| تعداد نشریات | 284 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 82 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,080 |
| تعداد مقالات | 34,362 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 47,740,889 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 78,774,287 |
مطالعه آزمایشگاهی اثر تغییر شکل دهانه‌ی ورودی لوله‌ی مکش بر کارایی میزان تخلیه‌ی رسوب از مخازن سد با روش هیدروساکشن | ||
| تحقیقات مهندسی سازه های آبیاری و زهکشی | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 21، شماره 78، اردیبهشت 1399، صفحه 41-56 اصل مقاله (1.9 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/idser.2019.124921.1371 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| رضا مغانلو1؛ محمد ذونعمت-کرمانی* 2؛ غلامعباس بارانی3؛ امین مهدوی میمند4 | ||
| 1کارشناسی ارشد، بخش مهندسی آب، دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، کرمان، ایران | ||
| 2دانشیار، بخش مهندسی آب، دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، کرمان، ایران | ||
| 3استاد، بخش مهندسی آب، دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، کرمان، ایران | ||
| 4دانشجوی دکتری سازه های آبی، بخش مهندسی آب، دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، کرمان، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در این پژوهش به بررسی آزمایشگاهی اثر تغییر شکل دهانه‌ی ورودی لوله‌ی مکش بر راندمان تخلیه‌ی رسوب از مخازن سد با بکارگیری روش هیدروساکشن (سیفون-لایروبی) پرداخته شده است. به این منظور آزمایش‌های مختلفی با لوله‌ها‌ی مکش به قطر 3 سانتی‌متر در دو طرح 1) دهانه‌های ساده با مقطع دایره‌ای شکل به عنوان وضعیت آزمایش شاهد و 2) دهانه گوه‌ای‌شکل ایجاد شده درمیان دهانه‌ی لوله با چهار زاویه‌ی گوه 15، 30، 45 و 60 درجه نسبت به امتداد لوله‌ی مکش و در سه وضعیت قرارگیری قائم در فواصل 2 سانتی‌متر بالای سطح رسوب، مماس بر سطح رسوب و 2 سانتی‌متر زیر سطح رسوب انجام شد. نتایج آزمایش‌ها نشان داد با فرض ثابت بودن زاویه‌ی انحراف دهانه‌ی لوله نسبت به امتداد لوله (α) با افزایش نسبت فاصله‌ی دهانه‌ی لوله‌ی مکش نسبت به سطح رسوبات به قطرلوله مکش(Hp/Dp)، نسبت حجم حفره شکل‌گرفته (Λ/Dp3) و غلظت رسوبات خروجی کاهش می‌یابد. همچنین در قیاس با آزمایش شاهد، میزان رسوب تخلیه شده در α با مقادیر 15 و 30 درجه کاهش یافت؛ این درحالی است که در °60=α (در تمامی نسبت‌های (Hp/Dp) و°45=α در (تنها در 0=(Hp/Dp) افزایش تخلیه رسوب مشهود بود. همچنین نتایج آزمایش‌ها نشان داد که با افزایش مقدار زاویه انحراف دهانه مکش، حجم رسوب لایروبی شده و میزان غلظت رسوبات خروجی افزایش می‌یابد. یافته‌های کلی تحقیق بیانگر آنست که در نظر داشتن زاویه °60 =α و قرارگیری دهانه مکش در زیر سطح رسوبات، بیشترین کارایی را در فرآیند تخلیه رسوب در پی خواهد داشت. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| رسوب غیرچسبنده؛ رسوب‌گذاری؛ سیفون لایروبی؛ مدل هیدرولیکی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Experimental study on the effects of deforming suction tube inlet shape on sediment discharge efficiency of dams reservoirs | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Reza Moghanloo1؛ Mohammad Zounemat-Kermani2؛ Gholam-Abbas Barani3؛ Amin Mahdavi-Meymand4 | ||
| 1Department of Water Engineering Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman | ||
| 2Academic staff, SBUK | ||
| 3SBUK | ||
| 4Department of Water Engineering Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction Dam reservoir sedimentation is known as one of the main serious problems that mainly affects the efficiency of dam's operation. Sedimentation may also block the conduits and it can destroy turbines, sluices, and valves. So it is necessary to find a way to solve this problem. In this regard, hydrosuction considered as a proper alternative and a potentially efficient method to remove the superficial deposited sediments from reservoirs. Hydrosuction system consists of a large pipeline working with an inlet suction tube lying on deposited sediments in the reservoir. In hydrosuction systems, the deposited sediments are withdrawn, as a mixture of sediments and water, from the reservoir and directed to downstream. The major advantage of using hydrosuction method is its economic aspects since the system doesn’t need extra energy for operation. Environment friendly method, hydrosuction can be used all over the reservoir, where the output and the volume of sediment removal could be under control. Researchers have tried to evaluate and improve the efficiency of this system. In this study, the effects of different shapes and forms of the suction mouth (tube inlet) on the efficiency of hydrosuction system in sediment removal were investigated. To achieve this goal, several experiments were carried out using different shapes of the suction mouth including the plain-type (circular) and wedge-shaped in the middle of the suction mouth. Methodology In the current work, the hydrosuction effective parameters were considered as the follow: water density (ρ), dynamic viscosity (μ), gravity acceleration (g), hydrosuction pipe diameter (Dp), diameter of sediment particles (D50), hydrosuction pipe velocity (V), length of pipeline (Lp), sediment density (ρs), the distance between inlet pipe and surface of sediment layer (Hp), the height of water on the sediments (Hw), the deference of height between water level and hydrosuction output (H), the angle between the head of the suction inlet and pipe (α), the shape of suction inlet (β), coefficient of particle shape (λ), sediment discharge (Qs), scour hole depth (L), scour hole diameter (R), scour hole volume (Λ), and time (t). Extracted dimensionless parameters by using Buckingham theorem are as follow: f(Q/VDp2,ρs/ρ, ρVDp/μ,D50/Dp,Lp/Dp,H/Dp,Q/VDp2,Hp/Dp,Hw/Dp,α,V2/Dpg,Vt/Dp,β,λ,Qs/VDp2,Λ/Dp3)=0 (1) Considering V, t, ρ, ρs, D50, Dp, Lp, and H as constants throughout the experiments, just two dimensionless parameters, Hp/ Dp and (Λ/Dp3), were evaluated in this study. The experiments were conducted in the hydraulic and water engineering laboratory of Water Engineering Department of Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman. The height, width and length of physical model tank (as the reservoir) were 70, 100 and 100 centimeters, respectively, and the diameter and length of hydrosuction pipeline were 3 and 250 cm respectively. Sediments samples were classified as sand with D50 = 0.51 mm. Before starting each experiment, the bottom of the model filled with a layer, 15 cm, of sediments . In this study, the effect of the suction mouth formation, as well as the effect of distance between the inlet pipe and the surface of sediments on the performance of hydrosuction system, were evaluated. The suction mouth formation included the plain-type (circular) and wedge-shaped in the middle of the suction mouth. The wedge-shaped type was considered with four angles of the pipe opening relative to the tube stretch ( =15, 30, 45, and 60 degrees). The values for were considered in three levels of 2cm above the surface of the sediment, on the sediments surface, and 2cm under the surface of the sediment. Results and Discussion The results of the experiments showed that with increasing the ratio of Hp/Dp , (Dp is the pipe diameter), the volume of sediment removal (Λ) decreased. Also, at α = 15o and 30o, the ratio of (Λ/Dp3) decreased, comparing to the reference test (plain-type, = 90 ), while at = 60 , the value of (Λ/Dp3) increased. By assuming a constant value for the ratio of Hp/Dp, the results implied that the ratio of (Λ/Dp3) and the concentration of the sediment outflow enhanced if the amount of α increased. By assuming a constant ratio value of Hp/Dp, just at α = 60 the ratio of (Λ/Dp3)increased compared to the reference test. Results revealed that a better performance of the hydrosuction system would occur by using a wedge-shaped suction mouth, α = 60 , and locating the suction tube two cm under the sediment