Related Links
Effect of environmental factors and maternal parent on some sugar beet seed characteristics | ||
| چغندرقند | ||
| Article 6, Volume 33, Issue 1, June 2017, Pages 89-75 PDF (255.37 K) | ||
| Document Type: Scientific - Research | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/jsb.2017.102291.1105 | ||
| Authors | ||
| M.R. Mirzaie* 1; J. Asghari2; D. Taleghani1; S. Sadeghzadeh Hemayati1 | ||
| 1SBSI | ||
| 2Professor, Unversity of Guilan, Rashat, Iran | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Standard seed percentage and mechanical viability are important characteristics in sugar beet seed production. In this study, effects of environmental factors and maternal parent on seed yield, mechanical viability percentage, germination percentage, and conversion coefficient of 10 sugar beet single crosses were evaluated. The experiment was conducted in randomized complete block design with four replications in Ardabil, Firuzkuh and Karaj in 2014. Single cross materials were produced from the cross of 10 male sterile lines with one o-type line. Combined analysis of variance results indicated that maternal parent × environment interaction had significant effect on raw seed yield, standard seed size yield, marketable seed yield, conversion coefficient, mechanical viability before seed processing, and percent weight of standard seed. Both environment and maternal parent influenced percent weight of standard seed, mechanical viability percentage after winnowing as well as germination percentage. However, filled clusters percentage was only affected by environment. Before seed processing, mechanical viability percentage was 90.41, 69.73, and 40.91% in Karaj, Ardabil, and Firuzkuh, respectively. As a consequence, marketable seed yield and conversion coefficient results in Karaj and Ardabil showed significant superiority to Firuzkuh. Results indicated that environment had significant effect (p<0.01) on the first flower opening as well as the 50% flowering. However, the maternal parents and the paternal parent flowered simultaneously in all regions. The highest marketable seed weight percentage belonged to MS FC 708 * OT 231 (64), MS KWS * OT 231 (61) and MS 7112* OT 231 (47) in Karaj, and MS KWS * OT 231 in Ardabil. Based on the results, it can be concluded that limited reproductive stage together with uniform plant growth in a single cross can ultimately lead to increased seed uniform maturity and conversion coefficient. The highest and lowest germination percentage belonged to MSFC607 * OT231 (91.84%) and MS FC 452 * OT 231 (79.33%), respectively. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Mechanical viability; germination percentage; sugar beet seed; seed conversion coefficient; seed yield | ||
| References | ||
|
Alcaraz G, Genter T, Laillet G, Rageot D. Sugar beet pollen biology. Proceedingsof the 61st IIRB Congress. 1998; Brussels, pp. 393–399.
Asghari J, Amir Moradi S, Kamkar B. Phsiology of Weeds. University of Guilan Press. 2009 (In Persian).
Bosemark NO. Influence of seed crop environment on root crop characteristics. Journal of International Institute for Sugar Beet Research. 1970; 4: 193-206.
Cassel F, Sharmasarkar S, Sharmasarkar SD, Miller D. Assessment of drip and flood irrigation on water and fertilizer use efficiencies for sugar beet. Agricultural water management .2001; 46, 24-251.
Csapody G. Influence of irrigation on sugar beet quality. Wissenschaftliche Beitrage Martin Luther Universitate Halle Wittenberg. 1980; 2: 552-555.
Chegini MA. Effect of environment (temperature and photoperriod) on bolting, flowering and seed production in sugar beet (Beta Vulgaris L.) (Ph.D thesis). The University of Reading. UK; 1999.
Chegini MA, Farzaneh S, Sadehzadeh Hmayati S. Effects of different steckling planting dates and seed harvest times on quantity and quality of Shirin cultivar’s seed. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2013; 29(2), 201-214.
CIFA Canadian Food Inspection Agency. Biology Document Bio. The Biology of Beta Vulgaris L(Sugar beet). 2002. http//www. inspection. gc.ca/English/plaveg/bio/ dir/bio 0201 e.shtml.
Cook DA, Scott RK. Sugar beet crop: principle and practical. Chapman and Hall. London. 1993; P. 675.
Coste FM, Crozat Y. Seed development and seed physiology quality of field grown beans (Phaseolus vulgar L.). Seed Sci. and Technol. 2001; 29: 121-136.
Donohue K, Schmitt J. Maternal environmental effects in plants: adaptive plasticity? In T. A. Mousseau and C. W. Fox [eds.], Maternal effects as adaptations. 1998; 137–158. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Durrant MJ, Loads AH. Some changes in sugar beet seeds during maturation and after density grading. Seed Science and Technology. 1990; 18:11–21.
Fabre D, Siband P, Dingkuhn M. Characterizing stress effects on rice grain development and filling using grain weight and size distribution. Field Crops Research. 2005; 92, 11–16.
Farzaneh S. Investigation of relationship between phonological, morphological and physiological characteristics of different maternal and paternal lines on quantity and quality of sugar beet seed. 2015; Final report of Sugar Beet Seed Institute. (in Persian, abstract in English)
Galloway LF. The effect of maternal and paternal environments on seed characters in the herbaceous plant Campanula Americana (Campanulaceae). American Journal of Botany. 2001; 88(5): 832–840
Gizbullin NG. Effect of ecological conditions of seed production on yield and quality of monogerm sugar beet seeds. Wisscenschaftliche Beitrage Martin Luther Universittat Halle. Wittenberg. 1984; No. 55: 528-536
Hampton JG, Boelt B, Rolston MP, Chastain TG. Effects of elevated CO2 and temperature on seed quality. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2013; 151, 154–162.
Heide OM, Junttila O, Samuelsen RT. Seed Germination and Bolting in Red Beet as Affected by Parent Plant Environment. Physiol. Plant. 1976; 36: 343-349.
ISTA. International Rules for Seed Testing. International Seed Testing Association, Switzerland. 2013.
Kockelmann A, Tilcher R, Fischer U. Seed Production and Processing. Sugar Tech. 2010; 12(3–4):267–275.
Kockelmann A, Meyer U. Seed production and quality. In Sugar Beet, ed. A.P. Draycott, 89–113. Oxford, UK: 2006 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2006.
Koizumi M, Kikuchi K, Isobe S, Ishida N, Naito S, Kano H. Role of seed coat in imbibing soybean seeds observed by micro-magnetic resonance imaging. Annals of Botany. 2008; 102, 343–352.
Longden PC. Influence of the seed crop environment on the quality of sugar beet seed. 1986; 1–16 in Proceedings of 49th Winter Congress of IIRB.
Marlander B, Lange T, Wulkow A. Dispersal principles of sugar beet from seed to sugar with relaton to genetically modified varieties. Journal Fur Kulturpflanzen. 2011; 63(11), 373-349.
Meier U, Bachmann L, Buhtz E, Hack H, Klose R, Märländer B, Weber E. Phänologische Entwicklungsstadien der Beta-Rüben (Beta vulgaris L.). Codierung und Beschreibung nach der erweiterten BBCH-Skala mit Abbildungen, Nachrichtenbl. Deut.Pfl anzenschutzd. 1993; 45: 37-41.
Naegele RP, McGrath JM. Seedling vigor in BETA VULGARIS: The Artistry of Germination. Plant Breeding and Genetics Program, Michigan State University and USDA-ARS, SBRU,494 PSSB, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI. 2009; 48824-1325
Platenkamp GAJ, Shaw RG. Environmental and genetic maternal effects on seed characters in Nemophila menziesii. Evolution. 1993; 47: 540–555.
Prijic L, Jovanovic M, Glamoclija D. Germination and vigor of wrinkled and greenish soybean seed. Seed Sci. and Technol. 1998; 26: 377-283.
Sadeghian Motahar SY. Sugar beet seed production. 1996; Agricultural Education Publishing Center press (In Persian).
Sadeghzadeh Hemayati S, Fatelah Talegani D, Khdadadi S, Nikpanah H, Dehghanshar M. Determination of optimal irrigation intervals in sugar beet seed production in Ardabil region. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2006; 22(1), 1-12. (in Persian, abstract in English)
Sadeghi H, Khazaei F, Sheidaei S, Yari L. Effect of seed size on seed germination behavior of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). J Agric Biol Sci. 2011; 6:5–8
Scott RK. The effect of weather on the concentration of pollen within sugar-beet seed crops Ann. appl. Biol. 1970; 66: 119-127.
Scott RK, Longden PC Wood, DW, Johnson. Seed production. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1978; Part 1, 58-59.
Smith GA. Sugar beet. In Hybridization of Crop Plant. Ed R. A. Forsberg, A. R. Hallauer and A. W. Hovin (Eds), Madison, Wisconin, USA. 1980; 601-616.
Scroller J. Study on the ripening of seed crop of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris subsp. Altisima doll. Var sacharifera). Rostlinna Vyroba. 1984; 30(2):1225-1230.
Sliwin´ska E. Analysis of the Cell Cycle in Sugar beet Seed during Development, Maturation and Germination. In Black M, Bradford K.J. and Vázquez-Ramos J (eds) Seed Biology: Advances and Applications. University Press. Cambridge, UK.. 2000; 133–139.
Spears JF, TeKrony DM, Egli DB. Temperature during seed filling and soybean seed germination and vigour. Seed Science. and Technol. 1997; 25: 233-244.
Taylor AG, Goffinet MC, Pikuz SA, Shelkovenko TA, Mttchell MD, Chandler KM, Hammer DA. Physico-chemical Factors Influence Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Seed Germination. CAB International. www.cabi-publishing.org . 2003; 433-440
Tekrony DM, Egli DB. Accumulation of Seed Vigour during seed development and maturation. p 369-385. In: Ellis, R.H. et.al. (ed) Basic and Applied Aspects of Seed Biology. Kluwer Acad. Pub. London. 1997.
Wojtyla L, Garnczarska M, Zalewski T, Bednarskic W, Ratajczak L, Jurga S. A comparative study of water distribution, free radical production and activation of antioxidative metabolism in germinating pea seeds. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2006; 163: 1207—1220.
Wood DW, Scott RK, Longden PC. The effects of mother-plant temperature on seed quality in Beta vulgaris L. (sugar beet). in Hebblethwaite, P.D. (Ed.) Seed production. London–Boston, Butterworths. 1980; 257–270.
Wood DW, Scott RK, Longded PC. Effects of seed crop ripening temperature on bolting in the sugar beet root crop. Proceeding of 45th Winter Congress. I.I.R.B. Bruscelles. 1982; 15-24 . | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 967 PDF Download: 552 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb