرپارامتری (Kruskal-Wallis) نشان داد که بین تراکم جمعیت برگخوار در استان همدان در کشت بذری و کشت نشایی برای سال اول بهترتیب 50/4 و 29/1 و برای سال دوم 98/6 و 81/8 لارو در هر مترمربع بود که در سطح یک درصد (X2(3)=11.515 وP=0.009)، اختلاف معنیدار داشتند. در استان آذربایجانغربی برای سال اول 20/1 و 84/1 و برای سال دوم 59/0 و 67/1 لارو در مترمربع بود که در سطح پنج درصد (X2(3)=10.491 و P=0.015) تفاوت معنیدار وجود داشت، اما برای استان کرمانشاه تفاوتی معنیداری بین دو نوع کشت وجود نداشت (X2(3)=6.326 و P=0.097). در حالیکه برای جمعیت سرخرطومی در استان همدان بهترتیب در سال اول 1/80 و 1/79 و در سال دوم 7/88 و 6/91 حشره کامل در مترمربع بود و اختلاف معنیدار در سطح یک درصد دیده شد (X2(3)=15.610 وP=0.0014). اما برای دو استان دیگر اختلاف معنیدار بین تعداد حشرات کامل سرخرطومی در مترمربع وجود نداشت (برای آذربایجانغربی X2(3)=3.203 و P=0.361 و برای کرمانشاه X2(3)=2.597و P=0.458). در مجموع میتوان گفت که تراکم این دو آفت در مزارع فوق در طی دو سال مورد بررسی، تحت تأثیر روش کشت نبود. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| الگوی کشت؛ چغندرقند؛ خسارت آفات؛ مدیریت آفات | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Comparison of population density of "Spodoptera exigua (Hübner)" and "LixusincanescensBoh." in seed and seedling cultivation of sugar beet | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| mohammad javad ardeh1؛ somaye allahvaisi2؛ Marya .Forouzan3؛ valiollah yosefabadi4؛ Mohammad Taghi Tohidi5؛ Heydar Azizi6 | ||
| 1Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection No. 1, Yaman (Tabnak) St., Chamran Highway, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant professor Plant Protection Research Department, Hamedan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, (AREEOA), Hamedan, Iran | ||
| 3Associated professor in Plant Protection Research Department, West Azarbaijan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, (AREEOA ), West Azarbaijan, Iran. | ||
| 4assistant Professor of Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI) - Agricultural Research Education and Extension, Karaj,Iran | ||
| 52- Plant Protection Research Department, Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Kermanshah, Iran | ||
| 6Assistant Professor of Sugar Beet Research Department, West Azarbayjan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (ARREO). Urmia, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In recent years, variation in the pattern of sugar beet cultivation from seed planting to the seedling planting, with the aim of saving irrigation consumption, has been remarkably considered. In this study, the population density of armyworm "Spodoptera exigua (Hübner)" and long-stemmed weevil "Lixus incanescens Boh." was evaluated in both seed and seedling planting methods in sugar beet fields in three cities of Hamdan, West Azarbaijan and Kermanshah. Sampling was performed from the 6-leaf stage in seed planting and one week after transplanting the seedlings to the field for seedling planting. From this purpose, 10 points were randomly selected from each type of planting methods by quadrat and the presence of the above pests was recorded weekly (for eight weeks). Comparing the data with the non-parametric method (Kruskal-Wallis) showed that the mean population density of armyworm in Hamadan province for seed and seedling were 4.50 and 1.29 larvae/m2, respectively for the first year, and 6.98 and 8.81, larvae/m2, respectively for the second year with significant difference (X2(3)=11.515 and P=0.009). In West Azarbaijan province, the means of larvae/m2 were 1.20 and 1.84 for seed and seedling planting in the first year and 0.59 and 1.67 for seed and seedling planting for the second year, respectively (X2(3)=10.491 and P=0.015), but no difference for the Kermanshah data (X2(3)=6.326 and P=0.097). While the mean population density of the sugar beet weevil in Hamedan provincewere1.80 and 1.79 adults/m2 for seed and seedling planting in the first year, and 7.88 and 6.91 adult/m2 for seed and seedling planting in the second year, respectively (X2(3)=15.610 and P=0.0014). However, no significant difference was observed for sugar beet weevil for the other two provinces (for West Azerbaijan X2(3)=3.203 and P=0.361 and for Kermanshah X2(3)=2.597 and P=0.458). In general, it can be said that the density of these two pests in the fields during the two years of evaluation was not affected by the planting method, however other indicators including environmental conditions are more effective on their density | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Pest damage, pest management, planting pattern, sugar beet | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdollahzadeh BMB, Aramideh S, HosseinzadehA.Effects of some chemical and biological insecticides on beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua Hubner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)) and natural enemies in sugar beet fields. Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad). 2022. 99(1): 27-37. DOI.org/ 0041–3216/2022/040027–037 Anonymous. Agricultural Census, Vol(1) Crops. Vice President Agricultural Census, Information and Communication Technology Center, Ministry of Agricultural Jihad, 2022.93 p. [In Persian] https://www.maj.ir/Dorsapax/userfiles/Sub65/amar99-1400.pdf Arbab Tafti R, Taqizadeh M, Alizadeh S, Fatuhi K, Obeidi U. Assessment of the amount of damage caused by the long-stemmed weevil (Lixusincanescens Boh. (Col.: Curculionidae)) on sugar beet in West Azarbaijan, Ardabil and Tehran provinces. Final Report of the Iraninan Research Plant Protection Institute. 2007. 35pp. No. 30295. [In Persian with English abstract] Ardeh MJ. Sugar beet pests. The second chapter of the handbook of “Sugar Beet Plant Protection” in Pourrahim et al., Iraninan Research Plant Protection Institute. 2015. P 5-24. [In Persian] Ardeh MJ, Allahvaisi S, Fourouzan M, Tohidi MT, Yosefabadi V. Evaluation of pest damage in two different cultivation methods (seed and transplant) in sugar beet, Final Report of Research Project, IRIPP, AREEO. 2023. 35pp. [In Persian with English abstract] Ashraf Abdollahi A, Hatami A, Yosefabadi V, Mehrabi AA. The effect of transplanting, sowing and harvesting date on yield and water use efficiency of autumn-sown sugar beet. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2020.35(2) 175-191. doi:10.22092/jsb.2020.125719.1215. [In Persian] Cokola MC, Mugumaarhahama Y, Noël G, Kazamwali LM, Bisimwa EB, Mugisho, JZ. Aganze, VM. Lubobo, AK., Francis F. Fall Armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in South Kivu, DR Congo: Understanding How Season and Environmental Conditions Influence Field Scale Infestations. Neotropical Entomology. 2021. 50: 145–155. doi:10.1007/s13744-020-00833-3. Ehler L, An evaluation of some natural enemies of Spodoptera exigua on sugar beet in northern California. Bio Control. 2004. 49, 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BICO.0000017364.20596.38 Gohari J, Rouhi A, Talaee A, Gholizadeh R. Economic analysis of the two methods of paper pot and direct sowing of sugar beet crop in Iran. Journal of Sugar Beet. 1996. 11 (1) 30-40. [In Persian with English abstract] Khairi M. Investigating effective factors in sugar beet armyworm out break. Journal of the Institute of Plant Pests and Diseases.1376. 42. 1-15. [In Persian with English abstract] Khozaei M, Kamgar Haghighi AA, ZandParsa S, Sepaskhah AR, Razzaghi F. Evaluation of direct seeding and transplanting in sugar beet for water productivity, yield and quality under different irrigation regimes and planting densities. Agricultural Water Management. 2020. 238p.106230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106230 [In Persian] Mansour MRK, Abou-Elkassem AB, Ecological studies on Spodoptera exigua (Hubner) and its biological control by the novel parasitoid, Cotesiaruficrus (Haliday) (Hymenoptera: Braconida) on sugar beet. Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research. 2022. 11 (4) 1193-1200. DOI: 10.36632/mejar/2022.11.4.79 Mansouri H, Hassani M, Hamze H, Jafari AM, Yosefabadi V. Comparing the quantitative, qualitative and economic yield of sugar beet planting by root transplanting method with direct seeding in Hamedan region. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2022. 37(1) 49-60. doi:10.22092/jsb.2022.353748.1268. [In Persian with English abstract] Moursy MAM, El-KadyMS. Study planting methods to improve water use efficiency and productivity of sugar beet in a newly reclaimed area. Life Science Journal. 2019. 16(12) 11-19. doi:10.7537/marslsj161219.02 Norouzi A. Evaluation of direct sowing and paper pot planting in sprinkler irrigationsystem. Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI); 2007. 45 p. Report. No. 2406. [in Persian, abstract in English] Parvizi R, Javanmoghadam H. Investigation of the long-stemmed weevil (LixusincanescensBoh. (Col.: Curculionidae)) in the province of West Azerbaijan. Journal of Plant Pests and Diseases. 1986. 55 (1-2) 1-8. [In Persian with English abstract] Saeidabadi H, Afsharmanesh GR, Shirzadi MH, Sadeghzadeh Hemayati S. The effect of drought stress and transplanting method on agronomic characteristics, quantitative and qualitative yield as well as water use efficiency of different sugar beet cultivars in autumn planting. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2021. 37 (1) 27-48. doi:10.22092/jsb.2022.352225.1252. [In Persian] Srivastava S, Misra V, Mall AK Kumar D. Problems and integrated pest management strategy for Spodopteralitura in sugar beet in India. Journal of Experimental Zoology 2020. 23(2):1887-1890 Yousefabadi V, Ardeh MJ, Mahmoudi B, Noori H. The importance of transplanting sugar beet from pest management of sugar beet point of view. Publication of Agricultural Education Research Organization, 2019.24 p. [In Persian] Zhu X, Han B, Song B, Yang J. Effect of extending seedling-raising period on yield of transplanting sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) in black soil area of Northeast China. Sugar Tech 2020. 22, 1103–1109. doi:10.1007/s12355-020-00862-7. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 402 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 248 |
||