Related Links
Providing a model for designing the criteria and markers for sustainable management of Zagros forest (Case study: Firouzabad forests of Kermanshah) | ||
| تحقیقات جنگل و صنوبر ایران | ||
| Article 11, Volume 26, Issue 4 - Serial Number 74, January 2019, Pages 551-564 PDF (726.46 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research article | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/ijfpr.2018.118585 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Morteza Tashakori Ghoozhdi* 1; Maziar Heidari2; Ali Masoumian Kaleshtari3 | ||
| 1Member of Scientific Board, University of Applied Science and Technology, Khorasan Razavi Affiliate, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Prof., Forests and Rangelands Research Department, Kurdistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Sanandaj, Iran | ||
| 3Member of Scientific Board, University of Applied Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran | ||
| Abstract | ||
| According to the importance of Zagros forests and their sustainability, it is necessary to introduce sustainability management indicators being appropriate to these forests. For this purpose, forests of Firoozabad district belonging to Kermanshah were selected. The study area was screened and analyzed by DPSIR method to obtain a complete understanding of the relationship between phenomena and subjects. Then, based on the TOP Down method, the series of criteria and markers in different regions of the world were investigated. Indicator Reporting on the Integration of Environmental Concerns into Agricultural Policy (IRENA) was used to design the criteria and markers for sustainable management of Zagros forests. The initial list of markers and criteria was prepared by local stakeholders (A total of 30 people) using Likert scale. After calculating the mean and relative weight of scores, the final list of criteria and markers was prepared. The results of DPSIR process showed that the most important driving forces in the studied area were: poverty, inadequate job opportunities and loss of access to new knowledge and technologies. In our study, 5 criteria and 30 markers were introduced. Results showed the most important and the least important criteria in study area were legal and customary frameworks for forest management (with relative weight of 0.819) and extent and area percent of regional ecosystems (with relative weight of 0.65). The most important markers of the 5th criteria (the most important criteria) were the existence of solutions for eliminating disparities between farmers regarding grazing livestock, harvesting non-wood products and the rate of compliance with local customs in the exploitation of land and natural resources in the area. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Middle Zagros; Likert scale; TOP Down method; DPSIR; Stakeholders | ||
| References | ||
|
- Bossel, H., 1999. Indicators for sustainable development: Theory, method, applications. A report to the Balaton group. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, Canada, 124p. - Carr, E.R., Wingard, P.M., Yorty, S.C., Thompson, M.C., Jensen, N.K. and Roberson, J., 2007. Applying DPSIR to sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 14(6): 543-555. - Farrell, E.P., Führer, E., Ryan, D., Andersson, F., Hüttl, R. and Piussi, P., 2000. European forest ecosystems: building the future on the legacy of the past. Forest Ecology and Management, 132(1): 5-20. - Fürstenau, C., Badeck, F.W., Lasch, P., Lexer, M.J., Lindner, M., Mohr, P. and Suckow, F., 2007. Multiple-use forest management in consideration of climate change and the interests of stakeholder groups. European Journal of Forest Research, 126(2): 225-239. - Ghazanfari, H., 2004. Study of growth and diameter distribution, in order to preparing the forest regulation methods in Baneh region (Case study of Havareh- khole). Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, 86p (In Persian). - Goleij, A., Hasanzad Navroodi, E., Mohammadi Limaei, S. and Jokar, M., 2016. Determination criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management based on the views of experts and local people (Case study: Asalem Forests, north of Iran). Iranian Journal of Forest, 8(3): 365-379 (In Persian). - Haidari, M., Lotfalian, M, Tashakori, M. and Valipour, A., 2016. Investigating the local utilization of forest in north Zagros (Case study: Baneh Region). Iranian Journal of Forest, 8(3): 313-331 (In Persian). - Howell, C.I., Wilson, A.D., Davey, S.M. and Eddington, M.M., 2008. Sustainable forest management reporting in Australia. Ecological Indicators 8(2): 123-130. - Imani Rastabi, M., Jalilvand, H. and Zandebasiri, M., 2015. Assessment of socio-economic criteria and indicators in monitoring of Kalgachi lordegan forest management plan. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 23(2): 199-208 (In Persian). - Moradi, Gh., Feghhi, J., Zobeiri, M. and Vacik, H., 2016. Evaluation of sustainable management indicators in Bagheshadi protected area. Journal of Natural Environment, 69(1): 197-210 (In Persian). - Nazariani, N., Fallah, A., Lotfalian, M. and Imani Rastabi, M., 2015. The most important criteria and indicators of production capacity and legal functions and frameworks (Case study: Namju area, Kuhdasht). Proceedings of National Conference on New Ideas in the Agriculture, Environment and Tourism. Ardabil, Iran, 20 Dec. 2015: 80-86 (In Persian). - Nazariani, N., Fallah, A., Lotfalian, M. and Imani Rastabi, M., 2018. Stakeholders' analysis to assessment indicators of sustainable management of forests (Case study: Lorestan Province, Kuhdasht County). Journal of Wood and Forest Science and Technology, 25(1): 117-132 (In Persian). - Rametsteiner, E., 2001. SFM indicators as tools in political and economic contexts- actual and potential roles: 107-131. In: Raison, R.J., Brown, A.G. and Flinn, D.W (Eds.). Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management. IUFRO 7 Research Series, CABI Publishing, New York, 427p. - Rawat, T.S., Menaria, B.L., Dugaya, D. and Kotwal, P.C., 2008. Sustainable forest management in India. Current Science, 94(8): 996-1002. - Tiryana, T., 2005. Assessment of sustainable Forest Management using fuzzy rule-based model. M.Sc. thesis, International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, Enschede, Netherlands, 107p. - Webb, N.P., Stokes, C.J. and Marshall, N.A., 2013. Integrating biophysical and socio-economic evaluations to improve the efficacy of adaptation assessments for agriculture. Global Environmental Change, 23(5): 1164-1177. - Wolfslehner, B., Rammer, W. and Lexer, M.J., 2008. Multi-Criteria decision analysis in sustainability impact assessment of forestry wood chains- concepts and implementation. In: Dilly, O. and Helming, K. (Eds.). Abstracts of International Conference on Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes. Berlin, Germany, 6-9 Apr. 2008: 235-236. - WWAP (World Water Assessment Programme), 2003. Water for people, water for life. The United Nations world water development report 1, UNESCO and Berghahn, Paris and London, 36p. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000129556 - Xiong, H.B. and Liu, J., 2009. Application of the DPSIR model in the evaluation of ecological sustainable development in Anhui Province. Journal of Hefei University of Technology (Natural Science), 32(3): 305-309. - Zandebasiri, M. and Parvin, T., 2012. Investigation on importance of Near East Process’s criteria and indicators on sustainable management of Zagross forests (Case study: Tange Solak Water Catchment, Kohgiloye and Boyer Ahmad province). Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 20(2): 204-216 (In Persian). | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 963 PDF Download: 713 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb