Molecular phylogeny of the genus Sanguisorba from Iran: Evidence based on cpDNA and nrDNA sequencing analysis

Amirahmadi, A., Kazempour-Osaloo, S., Kaveh, A., Maassoumi, A.A. & Naderi, R. 2016. The phylogeny and new classification of the genus Onobrychis (Fabaceae-Hedysareae): evidence from molecular data. Plan Systematics and Evolution 302: 1445–1456.

Álvarez, I. & Wendel, J.F. 2003. Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 417–434.

Ascherson, P. & Graebner, P. 1902. Tribus Sanguisorbeae. Synopsis der Mitteleuropa-ischen Flora, Leipzig. Pp. 384–436.

Bailey, L.H. 1949. Sanguisorba L. Manual of Cultivated Plants. Revised. Mac-millan Co., New York. Pp. 350–351.

Bentham, G. & Hooker, J.D. 1865. Genera Plantarum. Reeve & Co., London, 364 pp.

Bertoloni, A. 1835. Flora Italica. Volume. 2, Ex typographaeo Richardi Masii, sumptibus auctoris, Bononiae, 802 pp.

Brown, A. & Bouche, C. 1867. Sanguisorba. Index seminum horti botanici Berolinenesis. Appendix, Berolini.

Chung, K.S., Elisens, W.J. & Skvarla, J.J. 2010. Pollen morphology and its phylogenetic significance in tribe Sanguisorbeae (Rosaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 285: 139–148.

Daylami Moezi, A.D., Faghir, M.B. & Shahi, R.S. 2019. Flower and fruit micro-macromorphological characters of the genus Sanguisorba L. (Rosaceae) from Iran. Iranian Journal of Botany 10: 53–68.

Dobeš, C. & Paule, J. 2010. A comprehensive chloroplast DNA-based phylogeny of the genus Potentilla (Rosaceae): implications for its geographic origin, phylogeography and generic circumscription. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 56: 156–175.

Drummond, A.J., Rambaut, A. 2007. Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Ecology and Evolution 8: 214.

Edgar, R.C. 2004. Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research Special Publication 32: 1792–1797.

 Eriksson, T., Donoghue, M.J. & Hibbs, M.S. 1998. Phylogenetic analysis of Potentilla using DNA sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers (ITS), and implications for the classification of Rosoideae (Rosaceae). Plant Systematic and Evolution 211: 155–179.

Eriksson, T., Hibbs, M.S., Yoder, A.D., Delwiche, C.F. & Donoghue, M.J. 2003. The phylogeny of Rosoideae (Rosaceae) based on sequences of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA and the trnL/F region of chloroplast DNA. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: 197–211.

Faghir, M.B., Chaichi, K.K. & Shahvon, R.S. 2014. Foliar epidermis micromorphology of the genus Alchemilla (Rosaceae) in Iran. Phytologia Balcanica 20: 215–225.

Faghir, M.B., Ashori, F. & Mehrmanesh, A. 2017. Comparative leaf and petiole anatomy and micromorphology of the genus Geum (Rosaceae) from Iran. Iranian Journal of Botany 31: 58–117.

Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 38: 783–791.

Focke, W.O. 1888. Rosaceae. Pp. 1–61. In: Engler, A. & Prantle, K. (eds), Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 3, Leipzig: W. Engelmann.

Gremli, A. 1867. Beiträge zur Flora von Schaffhausen. Oesterreichische botanische Zeitschrift 17: 391–396.

Hall, R.E. 2001. The stock market and capital accumulation. The American Economic Review 91: 1185–1202.

Hebda, R.J. & Chinnappa, C.C. 1990. Studies on pollen morphology of Rosaceae in Canada. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 64: 103–108.

Helfgott, D.M., Francisco-Ortega, J., Santos-Guerra, A., Jansen, R.K. & Simpson, B.B. 2000. Biogeography and breeding system evolution of the woody Bencomia alliance (Rosaceae) in Macaronesia based on ITS sequence data. Systematic Botany 25: 82–97.

Hutchinson, J. 1964. The Genera of Flowering Plants. Dicotylédones. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 516 pp.

Juzepczuk, S.W. 1941. Rosaceae-Rosoideae, Prunoideae. Pp. 534. In: Komarov, V.L. (ed.), Flora U.S.S.R. Vol. X. Koeltz Botanical Books, 1st edn. Moskva-Leningrad.

Kerr, M.S. 2004. A phylogenetic and biogeographic analysis of Sanguisorbeae (Rosaceae), with emphasis on the Pleistocene radiation of the high Andean genus Polylepis (Doctoral dissertation).

Kalkman, C. 2004. Rosaceae. Pp. 343–386. In: Kubitzki, K. (ed.), The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Dicotyledons: Celastrales, Oxalidales, Rosales, Cornales, Ericales. Springer, Berlin.

Khatamsaz, M. 1993. Flora of Iran. Rosaceae. Research Institute of Forests and Rangeland Press. Tehran, 6: 88–140 (In Persian).

Kumar, S., Stecher, G. & Tamura, K. 2016. MEGA7 molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 3: 1870–1874.

Larkin, M.A., Blackshields, G., Brown, N.P., Chenna, R., McGettigan, P.A., McWilliam, H., Valentin, F., Wallace, I.M., Wilm, A., Lopez, R. & Thompson, J.D. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23: 2947–2948.

Miller, M.A., Pfeiffer, W. & Schwartz, T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for Inference of Large Phylogenetic Trees. In: Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE). Pp. 1–8.

Mishima, M., Ohmido, N., Fukui, K. & Yahara, T. 2002. Trends in site-number change of rDNA loci during polyploid evolution in Sanguisorba (Rosaceae). Chromosoma 110: 550–558.

Morgan, D.R., Soltis, D.E. & Robertson, K.R. 1994. Systematic and evolutionary implications of rbcL sequence variation in Rosaceae. American Journal of Botany 8: 890–903.

Nordborg, G. 1966. Sanguisorba L., Sarcopoterium Spach. and Bencomia Web. et Berth. Delimitation and Subdivision of the Genera. Distributor, Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm, 103 pp.

Nordborg, G. 1967. The genus Sanguisorba section Poterium. Experimental studies and taxonomy. Opera Botanica 16: 3–166.

Nordborg, G. 1969. Sanguisorba L. (Rosaceae). Pp. 152–155. In: Rechinger, K.H. (ed.), Flora Iranica. Vol. 66. Akademische Druck-und Verlagsanstalt, Graz.

Potter, D., Eriksson T., Evans, R.C., Oh, S., Smedmark, J.E.E., Morgan, D.R., Kerr, M., Robertson, K.R., Arsenault, M., Dickinson, T.A. & Campbell, C.S. 2007. Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 266: 5–43.

Purohit, K.M. & Panigrahi, G. 1984. The genus Sanguisorba (Rosaceae) in India. Blumea 30: 51–68.

Ronquist, F., Teslenko, M., Mark, P.V.D, Ayres, D.L., Darling, A., Hohna, S., Larget, B., Liu, L., Suchard, M.A. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542.

Rydberg, P.A. 1908. North American flora. Vol. 22. [Rosales]: Pt. 4. Rosaceae. Bot. Garden.

Schönbech-Temesy, E. 1969. Agrimonia (Rosaceae). Pp. 148–152. In: Rechinger, K.H. (ed.), Flora Iranica Vol. 66. Akademische Druck-und Verlagsanstalt, Graz.

Schulze-Menz, G.K. 1964. Rosales. Pp. 193–242. In: A. Engler’s Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, 12th edn. (Melchior, H., ed.). Vol. 2. Gebr. Borntraeger, Berlin.

Scopoli, I.A. 1772. Flora Carniolica 2, Vienna, 110 pp.

Shahi Shavvon, R., Kazempour Osaloo, S., Maassoumii, A.A., Moharrek, F., Karaman Erkul, S., Lemmon, A.R., Lemmon, E.M., Michalak, I., Muellner‐Riehl, A.N. & Favre, A. 2017. Increasing phylogenetic support for explosively radiating taxa: The promise of high‐throughput sequencing for Oxytropis (Fabaceae). Journal of Systematics and Evolution 55: 385–404.

Shaw, J., Lickey, E.B., Schilling, E.E. & Small, R.L. 2007. Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in angiosperms: the tortoise and the hare III. American Journal of Botany 94: 275–288.

Shaw, J., Shafer, H.L., Leonard, O.R., Kovach, M.J., Schorr, M. & Morris, A.B. 2014. Chloroplast DNA sequence utility for the lowest phylogenetic and phylo-geographic inferences in angiosperms: the tortoise and the hare IV. American Journal of Botany 101: 1987–2004.

Spach, E. 1846. Revisio generis Poterium. Annles des Sciences Naturelles 3, Ser. Botanque 5: 31– 43.

Sang, T., Crawford, D.J. & Stuessy, T.F. 1995. Documentation of reticulate evolution in peonies (Paeonia) using internal transcribed spacer sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA: implications for biogeography and concerted evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92: 6813–6817.

Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 4.0 b10. Beta 10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.

Takhtajan, A. 1997. Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press. New York, 620 pp.

Tantawy, M.E. & Naseri, M.M. 2003. A contribution to the achene knowledge of Rosoideae (Rosaceae) LM and SEM. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 5: 105–112.

Thomas, M.K., Lloyd-Jones, D.M., Thadhani, R.I., Shaw, A.C., Deraska, D.J., Kitch, B.T., Vamvakas, E.C., Dick, I.M., Prince, R.L. & Finkelstein, J.S. 1998. Hypovitaminosis D in medical inpatients. The New England Journal of Medicine 338: 777–783.

Yang, J.H., Hwang, Y.H., Gu, M.J., Cho, W.K. & Ma, J.Y. 2015. Ethanol extracts of Sanguisorba officinalis L. suppress TNF-α/IFN-γ-induced pro-inflammatory chemokine production in Ha CaT cells. Phytomedicine 15: 1262–1268.

White, T.J., Bruns, T., Lee, S.J.W.T. & Taylor, J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, Inc. 18: 315–322.

Wu, J.M., Hundley, A.F. & Visco A.G. 2005. Elective primary cesarean delivery: attitudes of urogynecology and maternal-fetal medicine specialists. Obstetrics & Gynecology 105: 301–306.

Xiang, Y., Huang, Ch., Hu, Y., Wen, J., Li, S., Yi, T., Chen, H., Xiang, J. & Ma, H. 2017. Evolution of Rosaceae fruit types based on nuclear phylogeny in the context of geological times and genome duplication. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34: 262–281.

Zhang, L., Koyyalamudi, S.R., Jeong, S.C., Reddy, N., Smith, P.T., Ananthan, R. & Longvah, T. 2012. Antioxidant and immunomodulatory activities of polysaccharides from the roots of Sanguisorba officinalis. The International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 51: 1057–1062.

Zhang, S.D., Jin, J.J., Chen, S.Y., Chase, M.W., Soltis, D.E., Li, H.T., Yang, J.B., Li, D.Z. & Yi, T.S. 2017. Diversification of Rosaceae since the Late Cretaceous based on plastid phylogenomics. New Phytologist 214: 355–1367.