Related Links
Study of genetic variation for drought tolerance in sugar beet half-sib families | ||
| چغندرقند | ||
| Article 1, Volume 33, Issue 1, June 2017, Pages 16-1 PDF (432.54 K) | ||
| Document Type: Scientific - Research | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/jsb.2017.107740.1130 | ||
| Authors | ||
| kayvan fotouhi1; E. Majidi* 2; Abazar Rajabi3; Reza Azizinejad4 | ||
| 11. Department of Plant Breeding, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Department of Plant Breeding, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3Sugar Beet Seed Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran | ||
| 4Department of Plant Breeding, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| Abstract | ||
| In order to evaluate the genetic variation of drought tolerance-related traits in sugar beet half-sib families, two experiments including 37 half-sib families were conducted under normal and drought stress conditions using a randomized complete block design with three replications at Agricultural Research Station of Miandoab, Iran in 2014. Based on the results, significant difference was observed between normal and drought conditions for root yield, white sugar yield, sugar yield, cell membrane stability (P < 0.01), and sugar content (P < 0.05). Significant difference was also observed among genotypes for root yield, sugar yield, K, cell membrane stability, water use efficiency (P < 0.01), white sugar yield, and chlorophyll index (P < 0.05). Genotype × environment interaction had significant effect (P < 0.01) on sugar content, Na, K, white sugar content, extraction coefficient of sugar, and molasses sugar. Drought stress significantly decreased root yield, sugar content, sugar yield, white sugar yield and cell membrane stability. Root yield and white sugar yield had 0.59 and 0.66 heritability under stress condition and 0.63 and 0.80 under normal condition, respectively. Under both conditions, white sugar yield had positive and significant correlation with root yield, sugar content, and extraction coefficient of sugar and negative and significant correlation with Na, K and molasses sugar. According to the path analysis results, under both conditions, sugar content, relative water content, and chlorophyll index had significant effect on white sugar yield. Finally, based on cluster analysis results, in both water treatments the genotypes were classified into three groups and genotype HSF-883 was selected as a superior genotype in terms of yield and quality under both conditions. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| drought; Nonstress; quality; sugar beet | ||
| References | ||
|
Abbasi Z, Arzani A, Majidi MM. Evaluation of Genetic Diversity of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Crossing parents using agro-morphological traits andmolecular markers. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. 2014; 16:1397-1411.
Aghaie Zade M. Sugar beet breeding.Technical Publication No. 94/47384. Sugar Beet Seed Improvement Institute, 2015.(in Persian)
Agrama HAS.Sequential path analysis of grain yield and its components in maize.Plant Breeding.1996;115:343-346.
AL-Jbawi E, Abbas F. The Effect of Length during Drought Stress on Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Yield and Quality. Persian Gulf Crop Protection. 2013; 2(1): 35-43.
Antonov I. Effect of parents on yield and quality in hybrid of sugar beet. Plant Breed.Abs.1985; 55(2): 1146.
Bashiri B, Mir Mahmoodi T, Fotohi K. Evaluation of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) genotypes for their trait associations under saline conditions. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology. 2015; 9(2): 243.258.
Bloch D, Hoffmann CM. Seasonal development of genotypic differences in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) and their interaction with water supply. J. Agronomy and Crop Science. 2005; 191: 263-272.
Board JE, Kang MS, Harville BG. Path analysis to identify indirect selection criteria for yield of late- planted soybean. Crop Sci. 1997;37:879-884.
Conti L. Conclusive results of a selection program for obtaining a dwarf bean (P. vulgaris) resistant to some viruses and characterized by agronomical qualities. Genet. Agrar. 1985;39 (1): 51-63.
Faberio C, Santa Olalla M, Lopez R, Dominguez A. Production and quality of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivated under controlled deficit irrigation condition in semiarid- climate. Agricultural Water Management. 2003; 62: 215-227.
Fotoohi K, Misbah M, Sadeghian Motahar SY, Rangi SA. Path analysis under normal conditions and salinity in sugar beet germplasm. Journal of sugar beet.2010; 26 (1): 1-14. (in Persian, abstract in English)
Ghasemi H, Mohammedan R, Naushad, Danaei M. Effects of some morphological and physiological traits of white sugar yield six monogerm sugar beet cultivars. Journal of plants and ecosystems. 2010. 80-67. (in Persian, abstract in English)
Hallauer AR, Miranda JB. Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. 1982. Iowa State University Press. Ames, Iowa, USA.
Moghadam M, Mohammadi Shooti A, Aghaei Sarbarzeh M. Introduction to multivariate statistical methods. Pishtazan Elm Tabriz Press, Iran,1994; P. 208.(in Persian)
Morillo-Velarde R, Ober Eric S. Water use and irrigation. In: Draycott AP (ed.): Sugar Beet. Blackwell Publishing.2006; 221-255.
Niazian M, Mostafavi K, Habib Shojaei S, Fayyaz E, Shahbazi A. 4 Diallel Cross Analysis in Sugar Beet (Betavulgaris L.): Identification of the Best Parentsand Hybrids for Resistance to Bolting andCercospora Leaf Spot in Sugar BeetMonogerm O-type Lines. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 2012; 4: 700-711.
Ober ES, Clark CJA, Bloa ML, Royal A, Jaggard KW and Pidgeon JD.Assessing the genetic resource to improve drought tolerance in sugar beet: Agronomic traits of diverse genotypes under drought and irrigated conditions. Field Crops Res, 2004, 90: 213-234.
Ober ES, Rajabi A. Abiotic Stress in Sugar Beet. Sugar Tech. 2010; 12(3-4): 294-298.
Ouda Sohier MM. Yield and quality of sugar beet as affected by planting density andnitrogen fertilizer levels in the newly reclaimed soil. Sugar Crops Res. Inst., Agric. Res.Center, Giza,Egypt. 2005.
Pidgeon JD, OberES, Qi A, Clark CJA, Royal A,Jaggard KW. Using multi-environment sugar beet variety trialsto screen for drought tolerance. Field Crops Research. 2006; 95:268–279.
Rajabi A, Ghaffari A, Izadi Darbandi A, Amir R. Multivariate analysis for agronomic characteristics and quality of sugar beet crop under drought conditions. Thirteenth National Congress of Crop Sciences. 6-4 September 2013. Seed and Plant Improvement Institute. Karaj, Iran. (in Persian, abstract in English)
Rajabi A, Vahidi H, Haj Seyed Hadi MR, Fathollah Taleghani D. Study on drought tolerance and interrelationships among some agronomic and morphophysiological traits in sugar beet lines. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 2013; 5(7): 761-768.
Reinfeld E, Emmerich A, Baumgarten G, Winner C, Beiss U. Zur voraussage des melassezuckers aus rubenanalysen. Zucker. 1974; 27:2-15.
Sadeghian Motahar SY, Mohammadan R, Taleghani DF, Khorshid A. Evaluation of sugar beet drought tolerance genotypes using of halfsib-family recurrent selection.2001. Final report, SBSI.
Sharifi M. Correlation and path analysis of some of the traits under irrigation regimes white sugar yield in sugar beet genotypes. Journal of Plant Ecophysiology. 2013; 6(17): 74. 88.
Sharifi M. Correlation and path analysis performance traits under irrigation regimes white sugar with some sugar beet genotypes. Journal of Plant Ecophysiology. 2014; 16 (17): 74-88.
Vahidi H, Rajabi A, Seyed MR, Hadi Fathollah D. Screening of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) genotype for drought tolerance. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences.2013; 1113-1104. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 1,122 PDF Download: 642 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb