| تعداد نشریات | 282 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 80 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,262 |
| تعداد مقالات | 36,058 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 55,187,748 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 94,186,240 |
مکان یابی مناطق مستعد احداث سد زیرزمینی با استفاده از منطق بولین و روش AHP در آبخیز امام زاده جعفر گچساران | ||
| پژوهش های آبخیزداری | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 33، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 129، دی 1399، صفحه 2-16 اصل مقاله (2.25 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/wmej.2020.126600.1228 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| آیت روهینا* 1؛ حسن احمدی2؛ ابوالفضل معینی3؛ عبدال شهریور4 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری گروه تخصصی جنگل، مرتع و آبخیزداری، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و محیط زیست، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2استاد گروه احیای مناطق خشک و کوهستانی، دانشکده منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران | ||
| 3استادیار گروه تخصصی جنگل، مرتع و آبخیزداری، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و محیط زیست، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران | ||
| 4استادیار بخش تحقیقات حفاظت خاک و آبخیزداری، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان کهگیلویه و بویراحمد، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، یاسوج، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| از مهمترین روشهای مورد استفاده برای نگهداشت و مدیریت آب در مناطق خشک و نیمه خشک احداث سدهای زیرزمینی میباشد. هدف از انجام این پژوهش ابتدا شناسایی مناطق مستعد جهت احداث سد زیرزمینی میباشد به گونه ای که در این مناطق برای احداث سد زیرزمینی محدودیتی وجود نداشته باشد. به این منظور با بهره گیری از منطق بولین و با استفاده از ویژگیهای آبخیز، پستی و بلندی، زمین شناسی، کاربری اراضی، گسل و قنات مناطقی که برای احداث سد زیرزمینی بدون محدودیت هستند تعیین شده اند. سپس با استفاده از روش تحلیل سلسله مراتبی و معیارهای کمّیت و کیفیت آب، اقتصادی و اجتماعی، مخزن سد و کاربری اراضی مناطق مناسب برای احداث سد زیرزمینی اولویت بندی شدند. سرعت ناسازگاری در این پژوهش 0/05 به دست آمد. بررسی سرعت ناسازگاری نشان داد که وزن دهی انجام شده برای معیارها و زیرمعیارهای مورد مطالعه قابل قبول میباشد. نتایج اولویت بندی منطقه نشان داد که شیب آبخیز از مهمترین معیارها در تعیین مناطق مناسب برای احداث سدزیرزمینی میباشد و احداث سد در شیبها بالا مقرون به صرفه نمیباشد. به طور کلی نتایج نشان داد که مناطق واقع در قسمت غربی و مرکزی آبخیز دارای امتیاز بیشتری برای احداث سد زیرزمینی میباشند و با توجه به اهمیت سدزیرزمینی در مناطق خشک و نیمه خشک میتوان بیان کرد که با احداث سدزیرزمینی در این مناطق میتوان وضعیت منابع آبی منطقه را بهبود داد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| اقتصادی- اجتماعی؛ کمیت آب؛ گچساران؛ مخزن | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Site Selection for Constructing Underground Dams Using Boolean Logic and the AHP method in the Imamzadeh Jafar Gachsaran Watershed | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ayat Rohina1؛ Hassan Ahmadi2؛ Abolfazl Moeini3؛ Abdal Shahrivar4 | ||
| 1Department of Forest, Range and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Professor, Department of Reclamation of Arid and Mountainous Regions, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran | ||
| 3Assistant Professor, Department of Forest, Range and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 4Assistant Professor, Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Department, Kohgiluyeh and Boyarahmd Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Underground dam is an important hydraulic structure in management water in the arid and semi-arid areas. The aim of this research was to identify appropriate sites for constructing underground dams, where they do not limit construction of other such dams in this region. By benefiting from the Boolean logic, and using the physiographic, topographic, geological, land-use, fault, and aqueduct criteria, the regions that had no limitations for the constructing underground dams were selected. Using the analytical hierarchy process as well as the quantity and quality criteria of water, economic and social, dam reservoir, capacity and land-use, suitable sites for project construction underground dams were prioritized. The inconsistency rate in this research was 0.05 Investigation of the inconsistency rate indicated that the scoring performed for the criteria and sub-criteria studied here were acceptable. The results of prioritization of the region indicated that the watershed slope was the most important criterion in determining suitable site for such projects, thus constructing dams at steep slopes was not economical. Furthermore, given the geological conditions of the region and high score of this criterion in constructing underground dams, this criterion should be paid more attention to in such constructions. Overall, the results indicated that the regions located in the western and central parts of the watershed had a higher score for underground dam construction. Considering the importance of underground dam in dry and semidry regions, it can be stated that by constructing such dams in these regions, it is possible to improve the management of water resources. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Economic-social, water quantity, Gachsaran, reservoir | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
A–Adamat R, Diabat A, Shatnawi G. 2010. Combining GIS with multi criteria decision making for siting water harvesting ponds in Northern Jordan. Journal of Arid Environments. 74(11): 1471–1477
Alizadeh A .2005. Principles of applied hydrology, Imam Reza University Press, Mashhad, Iran. 942 p. (In Persian). Almbaz-zadeh M, Chitsazan M, Shirmardi M. 2014. Positioning of suitable areas for the underground dam construction using GIS and AHP, Case study: Plain of Jaroo, northeast of Khuzestan province. International Analytical-Research Journal of Resources of Water and Development. 2(2):14–27 Ataei M. 2009. Multi-criteria decision making. Shahrood University, Semnan, Iran. 126 p. (In Persian). Azar A, Rajabzadeh A. 2010. Applied decision making MADM approach. Tehran. Iran. 98 p. (In Persian). Barkhordari J. 2015. The pre-selection of suitable sites for small underground dams in arid areas, Using GIS (A case study in Yazd_Ardakan watershed). International Geoinformatics Research and Development Journal. 6 (1): 18–27. Chezgi J, Moradi HR, Kheirkhah MM. 2010. Positioning of suitable areas for the underground dam construction using multi criteria decision making method with an emphasis on water resources (Study case: West Tehran Province). Iranian Journal of Watershed Management Science and Engineering. 4(13): 65–68 Dorfeshan F, Heidarnejad M, Bordbar A, Daneshian H. 2014. Locating suitable sites for construction of underground dams through analytic hierarchy process. International Conference on Earth, Environment and Life sciences. (EELS-2014) Dec. 23–24, 2014 Dubai (UAE). Esavi V, Karami J, Alimohammadi A, Niknezhad SA. 2013. Comparison of AHP and FUZZY-AHP methods for underground dam site selection in Taleghan Basin, Journal of Geoscience. 22(85): 27 – 34. Eshghizadeh M, Nora N. 2009. Positioning of suitable areas for the underground dam construction on Qantas, case study: Dahan Chenar Qanat of Kalat Province, Gonabad. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation Studies. 17(3): 45–64 Esmaeili A, Abdullahi Kh. 2011. Watershed management and soil conservation, 2nd Edition, Mohaghegh Ardebili, Iran. 585 p. (In Persian). Esmaili Uri A, Golshan M, Khorrami K. 2017. Prioritizing suitable axes for underground dams in Dosbiglu watershed. Natural Geography Research. 48 (4): 659–645. Forzieri G, Gardenti M, Caparrini F, Castelli F. 2008. A methodology for the pre-selection of suitable sites for surface and underground small dams in arid areas: A case study in the Kidal, Mali. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of the Earth. 33(1–2): 74–85. Foster S, Azevedo G, Bal tar A. 2002. Subsurface dams to augment groundwater storage in basement terrain for Human Subsistence-Brazilian Experience” World Bank, GWMATE Case Profile Collection. 52 p. Garagunis CN. 1981. Construction of an impervious diaphragm for improvement of a subsurface water-reservoir and simultaneous protectionfrom migrating salt water. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment. 24(1): 169–172. Gharzi R, Najafinezhad A, Noora N, Dehghani AA, Filehkesh E. 2013. Economic-Social issues of underground dam in Bafreh (Sabzehvar) watershed. 8th Iranian National Conference on Sciences and Watershed Management Engineering, Lorestan University, Khoram Abad, Iran. 8 p. (In Persian). Gupta RN, Mukherjee KP, Singh B. 1987. Design of underground artificial dams for mine water storage. Mine Water and the Environment. 6(2): 1 –14. Haji Azizi Sh, Kheirkhah MM, Sharifi A. 2011. Positioning of suitable areas for the underground dam construction using Analytic Hierarchy by spatial and non-spatial methods. Journal of Remote Sensing and GIS Applications in Natural Resource Sciences. 2(2): 27–37 Haji Azizi Sh. 2010. Determination of suitable waterways areas for the underground dam construction using multi criteria decision making method with an emphasis on remote sensing techniques and Geographic Information System B. A Thesis. Tehran Islamic Azad University, Department of Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System. Ishida S, Tsuchihara T, Yoshimoto S, Imaizumi M. 2011. Sustainable use of groundwater with underground dams. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly. 45(1): 51–61 Khorami K. 2013. Positioning of suitable areas for the underground dam construction. B.A Thesis. Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Iran. 102 p. (In Persian). Mahdavi M. 1995. Water management and artificial feeding of groundwater tables in Jahrom Township. Journal of Environmental Studies. 17(1): 16–23. Nilsson A. 1988. Groundwater Dams for small scale water supply. IT publications. 80 p. Onder H, Yilmaz M. 2000. Underground dams: A tool of sustainable development and management of groundwater resources. European Water. 11(12): 30–40. Onder H, Yilmaz M. 2005. Underground dams, A tool of sustainable development and management of groundwater resources. European Water publications. 11(12): 35–45. Pedrero F, Albuquerque A, Marecos do Montec H, Cavaliero V, Alarcon JJ. 2011. Application of GIS-based multi–criteria analysis for site selection of aquifer recharge with reclaimed water. Journal of Resources Conservation and Recycling. 5(1): 105–116. Pirmoradian R, Nakha’ie M, Asadiyan F. 2010. Positioning of suitable areas for the underground dam construction using Geographic Information System and Analytic Hierarchy, case study: Plain of Malayer, Hamedan Province. Natural Geography Quarterly. 3(8): 51–66. Rahman MA, Rusteberg B, Gogu RC, Ferreira JP, Sauter M. 2012. A new spatial multi-criteria decision support tool for site selection for implementation of managed aquifer recharge. Journal of Environmental Management. 99 (2012): 61–75. Rezaei P, Rezaei K, Nazari–Shirkouhi S, Jamalizadeh MR. 2013. Application of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making analysis for evaluating and selecting the best location for construction of underground dam. Acta Polytechnic Hungarian. 10 (7): 187–205. Saati ТL. 2008. Solution making at correspondences and backlinks: Analytic nets. – М: Izdatelstvo (Press) LKI. 360 p. Shaw K, Shankar R, Yadav SS, Thakur LS. 2012. Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications. 39(9): 8182–8192. Soleimani S, Nikoodal MM, Orumieyi A, Bahrami H. 2008. Positioning of suitable areas for the underground dam construction using GIS and RS (Case study: Plain of Mashhad). 3rd Conference of Iran Water Resources Management, Tabriz University, Faculty of Civil Engineering. 11 p. (In Persian). TabataeiYazdi J, NabiPeyLashkarian S. 2003. Underground water dams for small scale water supply (translation), Tehran, Publication of Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute. 68 p. (In Persian). Telmer K, Best M. 2004. Underground Dams: A Practical Solution for The Water Needs of Small Communities in Semiarid Regions. Scientific Communication. 1(1): 63–65. Trinh HC, Kwon Y. 2016. Effective Boolean dynamics analysis to identify functionally important genes in large-scale signaling network. Bio systems. 137(1): 64–72. Updegrove A, Wilson N, Shadden Sh. 2016. Boolean and smoothing of discrete polygonal surfaces. Advances in Engineering Software. 95(2):16–27. Vanrompay L. 2003. Report on the Technical Evaluation & Impact Assessment of Subsurface Dams (SSDs) TLDP Technical Report. 14 p. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,192 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,279 |
||