| تعداد نشریات | 282 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 80 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 3,196 |
| تعداد مقالات | 35,423 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 52,251,868 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 91,782,763 |
بهینهسازی ارزیابی سمپاش توربینی باغی به منظور سمپاشی درختان خرما و مقایسۀ عملکرد آن با عملکرد دو نوع سمپاش لانسدار | ||
| تحقیقات سامانهها و مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 22، شماره 77، خرداد 1400، صفحه 19-34 اصل مقاله (785.72 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/erams.2019.126165.1308 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمدعلی رستمی* 1؛ ناصر طاهری خراسانی2 | ||
| 1استادیار پژوهش، بخش تحقیقات فنی و مهندسی کشاورزی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان کرمان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش | ||
| 2کارشناس ارشد و مدیر حفظ نباتات سازمان جهاد کشاورزی استان کرمان | ||
| چکیده | ||
| سمپاشهای زراعی و باغی موجود در بازار برای سمپاشی درختان خرما با ارتفاع زیاد مناسب نیستند. در این تحقیق، یک سمپاش توربینی به منظور سمپاشی درختان مرتفع خرما در منطقۀ بم، بهینهسازی و عملکرد آن ارزیابی و با عملکرد دو نوع سمپاش کششی و فرغونی لانسدار رایج در منطقه مقایسه شد. برای ارزیابی قابلیتهای سمپاشها، هشت پارامتر مهم بررسی شد. نتایج این پژوهش نشان داد، کیفیت پاشش سمپاش توربینی بهینهسازی شده بهتر از کیفیت پاشش هر دو نوع سمپاش لانسدار مورد مطالعه است؛ ضریب کیفیت سمپاشی برای سمپاش توربینی 1/81 و برای سمپاشهای لانسدار تراکتوری و فرغونی به ترتیب 3/3 و 3/84 به دست آمد. در سمپاش توربینی، نسبت به دو نوع سمپاش لانسدار، نشست سم روی زمین به میزان 75 درصد کمتر ولی باد بردگی سم بیشتر بود. میزان مصرف محلول در سمپاش توربینی نسبت به انواع لانسدار حدود 50 درصد کاهش یافت. ظرفیت سمپاشی سمپاش توربینی، بدون نیاز به کارگر، 54 درخت در ساعت و برای سمپاشهای کششی و فرغونی لانسدار به ترتیب 30 و 27 درخت در ساعت، با یک کارگر، به دست آمد. نتایج این تحقیق نشان میدهد بهتر است از سمپاش توربینی بهینهسازی شده برای سمپاشی درختان خرما با ارتفاع مختلف استفاده شود. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| بادبردگی سم؛ ظرفیت سمپاشی؛ کیفیت سمپاشی؛ نخلستان | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Optimization and Evaluation of a Turbine Sprayer for Spraying the Date Palm Trees and Comparison of Its Performance with Two Types of Lance Sprayer | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohammad Ali Rostami1؛ Nasser Taheri Khorasani2 | ||
| 1Assistant Prof. of Agricultural Engineering Research Department, Kerman Agricultural and Resource Research and Education Center, AREEO, Kerman, Iran. | ||
| 2Master of Science, Plant protection Management, Kerman Agriculture-Jahad Organization | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Currently, the available crop and garden sprayers do not have the ability to spray palm trees at high altitudes. In this study, an air blast sprayer was optimized for high palm trees and its performance was evaluated and compared with the performance of trailed and wheelbarrow lance sprayers. In order to evaluate the sprayers in the region, eight important traits were considered. The results of this study showed that the optimum air blast sprayer quality was better than that of the trailed and wheelbarrow lance sprayers, such a way that the spray quality coefficient was 1.81 versus 3.3 and 3.84 for trailed and wheelbarrow lance sprayers. The presence of poison on the ground, in turbine sprayer was seventy-five percent less compared to the trailed and wheelbarrow lance sprayers. The amount of solvent in turbine sprayer is about 50% lower than that of tow lance sprayers. Spraying capacity was 54 trees per hour without the need for the worker for turbine sprayer and for trailed and wheelbarrow sprayers were 30 and 27 trees per hour with 1 worker. According to the results of this study, it is better to use an optimized turbine sprayer for spraying palm trees with different heights. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Drift, Palm Grove, Spraying Capacity, Spraying Quality | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Anon. (2007). Methods for field measurement of spray drift. ISIRI. No. 10493. (in Persian)
Anon. (2008). Field measurement of spray distribution in tree and bush crops. ISIRI. No. 10347. (in Persian)
Anon. (2014). Date dubas bug (Ommatissus lybicus) notes and ways to control it in the form of IPM. PlantProtection Organization, Office of Advent. Ministry of Jahad-e-Agriculture. (in Persian)
Babashani, B., Jilyep, Y. D., Mohammed U.S., & Ndirika, V. I. O (2013). Spray mass flux application variables of tree sprayers. Science Agriculture, 2(1), 16-21.
Behzadipour, F., Ghasemi Nejad Raeeni, M., Asoodar, A., Marzban, A., & Abdanan Mehdizadeh, S. (2017). The regression analysis of technical factors on the drift and droplets size at the spraying by using from Laboratory and software. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 48(1), 109-101. (in Persian)
Endalew, A. M., Debaer, C., Rutten, N., Vercammen, J., Delele, M. A., Ramon, H., Nicolaï B.M., & Verboven P. (2010). Modelling pesticide flow and deposition from air-assisted orchard spraying in orchards: A new integrated CFD approach. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 150(10), 1383-1392.
Fattahi, S. H., Abdollahpoor, Sh., Esmaeilzadeh, E., & Moghaddamvahed, M. (2014). Evaluation of an experimental model for flat-fan nozzles drift in wind tunnel by image processing. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 4(2), 266-274. (in Persian)
Heidari, A., & Assari, M. J. (2016). To investigate the effectiveness of aerial spraying on the control of Dubas bug Ommatissus lybicus. 27th Iranian Plant Protection Congress Proceedings. Aug. 30. University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran. (in Persian)
Jafari Malekabadi, A., Sadeghi, M., & Zaki Dizaji, H. (2014). Design and fabrication of telescopics boom for spraying orchards and comparison with a conventional sprayer. Journal of Mechanical Sciences in Agricultural Machines, 2(2), 28-43. (in Persian)
Jafari Malekabadi, A., Sadeghi, M., & Zaki Dizaji, H. (2016). Comparing quality of a telescopic boom sprayer with conventional orchard sprayers in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 18, 585-599.
Khot, L. R., Ehsani, R., Maja, J. M. J., Campoy, J. M., Wellington, C., & Al-Jumaili, A. (2014). Evaluation of deposition and coverage by an air-assisted sprayer and two air-blast sprayers in a citrus orchard. Transactions of the ASABE, 57(4), 1007-1013.
Manor, G., Hofner, A., Phishler, G., Epstein, Y., Nakash T., & Jacobi, M. (1989). Air stream facilitated application of cotton foliage treatments. Transaction of the ASAE, 32, 37-40.
Mokhtarpoor, B., Tabatabaeikloor, R., & Ebtali, Y. (2015). Assessment of the quality and manner of spraying of toxins in gardens by turbine spray gun and Lance sprayer. The first Scientific Congress on the Development and Promotion of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources in Iran. Sep. 19-20. Association for the Promotion of Basic Sciences and Technology, Tehran, Iran. (in Persian)
Naseri, M., Abbaspoorfard, M. H., Chaji, H., & Heidarzadeh, E. (2008). Investigating the effect of nozzle aperture diameter, pump pressure and tractor speed, on uniformity of spraying in air blast sprayer. 5th National Conference on Agricultural Machinery Engineering and Mechanization. Aug. 27. Mashhad, Iran. (in Persian)
Peyman, L., Abdollahpoor Sh., Ranabonab, B., & Moghaddam, M. (2011). Evaluation of the factors affecting the size of the toxin particles in order to stabilize the Volume mean diameter (VMD). Second National Conference on Mechanization ., & Modern Technologies in Agriculture. March 9-11, Institute of Simaye Danesh, Ahvaz, Iran. (in Persian)
Peyman, L., Abdollahpoor, Sh., Ranabonab, B., & Mahmoodi, A. (2012). Investigating the factors affecting the uniformity of the particle size of the poison using the c.v. First National Congress on Science and Technology in Agriculture. Sep. 10-12. Zanjan University, Zanjan, Iran. (in Persian)
Pejman, H., Torahi, A., & Nikbakht, P. (2006). Instructions for planting, keeping and harvesting dates. Ministry of Jahad-e-Agriculture, AREEO, Dates and Tropical Fruits Research Institute. (in Persian)
Rostami, M. A., & Taheri Khorasani, N. (2018). Optimization and evaluation of a garden turbine sprayer for spraying the palm trees. Research Report. Ministry of Jahad-e-Agriculture. AREEO, Agricultural Engineering Research Institute. (in Persian)
Safari, M., Sharifnasab, H., & Serajeh, H. (2011). Development and evaluation of boom automizer sprayer to control sunn pests in wheat production. Research Report. Ministry of Jahad-e-Agriculture. AREEO, Agricultural EngineeringResearch Institute. (in Persian)
Safari, M., Chaji, H., Lovaimi N., & Amirshaghaghi, F. (2007). The technical evaluation of sprayers used in wheat fields and the identification of suitable methods and machines. Research Report. Ministry of Jahad-e-Agriculture. AREEO, Agricultural Engineering Research Institute. No. 861324. (in Persian)
Scudeler, F., & Raetano, C.G. (2006). Spray deposition and losses in potato as a function of air-assistance and sprayer boom angle. Scientia Agricola, 63(6), 515-521. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 851 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 482 |
||