| تعداد نشریات | 282 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 80 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 3,196 |
| تعداد مقالات | 35,423 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 52,257,275 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 91,785,993 |
بررسی اثر تخریب جنگل های هیرکانی استان گلستان در افزایش انتشار گازهای گلخانه ای | ||
| تحقیقات حمایت و حفاظت جنگلها و مراتع ایران | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 19، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 37، شهریور 1400، صفحه 76-93 اصل مقاله (922.53 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ijfrpr.2021.351863.1446 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| حمیدرضا کامیاب* 1؛ زهرا اسدالهی2 | ||
| 1نویسنده مسئول، استادیار، گروه محیطزیست، دانشکده شیلات و محیطزیست، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گلستان، ایران | ||
| 2استادیار، گروه شیلات و محیطزیست، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه لرستان، خرمآباد، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| اکوسیستمهای جنگلی خدمات متنوع اکوسیستمی را فراهم میکنند که برای پایداری زیستی و حفظ پیچیدگی اکوسیستمها مهم هستند. یکی از مهمترین خدمات اکوسیستمی جنگل، تعدیل اقلیم است. از یک سو، کربن از طریق رشد درختان در منابع جنگلی ذخیره میشود و از طرف دیگر، فعالیتهای تغییر کاربری/پوشش زمین باعث تاثیر بر این ذخایر کربن میشود. به دلیل اثرات جنگلزدایی هیرکانی، در این مطالعه به بررسی اثرات تخریب جنگل بر انتشار گازهای گلخانهای در استان گلستان بر اساس برنامه REDD پرداخته شده است. چهار منبع ذخیره کربن شامل کربن روزمینی، زیرزمینی، لاشبرگ و کربن آلی خاک با مرور 31 مطالعه داخلی و گزارش IPCC استخراج گردید. برای پیشبینی میزان تخریب جنگل تا سال 1427 در سناریوی پایه REDD، زنجیره مارکوف استفاده شد. در سناریوی پایه، انتشار گاز دیاکسید کربن تا سال 1427 معادل 43655427 تن برآورد گردید. تبدیل جنگل به سایر کاربریها در اثر آتشسوزی منبع مهم انتشار گازهای گلخانهای مانند CH4 وN2O است. اطلاعات آتشسوزی در استان گلستان نشاندهنده وقوع 1511 فقره آتشسوزی از سال 1390 تا 1397 است، نتایج نشان داد که انتشار گازهای گلخانهای در اثر آتشسوزی نیز 51/16083 تن معادل دیاکسید کربن برآورد گردید. بالاترین میزان انتشار گاز دیاکسید کربن معادل 17 میلیون تن در شهرستان مراوه تپه است. نتایج این مطالعه نشان داد که جنگلهای هیرکانی نقش مهمی در کاهش انتشار گازهای گلخانهای دارد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| جنگلزدایی؛ انتشار گازهای گلخانهای؛ پروژه REDD؛ آتشسوزی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| A study on the effects of Hyrcanian deforestation on greenhouse gases emission in Golestan Province | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Hamidreza Kamyab1؛ Zahra Asadolahi2 | ||
| 1Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources | ||
| 2Lorestan University | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Forest ecosystems provide a wide range of multiple ecosystem services (ESs) that are important for sustaining life on earth and maintaining the integrity of the ecosystems. One of the most important forest ESs is climate regulation. On one hand, carbon accumulates through growth of trees into forest growing stock. On the other hand, Land use/land cover (LULC) change activities impact carbon stocks. Because of the ongoing Hyrcanian deforestation, we focused on how different LU change affect GHGs emissions in Golestan province based on REDD project. Four carbon pools include above-ground, below-ground, litter and soil organic carbon provided by the results of reviewing 31 internal studies and IPCC reports. For projection of 2047 year deforestation under the baseline scenario, the Markov Chain was used. With the implementation of the base scenario, the CO2 emission was estimated at 43655472 tons by 2047. The conversion of forests to other LULC types by fire is an important source of other GHGs emissions such as CH4 and N2O. Forest fire information of Golestan province shows that since the year 2011 to 2018, 1511 fires have occurred. The results showed that fire would emitted 16083.51 tCO2e GHGs (CH4 and N2O) by the year 2047. The highest emission rates of CO2 equal to 17 million tons occurred in Marave-Tappeh township. The results shows the important role of Hyrcanian forests in reducing GHGs emission. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Deforestation, GHGs emission, REDD, Fire | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
-Abbas Nejad, B. and Khajedin, J., 2014. Effect of urban reforestation on carbon sequestration in arid soils using remote sensing technology. Journal of RS and GIS for Natural Resources, 5(2): 75-88.
-Abdi, N.A., Madah, A.H. and Zahedi, A.G., 2008. Estimation of carbon sequestration in Astragalus rangelands of Markazi province (Case study: Malmir rangeland in Shazand region). Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 15(2): 269-282.
-Amani, M., Madah Arefi, H. 2003. Investigatin of the carbon sequestration potential in haloxylon land and feature strategy. The First National Conference on Haloxylon, Kerman, Iran (In Persian).
-Asgharnezhad, L., Akbarlou, M. and Karkaj, E.S., 2013. Influences of grazing and enclosure on carbon sequestration Puccenilia distans (Jacq.) Parl. and soil carbon sequestration (case study: Gomishan wetlands). International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production, 4(8): 1936-1941.
-Badeyan, Z., 2006. Relationship between Carbon sequestration and pH of soil in mixed Fagus orientalis forest. MSc thesis, Department of Forestry and Forest Economics, Tehran University, 111p.
-Badehian, Z. and Mansouri, M., 2017. Determine the amount of carbon sequestration in rangeland species (case study: Atriplex canescens). Human and Environment, 15(4): 1-10.
-Badehiyan, Z., Mansoori, M., Foshat, M. Fakhari., M. and Hosseini, M., 2016. Investigation on the soil carbon sequestration in natural forest and different plantation types (case study: Chamestan forest, Mazandaran). Forest and Wood Products, 69(3): 523-534.
-Bordbar, S.K. and Mortazavi Jahromi, S.M., 2006. Carbon sequestration potential of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. and Acacia salicina Lindl. plantation in western areas of Fars province. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi, 19(1): 95-103.
-Bos, A.B., De Sy, V., Duchelle, A.E., Herold, M., Martius, C. and Tsendbazar, N.E., 2019. Global data and tools for local forest cover loss and REDD+ performance assessment: Accuracy, uncertainty, complementarity and impact. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 80: 295-311.
-Cairns, M.A., Brown, S., Helmer, E.H. and Baumgardner, G.A., 1997. Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests. Oecologia, 111(1): 1-11.
-Eastman, J.R., 2015. TerrSet manual. Worcester, Massachusetts, US: Clark University, 390p.
-Eggleston, H. S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T. and Tanabe, K., 2006. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.
-Falahatkar, S., 2018. Concentration in changes of CO2 and CH4 greenhouse gases relation to environmental variable in Iran. Iranian Journal of Applied Ecology, 6(22): 65-79.
-Fund, B., 2008. Methodology for estimating reductions of GHG emissions from mosaic deforestation. RED-NM-001, version, 1, Washington, DC, 69p.
-Gholami, H., Azarnivand, H. and Biniaz, M., 2014. Study and comparison of the carbon sequestration by Atriplex canescens and Hulthemia persica in Nowdahak Range Research Station, Qazvin province. Quarterly Journal of Environmental Erosion Research, 4(2): 40-52 (In Persian).
-Gholami, H., Azarnivand, H. Madah-E-Arefi, H. and Rahbaralam, M., 2012. Estimation of carbon sequestration capacity in the planted region with Atriplex canescens (Case Study: Noudahak Range Research Station, Qazvin province). Whatershed Management Research, 65: 23-35.
-Golestan Province Land use Planning Report., 2013. Published by Gorgan University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, edited by Abdolrassoul Salmanmahiny. Gorgan City, Iran, 302p.
-Guadalupe, V., Sotta, E.D., Santos, V.F., Aguiar, L.J.G., Vieira, M., de Oliveira, C.P. and Siqueira, J.V.N., 2018. REDD+ implementation in a high forest low deforestation area: Constraints on monitoring forest carbon emissions. Land Use Policy, 76: 414-421.
-Haghdoust, N., Akbarinia, M., Hoseini, S. and Varamesh, S., 2012. Effects of substitution of degraded natural forests with plantations on soil Carbon sequestration and fertility in north of Iran. Journal of Environmental Studies, 38(3): 135-146.
-Haites, E., 2018. Carbon taxes and greenhouse gas emissions trading systems: what have we learned?. Climate Policy, 18(8): 955-966.
-Hiraishi, T., Krug, T., Tanabe, K., Srivastava, N., Baasansuren, J., Fukuda, M. and Troxler, T.G., 2014. 2013 supplement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories: Wetlands. IPCC, Switzerland, 51p.
-Hojjat Narimani, M., IranNezhad Parizi, N., Kiani, B. and Ghorbali, R., 2015. Effects of plantation with conifers on Carbon sequestration (Case study: Zob-e-Ahan company, Isfahan). Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 23(1): 53-63.
-Jafarian, Z. and Tayefeh Seyyed Alikhani, L., 2013. Carbon sequestration potential in dry farmed wheat in Kiasar region. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 23(1): 31-41.
-Ji, Y. and Ranjan, R., 2019. A global climate-economy model including the REDD option. Journal of Environmental Management, 247: 342-355.
-Johnson, J.H., 2013. Urban geography: an introductory analysis: Elsevier, 2nd Edition, 202p.
-Kia-Daliri, H., Akhavan, R. and Anissi, I., 2011. Timber marking and its impact on forest stand (Case study: Shourab district of Golband region). Iranian Journal of Forest, 3: 49-59.
-Khorramdel, S., Rezvanimoghadam, P. and Jafari, L., 2016. Evaluating the potential of Carbon sequestration for canola fields under Khorasan Razavi province. Journal of Crop Production, 9(3): 22-43.
-Lai, R., 2005. Forest soils and carbon sequestration. Forest Ecology and Management, 220: 242-258.
-Mahmoudi Taleghani, E., Zahedi Amiri, G., Adeli, E. and Sagheb-Talebi, K., 2007. Assessment of Carbon sequestration in soil layers of managed forest. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 15(3): 252-241.
-Massarella, K., Sallu, S.M., Ensor, J.E. and Marchant, R., 2018. REDD+, hype, hope and disappointment: The dynamics of expectations in conservation and development pilot projects. World Development, 109: 375-385.
-Mirzaei, J., Moradi, M. and Seyedi F., 2016. Carbon sequestration in the leaf, litter and soil of Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Prosopis juliflora and Ziziphus spina-christi species. Ecopersia. 4(3):1481-1491.
-Naghipour Borj, A., 2017. The effect of land use changes on soil Carbon sequestration and biomass plant in the central Zagros forests. Journal of Forest Resources Planning, 1(2): 64.
-Naghipour Borj, A. and Farokhnia, S., 2017. The effect of fire on Carbon sequestration of soil and plant biomass in Semi-Steppe rangelands of Central Zagros region, Iran. Journal of Plant Ecosystem Conservation, 5(1): 39-51.
-Nassiri Mahallati, M. and Kochaki. A., 2014. Simulating the potential yield and yield gaps of sugar beet due to water and Nitrogen limitations in Khorasan province using SUCROS model. Journal of Agroecology, 7(3): 315-330.
-Nazari, F., Hosseini, V. and Shabanian, N., 2012. Effect of fire severity on organic Carbon, total Nitrogen and available Phosphorus of forest soils (case study: Marivan). Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 20(1): 25-37.
-Parsamehr, K. and Gholamalifard, M., 2016. Applied introduction of modeling of REDD projects: A strategy for reduce the impacts of climate change. Environmental Researches, 7(13): 189-202.
-Parvizi, Y., Ghafori, A., NIikkami, D., Roghani, M., Mahdian, M., Farahpoor, M. and Noori, A. 2016. Comparison and Study the Carbon sequestration potential of different watershed management mechanical operation and terracing in different climatic regions of Iran. Iran-Watershed ManagementScience and Engineering, 10(34): 63-72.
-Pilehvar, B., Jafari Sarabi, H. and Mirazadi, Z., 2015. Soil Carbon sequestration compression in plantations with different species in Makhmalkooh forest park. khoramabad-Lorestan. Journal of Plant Research, 29(4): 706-716.
-Prato, T., 2005. Modeling ecological impacts of landscape change. Environmental Modeling and Software, 20: 1359-1363.
-Rakatama, A., Pandit, R., Iftekhar, S. and Ma, C., 2018. Heterogeneous public preference for REDD+ projects under different forest management regimes. Land Use Policy, 78: 266-277.
-Rakatama, A., Iftekhar, M.S. and Pandit, R., 2019. Perceived benefits and costs of REDD+ projects under different forest management regimes in Indonesia. Climate and Development, 1-13.
-Roosta, T., Fallah, A. and Amirnejad. H., 2013. Estimation of Carbon storage for Pistachio atlantica Desf. (Case study: Firuzabad Pistachio and Amygdalus forest research, Fars province). Iranian Journal of Forest, 5(2): 131-139.
-Salmanmahiny, A. and Kamyab, H., 2009. Applied remote sensing and GIS with Idrisi. Mehr Mahdis Publication, Tehran, 582p.
-Santini, M. and Valentini, R., 2011. Predicting hot- spots of land use change in Italy by ensemble forecasting. Reg Environ Change, 11: 483-502.
-Sheng, J., Han, X., Zhou, H. and Miao, Z., 2016. Effects of corruption on performance: Evidence from the UN-REDD Programme. Land Use Policy, 59: 344-350.
-Statistical Yearbook of Golestan Province, 2019. Available at: http://simabar.golestanmporg.ir.
-Tabeau, A., van Meijl, H., Overmars, K.P. and Stehfest, E., 2017. REDD policy impacts on the agri-food sector and food security. Food Policy, 66: 73-87.
-Taheri Abkenar, K., Heidari Safari Kouchi, A., Dehghanzad, S., Mostahsanpour, S. and Moradianfard, F., 2018. Estimation of Carbon emissions from loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) forest plantations using Allometric equations. Forest and Range Protection Research, 16(1): 88-101.
-Tahmoures, M., Jafari, M., Ahmadi, H., Azarnivand, H. and Nazari Samani, A., 2018. Quantitative evaluation of the effects of watershed management operations on carbon sequestration and storage in order to reduce climate change (Case study: Parood Watershed- One of the sub basins of Shahrood Basin). Iranian Journal of Ecohydrology, 5(1): 161-172.
-Tamartash, R., Tatian, M. and Yousefian, M., 2012. The ability of different vegetative forms to Carbon sequestration in plain rangeland of Miankaleh. Journal of Environmental Studies, 38(2): 45-54.
-Vahedi, A. and Mattagi, A., 2014. Amount of carbon sequestration distribution associated with oak tree’s (Quercus castaneifolia C.A. May) bole in relation to physiographical units of Hyrcanian natural forests of Iran. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 21(4): 716-728.
-Varamesh, S., Hosseini, S.M., Abdi, N. and Akbarinia, M., 2010. Increment of soil Carbon sequestration due to forestation and its relation with some physical and chemical factors of soil. Iranian Journal of Forest, 2(1): 25-35.
-Veldkamp, A. and Lambin, F., 2001. Predicting land- use change. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment, 85: 1-6.
-Veldkamp, A. and Verburg, P., 2004. Modelling land use change and environmental impact. Journal of Environmental Management, 72: 1-3.
-Vijge, M.J., 2015. Competing discourses on REDD+ Global debates versus the first Indian REDD+ project. Forest Policy and Economics, 56: 38-47.
-Yali, Z.P., Zarrinkafsh, M. and Moeini, A., 2016. Quantitative estimation of soil Carbon sequestration in three land use types (orchard, paddy rice and forest) in a part of Ramsar Lands, Northern Iran. Journal of Water and Soil, 30(3): 758-768.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,750 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 838 |
||