| تعداد نشریات | 287 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 85 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 3,159 |
| تعداد مقالات | 35,108 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 50,530,099 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 90,478,576 |
تاثیر کشت نشائی، تاریخ کاشت و برداشت بر عملکرد و کارائی مصرف آب چغندرقند پاییزه | ||
| چغندرقند | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 35، شماره 2، اسفند 1398، صفحه 175-191 اصل مقاله (1.4 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: کامل علمی - پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/jsb.2020.125719.1215 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سید علی اشرف عبداللهی* 1؛ علی حاتمی2؛ ولی اله یوسف آبادی3؛ علی اشرف مهرابی4 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری فیزیولوژی دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ایلام، ایلام، ایران. | ||
| 2استادیار دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ایلام، ایلام، ایران. | ||
| 3استادیار پژوهشی مؤسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه بذر چغندرقند- سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران | ||
| 4دانشیار دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ایلام، ایلام، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| این تحقیق به منظور بررسی تأثیر کشت نشایی بر کارایی مصرف آب چغندرقندپاییزهدر شهرستان مهران واقع در استان ایلام، به صورت فاکتوریل دوبار خرد شده در قالب طرح بلوکهای کامل تصادفی با چهار تکرار در دو سال زراعی 95 -1394 و 96-1395 اجرا شد. تیمارها شامل تاریخ کاشت در چهار سطح (1 و 20 مهرماه، 10 و 30 آبان ماه) و رقم در دو سطح (شریف و اسپارتاک) به عنوان فاکتورهای اصلی و روش کاشت در دو سطح (کشت مستقیم بذر و نشاکاری) به عنوان فاکتور فرعی (اسپلیت در مکان) و زمان برداشت در سه سطح (5 و 25 اردیبهشتماه و 15 خردادماه) به عنوان فاکتور فرعی فرعی (اسپلیت در زمان) اجرا گردید. نتایج تجزیه واریانس بر اساس امیدریاضی میانگین مربعات نشان داد که تأثیر سال بر صفات عملکرد ریشه، درصد قند، عملکرد شکرو عملکرد شکر سفید معنیدار بود اما تأثیری بر راندمان مصرف آب براساس عملکرد شکرسفید نداشت. تاریخ کاشت نیز بر عملکرد ریشه، عملکرد شکر و عملکرد شکرسفید اثر معنیدار داشت. تأثیر تاریخ برداشت بر عملکرد ریشه و عملکرد شکر معنیدار شد.راندمان مصرف آب براساس عملکرد شکرسفید در روش نشاکاری 1/60 کیلوگرم بر مترمکعب بود که 50 درصد نسبت به روش بذرکاری افزایش نشان داد.عملکرد ریشه در کشت نشایی 101 تن در هکتار بود (54 درصد افزایش نسبت به روش بذرکاری). بالاترین عملکرد شکرسفید با 14/08 تن در هکتار در روش نشاکاری، تاریخ کاشت اوایل مهرماه و تاریخ برداشت اواسط خردادماه بود (28 درصد افزایش نسبت به روش بذرکاری). با توجه به عملکردهای غیراقتصادی روش بذرکاری در کشت پاییزه چغندرقند استان، کاهش منابع آب، خسارت پرندگان مهاجر و محدودیتهای فصل رشد به نظر میرسد کاشت نشایی چغندرقند میتواند راه کار مناسبی برای افزایش تولید شکر و راندمان مصرف آب باشد که با تکمیل امکانات مکانیزاسیون میتواند به عنوان روشی مطمئن برای جایگزینی بذرکاری مطرح شود. با توجه به نتایج تحقیق شهرستان مهران نیز میتواند به عنوان منطقه مستعد توسعه کشت پاییزه چغندرقند مورد توجه قرار گیرد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| چغندرقند پاییزه؛ عملکرد ریشه؛ کشت نشایی؛ کارایی مصرف آب | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The effect of transplanting, sowing and harvesting date on yield and water use efficiency of autumn-sown sugar beet | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| s. A. Shraf Abdollahi1؛ A. Hatami2؛ V. Yosefabadi3؛ A. A. Mehrabi4 | ||
| 1PhD student of plant physiology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant professor of Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran. | ||
| 3Assistant Professor of Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI) - Agricultural Research Education and Extension, Karaj, Iran | ||
| 4Associate professor of Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of transplanting on water use efficiency of autumn-sown sugar beet in Mehran, Ilam province. The experiment was carried out as factorial split-split plot based on randomized complete block design with four replication in two grwoing season 2015-16 and 2016-17. Sowing date (late September, early October, early November and late November) and cultivar (Sharif and Spartak) laid out in main plots, planting method (direct seed planting & transplanting) in sub-plots and harvest time (late April, mid-May and early June) as sub-sub-plots (split at time). The results of ANOVA based on expected mean of squares showed that effect of year on root yield, sugar content, sugar yield, and white sugar yield was significant. However, it had no effect on the water use efficiency based on sugar yield. The effect of planting time on root yield, sugar yield, and white sugar yield was significant. The effect of harvest time on root yield and sugar yield was significant. Water use efficiency based on white sugar yield in transplanting method was 1.60 kg/m3 which was 50% more than seed planting method. Root yield in transplanting method was 101 t/ha (54% increase compared with seed planting method). The highest white sugar with 14.08 t/ha was observed in transplanting, late September sowing, and at early June harvest (28% increase compared with seed planting). Considering the non-economic performance of seed planting method in autumn sugar beet sowing in the province, reduction of water resource , damage of migratory birds, and limitations of growing season, it seems that sugar beet transplanting can be a proper way to increase sugar production and water use efficiency which can be considered as a reliable method to replace seeding by completing mechanization facilities. According to the study results, Mehran city can also be considered as a region prone to the extension of autumn sugar beet sowing. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Autumn-sown sugar beet, Root yield, Transplanting, Water use efficiency | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdollahian-Noghabi M, Study of changes of quantity and quality traits of sugar beet under various sowing dates and harvesting times (M.Sc. Thesis). Tarbiat Modarres University. 1992. (in Persian, abstract in English)
Adibifard N, Habibi D, Bazrafshan M, Taleghani, D, Ilkaee MN. Investigating of Cultivating the Autumn Sugar Beet in Fars Province (Zarghan). International Journal of Research Studies in Agricultural Sciences (IJRSAS). 2017, 3:1-9.
Ahmadi M. Assessing the possibility of autumn sugar beet cropping in the south of Khorasan-e Razavi province. Final Report Project of Sugar Beet Seed Institute, 2012. No. 91.41200. Iran. (in Persian)
Alimoradi A. Autumn–sown sugar beet characteristics. In: the proceedings of the 24th Seminar of Iranian Sugar Factories. Mashhad, Iran, 2002. P. 192-198. (in Persian)
Amiri R, Pirnia P, Rajabi A, Ebrahimi M, Aghaeizade M. Determining proper genotype of sugar beet for short growing season. 31st Seminar of Iranian Sugar Beet Factories, 12-13 August. Mashhad, 2009. P.106-112. (in Persian)
Basati J, Koolivand M, Nemati A, Zarei A. Evaluation of autumn-sown sugar beet production possibility in Kermanshah warm regions. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2002. 18(2): 119-130. (in Persian, abstract in English)
Biscoe PV, Jaggard KW, Farley RF, Messem AB. Radiation interception and sugar production. UK, Roth. Exp. St. Rep. 1979, 1:64-68.
Carter JN, Kemper WD, Traeller DJ. Yield and quality as affected by early and late fall and spring harvest of sugar beet. Journal of American Society Sugar Beet Technology. 1985, 23: 8-24.
Cavazza L. Experimental data on the irrigation technique for sugar beet in southern Italy. 39th winter congress of international institute for sugar beet, Bruxeles February, 1976. 347-364.
Cohen A. Sugar beet irrigation in Israel. 39th winter congress of international institute for sugar beet, Bruxeles February, 1976.5:329-338.
Ehlig CF, LeMert RD. Water use and yields of sugar beet over a range from excessive to limited irrigation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1979, 43:403-407.
Fortune RA, Burke JI, Kennedy T, O’Sullivan E. Effect of early sowing on the growth, yield and quality of sugar beet. Crops Res. Centre, Oak Park, 1999. 20: 25Pp.
Gohari J, Sharifi H; Orazizadeh M. Results of a study on the possibility of sugar beet planting
inIzeh region. Sugar Beet Journal, 1993. 9(2): 41-55. (In Persian, abstract in English)
Haghayeghi SA, Ahmadi M. Study on water productivity and yield simulation of autumn sown sugar beet in Khorasane Razavi province- Case study: Torbate- jam region, Khorasane Razavi Agriculture Research Center. Iran. (in Farsi), Final Report, 2013.No. 44904.
Haghayeghimoghadam SA, Alizadeh A, Ahmadi M, Banayan M, Ansari H. Effect of different irrigation regime on water use efficiency atumn sugar beet. Journal of Research agriculture engineering, 2015. 3(16): 15-30.
Javaheri MA, Najafinezhad H, Azad Shahraki F. Study of autumn sowing of sugar beet in Orzouiee area (Kerman province). Pajouhesh and Sazandegi, 2006. 71: 85-93. (In Persian).
Jozefyová L, Pulkrábek J, Urban J. The influence of harvest date and crop treatment on the production of two different sugar beet variety types. Plant Soil Environ, 2003. 49(11): 492–498.
Karbalaei S, Mehraban A, Mabasser HR, Bitarafan Z. Sowing date and transplant root size Effects on Transplanted sugar Beet in spring planting. Annuals of biological Research, 2010. 3(7): 3474-4478.
KazeminKhah K. The effects of transplanting time on the quality and quantity of paper pot cultivation of sugar beet in the salin soils of east Azarbaijan province. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2005. 15(1):203-212.
Koulivand M. The sugar beet crop. Press and Cultural department of Shahid Beheshti University Jihad. 1988. pp 246. (in Persian).
Khozaeia M, Kamgar Haghighia AA , Zand Parsaa S , Sepaskhaha AR, Razzaghia F , Yousefabadi VA , Emamd Y. Evaluation of direct seeding and transplanting in sugar beet for water productivity, yield and quality under different irrigation regimes and planting densities. Agricultural Water Management. Volume 238, 1 August 2020, 106230.
LauerJ G. Sugar beet performance and interactions with planting date, genotype, and harvest date. Agron. J, 1997.89(3):469-475.
Mohamadian R. Effect of sowing date and defoliation intensity on root yield and quality of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, 2016. 18(2): 88-103.
Mohammadi H, Ahmadpour M, Ziaee S, Fakheri B, Ramroudi M. Optimal cropping pattern of sugar beet growers with emphasis on price and yield risk: the case of Fasa district, Sugar Beet Journal. 2013; 29(2): 246- 263 (in Persian, abstracts in English).
Nasri R, Kashani A, SadeghianMotaharSY,Habibi D. Quantitative and Qualitative Characteristics of Fall Sugar beet in Direct Cultivation and Paper Pot Transplanting Under Saline Soils of Ahvaz. Journal plant breeding and cultivation, 2011. 4(7):25-40.
Olesen JE, Fenhann J, Larsen H, Mackenzie GA, Rasmussen B. Assessing impact of limatic change on crop production using growth models. Environmental models: emissions and consequences, 1990. 6:139-147.
Orazizadeh MR. Determinationof the most appropriate sowing date of seed of three monogerm cultivars of sugar beet for obtains the best plant density per hectar, 1997.Final report No. 7934.Agricultural research center Safiabad of Dezful. (in Persian).
Qasim ZS, Al-Rawi KM. A study on the effect of planting date on yield, sucrose percentage and purity of twenty-six commercial varieties of sugar beet. Mesopotamia J. Agric, 1971. 7:3-11.
Rimon D, HelenF, Cohen A. Effect of spring irrigation on autumn sown sugar beet. 39th Winter Congress of International Institute for Sugar Beet. Bruxeies, 1976. 23:387-396.
Rinaldi M, Vonella AV. The response of autumn and spring sown sugar beet to irrigation in Southern Italy: Water and radiation use efficiency. J. Field Crops Res, 2006. 95:103-114.
Sadeghzadeh S, Shirzadi MH, Aghayeezadeh M, Taleghani DF, Javaheri MA, Aliasgari A. Evaluation of sowing and harvesting date effects on yield and quality of five sugar beet cultivars in Jiroft region (autumn planting). J. Sugar Beet Res, 2012. 28(1):25-42. (in Farsi)
Sharifi H, Orazizadeh MR, Gohari J. Possible investigation of autumn sugar beet cultivation in Izeh region. Final report of research project in Agricultural Research Center Safiabad ofDezfool.1996. No. 9797. (in Persian)
Sharifi H. Research Report of Sugar Beet Research Department. Publication of Agriculture Research Center of SafiabadeDezful. 1989. 52 Pp. (in Farsi)
Storer KR, Schmeh WR, Hecker RJ. Growth analysis studies of sugar beet. Technical Bull., Colorado State Univ. Exp. Station. 1973. 69pp.
Taleghani D, Sadeghzadeh S, Mesbah M. Strategic Framework for Sugar Beet Research. Sugar Beet Seed InstituteKaraj, Iran. 2011.27-2(3):355-371 (in Persian).
Taleghani D, Mohamadian R, SadeghzadehS. Guidance cultivation, protection and harvesting of autumn sugar beet. Sugar Beet Seed Institute. Karaj, Iran. 2015. Office of the Agricultural extension and Natural Resources. 194 pages. (in Persian)
West K. Sugar beet from transplanting in England. British Sugar beet Reviw, 1984. 50(4):43-49.
Yousefabadi VA, Alebrahim MT, Tuobe A, Zand E, Abdollahiannoghabi M. Effect of seedling transplantation and post-emergence herbicides application on field dodder (CUSCUTA CAMPESTRIS) control in sugar beet. Romanian Agricultural Research, NO. 34, 2017 www.incda-fundulea.ro Print ISSN 1222-4227; Online ISSN 2067-5720.
Yousefabadi VA. Effect measure seedling and date transfer in main land of yield root and quality sugar beet in small pieces. Sugar Beet Seed Institute. Karaj, Iran. 2014. N0. 44990. (in Persian).
Yousefabadi VA, Abdollahian noghabi M. Effect nitrogen fertilizer arrangement and date harvest of yield root and quality particulars sugar beet. Journal Iran cultivation science. 2011. 13(3):521-532.
Yousefabadi VA, Hariri Moghadam F, Khairkhah M, Rabani M, Keshavarz K, MostashariM, Froghimanesh F. Seedling cultivation after grain cutting water. Thirty sixth seminar Iranian lumb sugar and sugar factory. Karaj. 2015. (in Persian) | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,099 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,068 |
||