| تعداد نشریات | 282 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 80 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 3,219 |
| تعداد مقالات | 35,690 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 53,571,479 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 92,851,326 |
میزان شکارگری و ترجیح سن شکارگرNesidiocoris tenuis درتغذیه از تخم بید آرد، Ephestia kuehniella و تخم بید گوجهفرنگیTuta absoluta در آزمایشگاه | ||
| مهار زیستی در گیاهپزشکی | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 5، شماره 1، شهریور 1396، صفحه 31-43 اصل مقاله (418.64 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/bcpp.2017.116040 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سید حسن ملکشی1؛ رضا طلایی حسنلویی* 2؛ جعفر محقق نیشابوری3؛ حسین اللهیاری4 | ||
| 1موسسه تحقیقات گیاهپزشکی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2گروه گیاهپزشکی دانشگاه تهران، کرج | ||
| 3موسسه تحقیقات گیاهپزشکی کشور | ||
| 4دانشگاه تهران-اکولوژی و کنترل بیولوژیک حشرات | ||
| چکیده | ||
| تخمهای بید آرد، Ephestia kuehniella یکی از منابع غذایی غنی از پروتئین برای تولید انبوه دشمنان طبیعی و بهویژه سنNesidiocoris tenuis میباشد که از آن بهعنوان طعمۀ جایگزین برای استقرار سن شکارگر در گلخانههای گوجهفرنگی استفاده میشود. مقایسۀ میزان شکارگری و ترجیح سنN. tenuis روی تخمهای بیدآرد و بیدگوجهفرنگی Tuta absoluta با آزمایش فاکتوریل بر پایۀ طرح کاملاً تصادفی در شرایط آزمایشگاهی انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد که جنسیت شکارگر و نوع طعمه بهصورت معنیداری در میزان شکارگری مؤثر هستند. میزان تغذیه سن ماده طی 24 ساعت از تخمهای بیدآرد و بیدگوجهفرنگی بهترتیب 83/4±58 و 83/4±50/77 عدد و بیانگر اختلاف معنیدار بین آنها بود. میزان تغذیۀ سن نر از تخمهای بیدآرد و بیدگوجهفرنگی نیز بهترتیب 83/4±5/27 و 09/5±44/61 عدد بود که تفاوت معنیداری مشاهده شد. در آزمون ترجیح طعمه نیز سن ماده به ترتیب از 63/3±3/41 و 20/3±8/29 عدد تخم بیدآرد و بیدگوجهفرنگی تغذیه کرد که تفاوت معنیداری مشاهده نشد. مقادیر متناظر برای جنس نر بهترتیب 53/1±33/14 و 39/2±33/20 عدد بود که بیانگر اختلاف معنیدار در سطح احتمال 5 درصد بود. در حشرات ماده، شاخص بتای منلی (Manly) بید آرد (طعمۀ I) و بید گوجهفرنگی (طعمۀ II) بهترتیب معادل 07/0±64/0 و 08/0± 36/0 بهدست آمد که بیانگر ترجیح تغذیۀ سن ماده نسبت به بیدآرد بود. در حالیکه در حشرات نر به ترتیب برابر با 02/0± 38/0 و 04/0±62/0 برای بید آرد و بید گوجه فرنگی بهدست آمد که نشان دهندۀ ترجیح تغذیه سن نر به بید گوجهفرنگی بود. بنابراین بر اساس شاخص بتای منلی، سن ماده ترجیح بیشتری به تغذیه از تخم بیدآرد دارد تا نیازهای غذایی خود را تأمین کند. لذا میتوان در رهاسازی سن شکارگر N. tenuis در گلخانههای گوجهفرنگی در کمبود یا غیاب طعمۀ اصلی از تخمهای بیدآرد بهعنوان مادۀ غذایی جایگزین استفاده کرد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| ترجیح طعمه؛ سن شکارگر؛ Nesidiocoris tenuis؛ غذای جایگزین؛ کنترل بیولوژیک؛ گوجهفرنگی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Predation rate and prey preference of Nesidiocoris tenuis on Ephestia kuehniella and Tuta absoluta eggs in laboratory | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| S. Hasan Malkeshi1؛ Reza Talaei-Hassanloui2؛ Jafar Mohaghegh3؛ Hosin Allahyari4 | ||
| 3Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Ephestia kuehniella eggs are among protein rich sources for mass production of the predator Nesidiocoris tenuis. It has been used as an alternative prey for the predator establishment in the tomato greenhouses. Comparing the predation rate of N. tenuis on E. kuehniella and Tuta absoluta eggs, a factorial experiment based on completely randomized design (CRD) was conducted and performed under laboratory conditions. Results indicated that predator sex and prey species significantly affected the rate of predation. The predation values of the female predatory on E. kuehniella and T. absolutaeggs were 58±4.83 and 77.50±4.83, respectively, showing a significant difference (P < 0.0001). The predation rates of the male predatory on the E. kuehniella and T. absolutaeggs were 27.50±4.83 and 61.44±5.09 respectively, showing a significant difference (P < 0.0001). In the prey preference test, predation of the female on the E. kuehniella and T. absolutaeggs were 41.3±3.63 and 29.8±3.20 respectively. Mean consumption of the male individuals from E. kuehniella eggs was 14.33±1.53 and from T. absolutaeggs was 20.33±2.39. The Manley’s preference indices (𝛽) female were 0.64±0.07 and 0.36±0.08 for the E. kuehniella (prey I) and T. absolutaeggs (prey II), respectively. While Manley’s indices (𝛽) for male were 0.38±0.02 and 0.62±0.04 for the E. kuehniella and T. absolutaeggs, respectively. According to our data, the male predatory showed preference towards the T. absolutaeggs than the E. kuehniella eggs. Therefore, based on the Manley’s preference indices (𝛽), females of N. tenuis need more E. kuehniella eggs to provide their dietary requirements for fecundity. In conclusion, E. kuehniella eggs can be used as an alternative food source in tomato greenhouses, especially when the main prey is insufficient or absent. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| alternative food, biological control, Nesidiocoris tenuis, Prey preference, tomato | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Alaee, T. & Allahyari, H. 2013. Prey preference of Hippodamia variegata (Col.: Coccinellidae) on two aphid species: Lipaphis erysimi and Brevicoryne brassicae. Plant Pests Research, 3: 13-19. (In Persian). Arno, J., Castane, C., Riudavets, J. & Gabarra, R. 2010. Risk of damage to tomato crops by the generalist zoophytophagous predator Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter). Bulletin Entomological Research, 100: 105-115. Arno, J., Castane, C., Riudavets, J., Roig, J. & Gabarra, R. 2006. Characterization of damage to tomato plants produced by the zoophytophagous predator Nesidiocoris tenuis. IOBC/ WPRS Bulletin, 29: 249-254. Attaran, M.R. 1995. The effects of laboratory hosts on the biological characteristics of parasitoid wasps, Habrobracon hebetor. MSc. thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modarres University. (In Persian). Bagheri, M.R., Hassanpour, M., Golizadeh, A., Farrokhi, S. & Samih, M.A. 2016. Age-stage two-sex life table and predation capacity of Nesidiocoris tenuis feeding on Trialeurodes vaporariorum on three important greenhouse crops.Biocontrol in Plant Protection, 3 (2): 77-96.(In Persian). Baniameri, V. 2004. Strategies for the integrated pest management (IPM) of the greenhouse vegetables. Proceedings of 3rd national conference on the development in the application of biological products & optimum utilization of chemical fertilizers & pesticides in agriculture. Karaj, Iran, 662-663. (In Persian). Bilde, T. & Toft, S. 1994. Prey preference and egg production of the carabid beetle Agonum dorsale. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 73: 151-156. Bjorndal, K.A.1991. Diet mixing: non-additive interactions of diet items in an omnivorous freshwater turtle. Ecology,72: 1234-1241. Calvo, F.J., Bolckmans, K. & Belda, J.E. 2012. Release rate for a pre-plant application of Nesidiocoris tenuis for Bemisia tabaci control in tomato. BioControl, 57: 809-817. Calvo, F.J., Lorente, M.J., Stansly, P.A. & Belda, J.E. 2012. Preplant release of Nesidiocoris tenuis and supplementary tactics for control of Tuta absoluta and Bemisa tabaci in greenhouse tomato. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 143: 111-119. Calvo, J., Bolckmans, K., Stansly, P.A. & Urbaneja, A. 2009. Predation by Nesidiocoris tenuis on Bemisia tabaci and injury to tomato. BioControl, 54: 237-246. Carnero, A., Diaz, S., Amador, S., Hernandez, M. & Hernandez, E. 2000. Impact of Nesidiocoris tenuis on whitefly populations in protected tomato crops. IOBC⁄ WPRS Bulletin, 23: 259. Cassis, G. & Schuh, R.T. 2012. Systematic, biodiversity, biogeography and host associations of the Miridae (Heteroptera: Cimicomorpha). Annual Review of Entomology, 57: 377-404. Castane, C. & Zapata, R. 2005. Rearing the predatory bug Macrolophus caliginosus on a meat-based diet. Biological Control, 34: 66-72. Castane, C., Arno, J., Gabarra, R. & Alomar, O. 2011. Plant damage to vegetable crops by zoophytophagous mirid predators. Biological Control, 59(1): 22-29. De Clercq, P., Arijs, Y., Van Meir, T., Van Stappen, G., Sorgeloos, P., Dewettinck, K., Rey, M., Grenier, S. & Febvay, G. 2005. Nutritional value of brine shrimp cysts as a factitious food for Orius laevigatus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae). Biocontrol Science and Technology, 15(5): 467-479. De Clercq, P., Coudron, T.A. & Riddick, E.W. 2013. Production of heteropteran predators. pp. 57-100. In: Morales-Ramos, J., Rojas, G.M. & Shapiro-Ilan, D. (eds.). Mass Production of Beneficial Organisms. New York: Elsevier. El-Dessouki, S.A., El-Kifl, A.H. & Helal, H.A. 1976. Life cycle, host plants and symptoms of damage of the tomato bug, Nesidiocoris tenuis Reut., in Egypt. Journal Plant Disease Protection, 83(4): 204-220. Eubanks, M.D. & Denno, R.F.1999. The ecological consequences of variation in plants and prey for an omnivorous insect. Ecology,80: 1253-1266. Evans, E.W., Stevenson, A.T. & Richards, D.K. 1999. Essential versus alternative food of insect predators: benefits of a mixed diet. Oecologia,121: 107-112. Fantinou, A.A., Perdikis, D.C., Maselou, D.A. & Labropoulos, P.D. 2008. Prey killing without consumption: does Macrolophus pygmaeus show adaptive foraging behavior? Biological control, 47: 187-193. Fantinou, A.A., Perdikis, D.C., Labropoulos, P.D., & Maselou, D.A. 2009. Preference and consumption of Macrolophus pygmaeus preying on mixed instar assemblages of Myzus persicae. Biological Control, 51 (1): 76-80. Gerling, D. 1990. Whiteflies: Their Bionomics, Pest Status and Management. Andover, Hants, UK: Intercept, pp. xvi, 348 pp. Kosari , A.A. & Kharazi-Pakdel, A. 2006 . Prey-preference of Orius albidipennis (Het.: Anthocoridae) on onion thrips and two-spotted spider mite under laboratory conditions. Journal of Entomological Society of Iran,26 (1): 73-91. (In Persian). Linnavuori, R. 2007. Studies on the Miridae (Heteroptera) of Gilan and the adjacent provinces in Northern Iran. II. List of species. Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae, 47: 17-56. Mahdavi, T.S. & Madadi, H. 2017. Prey preference of Nabis pseudoferus Remane on Aphis gossypii Glover and Tuta absoluta Meyrick. Plant Protection (Scientific Journal of Agriculture), 40(1): 33-47. (In Persian). Manly, B. 1974. A model for certain types of selection experiments. Biometrics, 30: 281-294. Molla, O., Gonzalez-Cabrera, J. & Urbaneja, A. 2011. The combined use of Bacillus thuringiensis and Nesidiocoris tenuis against the tomato borer, Tuta absoluta. BioControl, 56: 883-891. Molla, O., Monton, H., Vanaclocha, P., Beitia, F. & Urbaneja, A. 2009. Predation by the mirids Nesidiocoris tenuis and Macrolophus pygmaeus on the tomato borer Tuta absoluta. IOBC/ WPRS Bulletin, 49: 203-208. Murdoch, W., Chesson, W. & Chesson, P.L. 1985. Biological control theory and practice. American Naturalist, 125: 344-366. Nahani, A.S., Shahrokhi, S. & Poorhaji, A. 2016. Population growth parameters of tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lep.: Gelechiidae) at field condition in Khosrowshah region, East Azarbaijan province.Applied Entomology and Phytopathology, 83(2): 247-258. (In Persian). Perdikis, D., Fantinou, A., Garantonakis, N., Kitsis, P., Maselou, D. & Panagakis, S. 2009. Studies on the damage potential of the predator Nesidiocoris tenuis on tomato plants. Bulletin of Insectology, 62(1): 41-46. Perdikis, D.Ch., Arvaniti, Κ.A., Paraskevopoulos, A. & Grigoriou, Α. 2015. Pre-plant release enhanced the earlier establishment of Nesidiocoris tenuis in open field tomato. Entomologia Hellenica, 24: 11-21. Provost, C., Lucas, E. & Coderre, D. 2006. Prey preference of Hyaliodes vitripennis as an intraguild predator, active predator choice or passive selection. Biological Control, 37(2): 148-154. Sanchez, J.A. & Lacasa, A. 2008. Impact of the zoophytophagous plant bug Nesidiocoris tenuis (Het.: Miridae) on tomato yield. Journal of Economic Entomology, 101: 1864-1870. Sanchez, J. A. 2008. Zoophytophagy in the plant bug Nesidiocoris tenuis. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 10: 75-80. SAS Institute, 2004. SAS software version 9.1. Sas institute. Cary. Sharifian, I., Sabahi, Q. & Khoshabi, J. 2016. Functional response of Macrolophus pygmaeus (Rambur) and Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter) feeding on two different prey species. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 48: 910-920. Stephens, D.W. & Krebs, J.R. 1986. Foraging theory. Princeton University Press. 247 pp. Tahernia, S., Sarraf moayeri, H.R., Kavosi, O., Arbab, A. & Askari, F. 2017. Biological characteristics of mediterranean flour, Ephestia kuehniella in different light periods. The second national congress of monitoring and forecasting in plant protection. Gonbad, Iran, 265-268. Toft, S. & Wise, D.H. 1999. Growth, development and survival of a generalist predator fed single- and mixed species diets of different quality. Oecologia, 119: 191-197. Urbaneja, A., Gonzalez-Cabrera, J., Arno, J. & Gabarra, R. 2012. Prospects for the biological control of Tuta absoluta in tomatoes of the Mediterranean basin. Pest Management Science. 68: 1215-1222. Urbaneja, A., Monton, H. & Molla, O. 2009. Suitability of the tomato borer Tuta absoluta as prey for Macrolophus caliginosus and Nesidiocoris tenuis. Journal of Applied Entomology, 133: 292-296. Urbaneja, A., Tapia, G. & Stansly, P.A. 2005. Influence of host plant and prey availability on the developmental time and survival of Nesidiocoris tenuis Reuter (Het.: Miridae). Biocontrol Science and Technology, 15: 513-518. Urbaneja-Bernat, P., Alonso, M., Tena, A., Bolckmans, K. & Urbaneja, A. 2013. Sugar as nutritional supplement for the zoophytophagous predator Nesidiocoris tenuis. BioControl, 58: 57-64. Urbaneja-Bernat, P., Molla, O., Alonso, M., Bolkcmans, K., Urbaneja, A. & Tena, A. 2014. Sugars as complementary alternative food for the establishment of Nesidiocoris tenuis in greenhouse tomato. Journal of Applied Entomology, 133: 292-296. Van Driesche, R.G. & Bellows, T.S. 1996. Biological Control. Chapman and Hall, New York, 539 pp. Venzon, M., Janssen, A. & Sabelis, M.W. 2002. Prey preference an of the generalist predator Orius laevigatus. Oikos, 97: 116-124. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,486 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 952 |
||