Related Links
Desired Characteristics of the University Teacher from the Viewpoints of Students of Khuzestan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources | ||
| پژوهش مدیریت آموزش کشاورزی | ||
| Article 2, Volume 11, Issue 50, December 2019, Pages 19-38 PDF (665.29 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/jaear.2019.125759.1610 | ||
| Authors | ||
| bahman khosravipour* 1; Zahra Teimuri Koohsar2; maryam ameri3 | ||
| 1Professor of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan. | ||
| 2Ph.D. student of agricultural education, University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources of Khuzestan. | ||
| 3MSc in Information and Knowledge Management, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| The research is applied to the target and has been surveyed and the statistical population of the university students mentioned is 840 people. The sample size was determined by Krjesian and Morgan tables of 162 individuals and selected by proportional allocation method. The data gathering tool was a researcher-made questionnaire whose validity was confirmed by a group of faculty members and its reliability was determined by using an alpha-factor of 0.09. The results showed that the most important criterion for the observance of the coherence of the taught content was the provision of appropriate psycho-psychological atmosphere and friendly environment in the classroom, the faculty and the mastery of the course, as well as the faculty's executive positions and the teacher's attention to the regular presence of students in low class The most important priorities were categorized in the form of five factors of communication skills, teaching methodology, knowledge science, personality and individuality and evaluation, and in total, 976/54 of the total corresponding changes Explained. Based on the t-test, it was found that there is a significant difference between the students' gender with the knowledge of scholarship and the faculty personality and faculty, as well as between marital status and facial personality. The results of the test by Croswell Calvolis showed that there is a significant difference between the faculty type with the skill of the teaching method and the field of study with the knowledge of faculty scholarship | ||
| Keywords | ||
| desired characteristics of teacher; University of Agricultural Sciences; students' viewpoint; khuzestan | ||
| References | ||
|
Adombent, M.,) 2013 (. Exploring universities’ transformative potential for sustainability-bound learning in changing landscapes of knowledge communication. Baird, C., & Dooey, P. (2012). Learning in transition: Culture to culture. Journal of the Australia and New Zealand Student Services Association, 39,9 –20. Bergman, K,Gaitskill, T. (1990). Faculty, and student perceptions of effective Clinical teachers: an extension study. J. Prof. Nurs. ; 6 (1). Ebiquity. (2014). Global customer service barometer: Findings in the United States. Available at http://about.mericanexpress.com/news/docs/2014x/2014-Global-Customer-Service-Barometer-US. pdf. Gien- Lant T. (1991). Evaluation of faculty teaching effectiveness toward accountability in education. Nurs Edu; 30: 92-95. Gillespie, M. (2005). Student-teacher connection: A place of possibility. J Adv Nurse. 52 (2): 9-211. Kaiser, J. Retelsdorf, J. Südkamp, A and Möller, J. (2013). Achievement and engagement: How student characteristics influence teacher judgments. Learning and Instruction 28, 73-84. Jacobson, MD. (1986). Effective and ineffective behavior of teachers of nursing as determined by their student. Nurse Res. 18 (2): 6-146. Journal of Cleaner Production 49, 11e24. Raufelder, D., Bukowski, W. M., & Mohr, S. (2013). Thick description of the teacher–student relationship in the eductaional context of school: results of an ethnographic field study. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 1, 1–18. http://dx.doi. org/10.11114/jets. vli2.108. Raufelder, D. Nitsche, L. Breitmeyer, S. Keßler, S. Herrmann, E and Regner, N. (2016). Students’ perception of “good” and “bad” teachers—Results of a qualitative thematic analysis with German adolescents. International Journal of Educational Research 75, 31–44. Sproule R. (2010). Student Evaluation of Teaching: A methodological critique of conventional practices. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8 (50): 1-23. Strikwerda-Brown, J. Oliver, R. Hodgson, D. Palmer, M. and Watts, L. (2008). Good teachers/bad teachers: how rural adolescent students’ views of teachers impact on their school experiences. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33, 29–44. http://dx.doi. org/10.14221/ajte. v33n6.3. Tatarinceva, A. M., Sokolova, N. L., Sergeeva, M. G, Bedenko, N. B., Samokhin, B. I (2018) The influence of a psychological and a cognitive component of a student's thinking style on his/her success in lifelong learnin, Revista ESPACIOS, Vol. 39 (Nº 02) Año 2018. doi:10.1177/0022487114560908. Wright, S. L., & Jenkins-Guarnieri, M. A. (2012). Student evaluations of teaching: Combining the meta-analyses and demonstrating further evidence for effective use. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37, 683. Xu Changfa.) 2018. (The logic of the re-development of labor education in the new era [J]. Educational Research, 39 (11): 12-17. Zeichner, K., Payne, K. A., & Brayko, K. (2015). Democratizing teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 66 (2), 122–135. doi:10.1177/0022487114560908. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 479 PDF Download: 377 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb