اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات282
تعداد نشریات سازمان80
تعداد شماره‌ها3,188
تعداد مقالات35,336
تعداد مشاهده مقاله51,491,342
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله91,338,947
یزدانی, سعید, نوروزی, حسین, شاکری بستان آباد, رضا. (1402). بررسی مؤلفه‌های اثرگذار بر امنیت غذایی خانوارهای روستایی در استان‌های ایران رهیافت پانل پروبیت کسری. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 26(2), 27-50. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2023.359126.1466
سعید یزدانی; حسین نوروزی; رضا شاکری بستان آباد. "بررسی مؤلفه‌های اثرگذار بر امنیت غذایی خانوارهای روستایی در استان‌های ایران رهیافت پانل پروبیت کسری". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 26, 2, 1402, 27-50. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2023.359126.1466
یزدانی, سعید, نوروزی, حسین, شاکری بستان آباد, رضا. (1402). 'بررسی مؤلفه‌های اثرگذار بر امنیت غذایی خانوارهای روستایی در استان‌های ایران رهیافت پانل پروبیت کسری', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 26(2), pp. 27-50. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2023.359126.1466
یزدانی, سعید, نوروزی, حسین, شاکری بستان آباد, رضا. بررسی مؤلفه‌های اثرگذار بر امنیت غذایی خانوارهای روستایی در استان‌های ایران رهیافت پانل پروبیت کسری. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 26(2): 27-50. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2023.359126.1466

بررسی مؤلفه‌های اثرگذار بر امنیت غذایی خانوارهای روستایی در استان‌های ایران رهیافت پانل پروبیت کسری

روستا و توسعه
مقاله 2، دوره 26، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 102، آبان 1402، صفحه 27-50    اصل مقاله (397.25 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30490/rvt.2023.359126.1466
نویسندگان
سعید یزدانی* 1؛ حسین نوروزی2؛ رضا شاکری بستان آباد3
1استاد گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران.
2دکتری اقتصاد کشاورزی، گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران.
3دانشجوی دکتری اقتصاد کشاورزی، گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران.
چکیده
نقش تغذیه در سلامت جامعه و ارتباط آن با توسعه اقتصادی سبب شده است تا امنیت غذایی در بین اولویت­ها و­ اهداف برنامه‌های توسعه هر کشور قرار گیرد. تدوین و طراحی برنامه هدفمند به­منظور ارتقاء و بهبود وضعیت امنیت غذایی مستلزم شناسایی و سنجش میزان اثرگذاری مؤلفه‌های مؤثر بر آن است. ازاین‌رو، در این مطالعه مهم­ترین مؤلفه‌های اثرگذار بر امنیت غذایی خانوارهای روستایی در استان‌های ایران در دوره زمانی 1385-1398 با استفاده از روش پانل پروبیت کسری مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. نتایج مطالعه نشان داد که متغیرهای ضریب جینی، تورم، مالیات سرانه و بیکاری، اثر منفی و معنی‌دار و متغیرهای درآمد سرانه و توسعه مالی اثر مثبت و معنی‌داری بر امنیت غذایی خانوارهای روستایی در استان‌های کشور داشته است. به­طوری­که با افزایش یک درصدی هریک از این متغیرها شاخص امنیت غذایی به ترتیب به میزان 0/07-،  0/17-،  0/99-،  0/06-، 0/84 و 0/13 درصد تغییر می­یابد. با توجه به اثر منفی مالیات سرانه بر امنیت غذایی و تأثیر منفی مالیات‌ بر توزیع درآمد و درآمد در دسترس و همچنین اثر منفی ضریب جینی بر امنیت غذایی و اثر توزیع درآمد بر آن، با بهبود ضریب جینی و افزایش درآمد در دسترس، ارتقاء امنیت غذایی میسر خواهد بود. ازاین‌رو، پیشنهاد می‌شود در راستای بهبود امنیت غذایی، با توجه به اثرگذاری مثبت ضریب توسعه مالی بر امنیت غذایی و همچنین افزایش درآمد در دسترس، دولت با توجه بیشتر به مناطق روستایی و کمتر توسعه‌یافته با اعطای تسهیلات و وام‌های ارزان ­قیمت و هدفمند، زمینه‌های افزایش سرمایه‌گذاری و درآمد و کاهش بیکاری و فقر را فراهم آورد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
امنیت غذایی؛ تورم؛ ضریب جینی؛ توسعه مالی؛ مناطق روستایی
عنوان مقاله [English]
Investigating the Components Affecting Food Security of Rural Households in the Provinces of Iran Fraction Probit Panel Approach
نویسندگان [English]
S. Yazdani1؛ H. Noroozi2؛ R. Shakeri Bostanabad3
1Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
2PhD in Agricultural Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
3PhD Student in Agricultural Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
چکیده [English]
Abstract
Introduction
Food security is the most important principle for maintaining the health of society, when affecting various dimensions such as political, economic, social and cultural dimensions. Therefore, it is very important to examine the food security situation and identify the factors affecting it, so that practical policy and support solutions can be provided to improve the nutritional status of the society.
