Related Links
Evaluation of Morphological Characteristics in some Fig (Ficus carica L.) Genotypes | ||
| نهال و بذر | ||
| Article 1, Volume 32, Issue 2, August 2016, Pages 147-163 PDF (472.21 K) | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/spij.2017.111294 | ||
| Authors | ||
| M. Jafari; H. Zare* ; Gh. Golkar; , L. Jokar; Z. Tabatabaei | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Identification and collection of germplasm of each crop is the first step in breeding programs and introducing adapted cultivars in each region. This study was carried out to characterized and register thirteen fig and caprifig genotypes in Fars, Markazi, Lorestan and Kermanshah provinces during 2009 to 2010. Fifty four morphological characters were evaluated based on National Distinction Tests Guidelines of Uniformity and stability of fig genotypes. Based on the results of the data cluster analysis and considering of the 50% similarities, studied fig genotypes were classified into five groups. In this classification, the highest similarity was between Sabz and Rono and the lowest between Sabz and Siah-e-Dorosht genotypes. The results also showed that 27 evaluated characters had the ability for separating the desirable genotypes, and key characters were determined for identification of each genotype. Practical cases of these results are the use of morphological characters for separation of complex cultivars in orchards and collections, introduction of key characters of each genotypes for easy and quick diagnosis, selection of parents for crosses in breeding programs and molecular identification facilitating. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Fig; genotypes; Morphological characters; fruit characterization; key characters | ||
| References | ||
|
Abbasi, K. 2013. Identification and evaluation of native fig cultivars of Kermanshah province. MSc. Thesis, College of Agriculture, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran. 188 pp. (in Persian).## Aksoy, U. 1986. An evaluation of the dried fig crop with respect to the standard quality requirments. Kura Incir Ururunun Standard Kaline Nite Likeri Yanunden Degerlendirilmesi Ziraat Farcullest Devisi 23: 23-30. ## Aksoy, U. 1991. Descriptors for fig (Ficus carica L. and related Ficus sp.). Ege University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture, Izmir, Turkey.## Ali, Z. A., Mustafa, N. S., Abdel- Raouf, H. S., El-Shazly, S. M., and El-Berry I. M. 2013. Characterization of some fig cultivars by anatomical traits on both leaves and stems. World Applied Sciences Journal 24 (8): 1065-1071.## Aljane, F., Nahdi, S., and Essid, A. 2012. Genetic diversity of some accessions of Tunisian fig tree (Ficus carica L.) based in morphological and chemical traits. Journal of Natural Products and Plant Resources 2 (3): 350-359.## Anonymous, 2002. Agricultural Statistics.Vol. 1. 2002/08, Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Tehran, Iran (in Persian).## Babazadeh Darjazi, B. 2011. Morphological and pomological characteristics of fig (Ficus carica L.) cultivars from Varamin, Iran. African Journal of Biotechnology 10(82): 19096-19105.## Basheer-Salimia, R., Awad, M.,Hamdanl, Y., and Shtaya. M. 2013. Genetic variability of some Palestinian fig (Ficus carica L.) genotypes based on pomological and morphological descriptors. An - Najah University Journal of Research (N. Sc.) Vol. 27.## Baziar, Gh. 2012. Evaluation of genetic variability of fig (Ficus carica L.) in Fars province by morphological traits and RAPD markers. MSc. Thesis, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. 98 pp. (in Persian).## Çalişkan, O., and Polat, A. A. 2011. Phytochemical and antioxidant properties of selected fig (Ficus carica L.) accessions from the eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. HortScience 128: 473-478.## Condit, J. 1955. Fig varieties. A monograph. Hill Gradia 23 (11): 323-528. ## El-kassas, S. E., Mahmoud, H. M., Amen, K. I. A., and Badawy, A. A. 1992. Evaluation of some introduced and local fig cultivars under Assiut conditions. Agricultural Science 23: 281-294. ## Faryabi, A. 2006. Identification and evaluation of native fig cultivars of Lorestan province with morphological charecters. MSc. Thesis, College of Agriculture, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran. 220 pp. (in Persian).## Gaaliche, B., Saddoud, O., and Mars, M. 2012. Morphological and pomological diversity of fig (Ficus carica L.) cultivars in northwest of Tunisia. International Scholarly Research Network ISRN Agronomy. 2012: 1-9.## Hutchinson, J. 1973. The Families of Flowering Plants: Arranged According to a New System Based on Their Probable Phylogeny. Oxford Clarendon Press xx, Axford, UK. 968pp.## Koyuncu, M. A. 2004. Promising fig (Ficus carica L.) genetic resources from Birecik (Urfa) region of Turkey. European Journal of Horticultural Science 69 (4): 153-158.## Maspi, A. 2011. Identification and evaluation of native fig cultivars of Ilam province. MSc. Thesis, College of Agriculture, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran. 188 pp. (in Persian).## Oukabli, A., Mekaoui, M., Ibnouali-EL-Aloui. M., and Bari, A. 2008. Contribution to identification of fig (Ficus carica) gentypes tolerant to drought. Acta Horticulturae 798: 87-95.## Sabet Sarvestany, J. 1993. Identification of fig cultivars grown in Estahban city of Iran. MSc. Thesis, College of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran. 200 pp. (in Persian).## Saddoud, O., Baraket, G., Chatti, Kh.,Trifi,, M., Marrakchi, M., Mars, M., and Salhi-Hannachi, A. 2011. Using morphological characters and simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers to characterize Tunisian fig (Ficus carica L.) cultivars. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia 53(2): 7-14.## Safaei, H., Karami, M. J., Ghanavati, F. 2008. Complementary study of major charactristics of edible fig (Ficus carica L.) grown in Fars province. Seed and Plant 24 (1): 193-205 (in Persian).## | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 633 PDF Download: 383 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb