The effect of Non-formal skills training of livestock and veterinary operators in Alborz province. | ||
| پژوهش مدیریت آموزش کشاورزی | ||
| Article 1, Volume 13, Issue 59, January 2022, Pages 11-32 PDF (542.22 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/jaear.2022.355802.1850 | ||
| Authors | ||
| majidreza khodaverdian* 1; seyed davood hajimirrahimi2; SHAHRAM MOGHADDAS FARIMANI3; Soheil Ghaemmaghami3; Omid Jamshidi4 | ||
| 1Member of the Institute of Education, Agricultural Extension, Head of Scientific Resources Compilation Department | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Imam Khomeini Training Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Assistant Professor of Agricultural Education and Extension Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 4Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Crop Sciences, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran | ||
| Abstract | ||
| In recent decades, the Ministry of Agriculture-Jahad has been holding informal skill trainings for farmers with the aim of extension of new technologies. The sample size was estimated to be 212 using the Cochran's formula. In order to select the samples, stratified random sampling method with proportional assignment was used. The validiy of the instrument was evaluated by panel of experts including specialists of the Agricultural Research, Education . For determining the reliability of the research instrument, the pioneer test method and completing the questionnaires by a group of 30 people, outside from the statistical population and calculating the values of the ordinal theta coefficient θ = 0.81-98 . Ordinal regression findings indicate that among the characteristics of the training course, instructor and content, variables amount of practical hours of the course, ease and comprehensibility of content, the amount of practical skills of the instructor and the amount of use of scientific and specialized visits in duration of the course” remained at the level of significance of 5% and the practical skills of the instructor remained at the level of 1% in the model. Also, the results of nonparametric Wilcoxon test showed that in five indicators, increasing the technical knowledge of users, increasing the skills of users, increasing income and improving the livelihood of users, improving motivation and job satisfaction and increasing quantitatively and improving the quality of products, there are statistically significant difference between before and after participation in the courses at the 99% confidence level | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Keywords: : Job Satisfaction; Livelihood Improvement; Informal Skills Training; Livestock and Veterinary Training; Alborz Province | ||
| References | ||
|
• Adesoji, A. J., Farinde, A. J., & Ajayi, O. A. (2006). Assessment of the need of farmers for future agricultural extension work development in Osum state,Nigeria.Journal of Applied Science, 6(15), 3089-3095. ISSN: 1812-5654. • Babu, T. N., Suhasini, N. & Narayanappa, G. L. (2017). Role of talent management in job satisfaction and employee engagement in information technology industry, International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering, Management, Science and Technologies, RISE •Krishna Sai Prakasam Group of Institutions, Andhra Pradesh, India • Bours,H.)2011(. Evaluation of publicly funded agricultural extension system in Somalia, Rural Sociology, 67 (1): 114-131 • Butt, T. M.,Gao , Q., & Hussan, M. Z. Y. (2015). An Analysis of the Effectiveness Farmer Field School (FFS) Approach in Sustainable Rural Livelihood (SRL): The Experience of Punjab-Pakistan. Agricultural Sciences, 6(10), 1164. • Chapman, D. W. (2008). Options for improving the management of education systems. Policy-making for education reform in developing countries: Policy, options and strategy, 251-272. • Farooq, A., Ishaq, M., and Shah, N. (2010). Agricultural extension agents and challenges for sustainable development. Journal of Sarhad Agriculture, 26(3), 419-426. • Himire,K.(2014). Assessment of progress in improving the situation of farmers in India, Agriculture and Human Values, 12 (6): 62-74 • Jeff Coutts,H.)2015(.Evaluation models promote collaborative programs in agriculture, Agricultural Research and Extension Network paper No. 57, ODI, London. • Kassa,L.)2015(.EvaluationExecutive agricultural extension program for sustainable agricultural development, Journal of agriculture + rural development, No. 1, pp: 28 –30. • Lamm, K. W., Carter, H. S., & Lamm, A. J. (2016). Evaluating Extension based leadership development programs in the southern United States. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57(1), 121-136. • MdoeP.f(2014).Assessment of progress in agriculture, international labour office. • Melinda,Z.(2013).Assessment of national agricultural programs in order to promote globalization, Rural Sociology, 57: 620-619. • Mirgohar, M., and. Movahed mohamady, H. (2008) study of extension and training needs assessment OF agricultural with using of measure differences in the level of technical knowledge and its application Azrvykrd. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education, 4(1), pp. 72-61. • Rajalahti,P.)2015(.Monitoring and evaluation of agricultural research in order to access development indicators, Agrarian Research and Training Institute. Lc call No; HD1486.S83, P 38. • Sandrine,N.)2013(.Evaluation of programs to promote an increase in agricultural information to farmers in Ethiopia, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66 (3): 312-320. • Singh, K.,Peshin, R., & Saini, S. K. (2011). Evaluation of the agricultural vocational training programmes conducted by the Krishi Vigyan Kendras (Farm Science Centres) in Indian Punjab. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics (JARTS), 111(2), 65-77. • Surur, O. O. (2007). Effectiveness of agricultural development training program: the cases of teff and livestock farmers of Alaba Woreda, Southern Ethiopia (Doctoral dissertation, Haramaya University). Toowoomba,A.)2011(.The reasons for promoting agricultural development program evaluation, Ecological Economics, 65: 145-154. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 672 PDF Download: 463 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb