| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,975 |
| تعداد مقالات | 33,408 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 43,903,316 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 20,405,395 |
تحلیل هنجارهای اثرگذار بر رفتار مشارکتی مرتعداران در راستای حفاظت از مراتع (مورد مطالعه: حوزه آبخیز کریم‌آباد، شهرستان دهگلان) | ||
| تحقیقات حمایت و حفاظت جنگلها و مراتع ایران | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 19، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 37، شهریور 1400، صفحه 110-124 اصل مقاله (581.71 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ijfrpr.2021.352007.1448 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| حیدر میرزایی* 1؛ فرزاد احمدی2 | ||
| 1نویسنده مسئول، استادیار، گروه منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه رازی کرمانشاه، کرمانشاه، ایران | ||
| 2دانشجوی دکترای علوم مهندسی مرتع، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، مرتع، ساری، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| حفاظت از مراتع در سیستم‌های پیچیده اجتماعی– اکولوژیکی، به‌دلیل تغییرات مداوم فاقد قطعیّت است. در این شرایط، سازمان‌های مسئول حفاظت از مراتع باید از هنجارهای اثرگذار بر رفتار مشارکتی افراد محلی آگاهی داشته باشند. هدف از این پژوهش، تحلیل هنجارهای اثرگذار بر رفتار مشارکتی مرتعداران برای حفاظت از مراتعِ شهرستان دهگُلان است. این مطالعه جزو تحقیقات توصیفی-همبستگی است که در آن از تکنیک پیمایش برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها استفاده شده است. جامعه آماری شامل 418 مرتع‌دار بود که نمونه‌ها به‌صورت تصادفی انتخاب شدند. روش گردآوری داده‌ها و اطلاعات، پرسشنامه بوده است. نتیجه تحلیل توصیفی شاخص‌ها نشان داد که رابطه رفتار مشارکتی مرتعداران و سه متغیر باورهای هنجاری، هنجارهای قانونی و هنجارهای مشارکتی در سطح متوسط بودند. همچنین نتایج بررسی ضریب همبستگی اسپیرمن نشان داد که متغیرهای باورهای هنجاری، هنجارهای قانونی و هنجارهای مشارکتی با متغیر دوم (رفتار مشارکتی مرتعداران در زمینه حفاظت از مراتع) در سطح خطای یک درصد رابطه مثبت و معنی‌داری داشتند. به‌علاوه، نتایج حاصل از تحلیل مسیر نشان داد که بیشترین اثرگذاری مستقیم و غیرمستقیم و بیشترین اثر کل بر رفتار مشارکتی مرتعداران مربوط به متغیر باورهای هنجاری بود. بنابراین به نظر می‌رسد که به هر میزان هنجارها و باورهای مرتعداران در زمینه حفاظت از مراتع بهبود پیدا کند، رفتار مشارکتی مناسب‌تری را از خود بروز می‌دهند که در این شرایط شاهد پایداری مراتع خواهیم بود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| رفتار مشارکتی؛ باورهای هنجاری؛ هنجارهای قانونی؛ هنجارهای مشارکتی؛ حفاظت از مرتع | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Analyzing Effective Norms on Pastoralists Participatory Behavior toward Rangeland Conservation (The Case of Study: Karimaabad watershed, Dehgolan city). | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Heydar Mirzaei1؛ farzad ahmadi2 | ||
| 1Department of Natural Resources, Razi University | ||
| 2Department of Rangeland Management, Agriculture and Natural Resources Unversity of Sari | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Rangeland protection in complex socio-ecological systems has uncertainties due to constant changes, therefore rangeland protection organizations need to understand the norms that affect the participatory behavior of local people. This study was conducted to analyze the norms affecting the participatory behavior of ranchers for protection of rangelands in Dehgolan city in Kurdistan province. This study is a descriptive-correlational research in which the survey technique is used to collect data. The statistical populations consisted of 418 rangers and the samples were randomly selected. The method of data collection and information was a questionnaire. The result of descriptive analysis of indicators showed that the relation between participatory behavior of ranchers and three independent variables including normative beliefs, legal norms and participatory norms, was moderate. Also, the results of Spearman correlation coefficient showed that all three independent variables have a positive and significant relationship with the dependent variable (participatory behavior of ranchers) at the level of 1%. The route analysis’s results showed that the most direct and indirect effects and the most total effect on the participatory behavior of ranchers were related to the variable of normative beliefs. It seems as much as the norms and beliefs of the ranchers regarding to rangeland protection improve, they will show more appropriate participatory behavior, in which stability of rangeland will be increased. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| participatory behavior, normative beliefs, legal norms, participatory norms, rangeland protection | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
-Bamberg, S., 2013. Changing environmentally harmful behaviors: A stage model of self-regulated behavioral change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34:151-159.
-Bhanot, S.P., 2021. Isolating the effect of injunctive norms on conservation behavior: New evidence from a field experiment in California. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 163: 30-42.
-Corral-Verdugo, V. and Frías-Armenta, M., 2006. Personal normative beliefs, antisocial behavior, and residential water conservation. Environment and Behavior, 38 (3): 406-421.
-Zhang, Y. and Hawk, S.T., 2022. I buy stability in a buying world: Social norms about materialism moderate the relation between perceived self-esteem stability and materialistic values. Personality and Individual Differences, 184 (4): 311-322.
-Eddy, I.M., Gergel, S.E., Coops, N.C., Henebry, G.M., Levine, J., Zerriffi, H. and Shibkov, E., 2017. Integrating remote sensing and local ecological knowledge to monitor rangeland dynamics. Ecological Indicators, 82: 106-116.
-Engel, M., Vaske, J.J. and Bath, A. J., 2020. Value orientations and beliefs contribute to the formation of a marine conservation personal norm. Journal for Nature Conservation, 55 (1): 128-140.
-Fan, J.W., Zhong, H.P., Chen, L.B. and Zhang, W.Y., 2007. Some scientific problems of grassland degradation in arid and semi-arid regions in northern China. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 29(5): 95-101.
-Folke, C., 2006. Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16 (3): 253-267.
-High, C. and Nemes, G., 2007. Social learning in LEADER: Exogenous, endogenous and hybrid evaluation in rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 47(2): 103-119.
-Hurlimann, A., Dolnicar, S. and Meyer, P., 2001. Understanding behavior to inform water supply management in developed nations–A review of literature, conceptual model and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(1): 47-56.
-Katuwal, H., 2012. Demand for water quality: empirical evidence from a knowledge, attitude, behavior, and choice experiment survey about the Bagmati River in Kathmandu, Nepal. PhD Dissertation at University of New Mexico, 180p.
-Klöckner, C.A., 2013. A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behavior: A metaanalysis. Global Environmental Change, 23(5): 1028-1038.
-Kollmuss, A. and Agyeman, J., 2002. Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?. Environmental Education Research, 8(3): 239-260.
-Kovács, E., Mile, O., Fabók, V., Margóczi, K., Kalóczkai, Á., Kasza, V. and Mihók, B., 2021. Fostering adaptive co-management with stakeholder participation in the surroundings of soda pans in Kiskunság, Hungary–An assessment. Land Use Policy, 100: 166-179.
-Latif, S.A., Omar, M.S., Bidin, Y.H. and Awang, Z., 2013. Role of Environmental knowledge in creating pro-environmental residents. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 105: 866-874. -Lee, Y.K., Kim, S., Kim, M.S. and Choi, J.G., 2014. Antecedents and interrelationships of three types of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Business Research, 67(10): 2097-2105 -Mahdavi, D., Gheidari sajacy, H. and Mahmoudi, H., 2019. Analysis of ecological attitude and behavior of nomadic communities after the implementation of participatory management plan Forests and rangelands in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province. Journal of Geography and Environmental Planning. 74(2): 155-135 (in Persian).
-Nan, Z., 2005. The grassland farming system and sustainable agricultural development in China. Grassland Science, 5 (1): 15-19.
-Noguera-Méndez, P., Molera, L. and Semitiel-García, M., 2016. The role of social learning in fostering farmers’ pro-environmental values and intentions. Journal of Rural Studies, 46: 81-92.
-Ohta, R., Ryu, Y. and Otani, J., 2020. Rural physicians' perceptions about the challenges of participating in interprofessional collaboration: Insights from a focus group interview. Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice, 20(10): 255-267.
-Prager, K., Nienaber, B., Neumann, B. and Phillips, A., 2015. How should rural policy be evaluated if it aims to foster community involvement in environmental management?. Journal of Rural Studies, 37: 120-131.
-Putnam, R.D., 2001. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. United States: Simon and Schuster. Harvard University, 544p.
-Ranjbar, B., Naimi, A. and Nahavandian, F., 2019. Analysis of norms affecting the participatory behavior of farmers in order to protect the water of Zarivar wetland watershed in Marivan city. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education, 15(2): 16-1 (in Persian).
-Salehi, S., Chizari, M., Sedighy, H. and Bijani, M., 2017. The effect of environmental beliefs on the sustainable behavior of farmers in Fars province in the exploitation of groundwater resources. Journal of Science and Promotion of Agricultural Education, 13(1): 193-175 (in Persian).
-Schultz, P.W., 2002. Knowledge, information, and household recycling: Examining the knowledge-deficit model of behavior change. In New Tools for Environmental Protection, Education, Information, and Voluntary measures (pp. 67-82), Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
-SFA, 2005. A bulletin of status quo of desertification and sandification in China. State Forestry Administration Beijing. 25p.
-SFA, 2011. A bulletin of status quo of desertification and sandification in China, State Forestry Administration Beijing 27p.
-SFA, 2015. A bulletin of status quo of desertification and sandification in China, State Forestry Administration Beijing 29p.
-Stern, P.C., 2000. New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3): 407-424.
-Valizadeh, N., Bijani, M. and Abbasi, A., 2015. Environmental analysis of farmers' participatory behavior in the protection of surface water resources in the southern catchment area of Lake Urmia. Journal of Science and Extension of Agricultural Education, 11(2): 201-183 (in Persian).
-Vucetich, J,A. and Nelson, M.P., 2010. Sustainability: virtuous or vulgar?. BioScience, 60(7): 539-544.
-Wang, F., Pan, X., Wang, D., Shen, C. and Lu, Q., 2013. Combating desertification in China: past, present and future. Land Use Policy, 31: 311-313.
-Willcox, A.S. and Giuliano, W.M., 2014. Explaining cattle rancher participation in wildlife conservation technical assistance programs in the southeastern United States. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 6(6): 629-635.
-Yazdani, H., 2016. Investigating the effective factors on environmental behaviors of Zarivar Lake stakeholders in Marivan city. Master Thesis in Rural Development, Faculty of Agriculture, Zanjan University, 150p (in Persian).
-Yazdanpanah, M., Vital, D. and Zamani, Gh., 2011. Analysis of behavior and behavioral tendencies of employees of agricultural organizations towards water conservation: application of evolved theory of planned behavior. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1(9): 22-1.
-Zahedi Mazandarani, M.J., Shiani, M. and Alipour, P., 2014. The impact of participatory norms on social welfare. Social Welfare Quarterly, 14(52): 33-63 (in Persian).
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 865 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 352 |
||