| تعداد نشریات | 282 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 80 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 3,219 |
| تعداد مقالات | 35,690 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 53,573,815 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 92,853,346 |
اثر دماهای یخبندان بر سنین مختلف ژنوتیپهای نخود در شرایط کنترل شده | ||
| به زراعی نهال و بذر | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 31، شماره 2، مرداد 1394، صفحه 161-172 اصل مقاله (191.38 K) | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/sppj.2017.110572 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| داود صادقزاده اهری* | ||
| چکیده | ||
| به منظور بررسی اثرات دماهای مختلف زیر صفر بر ژنوتیپهای پیشرفته نخود دیم، این مطالعه در سال زراعی 92-1391 در ایستگاه تحقیقات کشاورزی دیم مراغه و در شرایط کنترل شده (اطاقک سرما) در قالب آزمایش اسپلیت- اسپلیت پلات با سه تکرار و بر پایه طرح آماری بلوکهای کامل تصادفی اجرا شد. سنین مختلف گیاهچهای (1، 3 و 6 هفتهای) در کرتهای اصلی، دماهای مختلف زیر صفر ( صفر، 5-، 10-، 15- و 20- درجه سانتیگراد) در کرتهای فرعی و ژنوتیپهای نخود (ILC 3279 ،FLIP 00-75 ، ILC 482، FLIP 00-84،Sel. 96th. 11439، ILC 533 و رقم سارال) در کرتهای فرعی- فرعی قرار گرفتند. نتایج نشان داد که تاثیر عامل سن گیاهچه بر نسبت مقاومت به سرما (FRR) از نظر آماری معنیدار نبود، ولی بیشترین و کمترین تحمل سرما به ترتیب در سنین 3 و 6 هفتگی مشاهده شد. عامل شدت سرما تاثیر معنیداری بر تحمل سرمای ژنوتیپها داشت و با افزایش شدت سرما از صفر به سمت 20- درجه سانتیگراد، تحمل سرمای ژنوتیپها کاهش یافت. تفاوت بین ژنوتیپهای آزمایشی از نظر نسبت تحمل سرما نیز معنی دار بود و در مجموع، رقم ســارال با نسبت تحمل سرمای معادل 89/0 در مقایسه با سایر لاینهای آزمایشی، برتری داشته و از تحمل مطلوب و قابل قبولی برخوردار بود. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| نخود؛ مناطق سردسیر دیم؛ تحمل سرما؛ سن گیاهچه | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Effect of Freezing Temperatures on Different Seedling Ages of Chickpea Genotypes under Controlled Conditions | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| D. Sadeghzadeh Ahari | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In order to study the effects of sub-zero temperatures on advanced chickpea genotypes, this study was carried out as split-split plot based on randomized complete block design with three replications under controlled conditions (cold room) at Maragheh Dryland Agricultural Research Station during 2013-2014 cropping season. Different seedling stages (1,3 and 6 weeks after planting) were in main plots, different sub-zero temperatures (0, -5, -10, -15 and -20 °C) in sub plots and chickpea genotypes (ILC3279, FLIP00-75, ILC482, FLIP00-84, Sel.96th.11439, ILC 533 and cultivar Saral) in sub-sub plots. Results showed that seedling age did not significantly affect the frost resistance ratio (FRR), but the highest and the lowest FRR were observed in seedlings with 3 and 6 weeks age, respectively. Cold severity had significant effect (p≤ 0.01) on FRR and with increasing cold severity from 0 to -20°C, FRR of genotypes was decreased. Differences among chickpea genotypes were significant (p≤ 0.01) and Saral cultivar with FRR = 0.89 showed an acceptable level of cold tolerance comparing with the other genotypes. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Chickpea, cold dryland areas, Cold tolerance, seedling age | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aghaei, M., and Kanoni, H. 2004. Chickpea. Tagh-e-Bostan Publications, Kermanshah, Iran. 138pp. (in Persian).## Anonymous 2012. Statistical Information of Agricultural Crops Production in Iran. Department of Statistics, Ministry of Jihad-e-Keshavarzi, Vol .1, Tehran, Iran (in Persian).## Baker, R. J. 1994. Breeding methods and selection indices for improved tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses in cool season food legumes. Euphytica 73: 67-72.## Chaeichi, M. R., and Maleki-Farahani, S. 2007. Effect of chilling stress in different phonological stages on growth and yield of desi type chickpea. Sceintific Journal of Agriculture 30(2): 13-24 (in Persian).## Eradatmand-Asli, D., and Mehrpanah, H. 2009. Pulse Crops Production and Nitrogen Fixation. Publications of Islamic Azad University of Saveh, Saveh, Iran. 289pp. (in Persian). ## Gan, Y. T., Siddique, K. H. M., MacLeod, W. J., and Jayakumar, P. 2006. Management options for minimizing the damage by ascochyta blight (Ascochyta rabiei) in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Field Crops Research 97: 121-134.## Heidarvand, L., Maali Amiri, R., Naghavi, M. R., Farayedi, Y., Sadeghzadeh, B., and Alizadeh, Kh. 2011. Physiological and morphological characteristics of chickpea accessions under low temperature stress. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 58 (1): 157-163.## Kanouni, H. 2004. Study of cold tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes in fall sown nurseries. Seed and Plant 20(1): 89-99 (in Persian).## Kanouni, H., Khalily, M., and Malhotra, R. S. 2009. Assessment of cold tolerance of chickpea at rainfed highlands of Iran. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture. & Environmental Science 5(2): 250-254.## Khalili, A., Hojam, S., and Irannejhad, P. 1991. Extensive Project of Country Water. Vol.4. Recognization of Iranian Climatology, Weathear Divisions. Minstry of Power Publications, Tehran, Iran. 274 pp. (in Persian).## Otoole, N., Stoddard, F. L., and Obrien, L. 2001. Screening of chickpea for adaptation to autumn sowing. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 186: 193- 207.## Ozdemir, S., and Karadavut, U. 2003. Comparison of the performance of autumn and spring sowing of chickpeas in a temperate region. Turk Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 27: 345-352.## Parsa, M., and and Bagheri, A. R. 2008. Pulses. Mashhad Jihad-e- Daneshghahi Publications, Mashhad, Iran. 524pp. (in Persian).## Saccardo, F., and Calcangno, F. 1990. Consideraton of chickpea plant idiotype for spring and winter sowing. CIHEAM- Option Mediterranean www.Ciheam.Org.## Sadeghzadeh-Ahari, D. 2012. Improving Research Results of Dryland Pulses. Dryland Agricultural Research Institute Publication. No. 44106, Maagheh, Iran. 220 pp. (in Persian).## Sadeghzadeh Ahari, D., and Farayedi, Y. 2013. Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) advanced lines to no snow cover cold in fall planting. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal 29-1: 711-727 (in Persian).## Saeed, A., Darvishzadeh, R., Hovsepyan, H., and Asatryan, A. 2010. Tolerance to freezing stress in cicer accessions under controlled and field conditions. African Journal of Biotechnology 9(18): 2618-2626.## Singh, K. B., Malhotra R. S., and Saxena M. C. 1995. Additional sources of tolerance to cold in cultivated and wild Cicer species. Crop Science 35: 1491-1497.## Singh, K. B., Malhotra, R. S., Saxena, M. C., and Bejiga, G. 1997. Superiority of winter sowing over traditional spring sowing of chickpea in the Mediterranean region. Agronomy Journal 89: 112-118.## Singh, K. B., and Reddy, M. V. 1996. Improving chickpea yield by incorporating resistance to ascochyta blight. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 92: 509-515.## Toker, C., and Cagiran, M. I. 2003. Selection criterion in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science 53: 42-45. ## Wery, J. 1990. Adaptation to frost and drought stress in chickpea and implications in plant breeding. pp. 77-85. In: Saxena, M. C., Cubero, J. I., and Wery, J. (eds.). Present Status and Future Prospects of Chickpea Crop Production and Improvement in the Mediterranean Countries. Options Mediterranean’s Series Seminaries. No. 9, CHEAM, France. ## Zaferanieh, M., Nezami, A., Parsa, M., Porsa, H., and Bagheri, A. 2009. Evaluation of fall sowing of cold tolerant chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasms under complementary irrigation in Mashhad condition: II. Yield and yield components. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 2(7): 483-492 (in Persian).## | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 548 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 375 |
||