| تعداد نشریات | 282 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 80 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 3,220 |
| تعداد مقالات | 35,690 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 53,588,682 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 92,863,306 |
تحلیل اقتصادی سیستمهای مختلف تولید بامیه در استان خوزستان | ||
| تحقیقات سامانهها و مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 21، شماره 74، شهریور 1399، صفحه 33-46 اصل مقاله (1.1 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/erams.2018.121717.1256 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمد جوام1؛ محمود قاسمی نژاد رائینی* 2؛ افشین مرزبان3 | ||
| 1دانشآموخته کارشناسی ارشد گروه مهندسی مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان، اهواز، ایران | ||
| 2استادیار، گروه مهندسی ماشینهای کشاورزی و مکانیزاسیون، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان ، ملاثانی ، خوزستان | ||
| 3دانشیار گروه مهندسی مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان، اهواز، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| امروزه کشاورزان به دنبال راهکارهایی برای افزایش تولید و درآمد خود هستند. یکی از این راهکارها، تولید خارج از فصل محصولات زراعی و باغی است. با توجه به سطح وسیع کشت محصول بامیه در استان خوزستان، این پژوهش با هدف بررسی اقتصادی سیستمهای مختلف تولید این محصول اجرا شد که در استان خوزستان به سه روش زیر پلاستیک، خاکپوش و مزرعهای کشت میشود. اطلاعات این پژوهش از طریق پرسشنامه و با بررسیهای میدانی از 120 کشاورز جمعآوری شد که به صورت تصادفی انتخاب شده بودند. بیشترین مقدار سود خالص (278/44 میلیون ریال در هکتار) در کشت زیر پلاستیک بامیه به دست آمد. سود خالص در سیستمهای کشت خاکپوش و کشت مزرعهای به ترتیب 87/06 و 61/94 میلیون ریال در هکتار بود. نسبت فایده به هزینه در کشت زیر پلاستیک بامیه با نسبت 3/7 به طور معناداری از کشت مزرعهای (2/28) و خاکپوش (2/15) بیشتر بود. بیشترین مقدار هزینه تولید (103 میلیون ریال در هکتار) در کشت زیر پلاستیک بامیه به دست آمد. کشت خاکپوش و کشت مزرعهای با به ترتیب 78/5 و 48/7 میلیون ریال در هکتار در رتبههای بعدی قرار گرفتند. شاخص هزینهای مکانیزاسیون کشت مزرعهای بامیه با 6/10 درصد، به طور معنیداری از کشت خاکپوش (6/8 درصد) و کشت زیر پلاستیک (4/6 درصد) بیشتر بود. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| پلاستیک؛ سود؛ شاخص هزینهای مکانیزاسیون؛ نسبت فایده به هزینه | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Economic Analysis of Okra Production Systems in Khuzestan Province | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohammad Javam1؛ Mahmoud Ghasemi Nejad Raeini2؛ afshin marzban3 | ||
| 1MSc. Student ,Department of Agricultural Machinery and Mechanization Engineering, Khuzestan Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University (KhAU), Khuzestan, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor,Department of Agricultural Machinery and Mechanization Engineering, Khuzestan Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University (KhAU), Khuzestan, Iran | ||
| 3associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Machinery and Mechanization Engineering, Khuzestan Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University (KhAU), Khuzestan, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Today, farmers are looking for solutions to increase production and income. One of these solutions is the supplyink off-season crops and horticultural products. Considering the high level of okra production and consumption in Khuzestan province, this study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the economic systems of this product. In this area, okra is cultivated in three ways: okra planted under plastic, mulch and open field. Required data was collected using face-to-face questionnaire from 120 okra growers. The highest amount of net income (287.44 million Rials per hectare) was obtained in okra planted under plastic, plastic mulch (87.06) and open field (61.98) were in the next priorities respectively. The highest amount of benefit-cost ratio (3.7) was obtained in okra planted under plastic, open field (2.3) and plastic mulch (2.1) were in the next priorities respectively. The highest amount of production cost (103 million Rials per hectare) was obtained in in okra planted under plastic, plastic mulch (78.5) and open field (48.7) were in the next priorities respectively. The highest amount of mechanization cost index (10.6%) was obtained in open field, plastic mulch (6.8%) and okra planted under plastic (4.6%) were in the next priorities respectively. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Benefit-Cost Ratio, Income, Plastic, Mechanization Cost Index | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdollahi-Arpanahi, Z., Marzban, A., Asoodar, M. A., & Abdeshahi A. (2016). Energy analysis of watermelon production under plasticulture and open-field systems using DEA method in Khuzestan. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 47(2), 293-301. (in Persian)
Abdolahzare, Z., Ghasemi-Nejad-Raeini M., Abdollahzareh. S., & Changizi, A. (2014). Investigation and comparison of energy consumption and production costs of tunnel culture and tomato space. case study of Behbahan city. The 8thNational Congresson Agricultural Machinery Engineering Biosystem &MechanizationofIran. Jan. 29-31. Mashhad University. (in Persian)
Almasi, M., Kiani, S., & Loveimi, N. (2011). Fundamentals of Agricultural Mechanization. Hazrat Masoumeh Press, Qom, Iran. (in Persian)
Anon. (2015). Crop statistics, Statistics of agricultural crops. Report. Ministry of Agriculture Jihad, Deputy Director of Planning and Economics, Center for Information and Communication Technology. (in Persian)
Banaeian, N. Omid, M., & Ahmadi, H. (2011). Application of data envelopment analysis to evaluate efficiency of commercial greenhouse strawberry research. Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 3(3), 185-193.
Cetin, B., & Varder, A. (2008). An economic analysis of energy requirements and input costs for tomato production in Turkey. Renewable Energy. 33, 428-433.
Dileep, B. K., Grover, R. K., & Rai, K. N. (2002). Contract farming in Tomato: An economic analysis. Indian journal of Agricultural Economics, 57(2), 197-210.
Flores-Parra, I. M., Diaz-Alvarez, J. R., & Bienvenido, J. F. (2008). Development of a knowledge model about plasticulture using concept maps. 3rd International Conference on Concept Mapping. Sep. 22-25. Tallinn, Estonia and Helsinki, Finland. 3, 148-151.
Haddadi, S., & Yazdani, S. (2017). Investigation of factors affecting the adoption of organic cucumber cultivation by farmers in alborz Province. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 48(3), 369-378. (in Persian)
Kuswardhani, N., Soni, P., & Shivakoti, G. P. (2013). Comparative energy Input-output and financial analyses of greenhouse and field vegetables production in west Java Indonesia. Energy, 53, 83-92.
Loghmanpour, R., Tabatabaekoloor, R., & Akram, A. M. A. (2013). Input-output energy and economic analysis of strawberry production in Iran. American Journal of Engineering Research, 2(5), 173-177.
Mehrabi-Boshrabadi, H., & Zeynalzadeh R. (2008). Investigation of policies effects and comparative advantage of cucumber and tomato in greenhouse and outdoor in Kerman province. Journal Agriculture Science Natural Resource, 14(5), 1-12. (in Persian)
Mohammadi, A., & Omid, M. (2010). Economic analysis and relation between energy inputs and yield of greenhouse cucumber production in Iran. Applied Energy, 87, 191-196.
Mohammadi, A., Tabatabaeefar, A., Shahin, S., Rafiee, S., & Keyhani, A. (2008). Energy use and economic analysis of potato production in Iran a case study: Ardabil province. Energy Conversion and Management, 49, 3566-3570.
Naval, K. S., Saroj, R. S., Seema, S., & Avinash, K. (2013). Energy use efficiency and cost analysis of tomato undter greenhouse and open field production system at Nubra valley Jammu and Kashmir. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 3(4), 1233-1241.
Ozkan, B., Fert, C., & Karadeniz, F. (2007). Energy and cost analysis for greenhouse and
Pahlavan, R., Omid, M., & Akram, A. (2012). Application of data envelopment analysis for performance assessment and energy efficiency improvement opportunities in greenhouse cucumber production. Journal of Agricultural Technology, 14, 1465-1475. (in Persian)
Rezvani-Moghadam, P., Feizi, H., Mondani, F. (2011). Evaluation of tomato production systems in terms of energy use efficiency and economic analysis in Iran. Notulae Scientia Biologicale, 3(4), 58-65.
Sepahvand, M., & Omidvari, Sh. (2015). Energy-economic analysis of spring crop production in Lorestan province (Case study: Choghvalandi region). 1stCongressof the development andpromotionof AgriculturalSciencesand Natural Resources and the Environment, Natural Resources and Environment of Iran. Sep. 19-20.Tehran, Iran. (in Persian)
Shahnavazi, A. (2017). Determining the efficiency rank of irrigated crops in Iranian agricultural sector. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 48(2),
Singh, G. (2006). Estimation of a mechanisation index and its impact on production and economic factors a case study in India. Biosystems Engineering, 93(1), 99-106.
Tavoosi, M. Musavi-Fazl, S. M. H., & Dehghani A. (2015). The effects of polyethylene mulch and sowing date on early maturity, growth and yield of okra. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 259-269. (in Persian).
Wayne, L. S. (2000). Plasticulture in California Vegetable Production. UC Cooperative Extension Vegetable Farm Advisor. Sun Diego Country. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 6,428 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,077 |
||