surface. Conclusion In this study the hydrosuction process with 4 different angles of the pipe opening relative to the tube stretch (15, 30, 45 and 60), and 3 distances of the pipe inlet from the sediment level (above, tangent, and under the sediment level) were tested. Considering a constant wedge-shaped angle (α), the results indicated that by increasing the distance of the pipe inlet (Hp/Dp) from the sediment level, the amount of the extracted sediment will be decreased (ᴧ /Dp3). These results are in line with the results of Forutan-Eghlidi et al (2019). In general only at α=60 the wedge-shaped pipe have greater efficiency compared to normal pipe shape. In all conducted experiments, the middle wedge-shaped pipe with α=60 and Hp/Dp=-0.66 had the greatest performance in dredging the sediments. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Deformation of Inlet Opening, Hydrosuction Sediment Discharge, Sedimentation, Suction Tube | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Chen, S. Ch., Wang, Sh. Ch., and Wu, Ch. H. (2010). Sediment removal efficiency of siphon dredging with wedge-type suction head and float tank. International Journal of Sediment Research,25(2): pp. 149-160.
Cheraghali, M., Ahmadi, A., Saanei. M., & emamgholizadeh, S. (2015). Influence of water height on the efficiency of hydrosuction method.National Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Development. Oct. 29. Shahrood University of Technology. (in Persian)
Fan. J. (1986). Turbid density currents in reservoirs. Water International, 11(3): pp. 107-116.
Forutan-Eghlidi, M., Zounemat-Kermani, M., Rahimpour, M., & Moghbeli, A. (2019). Experimental study on the effect of distance of suction tube mouth from sediment surface on the hydrosuction system performance. Journal of Hydraulics, 13(3): pp. 47-58. (in Persian)
Hotchkiss, R. H., & Huang, X. (1995). Hydrosuction sediment-removal systems (HSRS): Principles and field test. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 121(6): pp. 479-489.
Jolanda, M. I., Jenzer, A., Giovanni, D. C., & Anton, J. Schleiss. (2015). Sediment evacuation from reservoirs through intakes by jet-induced flow. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 141(2): pp. 1-9.
Maghsoudlou-Nezhad, A., Ahmadi, A., Saanei. M., & emamgholizadeh, S. (2015). Influence of suction pipe velocity on the efficiency of hydrosuction method. National Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Development. Oct. 29. Shahrood University of Technology. (in Persian)
Pishgar, R., Ayyoubzadeh, S. A., Saneie, M., & Ghodsian, M. (2015). Experimental investigation of suction pipe holes arrangement effect on the burrowing-type dredging method performance. Journal of Hydraulics, 10(1): pp. 1-12. (in Persian)
Pishgar, R., Ayyoubzadeh, S. A., Saneie, M., & Ghodsian, M. (2016). Experimental Investigation of the suction pipe geometrical and mechanical characteristics effect on the sediment removing efficiency of hydrosuction method. Modares Civil Engineering Journal, 16(2): pp. 67-80. (in Persian)
Shrestha, H. S. (2012). Application of hydrosuction sediment removal system (HSRS) on peaking ponds, Hydro Nepal. Journal of Water, Energy and Environment,11(1): pp. 43-48.
Talebbeydokhti, N. & Naghshineh, A. (2004). Flushing sediment through reservoirs. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, 28(1): pp. 119-136.
Ullah, S. M., Mazurek, K. A., Rajaratnam, F., & Reitsma, S. (2005). Siphon removal of cohesionless materials. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 131(3): pp. 115-122.
Yan, T., Chen, L., Xu, M., & Zhou, M. A. (2012). Siphon pipeline resistance characteristic research. International Conference on Modern Hydraulic Engineering, 28, pp. 99-104. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 963 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 406 |
||