Materials and Methods
In this study, in order to investigate the factors affecting food security in the provinces of the country, the fractional Probit panel model, which is bounded for the dependent variables, has been used. The boundedness of the dependent variable (the food security index is in the range (1 and 0)), differentiates this model from the common panel data method. The difference of these variables from the point of view of econometrics is that not only do they have a possible outcome, but they include both the outcome of the corner solution and the continuous outcome in the range of zero and one.
Results and Discussion
According to the obtained results, using the fractional Probit panel approach, the variables of Gini coefficient, per capita tax, unemployment and inflation, have a negative and significant sign, and the variables of per capita income and financial development index have a positive and significant sign. Considering the final effect of the Gini coefficient on food security, it is expected that with an increase of one percent in the Gini coefficient, the food security index will decrease by 0.07 percent. Per capita tax, with a final effect of -0.99, shows that with a one percent decrease in this variable, the food security situation increases by 0.99 percent. Considering the positive and significant effect of financial development on food security, with a one percent increase, the food security index will improve by 0.13 percent. With a one percent increase in per capita income, the food security index increases by 0.84 percent. The sign of the inflation variable in this model is negative and it indicates the decrease in food security due to the increase in inflation. In fact, inflation reduces the availability of food by reducing purchasing power and as a result reduces the level of food security, so according to the results, with a one percent increase in inflation, the food security index will decrease by 0.17 percent. In fact, this result can be expressed as considering that the increase in the general level of prices reduces the available income and purchasing power of households, which reduces the economic access to food and food with higher nutritional value and threatens food security. The effect of the unemployment rate variable on food security is negative, which means that with a one percent decrease in the unemployment rate, the food security index will improve by 0.06 percent.
Conclusions
Based on the results, considering the final negative effect of the Gini coefficient on food security, it is suggested that the structure of income distribution by the government through implementing targeted and principled policies in line with investment in the provision of facilities and public goods and infrastructure, especially in less developed areas and rural areas should be reviewed and redesigned. The implementation of this policy by increasing the amount of per capita income and more public facilities, in addition to the distribution of income will become more balanced and help to reduce inequalities. Considering the negative effect of per capita tax on food security, it can be said that the effect of indirect tax on food security was greater than the effect of direct tax. In other words, due to the negative impact of indirect taxes on income distribution and its high share in the country's tax revenues, its destructive effect on income distribution has been overcome, and therefore, with the increase of the Gini coefficient and the decrease of available income, the food security situation worsens. Considering the positive and significant effect of financial development on food security, by creating a healthy competitive environment in the banking system and making payment facilities efficient, facilities and credits granted to the economic and production sectors are directed and on the other hand, by using new methods in the financial and capital markets, it will be possible to increase the access of individuals, companies and enterprises to financial tools and facilities in order to improve the performance and level of national production to help improving food security. Also, the results showed that inflation has a negative effect on food security. Inflation, especially high and continuous in Iran's economy, causes uncertainty in investment, lower real interest rates, and more depreciation of capital, which, along with the outflow of capital from the country, in the long term, causes a decrease in food security by reducing the purchasing power of the household. On the other hand, unemployment causes poverty by decreasing the household income, followed by a decrease in food security, which due to the two-way relationship between poverty and the destruction of natural resources leads to problems like soil erosion, water pollution, emission of greenhouse gases and the loss of environmental diversity, which limit production and production resources in the long term, leading to the food security situation to be more endangered.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Food Security, Inflation, Gini Coefficient, Financial Development, Rural Areas
مراجع
  1. Amirzadeh Moradabadi, S., Ziaee, S., Mehrabi Boshrabadi, H. & Kehkha, A. (2020). Effect of agricultural sustainability on food security of urban households in Iran: A spatial analysis at provincial level. Agricultural Economics and Development, 28(2), 25-48. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.30490/aead.2020.262222.1005. [In Persian]
  2. Anriquez, G., Daidone, S. & Mane, E. (2013), Rising food prices and undernourishment: A cross-country inquiry, Food Policy, 38: 190–202. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.02.010
  3. Asefa, S. & Zegeye, T. (2003). Rural poverty, food insecurity and environmental degradation in Ethiopia: A case study from south central Ethiopia. International Conference on Development Studies in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  4. Aslannasb, A. (2020). Analyzing the effect of income distribution inequality on food security in the country. Third international conference on interdisciplinary studies in Iranian food industry and nutrition sciences. Center for the Development and Expansion of Interdisciplinary Studies. Tehran. Iran. [In Persian]
  5. Assoumou-Ella, (2019). External trade and food security: The case of CEMAC countries. Journal of Food Security, 7(2), 58-62.
  6. Bagherzadeh Azar, F., Ranjpour, R., Karami Takanlou, Z., Motaffaker Azad, M. & Assadzadeh, A. (2017). The impact of economic variables on food security in the provinces of Iran: Measuring and comparing. Journal of Applied Theories of Economics, 3(4), 47-76.
  7. Barrett, C.B. (2010). Measuring food insecurity. Science, 327(5967), 825–828.
  8. Bigman, P. (1973). An attempt at regional integration: The case history of Kenya, Uganda, Tanganyika. PhD Thesis, Reed College.
  9. Biniaz, A. & Mohamadi, H. (2018). The effect of agriculture trade openness on food security in Iran (ARDL approach). Agricultural Economics Research, 10(38), 81-104. doi: 20.1001.1.20086407.1397.10.38.6.8. [In Persian]
  10. Campbell, B.M., Vermeulen. S.J., Aggarwal. P.K., Corner-Dolloff. C., Girvetz. E., Loboguerrero. A.M., Ramirez-Villegas. J., Rosenstock. T., Sebastian. L., Thornton. P.K. & Wollenberg. E. (2016). Reducing risks to food security from climate change. Global Food Security. 11, 34-43. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2016.06.002.
  11. Carletto, C., Zezza, A. & Banerjee R. (2013). Towards better measurement of household food security: Harmonizing indicators and the role of household surveys. Global Food Security, 2(1), 30-40.
  12. Devereux, S. (1993). Theories of famine. Namibian Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia.
  13. Dithmer, J. & Abdulai, A. (2017). Does trade openness contribute to food security? A dynamic panel analysis. Food Security, 69, 218-230.
  14. Elmi, Z. & Roostaei Shalmani, K. (2014). Impact of development on female economic participation in MENA countries by Fractional Panel Probit model. Economic Growth and Development Research, 4(14), 28-11. Available at: https://egdr.journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_791.html?lang=en#:~:text=20.1001.1.22285954.1393.4.14.1.6 [In Persian]
  15. Elms, A.E. (2016). Understanding food access and food choices among low-income inner city youth: A photovoice project. Theses and Dissertations Barrett, The Honors College Thesis. Arizona State University.
  16. Eskandari-Damaneh, H., Noroozi, H., Taheri-Reykandeh, E., Ghoochani, O. & Cotton, M. (2020). Evaluating rural participation in wetland management: A contingent valuation analysis of the set-aside policy in Iran. Science of The Total Environment. 747, Article 141127. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141127.
  17. Etana, D. & Tolossa, D. (2017). Unemployment and food insecurity in urban Ethiopia. African Development Review, 29(1), 56-68. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12238
  18. Fengying, N., Jieying, B. & Xuebiao, Z. (2010). Study on China's food security status. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 1, 301-310.
  19. Goli, Y. & Moniri, M. (2018). The targeted subsidies act implementation and the combination of agricultural goods in Iranian households’ basket. Journal of the Macro and Strategic Policies, 6(22), 121–140. [In Persian]
  20. Ghanian, M., Mehrab Ghoochani, O., Noroozi, H. & Cotton, M. (2022). Valuing wetland conservation: A contingent valuation analysis among Iranian beneficiaries, Journal for Nature Conservation, 66. Article 126140. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2022.126140.
  21. Hosseini, S.S., Noroozi, H., Pakravan, M.R. & Mehrparvar Hosseini, E. (2016). Effects of agriculture sector producer support estimate and consumer support estimate on food security in Iran. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 47(3), 755-769. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.22059/ijaedr.2016.60601 [In Persian]
  22. Khodabakhshi, A. & Golestaninasab, R. (2021). Impact of the trade openness on food security in oil-based economies (OPEC Countries). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 52(3), 541-552. doi: 10.22059/IJAEDR.2021.291891.668842 [In Persian]
  23. KianiRad, A. & Noroozi, H. (2022). Explanation of factors affecting the natural resources degradation with emphasis on poverty and food security.Agricultural Economics and Development, 29(4), 119-150. doi: 10.30490/aead.2022.355650.1373. [In Persian]
  24. Koizumi, T. (2015). Biofuels and food security, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 829-841. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.041.
  25. kölling, A. (2012). Firm size and employment dynamics: Estimations of labor demand elasticities using a fractional panel probit model. Labour, 26(2), 174-207.
  26. Loopstra R. & Tarasuk V. (2013). Severity of household food insecurity is sensitive to change in household income and employment status among low-income families, Journal of Nutrition, 143(8), 1316–1323.Available at: https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.113.175414.
  27. Masters. W.A., Andersson Djurfeldt. A., De Haan. C., Hazell. P., Jayne. T., Jirström. M. & Reardon. T. (2013). Urbanization and farm size in Asia and Africa: Implications for food security and agricultural research, Global Food Security, 2(3), 156-165. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2013.07.002
  28. Mehrabi Boshrabadi, H. & Owhadi, A.H. (2014). Investigation of effective factors on food security in Iran. Agricultural Economics, 8(Special Issue), 111-121. [In Persian]
  29. Mehrabi Boshrabadi, H. & Mousavi Mohammadi, H. (2018). An examination of the effects of trade liberalization on food security of Iranian rural households. Village and Development, 12(2), 1-13. [In Persian]
  30. Mohammadzadeh, S.H. and Karbasi, A. (2017). Factors affecting food security with emphasis on the role of agricultural sustainability in Iran. Third National Agricultural Economics Student Conference. University of Guilan. Rasht. Iran. [In Persian]
  31. Mostajeran, F., Zibaei, M. & Farajzadeh, Z. (2018). Trade liberalization consequences with an emphasis on food security in Iran: Computable general equilibrium analysis. Agricultural Economics and Development, 26(1), 145-180. [In Persian]
  32. Papke, E. & Wooldridge, J.M. (1996). Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11, 619-63.
  33. Papke, E. & Wooldridge, J.M. (2008). Panel data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates. Journal of Econometrics, 145(1-2), 121-133.
  34. Pingali, P. (2007). Westernization of Asian diets and the transformation of food systems: Implications for research and policy, Food Policy, 32(3), 281-298. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.08.001.
  35. Roostaei Shalmani, K., Elmi, Z. & Karimi Potanlar, S. (2018). Estimation of labor demand elasticity of small and medium (sme) industrial firms by Fractional Panel Probit model. The Journal of Economic Studies and Policies, 5(1), 23-48. [In Persian]
  36. Salehi Komroudi, M. & Shakeri Bostanabad, R. (2019). The impact of climate change on agricultural production and food security in East Azarbaijan Province. Journal of Environmental Science Studies, 4(3), 1801-1809. [In Persian]
  37. Sen, A. (1976). Famines as failures of exchange entitlements. Economic and Political Weekly. 11(31/33),1273-1280.
  38. Shakeri Bostanabad, R. & Jalili, Z. (2020). Factors affecting provincial income distribution inequality in Iran: Using a fractional Panel Probit model. QJER, 20(4), 205-228. [In Persian]
  39. Subramaniam,Y., Ariffin Masron, T. & Hadiyan N.A. (2019). The impact of biofuels on food security, International Economics, 160, 72-83, ISSN 2110-7017. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2019.10.003.
  40. Tadesse, G., Bernardina, A., Matthias, K. & Joachim, V.B. (2016). Drivers and triggers of international food price spikes and volatility. Food Policy, 47, 117-128. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.08.014.
  41. Tian, J., Bryksa, B.C. & Yada. R.Y. (2016). Feeding the world into the future – food and nutrition security: The role of food science and technology. Frontiers in Life Science, 9(3), 155-166. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/21553769.2016.1174958.
  42. M.P. (1989). Economic development in the Third World. New York: Longman.
  43. WHO. (2020). WHO reveals leading causes of death and disability worldwide: 2000-2019. Available at: https://www.who.int/news/item/09-12-2020-who-reveals-leading-causes-of-death-and-disability-worldwide-2000-2019.
  44. World Bank (2020). Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/overview.
  45. Yazdani, S. & Noroozi, H. (2016). Investigating the effect of partial energy efficiency and supporting the agricultural sector on food security in Iran. Ninth Biennial Conference on Agricultural Economics of Iran. Kerman Shahid Bahonar University. Kerman. Iran. [In Persian]
  46. Yotopoulos, A. (1997). Food security, gender and population.
    New York: United Nations Population Fund.
  47. Zaree, M. & Mehrabi Boshrabadi, H. (2013). The effect of financial development on food security of rural households in Iran. Agricultural Economics Research, 5(17), 65-80. doi: https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20086407.1392.5.17.4.9 [In Persian]
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 384
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 163


counter
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب