| تعداد نشریات | 282 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 80 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,265 |
| تعداد مقالات | 36,088 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 55,312,701 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 94,273,488 |
شناسائی و گزینش مقدماتی ژنوتیپهای گلابی (.Pyrus communis L) از کلکسیون شاهرود با هدف استفاده در برنامه‌های به‌نژادی | ||
| نهال و بذر | ||
| دوره 42، شماره 1، فروردین 1405، صفحه 115-148 اصل مقاله (1.49 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/spj.2026.374590.1489 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| حمید عبدالهی* 1؛ محمد عابدینی اسفهلانی2 | ||
| 1دانشیار، پژوهشکده میوه‌های معتدله و سردسیری، موسسه تحقیقات علوم باغبانی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران. | ||
| 2استادیار، بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان سمنان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، شاهرود، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| ژنوتیپ ها گلابی موجود در کلکسیون شاهرود از ژنوتیپهای قدیمی گلابی کشور بوده که ارزش تجاری و استفاده از آنها در برنامه های به نژادی بررسی نشده است. در این پژوهش، از 25 ژنوتیپ شامل ارقام بومی و وارداتی این کلکسیون، ارقام آستانه، کوزه کلاغی، چینی، تاشکندی، قوسی، حسنکندری، کدوعنبری و ملچی و شاهد درگزی از نظر اصالت تایید و پس از کشت در قالب طرح بلوک های کامل تصادفی با چهار تکرار و رسیدن به باردهی در سالهای 1396 و 1397، خصوصیات درخت و پاکوتاهی، خصوصیات برگ، شکوفه و گلدهی و خصوصیات ظاهری و ارزیابی حسی میوه روی آنها بررسی شد. در میان این ارقام، سه رقم چینی، حسن کندری و ملچی قدرت رشد ضعیفی داشتند. مقایسه میزان سبزینگی برگ ارقام با رقم درگزی، بیانگر این بود که تنها رقم کدوعنبری میانگین سبزینگی بالائی داشت. سایرخصوصیات نظیر شکل شکوفه ها و همپوشانی گلبرگها، رنگ برگهای بهاره، طول، قطر و نسبت طول به قطر میوه، موقعیت بیشترین قطر میوه و ارزیابی حسی میوه نشان داد که ارقام شباهت زیادی به ژنوتیپ های جنگلی شمال کشور دارند. ارزیابی خصوصیات کیفیت میوه بر اساس ارزیابیهای حسی بیانگر برتری رقم شاهد درگزی و رقم تاشکندی بود. ارقام چینی، کدوعنبری، حسن کندری، آستانه و کوزه کلاغی، ار نظر کیفیت میوه در رده پائینتری بودند که بیانگر عدم مطلوبیت این ارقام برای استفاده تجاری است. با توجه به پاکوتاهی قابل توجه ارقام چینی، حسن کندری، و ملچی لازم است قدرت جوانه زنی بذر، القاء زودبادرهی و قدرت ریشه زائی آنها بررسی شود. پیشنهاد می شود که با توجه به لزوم پاکوتاه تر کردن درختان باغ های گلابی، در مقایسه با پایه فعلی پیرودوارف، امکان استفاده مستقیم و یا تولید دورگ هایی با این ارقام برای استفاده به عنوان پایه، ارزیابی شوند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| گلابی؛ سبزینگی؛ کیفیت میوه؛ کلروز پهنک برگ؛ پاکوتاهی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Identification and Preliminary Selection of Pear (Pyrus communis L.) Genotypes from the Shahroud Collection for Use in Breeding Programs | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| H. Abdollahi1؛ M. Abedini Esfahlan2 | ||
| 1Associate Professor, Temperate Fruits Research Center, Horticultural Sciences Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Karaj, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Field and Horticultural Crops Sciences Research Department, Semnan Agriculture and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Shahroud, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Pear genotypes in Shahroud collection are among the historical Iranian cultivars that their horticultural and commercial values have not been previously assessed. In this study, 25 native and introduced pear genotypes and cultivars from this collection were evaluated for authenticity, and subsequently eight cultivars including: Astaneh, Kuzeh Kalaghi, Chini, Tashkandi, Ghosi, Hassan Kondori, Kadu Anbari, and Malachi, and cv. Dargazi (control) were selected for further assessments. The evaluated traits were tree vigor and dwarf growth habit, leaf and blossom characteristics, fruit morphology and sensory attributes. Among the studied genotypes, cv. Chini, cv. Hassan Kondori, and cv. Malachi exhibited weak growth vigor. Comparison of leaf chlorophyll index revealed that just Kadu Anbari had mean value higher than cv. Dargazi. Sensory attributes based quality assessments highlighted the superiority of cv. Dargazi and cv. Tashkandi. Considering the dwarf growth habit of cv. Chini, cv. Hassan Kondori, and cv. Malachi, it is necessary to evaluate their seed germination attributes, precocity of grafted cultivars on their seedlings, and rooting ability to assess their potential for use in pear breeding programs. Keywords: Pear, chlorophyll, fruit quality, leaf blade chlorosis, dwarfing. Introduction The common pear (Pyrus communis L.), and ranks second in importance among pome fruits (Abdollahi, 2010). Globally, the pear is the third most important fruit in terms of fruit production, within the temperate fruit category (FAO, 2025). Furthermore, the plateau of Iran is a major center of diversity for the genus Pyrus, and from the 20 to 22 recognized species of this genus, at least seven to eight species, are distributed across various regions of Iran (Abdollahi, 2010; Bell and Itai, 2011). Iranian pear germplasm, regardless of their origins, are preserved in the collections of the Temperate Fruit Research Center of the Horticultural Science Research Institute and the Shahroud Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, as well as scattered collections in the Isfahan, West Azerbaijan, and Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Centers (Abdollahi, 2010). These collections comprise approximately 40 native cultivars. The preliminary evaluations of this germplasm was carried out by Manee (1994) during the 1960s and 1970s. Subsequently, superior cultivars were developed in initial nurseries. Atefi (1990) conducted a more comprehensive study and documented some information about quantitative traits of native pear cultivars. Some imported cultivars such as cv. Coscia, cv. Williams (Bartlett), cv. Duchesse d'Angouleme, cv. Louise Bonne de Jersey, and cv. Spadona were also evaluated in his research. There is very limited information about native pear cultivars from Shahroud collection. Therefore, the present research was carried out, as first evaluation, for determination of their authenticity, and subsequent assessment of specific horticultural and fruit quality traits. Material and Methods For identification and preliminarily evaluation of pear cultivars and accessions from the pear collection of Shahroud Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, fruit samples of 25 pear genotypes and cultivars were harvested in 2010 and transferred to the Temperate Fruit Research Center of the Horticultural Science Research Institute. The fruit traits of all 25 accessions were compared with key characteristics and starred fruit traits of introduced and native cultivars from the Karaj pear collection. Eight cultivars including: cv. Astaneh, cv. Kuzeh Kalaghi, cv. Chini, cv. Tashkandi, cv. Ghosi, cv. Hassan Kondori, cv. Kadu Anbari, and cv. Malachi, together with cv. Dargazi (control), were selected and grafted on seedling rootstocks in 2011. The grafted saplings were transplanted, at distance of 4 × 5 meters, using randomized complete block design with four replications in the pear collection orchard in Kamalshahr Horticultural Research Station in Karaj, Iran, in the winter of 2013. The trees were trained to a modified central leader system, and maintained in the following years. Morphological and pomological traits were evaluated using the national guideline of distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) tests of common pear (P. communis L.) (Sadeghi et al., 2008). To quantify leaf chlorosis, in upper and lower sections, of current-season shoots, the SPAD index was scored using a chlorophyll meter. In addition, fruit quality properties, including appearance and marketability, flesh aroma, flesh flavor, flesh juiciness, and flesh firmness (sensory), were evaluated by five panelists using one to five scale. Analysis of variance was performed for data of quantities traits using SAS ver. 9.4 . Duncan’s Multiple Rage Test was used for mean comparisons. Results and Discussion Among the studied pear cultivars, cv. Chini, cv. Hassan Kondori, and cv. Malachi showed weak growth vigor. Comparison of leaf chlorophyll index with revealed that only cv. Kadu Anbari had mean value higher than cv. Dargazi. Other traits such as blossom shape, leaf color, fruit dimensions including fruit length and diameter, fruit length: diameter ratio, fruit maximum diameter position, and sensory tests of flesh tissue, indicated that these cultivars have a strong resemblance to wild pear genotypes from forests in the north of Iran. These native germplasm are potential genetic resources for use in pear breeding programs (Bell and Itai, 2011). Sensory attributes based quality assessments highlighted the superiority of cv. Dargazi and cv.Tashkandi. In addition, cv. Malachi appears to be an interspecific hybrid between the Syrian pear (Pyrus syriaca Boiss.) and the common pear. The results showed that cv. Chini, cv. Kadu Anbari, cv. Hassan Kondori, cv. Astaneh, and cv. Kuzeh Kalaghi had low in quality, indicating their unsuitability for commercial use (Abdollahi, 2010). However, considering the dwarf growth habit of cv. Chini, cv. Hassan Kondori, and cv. Malachi, it is necessary to evaluate their seed germination attributes, precocity of grafted cultivars on their seedlings, and rooting ability to assess their potential for use in pear breeding programs for development of new dwarf rootstocks for commercial pears cultivars. References Abdollahi, H. 2010. Pear: botany, cultivars and rootstocks. Iranian Agricultural Ministry Publications, Tehran, Iran. 210 pp. (in Persian). Atefi, J. 1990. Primary evolutions of the pear cultivars in Iran. Technical Handbook of Horticultural Research Department, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Karaj, Iran. 95 pp. (in Persian). Bell, L. R. and Itai, A. 2011. Pyrus. Pp. 147–177. In: Kole, C. (ed.). Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. Manee, A. 1994. Growing of pear and quinces. Iran Technical Publishing Corporation, Tehran, Iran. 113 pp. (in Persian). Sadeghi, L., Abdollahi, H. and Fakhraee Lahiji, M. 2008. National guideline for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability in pear. Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute. 37 pp. (in Persian). | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Pear, chlorophyll, fruit quality, leaf blade chlorosis, dwarfing | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdollahi, H. 2010. Pear: botany, cultivars and rootstocks. Nashr-e-Amoozesh Keshavarzi. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Ministry of Jihad-e- Agriculture. Tehran, Iran. 210 pp. (in Persian).
Abdollahi, H. 2021. An illustrated review on manifestation of pome fruit germplasm in the historic miniatures of ancient Persia. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 68, pp.2775-2791. DOI: 10.1007/s10722-021-01244-y
Abdollahi, H. and Salehi, Z. 2017. Histology of oxidative stress and generation of reactive oxygen species against progress of fire blight causal agent in pear cultivars. Seed and Plant Production Journal, 33, pp.139-162. DOI: 10.22092/sppj.2018.116423
Abdollahi, H. and Tahzibi Hagh, F. 2018. Evaluation of vegetative and reproductive characteristics of some introductions of European pear (Pyrus communis L.) cultivars using morphological markers. Seed and Plant Journal, 34-1, pp. 395-421 (in Persian). DOI: 10.22092/spij.2019.119544
Abdollahi, H., Ghahremani, Z., Erfaninia, K. and Mehrabi, R. 2015. Role of electron transport chain of chloroplasts in oxidative burst of interaction between Erwinia amylovora and host cells. Photosynthesis Research, 124, pp.231-242. DOI: 10.1007/s11120-015-0127-8
Abdollahi, H., Tahzibi Hagh, F. and Ghahremani, Z., 2011. Correlation between fire blight resistance and morphological characteristics of pear (Pyrus communis L.). Acta Horticulturae, 896, pp.339-345. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.896.46
Arzani, K. 2002. Introduction of some Asian pear cultivars (Pyrus pyrifolia) to Iran. Acta Horticulturae, 596, pp.287-290. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.596.45.
Atefi, J. 1990. Primary evolutions of the pear cultivars in Iran. Technical Handbook of Horticultural Research Department, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran. 95 pp. (in Persian).
Attar, S., Davarynejad, G. and Nemati, S.H. 2017. Study of quantitative and qualitative traits of five native and foreign pear cultivars in Khorasan Razavi province. Plant Production Technology, 8, pp.53-67 (in Persian). DOI: 10.22084/ppt.2016.1855
Babaei, F., Abdollahi, H. and Khorramdel Azad, M. 2011. Detection of pear S-alleles by setting up a revised identification system. Acta Horticulturae, 976, pp.339-343. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.976.46
Barbera, G., Bellini, E., Bolognesi, G., Brigati, S., Cannella, C., Della Casa, R., Fideghelli, C., Laffi, F., Musacchi, S., Natarelli, L., Nin, S., Pasini, W., Pasqualini, E., Ponti, I., Predieri, S., Rapparini, F., Senesi, E., Sansavini, S. and Viggiani, P. 2007. Pero. Coltura & Cultura. Bayer CropScience. Milan, Italy. 335 pp. (in Italian).
Bashiri, H., Cheghamirza, K., Arji, I. and Mahmodi, N. 2017. Assessing genetic diversity of Pyrus spp. in the central Zagros Mountains based on morphological characters. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 64, pp.391-404. DOI: 10.1007/s10722-016-0367-2
Bell, L.R. and Itai, A. 2011. Pyrus. Pp. 147–177. In: Kole, C. (ed.). Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
Davoodee, A., Majidi, E., Rahimian, H. and Valizade, M. 2005. The intensity of disease of pear cultivars to fire blight with use the standard system of USDA. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Water and Soil Science, 9, pp.159-168 (in Persian). DOI: 20.1001.1.24763594.1384.9.2.14.4
Erfani, J., Abdollahi, H., Ebadi, A., Fatahi Moghadam, M.R. and Arzani, K. 2013. Evaluation of fire blight resistance and the related markers in some European and Asian pear cultivars. Seed and Plant Journal, 29-1, pp.659-672 (in Persian). DOI: 10.22092/spij.2017.111183
Erfani, J., Ebadi, A., Abdollahi, H. and Fatahi, M.R. 2012. Genetic diversity of some pear cultivars and genotypes using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 30, pp.1065–1072. DOI: 10.1007/s11105-012-0421-y
Esmaeili, A., Abdollahi, H., Bazgir, M. and Abdossi, V. 2019. Effect of lime concentration on pear’s rootstock/scion combinations. Horticultural Science, 46, pp.123-131. DOI: 10.17221/210/2017-HORTSCI
FAO. 2025. Food and agricultural organization statistic yearbook. Publication of Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome, Italy. 418 pp. DOI: 10.4060/cd4313en
Hassani, M., Salami, S. A., Nasiri, J., Abdollahi, H. and Ghahremani, Z. 2016. Phylogenetic analysis of PR genes in some pome fruit species with the emphasis on transcriptional analysis and ROS response under Erwinia amylovora inoculation in apple. Genetica, 144, pp.9-22. DOI: 10.1007/s10709-015-9874-x
Manee, A. 1994. Growing of pear and quinces. Iran Technical Publishing Corporation, Tehran, Iran. 113 pp. (in Persian).
Nikzad Gharehaghaji, A., Abdollahi, H., Arzani, K., Shojaeiyan, A., Padasht, M.N., Dondini, L. and De Franceschi, P. 2014a. Contribution of western and eastern species to the Iranian pear germplasm revealed by the characterization of s-genotypes. Acta Horticulturae, 1032, pp.159-167. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1032.21
Nikzad Gharehaghaji, A., Arzani, K., Abdollahi, H., Shojaeiyan, A., Dondini, L. and De Franceschi, P. 2014b. Genomic characterization of self-incompatibility ribonucleases in the Central Asian pear germplasm and introgression of new alleles from other species of the genus Pyrus. Tree Genetic and Genomics, 10, pp. 411-428. DOI: 10.1007/s11295-013-0696-7
Nikzad Gharehaghaji, A., Arzani, K., Abdollahi, H., Shojaeiyan, A., Henareh, M., De Franceschi, P. and Dondini, L. 2014c. Chloroplast genome diversity of the Pyrus genus; from Iranian and European wild pear species to the cultivated cultivars. Acta Horticulturae, 1032, pp.151-158. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1032.20
Sabeti, H. 1994. Trees and shrubs of Iran. Yazd University Press, Yazd, Iran. 810 pp.
Sadeghi, L., Abdollahi, H. and Fakhraee Lahiji, M. 2008. National guideline for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability in pear. Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute. 37 pp. (in Persian).
Sadeghnejad, S., Abdollahi, H., Nikzad Gharehaghaji, A. and Hassani, M. 2014. Interspecies hybridization of Pyrus species along the Silk Road, detected by
Safarpoor Shorbakhlo, M., Bahar, M., Tabatabee, B.E.S. and Abdollahi, H. 2008. Determination of genetic diversity in pear (Pyrus spp.) using microsatellite markers. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science and Technologies, 9, pp.113-128 (in Persian).
Salehi, Z., Abdollahi, H. and Miri, S.M. 2018. Chlorophyll fluorescence response in susceptible and tolerant pear cultivars to fire blight in active and inactive chloroplast conditions. Seed and Plant Production Journal, 34, pp.73-87. DOI: 10.22092/sppj.2018.118102
Tahzibi Hagh, F., Abdollahi, H., Ghasemi, A. A. and Fathi, D. 2011. Vegetative and reproductive traits of some Iranian native pear (Pyrus communis L.) cultivars based on DUF descriptor. Seed and Plant Journal, 27-1, pp.37-55 (in Persian). DOI: 10.22092/spij.2017.111049
Zamani, A., Attar, F. and Joharchi, M.R. 2009. Pyrus pashia (Rosaceae), a new record for the flora of Iran. The Iranian Journal of Botany, 15, pp.72-75. DOI: 20.1001.1.1029788.1388.15.1.11.3
Zong Y, Sun P, Liu J, Yue X, Li, K, Teng Y. 2013 Genetic diversity and population structure of seedling populations of Pyrus pashia. Plant Molecular Biology Reports, 32, pp.644-651. DOI: 10.1007/s11105-013-0680-2 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 7 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3 |
||