اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات282
تعداد نشریات سازمان80
تعداد شماره‌ها3,247
تعداد مقالات35,894
تعداد مشاهده مقاله54,450,830
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله93,620,895
نصراصفهانی, اسماعیل, پالوج, مجتبی. (1402). تحلیل اندازه واحدهای بهره‌برداری کشاورزی و ارائه راهکارهای مناسب برای یکپارچه‌سازی اراضی. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 31(4), 183-215. doi: 10.30490/aead.2023.351812.1262
اسماعیل نصراصفهانی; مجتبی پالوج. "تحلیل اندازه واحدهای بهره‌برداری کشاورزی و ارائه راهکارهای مناسب برای یکپارچه‌سازی اراضی". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 31, 4, 1402, 183-215. doi: 10.30490/aead.2023.351812.1262
نصراصفهانی, اسماعیل, پالوج, مجتبی. (1402). 'تحلیل اندازه واحدهای بهره‌برداری کشاورزی و ارائه راهکارهای مناسب برای یکپارچه‌سازی اراضی', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 31(4), pp. 183-215. doi: 10.30490/aead.2023.351812.1262
نصراصفهانی, اسماعیل, پالوج, مجتبی. تحلیل اندازه واحدهای بهره‌برداری کشاورزی و ارائه راهکارهای مناسب برای یکپارچه‌سازی اراضی. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 31(4): 183-215. doi: 10.30490/aead.2023.351812.1262

تحلیل اندازه واحدهای بهره‌برداری کشاورزی و ارائه راهکارهای مناسب برای یکپارچه‌سازی اراضی

اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه
مقاله 8، دوره 31، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 124، اسفند 1402، صفحه 183-215    اصل مقاله (546.25 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30490/aead.2023.351812.1262
نویسندگان
اسماعیل نصراصفهانی* 1؛ مجتبی پالوج2
1مربی مؤسسة پژوهش‌های برنامه‌ریزی، اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعة روستایی، تهران، ایران
2دانشیار مؤسسة پژوهش‌های برنامه‌ریزی، اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه روستایی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
پدیده خرد شدن اراضی کشاورزی که به ‏صورت جدی، از پنجاه سال قبل، آغاز شده و در یک دهه اخیر، به‏‌گونه‌‏ای نگران‌‏کننده در حال افزایش بوده اســت، از موانع بســیار مهم برای تحقق توسعه پایدار و امنیت غذایی در کشور به ‏شمار می‌رود. پژوهش کاربردی حاضر، با هدف بررسی و تحلیل اندازه واحدهای بهره‌برداری کشاورزی و ارائه راهکارهای مناسب برای یکپارچه‌سازی اراضی، به روش توصیفی- تحلیلی انجام گرفت. گردآوری داده‌های پژوهش با بهره‌‏گیری از روش‌های کتابخانه‌ای و میدانی (پرسشنامه و مصاحبه) انجام پذیرفت؛ و در این ارتباط، برای دستیابی به راهکارهای یکپارچگی اراضی کشاورزی، از تحلیل سوات (SWOT) استفاده ‌شد. بدین منظور، بر اساس بررسی‌های اسنادی و کتابخانه‌ای و نیز مصاحبه‌ با برخی از کارشناسان و خبرگان، فهرستی از عوامل راهبردی (نقاط قوت، نقاط ضعف، فرصت‌ها و تهدیدها) تهیه و با ارسال پرسشنامه، نسبت به ارزیابی عوامل داخلی (IEF) و خارجی (EFE) اقدام شد. میانگین نظرات اخذشده از 45 کارشناس ستادی و استانی وزارت جهاد کشاورزی آشنا به موضوع حاکی از آن بود که امتیاز ارزیابی عوامل داخلی (IEF) 2/72 و امتیاز ارزیابی عوامل خارجی (EFE) 2/94 است. برای تدوین راهبردهای یکپارچه‌سازی اراضی با ترکیب زوجی مؤلفه‌های چهارگانه قوت (S)، ضعف (W)، فرصت (O) و تهدید (T)، چهار گروه راهبردهای تهاجمی (SO)، رقابتی (ST)، محافظه‌‏کارانه (WO) و تدافعی (WT) برای یکپارچه‌سازی اراضی کشور استخراج شدند. همچنین، برای تعیین موقعیت راهبردی، از ماتریس داخلی و خارجی (IEM) استفاده ‌شد. با توجه به نتایج به ‏دست‌‏آمده، میانگین امتیاز ارزیابی عوامل داخلی (IEF) و ارزیابی عوامل خارجی (EFE) نقطه برخورد امتیاز ماتریس داخلی و خارجی در منطقه راهبرد تهاجمی (SO) قرار گرفت، بدین معنی که باید اقدامات یکپارچه‏‌سازی در قالب این نوع راهبرد و با استفاده از نقاط قوت داخلی و فرصت‌‌های خارجی انجام شود. بدیهی است که وزارت جهاد کشاورزی برای بهره‏‌گیری مناسب از هشت راهبرد‌‌ SO به‌‏دست‌‏آمده، باید با همکاری و مشارکت سایر دستگاه‌های مسئول، اجرای راهبرد‌‌های ST ،WT و WO را نیز مورد توجه قرار دهد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
اندازه واحد بهره‌برداری زمین؛ برنامه‌‏ریزی راهبردی؛ تحلیل سوات (SWOT)؛ یکپارچه‌سازی اراضی
عنوان مقاله [English]
Analyzing the Size of Agricultural Utilization Units and Providing the Appropriate Solutions to Land Consolidation
نویسندگان [English]
Esmaeil Nasr Esfahani1؛ Mojtaba Palouj2
1Instructor of Agricultural Planning, Economics and Rural Development Research Institute (APERDRI), Tehran, Iran
2.Associate Professor of Agricultural Planning, Economics and Rural Development Research Institute (APERDRI), Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]
Introduction: Given the important progress in economic activities, the agricultural sector still has a special position in the field of economy and security of society. The importance and central role of the agricultural sector in the national economy in terms of the food security, providing employment, exporting agricultural products and food industries, as well as providing raw materials for many industries are undeniable. Iran's agricultural sector has experienced positive developments over recent years, but it faces various problems and challenges. Agricultural land fragmentation is one of the main challenges of Iran's agriculture, which can affect agricultural production, rural development, labor supply, food security, and land use change. Consolidation of agricultural lands is a logical and practical solution to the changes caused by smallness and fragmentation of lands. Therefore, formulation of land integration strategies is considered as the main component of land management and prevention of land fragmentation. Thus, this study mainly aimed at providing agricultural land integration strategies, so that the planners and plan implementation officials could advance the implementation as desirable as its application to consolidate the agricultural lands.
Materials and Methods: This study used SWOT analysis to find solutions for the land consolidation; in addition, library and field methods (questionnaire and interviews) were used to collect data. For this purpose, a list of strategic factors (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) was prepared based on document and library reviews and interviews with 45 experts from the headquarters and provincial departments of the Ministry of Agriculture-Jahad (MAJ), who were familiar with the subject, and by completing the questionnaires regarding the Internal Factor Evaluation (IEF) and External Factor Evaluation (EFE). The Internal and External Matrices (IEM) were used to determine the strategic position of the land consolidation.
Results and Discussion: The average of the opinions received from staff and provincial experts indicated that the score for evaluating internal factors was 2.72 and for evaluating external factors was 2.94. Based on this, intersection point of internal and external matrix scores was located in the area of SO strategy, which meant that in the framework of this strategy, the land consolidation measures should be carried out using internal strengths and external opportunities. It is obvious that in order to be able to use the 8 SO strategies obtained optimally, the MAJ should pay attention to the implementation of ST, WT and WO strategies with the cooperation and participation of other authorities.
Conclusion: The study results indicated that it was necessary to formulate a strategic and operational plan for the land consolidation according to the different dimensions and aspects of the issue. It was also found necessary to take some measures as follows: the most appropriate use of the capacities and facilities of effective external and internal organizations; formulation and implementation of supportive and encouraging laws and regulations to maintain the land use and strict supervision to prevent the land use change; improving the beneficiaries’ awareness and informing them of the economic and social results of the land consolidation; and finally, the government investment and credit provision as well as granting appropriate credit and banking facilities to the concerned farmers.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Farm Size, Land Consolidation, Strategic Planning, SWOT Analysis
اصل مقاله
  • Abdollahzadeh, A., Changizi, M., & Sharifzadeh, M. Sh. (2015). Investigating the effect of land consolidation projects on agricultural sustainability (case study: Haraz Plain in Mazandaran province). Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 4(4), 147-162. [In Persian]
  • Abdollahzadeh, G. H., & Kalantari, Kh. (2006). Study of factors affecting agricultural land fragmentation. Journal of Agriculture, 8(1), 33-45. [In Persian]
  • Amirnejad, H., & Rafiee, H. (2009). Determination of effective factors in land consolidation adoption by rice producers in selected villages of Mazandaran province. Journal of Water and Soil Science (Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources), 13(48), 329-338. [In Persian]
  • Asefi, A. (2000). Designing the integration of agricultural land using Geographical Information System (GIS). Master's Thesis in Geography and Rural Planning. Tarbiat Modares University of Tehran. [In Persian]
  • Asimeh, M., Nooripour, M., Azadi, H., Van Eetvelde, V., Sklenička, P., & Witlox, F. (2020). Agricultural land use sustainability in Southwest Iran: improving land leveling using consolidation plans. Land Use Policy, 94, 104555.
  • Asimeh, M., & Nooripour, M. (2021). Analysis of factors affecting the adoption of lands' leveling and consolidation plans: the case of the villages of Zarghan district. Journal of Geography and Development, 19(62), 209-228. [In Persian]
  • Aslan, S. T., Gundogdu. K. S., Yaslioglu, E., Kirmikil. M., & Arici, I. (2007). Personal, physical and socioeconomic factors affecting farmer’s adoption of land consolidation. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(2), 204-213.
  • Bahadori, M., & Rais al-Sadat, S. A. (2006). An analysis on the necessity of transformation of small and peasant exploitation systems in the current structure of Iran's agriculture. Conference on Micro and Peasant Exploitation Systems (Aabstract Collection of Articles). pp. 12-13. [In Persian]
  • Bakhshi Moghadam, A., Mahmoudi, S., & Hajizadeh, A. (2022). Investigation and analysis of factors affecting the success of agricultural land integration plan (example: Chobar village, Shaft city). Scientific Journal of Geographical Studies of Coastal Areas, 3(2), 49-68.
  • CIIMP (2015). The system of exploiting resources and production factors in agriculture; principles and requirements. Water, Environment, Food Security and Natural Resources Think Tank, Center for Iranian Islamic Model of Progress (CIIMP). [In Persian]
  • Cioffo, G. D., Ansoms, A., & Murison, J. (2016). Modernising agriculture through a ‘new’ Green Revolution: the limits of the Crop Intensification Programme in Rwanda. Review of African Political Economy, 43(148), 277-293.
  • Daly, H. E. (2007). Ecological economics and sustainable development. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • David, F. R. (2014). Strategic management. Translated by A. Parsadian and S.M. Arabi. The 28th Cultural Research Office, Tehran. [In Persian]
  • Demetriou, D. (2013). The development of an Integrated Planning and Decision Support System (IPDSS) for land consolidation. Springer Science and Business Media.
  • Ebrahimi, M. S., Kalantari, Kh., Asadi, A., Mohd Mohammadi, H., & Saleh, A. (2010). An analysis of on-farm development program in rice fields. Journal of Economics and Agricultural Development of Iran. 2-41(3), 299-312. [In Persian]
  • Einali, J. (2014). Assessing the role of social capital in agricultural land consolidation, case study: Hesar e Valiasr County, Avaj Township. Journal of Rural Research, 5(2), 375-396. DOI: 10.22059/jrur.2014.52476. [In Persian]
  • Ertunç, E., Çay, T., & Haklı, H. (2018). Modeling of reallocation in land consolidation with a hybrid method. Land Use Policy, 76, 754-761.
  • Gessesse, A. T., Li, H., He, G., & Berhe, A. A. (2018). Study on farmers land consolidation adaptation intention: a structural equation modeling approach, the case of Sichuan province, China. China Agricultural Economic Review, 10(4), 666-682.
  • Ghadermazi, H., Ahmadi Dehrashid, A., & Bijani, M. (2020). Agricultural land consolidation in Iran: advantages and limitations (the case of villages in Dehgolan County, Iran). Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 22(2), 317-332.
  • Ghadimi, S., Eshaghi, S., Nasrabadi, P., & Azami, M. (2013). A review of reasons for rejection of integration of land, and a presentation of approaches to the integration of agricultural lands (case study: rural district, North Zayandeh-Rood River, Faridan County). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 43(4), 661-675. DOI: 22059/ijaedr.2013.51352. [In Persian]
  • Gonzales Garcia, I. (2007). Land Consolidation in Spain: The Land Registry Perspective. Effective and Sustainable Land Management–A Permanent Challenge for Each Society. In: UNECE WPLA Workshop, Session III-Social and Constitutional Dimension of Land Management, Munich, May, pp. 24-25.
  • Hadipour, M., Roumiani, A., Azizpour, F., & Lasmipour, R. (2019). Barriers to the promotion of agricultural land consolidation in rural areas from farmers' point of view (case study: Fash sub-district of Kangavar County). Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 8(24), 45-62. [In Persian]
  • Hadizadeh Bazzaz, M., Bozarjomehri, Kh., Shayan, H., & Noghanidokht Bahmani, M. (2014). Performance evaluation of rural production cooperatives on the sustainable agricultural development (case study: Neyshabour County). Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 4(2), 111-125. [In Persian]
  • Hanger, J. D., & Wheelen, T. L. (2015). Essentials of strategic management. Translated by M. Arabi and R. Rezvani. Cultural Research Office, Tehran. [In Persian]
  • Haqiqat, S., Irvani, H., Kalantari, K. H., Mahdavi, E., & Ghadimi, S. A. (2015). Analysis of the driving factors of land integration plan from the perspective of farmers in Fars province. Iranian Economic Economics and Development Research, 64(1), 21-34. [In Persian]
  • Holden, E., Linnerud, K., & Banister, D. (2014). Sustainable development: our common future revisited. Global Environmental Change, 26, 130-139.
  • Jamshidi, A., Teimoori, M., & Jamshidi, M. (2012). Analysis of factors affecting land fragmentation in Shirvan Chardavol County, and provision of appropriate reorganizing mechanisms. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 42-2(3), 367-378. [In Persian]
  • Javan, J., & Saboonchi, Z. (2013). Analytical investigation of effective factors on agricultural land fragmentation and land consolidation challenges (case study: Neishabour plain). Journal of Arid Regions Geographic Studies, 3(8), 1-19. [In Persian]
  • Karbasi, A., Hosseini, S. M., Dadrasmoghadam, A., & Hamidipour, H. (2023). Factors affecting the land saffron integration of Ghaenat, Iran: a generalized order logit approach. Rural Development Strategies, 10(3), 309-324. DOI: 10.22048/rdsj.2023.342077.2021. [In Persian]
  • Karimi Khorrami, M. H. (2015). Agricultural lands at risk of destruction (explaining the effective factors in the fragmentation of agricultural lands with a view to the small ownership system and land integration). National Conference on Land Management, Land Affairs of Iran. [In Persian]
  • Liu, Y. (2018). Introduction to land use and rural sustainability in China. Land Use Policy, 74, 1-4.
  • Long, H., Zhang, Y., & Tu, S. (2019). Rural vitalization in China: a perspective of land consolidation. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 29, 517-530.
  • Luo, W., & Timothy, D. J. (2017). An assessment of farmers’ satisfaction with land consolidation performance in China. Land Use Policy, 61, 501-510.
  • Mahdavi, A., Kiani, M., & Daneshvar Ameri, Zh. (2017). Evaluation of obstacles to the consolidation of agricultural lands (the case of villages in Azna city). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 48(2), 333-342. [In Persian]
  • Medonos, T., Vilhelm, V., Hruska, M., & Jelinek, L. (2011). What determines the Czech land market prices? Some regional findings. AGRIS On-Line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 3(665-2016-44814), 41-53.
  • Montgomery, B., Dragićević, S., Dujmović, J., & Schmidt, M. (2016). A GIS-based logic scoring of preference method for evaluation of land capability and suitability for agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 124, 340-353.
  • Moradi, M., Fal-Soleiman, M., & Abtahinia, A. (2013). Recognition of effective factors on farmers' willingness to take part in farming land consolidation plan performance, case: Khoosf Township. Iranian Journal of Geography and Development, 11(32), 89-102. [In Persian]
  • Munnangi, A. K., Lohani, B., & Misra, S. C. (2020). A review of land consolidation in the state of Uttar Pradesh, India: qualitative approach. Land Use Policy, 90, 104309.
  • Namjooyan, Sh., Vermazyar, M.J., & Molla Ahmad Najmabadi, A. (2018). Collection of laws and regulations related to fragmentation of agricultural lands. Nashr-e Nevisandeh, pp. 316. [In Persian]
  • Niroula, G. S., & Thapa, G. B. (2005). Impacts and causes of land fragmentation, and lessons learned from land consolidation in South Asia. Land Use Policy, 22(4), 358-372.
  • Pourmarashi, S. M. (1996). Consolidation of agricultural lands in Iran and other countries. Journal of Planning and Budgeting, 1(11), 57-82. [In Persian]
  • Rakhshaninasab, H., & Safari, Kh. (2016). Strategic planning management of solid waste in Zahedan city using SWOT method. Environmental Science and Technology, 18(3), 149-164. [In Persian]
  • Rezaei Moghaddam, K., Rahimi, S., & Bakhshoodeh, M. (2014). Individual, economic, social, environmental and agronomic factors affecting adoption of agricultural land consolidation by wheat growers in Shiraz County. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 6(22), 135-157. [In Persian]
  • Sadeghi, H., & Khanzadeh, M. (2018). Strategic analysis of agricultural development by SWOT and QSPM matrix: a case study of Urmia Lake basin. Agricultural Economics and Development, 27(108), 91-120. [In Persian]
  • Savari, M., Mirzaei, A., & Asadi, Z. (2021). Determination and prioritization of barriers to consolidation of agricultural lands in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 13(4), 111-133. [In Persian]
  • SCI (2018). Statistical yearbook of Iran. Statistical Center of Iran (SCI), Office of the Head, Public Relations and International Cooperation, pp. 935. [In Persian]
  • Selmone, E., Dapkienė, M., & Valčiukienė, J. (2016). SWOT analysis of land consolidation projects in western Lithuania. Aleksandras Stulginskis Univ., Akademija, Kauno Reg.
  • Shokati Amghani, M., Kalantari, Kh., Asadi, A., & Shabanali Fami, H. (2018). Investigating the factors affecting the land fragmentation in East Azerbayjan province. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 49(3), 478-508. [In Persian]
  • Shokati Amghani, M., Savari, M., Amiri, N., & Zarifian, Sh. (2020). Identification of promoters and deterrents factors of agricultural land consolidation plan (a case study: wheat growers of Shoush County, Iran). Journal of Rural Research, 10(4), 634-649. [In Persian]
  • Sklenicka, P., Molnarova, K., Pixova, K. C., & Salek, M. E. (2013). Factors affecting farmland prices in the Czech Republic. Land Use Policy, 30(1), 130-136.
  • Viccaro, M., & Caniani, D. (2019). Forest, agriculture, and environmental protection as path to sustainable development. Resour. Res., 28 (Suppl. 1), 1-4. DOI: 10.1007/s11053-019-09497-2.
  • Yan, J., Xia, F., & Bao, H. X. (2015). Strategic planning framework for land consolidation in China: a top-level design based on SWOT analysis. Habitat International, 48, 46-54.
  • Yin, Q., Sui, X., Ye, B., Zhou, Y., Li, C., Zou, M., & Zhou, S. (2022). What role does land consolidation play in the multi-dimensional rural revitalization in China? A research synthesis. Land Use Policy, 120, 106261.
  • Yousefi A, Shahabinejad M., & Amini, A. (2015). Assessing farmers' willingness to participate in land consolidation projects in Meymeh district, Isfahan. Researches in Geographical Sciences, 15(37), 7-24. [In Persian]
  • Yucer, A. A., Kan, M., Demirtas, M., & Kalanlar, S. (2016). The importance of creating new inheritance policies and laws that reduce agricultural land fragmentation and its negative impacts in Turkey. Land Use Policy, 56, 1-7.
  • Zarei, R. (2022). Examining global experiences of agricultural land integration; lessons learned for Iran. Islamic Parliament Research Center (IPRC), Infrastructure Studies Office (Agriculture and Rural Development Group), 18618. [In Persian]
  • Zarifian, Sh., Damavandi, A., & Saadi, H. (2012). Identification of the Factors affecting the Land consolidation adoption by farmers of Kabutarahangh County of Hamedan province. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 26(4), 237-243. [In Persian]
  • Zhou, Y., Li, Y., & Xu, C. (2020). Land consolidation and rural revitalization in China: mechanisms and paths. Land Use Policy, 91, 104379.
مراجع
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 528
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 426


counter
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب