اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات282
تعداد نشریات سازمان80
تعداد شماره‌ها3,219
تعداد مقالات35,690
تعداد مشاهده مقاله53,565,493
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله92,844,616
Mirzaei, Sahar, Banijamali, Seyed Mohamad, Azadi, Pejman. (1402). Evaluating Domestic Achillea millefolium as a Suitable Plant to Use in the Urban Landscaping of Dry and Semi-dry Regions. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 12(2), 135-144. doi: 10.22092/jmpb.2022.357501.1447
Sahar Mirzaei; Seyed Mohamad Banijamali; Pejman Azadi. "Evaluating Domestic Achillea millefolium as a Suitable Plant to Use in the Urban Landscaping of Dry and Semi-dry Regions". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 12, 2, 1402, 135-144. doi: 10.22092/jmpb.2022.357501.1447
Mirzaei, Sahar, Banijamali, Seyed Mohamad, Azadi, Pejman. (1402). 'Evaluating Domestic Achillea millefolium as a Suitable Plant to Use in the Urban Landscaping of Dry and Semi-dry Regions', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 12(2), pp. 135-144. doi: 10.22092/jmpb.2022.357501.1447
Mirzaei, Sahar, Banijamali, Seyed Mohamad, Azadi, Pejman. Evaluating Domestic Achillea millefolium as a Suitable Plant to Use in the Urban Landscaping of Dry and Semi-dry Regions. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 12(2): 135-144. doi: 10.22092/jmpb.2022.357501.1447

Evaluating Domestic Achillea millefolium as a Suitable Plant to Use in the Urban Landscaping of Dry and Semi-dry Regions

Journal of Medicinal plants and By-products
دوره 12، شماره 2، شهریور 2023، صفحه 135-144    اصل مقاله (1.08 M)
نوع مقاله: Research Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/jmpb.2022.357501.1447
نویسندگان
Sahar Mirzaei* 1؛ Seyed Mohamad Banijamali1؛ Pejman Azadi2
1Ornamental Plants Research Center, Horticultural Science Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Mahallat, Iran
2Agriculture Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
چکیده
In this project, domestication of one of the wild flowering plants, Achillea millefolium L. (yarrow plant) was done to find out its resistance to drought stress condition. Plant samples were collected from the Isfahan region of Iran and were further multiplied by divisions of plants. The study was conducted on the improvement of seeds germination using GA3, morphological and phenological study and to estimate drought tolerance of yarrow plants. The seeds of selected plants were treated with GA3 hormone (0, 250 and 500 ppm) to break the dormancy and improve the germination percentage. GA3 treatment improved the seed quality parameters and the best results were obtained with GA3 @ 500 ppm. The plants propagated through division were cultivated in the field for the domestication of plants and to estimate their potential for landscape purposes. Also, the Phenological cycle of plants was monitored. Attractive flowers, Long duration of flowering and applying green cover during the year was positive points of yarrow for using in the landscape. Irrigation was applied at 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% levels of available water from April to September. Morphological and physiological parameters showed that A. millefolium could significantly tolerate drought treatments until 50% of available water and even at 75%, plants could survive and produce new stems.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Drought Stress؛ Morphology؛ Proline؛ Seed؛ Yarrow
مراجع
  1. Altinterim B., Danabas D., Aksu O. The effects of common yarrow (Achillea millefolium Linnaeus), cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum Blume) and rosemary (Rosemarinus officinalis Linnaeus) hydrosols on the some immunological and hematological parameters of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L., 1758). Cell & Molecular Biol. 2018; 64(14): 19–24.
  2. Salehi B., Selamoglu Z., Sevindik M., Fahmy N.M., Al-Sayed E., El-Shazly M., Csupor-Löffler B., Csupor D., Yazdi S.E., Sharifi-Rad J., Arserim-Uçar D.K., Arserim E.H., Karazhan N., Jahani A., Dey A., Azadi H., Vakili S.A., Sharopov F., Martins N., Büsselberg D. Achillea spp.: A comprehensive review on its ethnobotany, phytochemistry, phytopharmacology and industrial applications. Cell & Molecular Biol. 2020; 66(4): 78–103.
  3. Warwick S., Black L. The biology of Canadian weeds: Achillea millefolium L. Can. J Plant Science. 1982; 62: 163-182.
  4. Farshadfar M. Chromosome location of ISSR markers and genes controlling seed germination under drought stress in wheat-barley disomic addition lines. Cell & Molecular Biology. 2020; 66(1): 101–108.
  5. Abbasi A., Maleki A., Babaei F., Safari H., Rangin A. The role of gibberellic acid and zinc sulfate on biochemical performance relate to drought tolerance of white bean under water stress. Cellular and Molecular Biology. 2019; 65(3): 1–10.
  6. Falaknaz M., Alaami A., Mehrabi A., Sabouri A., Kahrizi D., Karimi N. Cellular and physiological responses to drought stress in Aegilops tauschii genotypes. Cellular and Molecular Biology. 2019; 65(7): 84–94.
  7. McDowell N., Pockman W., Allen C., Breshears D., Cobb N., Kolb T., Plaut J., Sperry J., West A., Williams D., Yepez E. Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought. New Phytologist. 2008; 178: 719-739.
  8. Anjum Sh., Xie X., Wang L., Saleem M., Man Ch., Lei W. Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. African J Agric Res. 2011; 6: 2026-2032.
  9. Niari Khamssi N., Najaphy A. Physiological and biochemical responses of durum wheat under mild terminal drought stress. Cell & Molecular Biol. 2018; 64(4): 59-63.
  10. Maguire J. Speed of germination, aid in selection and evaluation for seedling emergence and vigor. Crop Sci. 1962; 2: 176-177.
  11. Agrawal R. Seed technology. Pub. Co. PVT. LTD. New Delhi. India. 2003.
  12. Blum A., Ebercon A. Cell membrane stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat. Crop Sci. 1981; 21: 43-47.
  13. Smart R., Bingham G. Rapid estimates of relative water content. Plant Physiology. 1974; 53: 258-260.
  14. Troll W., Lindsey J. A photometric method for the determination of proline. J Biological Chem. 1955; 215: 655-660.
  15. Maxwell K., Johnson G. Chlorophyll fluorescence, a practical guide. J Experimental Botany. 2000; 51: 659-668.
  16. Chance B., Maehly A. Assay of catalase and peroxidases. Elsevier Methods in Enzymology. 1955; 2: 764-775.
  17. Rawat B., Khanduri V., Sharma Ch. Beneficial effects of cold-moist stratification on seed germination behaviors of Abies pindrow and Picea smithiana. J Forestry Res. 2008; 19: 125-130.
  18. Chauhan B, Gill G, Preston C. Factors affecting seed germination of three horns bedstraw (Galium tricornutum) in Australia. Weed Sci. 2006; 54: 471-477.
  19. Gashi B., Abdullai K., Mata V., Kongjika E. Effect of gibberellic acid and potassium nitrate on seed germination of the resurrection plants Ramonda serbica and Ramonda nathaliae. African J Biotechnology. 2012; 20: 4537-4542.
  20. Akbari M., Ghobadi M.E., Ghobadi M., Jalali-Honarmand S., Saeidi M. Effect of decapitation and exogenous application of gibberellic acid (GA3) and cytokinin (CK) on some physiological characteristics of stevia. Cell & Molecular Biol. 2018; 64(2): 50–56.
  21. Maleki A., Naderi R., Naseri A., Fathi A., Bahamin S., Maleki R. Physiological Performance of Soybean Cultivars under Drought Stress. Bulletin of Environment Pharmacology and Life Sci. 2013; 2: 38-44.
  22. Kabiri R. Effect of salicylic acid to reduce the oxidative stress caused by drought in the hydroponic cultivation of Nigella sativa. MA thesis. Kerman Shahid Bahonar University. 2010.
  23. Rahmani N. Effect of irrigation and nitrogen application on the quantity and quality of medicinal plant Marigold (Calendula Officinalis L.). Master Thesis Agronomy, University of Takestan Branch. 2006.
  24. Riaz A., Younis A., RiazTaj A., Karim A., Tariq U., Munir Sh., Riaz S. Effect of drought stress on growth and flowering of Marigold (Tagetes erecta L.). Pakistan J Botany. 2013; 45: 123-131.
  25. Saremirad A., Mostafavi K. Study of Genetic and Phenotypic Diversity of Sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) Genotypes for Agro-morphological Traits under Normal and Drought Stress Conditions. J Plant Productions. 2020; 43(2): 227-240.
  26. Eyni Nargeseh H., Aghaalikhani M., Shirani Rad A., Mokhtasi-Bidgoli A., Modares Sanavy S. Response of New Genotypes of Rapeseed (Brassica napus) to Late Season Withholding Irrigation under Semi-Arid Climate. J Plant Productions. 2019; 41(4): 55-68.
  27. Bagheri A. Effects of drought stress on chlorophyll, proline and rates of photosynthesis and respiration and activity of superoxide dismutase and peroxidase in millet (Panicum milenaceum L.). National conference on water scarcity and drought management in agriculture. Islamic Azad University Arsanjan. 2009; 16-17.
  28. Karimi Rahjerdi M., Farahvash F., Mirshekariand B., Abbaszadeh B. The effect of drought stress on flower yield and morphology of Matricaria chamomilla L. in different harvests. Annals of Biological Res. 2013; 4: 145-147.
  29. Jorenush M., Rajabi M. Effect of Drought and Salinity Tensions on Germination and Seedling Growth of Artichoke (Cynara Scolymus L.). Inter J Advanced Biological and Biomedical Res. 2015; 3: 297-302.
  30. Yuan Y., Chen D., Shao X., Li Y., Ding F., Kwizera C. Effects of different irrigation quantities on plant growth and photosynthesis characters of flue-cured tobacco. J Food Agric and Environment. 2012; 10: 1160-1163.
  31. Ashraf M., Foolad M. Roles of glycine, betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2007; 59: 206-216.
  32. Mandal K., Saravanan R., Maiti S. Effect of different levels of N, P and K on downy mildew (Peronospora plantaginis) and seed yield of Planta goovata. Crop Protection. 2008; 27: 988-995.
  33. Sajedi N., Sajedi A. Effect of drought stress on physiological characteristics of maize mycorrhiza and zinc. J Crop Sci. 2008; 11: 202-222.
  34. Farooq M., Wahid A., Kobayashi M., Fujita D., Basra S. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Sustainable Agric. 2009; 29: 185-212.
  35. Hirayama M., Wada Y., Nemoto H. Estimation of drought tolerance based on leaf temperature in upland rice breeding. Breeding Sci. 2006; 56: 47-54.
  36. Heidaiy Y., Moaveni P. Study of Drought stress on accumulation and proline among aba in different genotypes forage corn. Res J Biological Sci. 2009; 4: 1121-1124.
  37. Zhou R., Yu X., Ottosen C., Rosenqvist E., Zhao L., Wang Y., Wu Z. Drought stress had a predominant effect over heat stress on three tomato cultivars subjected to combined stress. BMC Plant Biology. 2017; 17: 24-25.
  38. Rahdari P., Hoseini S., Tavakoli S. The studying effect of drought stress on germination, proline, sugar, lipid, protein and chlorophyll content in Purslane (Portulaca oleraceae L.) leaves. . J Med Plants Res. 2012; 6: 1539-1547.
  39. Mafakheri A., Siosemardeh A., Bahramnejad B., Struik P., Sohrabi Y. Effect of drought stress on yield, proline and chlorophyll content in three Chickpea cultivars. J Australian Crop Sci. 2010; 4: 580-585.
  40. Bagheri M., Yeganeh H., Jabarzare A. Effects of Drought Stress on Artemisia sieberi Besser Germination Behavior. J Res in Agric Sci. 2010; 6: 113-120.
  41. Xiao X., Xu X., Yang F. Adaptive responses to progressive drought stress in two Populus cathayana populations. Silva Fennica. 2008; 42: 705-719.
  42. Koc E., Islek C., Ustun A. Effect of cold on protein, proline, phenolic compounds and chlorophyllcontent of two pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) varieties. Gazi University J Sci. 2010; 23: 1-6.
  43. Gill S., Tuteja N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol & Biochem. 2010; 48: 909–930.
  44. Cuypers A., Smeets K., Ruytinx J., Opdenakker K., Keunen E., Remans T., Horemans N., Vanhoudt N., Sanden S., Belleghem F. The cellular redox state as modulator in cadmium and copper responses in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings. J Plant Physiol. 2011; 168: 309–316.
  45. DaCosta M., Huang B. Changes in antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation for bent grass species in responses to drought stress. J American Society Hortic Sci. 2007; 132: 319–26.
  46. Sairam R., Srivastava G., Saxena D. Increased antioxidant activityunder elevated temperature: a mechanism of heat stress tolerance in wheat genotypes. Plant Biology. 2000; 43: 245-251.
  47. Tatari M, Fotouhi Ghazvini R, Mousavi A, Babaei G. Comparison of some physiological aspects of drought stress resistance in two ground cover genus. J Plant Nutrition. 2018; 41: 1215-1226.
  48. Chopra R., Selote D. Acclimation to drought stress generates oxidative stress tolerance in drought-resistant than susceptible wheat cultivar under field conditions. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2007; 60: 276–83.
  49. Guo Z., Ou W., Lu S., Zhong Q. Differential responses of antioxidative system to chilling and drought in four rice cultivars differing in sensitivity. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2006; 44: 828–36.
  50. Liu J., Xie X., Du J., Sun J., Bai X. Effects of simultaneous drought and heat stress on Kentucky blue grass. Scientia Horticulture. 2008; 115: 190–195.
  51. 51. Jinrong L., Xiaorong X., Jixiong S., Xiaomin B. Effects of simultaneous drought and heat stress on Kentucky bluegrass. Sci Hortic. 2008; 115: 190–5.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 848
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,105


counter
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب