| تعداد نشریات | 282 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 80 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,257 |
| تعداد مقالات | 35,995 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 55,014,261 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 94,050,462 |
ارزیابی صفات فنولوژیکی و باروی، و تعیین خودسازگاری در دورگ‌های امیدبخش زردآلو (.Prunus armeniaca L) | ||
| نهال و بذر | ||
| دوره 42، شماره 1، فروردین 1405، صفحه 37-57 اصل مقاله (639.27 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/spj.2026.374213.1484 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| رحیم قره شیخ بیات* | ||
| استادیار، پژوهشکده میوه های معتدله و سردسیری، موسسه تحقیقات علوم باغبانی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| زردآلو (.Prunus armeniaca L) یکی از محصولات میوه‌‌ای مهم مناطق معتدل با سازگاری اقلیمی وسیع در ایران است. به‌منظور دستیابی به ژنوتیپ های جدید خودسازگار، هفت هیبرید امیدبخش زردآلو در سال‌های 1390 تا 1391 از نتاج حاصل از تلاقی بین ارقام تجاری بومی (شمس، شاهرودی و اردوباد) با چهار والد گرده‌دهنده خودسازگار خارجی (پالوملا، سن کسترزه، کافونا و ویتیلو) انتخاب شدند. پس از ارزیابی‌های مقدماتی مبتنی بر شاخص‌های مورفولوژیک، خصوصیات کمی و کیفیت میوه و مهمتر از همه صفت خودسازگاری، این ژنوتیپ‌ها برای بررسی دقیق‌تر صفات فنولوژیک و باروری، شامل زمان آغاز شکوفه‌دهی، طول دوره شکوفه‌دهی، جوانه‌زنی دانه گرده و درصد میوهبندی پس از خودگرده‌افشانی، مورد مطالعه قرار گرفتند. در سال 1395 باغ آزمایشی با تعداد سه اصله از هر کدام در ایستگاه تحقیقات باغبانی مشکین‌دشت (کرج) احداث شد. تحلیل داده‌ها طی دو سال متوالی باردهی، ضمن تایید ژنوتیپ و فنوتیپ خودسازگار این دورگ‌ها، تفاوت بسیار معنی‌داری در سطح احتمال یک درصد بین ژنوتیپ‌ها از نظر زمان آغاز شکوفه‌دهی، طول دوره شکوفه‌دهی و درصد میوهبندی ناشی از خودگرده‌افشانی نشان داد. اثر متقابل ژنوتیپ × سال نیز معنی‌دار بود. میانگین طول دوره شکوفه‌دهی در این هیبریدها ۱۳ روز و میانگین میوهبندی بعد از خودتلقیحی بیش از 27% ثبت شد. میانگین میزان جوانه‌زنی دانه گرده (۴۸%) و بالاتر از میانگین والدین بود. نتایج این پژوهش نشان دادکه هیبریدهای امیدبخش زردآلو مورد ارزیابی از میزان باروری بالابی، در شرایط خودگرده‌افشانی، برخوردار بودند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| زردآلو؛ به‌نژادی؛ فنولوژی؛ گرده افشانی؛ لوله‌گرده؛ آلل Sc | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Evaluation of Phenological and Reproductive Traits, and Determination of Self-Compatibility in Apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) Promising Hybrids | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| R. Gharesheikhbayat | ||
| Assistant Professor Temperate Fruits Research Center, Horticultural Sciences Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Karaj, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) is a temperate fruit crop of high horticultural and economic value, exhibiting high adaptability to different climatic conditions across Iran. To develop new self-compatible genotypes, seven promising hybrid genotypes were selected between 2011 and 2012 from crosses between local commercial cultivars (Shams, Shahroudi, and Ordoubad) and four foreign self-compatible pollen parents (Palumella, San Castrese, Cafona and Vitilo). The experimental orchard was established in 2016 at the Meshkin-Dasht Horticultural Research Station, Karaj, Iran. Data analysis over two consecutive fruiting years, 2019 and 2020, confirmed the self-compatibility genotype and phenotype of the hybrid genotypes. Significant differences (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01) were observed among genotypes as well as significant genotype × year interactions for bloom onset, bloom duration, and self-pollinated fruit set. The average blooming duration was about 13 days, and the average fruit set following self-pollination was more than 17%. These traits are important for commercial apricot production. The mean pollen germination rate of 48% indicated that these hybrids had high fertility potential under self-pollination conditions. Keywords: Apricot, phenology, pollination, pollen tube, Sc-allele, breeding. Introduction Pollination is very important for economic fruit production in the Rosaceae family, particularly for apricot. While self-incompatibility serves as an evolutionary strategy for genetic diversity, it presents a significant challenge in modern, single-cultivar orchards by limiting fruit set. Consequently, effective pollination management such as planting cross-compatible cultivars or adopting self-compatible cultivars is essential to maximize fruit yield without expanding cultivation area. Recent research highlights the importance of identifying self-compatibility in various apricot genotypes. Zarrinbal et al. (2018) confirmed self-compatibility in some apricot genotypes, including the Iranian hybrid AD731 and European cultivars, Canino, San Castrese, Palumella and Cafona. Furthermore, molecular advancements have strengthened these efforts. Liu et al. (2018) utilized S-RNase primers to identify S-alleles in Chinese apricot genotypes, distinguishing between self-incompatible and self-compatible types. To overcome the economic constraints imposed by self-incompatibility (SI) in local apricot cultivars in Iran, crossbreeding scheme has been design designed and implemented. The objective of this research was to evaluate the phonological and reproductive traits, and determination self-compatibility of seven apricot hybrid genotypes. Materials and Methods Seven apricot hybrid genotypes, selected from a crossbreeding program aimed at developing superior self-compatible genotypes, were evaluated in an experimental orchard in Meshkin-Dasht Research Field Station, Horticultural Sciences Research Institute, Karaj, Iran. These genotypes were derived from crosses between Iranian local apricot cultivars; Shams, Shahroudi, and Ordoubad as female parents and four Italian commercial cultivars; Palumella, San Castrese, Cafona, and Vitillo as pollen donors. For the purpose of further testing and reporting, the studied hybrids are designated as SHAR-06, SHAR-51, SHAR-57, SHAR-64, SHMS-26, SHMS-65, and SHMS-88, considering their maternal lineage. Phenological traits were recorded based on the percentage of open flowers on the canopy. Onset of blooming was defined when 10% of flowers were open and the end of blooming (petal fall) stage was recorded when approximately 80-90% of the petals had abscised from the flowers, in accordance with the BBCH-scale; stone fruit. Self-compatibility was evaluated by bagging branches for controlled self-pollination and recording final fruit set under field conditions (Burgos et al., 1993). Pollen viability was verified through `in vitro' germination on standard agar media, and pollen tube growth in self-pollinated pistils was monitored on cut branches using aniline blue fluorescence microscopy. Finally, S-alleles were determined via PCR-based S-RNase genotyping following the specific consensus primer protocols established for apricot. Results and Discussions The results revealed significant (P<0.05%) differences in fruit set among the studied apricot genotypes. Genotype SHAR-06 exhibited the highest fruit set, whereas control cultivars showed significantly lower values. This variation in fruit set is a critical factor in apricot breeding, as it often reflects the level of self-compatibility or the efficiency of pollen-pistil interactions. The observed differences in fruit set could be attributed to the genetic variation in S-alleles, which governs self-incompatibility (SI) in Prunus armeniaca (Andres and Duran, 1998). Higher fruit set percentages in certain genotypes suggest a higher potential for self-compatibility, a trait highly sought after in intensive orchard management (Zarrinbal et al., 2018). Significant differences were also observed in the timing of blooming. The timing of blooming is a genetically controlled trait influenced by environmental factors such as temperature. The mean blooming onset varied from 1 to 8.5 days after early flowering control cultivar. Furthermore, the blooming duration (flowering period) showed significant differences among genotypes. Genotypes with a prolonged blooming period, such as SHMS-26 and SHMS-65 might provide a wider window for successful pollination, which could potentially mitigate the risks of environmental stresses during flowering stage. The relationship between blooming onset and duration is a key component of the flowering phenology that determines the synchronization of pollen availability and stigma receptivity (Milatović et al., 2013). In conclusion, the significant variation in phenological traits and fruit set among the seven apricot hybrid genotypes indicated wide genetic basis for these traits. The genotypes that showed stable blooming onset and duration combined with high fruit set should be considered for being used in apricot breeding programs for development of self-compatible apricot hybrids. References Andres, M.V. and Duran, J.M. 1998. Self-incompatibility in Spanish clones of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) tree. Euphytica, 101, pp.349-355. DOI: 10.1023/A:1018325517208 Liu, M., Hou, P., Zhang, L., Dong, Y. and Zong, W. 2018. S-genotype characterization of 10 Kernel-apricots native to China. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 94(2), pp.237-242. DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2018.1478679 Milatović D., Nikolić D., Fotirić-Akšić M. and Radović A. 2013. Testing of self-(in)compatibility in apricot cultivars using fluorescence microscopy. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus, 12(6), pp.103-113. DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2007.11512215 Zarrinbal, M., Soleimani, A., Baghban Kohnehrouz, B. and Dejampour, J. 2018. Self-compatibility in some apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) genotypes. Crop Breeding Journal, 8(1 & 2), pp.49-59. DOI: 10.22092/cbj.2018.122435.1025 | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Apricot, phenology, pollination, pollen tube, Sc-allele, breeding | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Adams, C.R., Bamford, K.M. and Early, M.P. 2008. Principles of Horticulture. Fifth Edition. Elsevier. Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford, United Kingdom. 413 pp.
Anonymous, 2023. Agricultural Statistics, Volume 3. Horticultural Products. Center for Statistics, Information and Communication Technology. Deputy of Planning and Economic Affairs. Ministry of Agricultural Jihad. 400 pp.
Andres, M.V. and Duran, J.M. 1998. Self-incompatibility in Spanish clones of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) tree. Euphytica, 101, pp.349-355. DOI: 10.1023/A:1018325517208
Asma, B.M. 2008. Determination of pollen viability, germination ratios and morphology of eight apricot genotypes. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7(23), pp.4269-4273. DOI: 10.4314/ajb.v7i23.59562
Audergon, J.M., Guerriero, R., Monteleone, P. and Viti R. 1999. Contribution to the study of inheritance of the character self-incompatibility in apricot. Acta Horticulturae. 488, pp.275-280. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1999.488.43
Burgos, L., Alburquerque, N. and Egea, J. 2004. Review: flower biology in apricot and its implications for breeding. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 2(2), pp.227-241. DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2004022-77
FAO. 2024. FAO statistical data. Available on: www.faostat.org
Gharesheikhbayat, R. 2010. Self-incompatibility in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.); new achievements and molecular aspects of S-locus allele segregation. Ph. D Thesis, University of Bologna. Bologna, Italy.164 pp. DOI: 10.6092/unibo/amsdottorato/2997
Gharesheikhbayat, R., Dejampour, J. and Zarrinbal, M. 2025. Apricot. Pp. 152-175. In: Mahmoodi, R. and Tavakoli, A.R. (eds.) Productivity and Production Management of Horticultural Crops on National Cropping Pattern. Horticultural Sciences Research Institute publication. Karaj, Iran. (in Persian).
Halász, J., Pedryc, A. and Hegedus, A. 2007. Origin and dissemination of the
Halász, J., Pedryc, A., Ercisli, S., Yilmaz, K.U. and Hegedűs, A. 2010. S-genotyping supports the genetic relationships between Turkish and Hungarian apricot germplasm. 2010. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 135(5), pp.410-417. DOI: 10.21273/JASHS.135.5.410
Herrera, S., Rodrigo, J., Hormaza, J. and Lora, J., 2018. Identification of self-incompatibility alleles by specific PCR analysis and S-RNase sequencing in apricot. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19(11), 3612, pp.1-13. DOI: 10.3390/ijms 19113612
Jamshidi, A.R., Imani, A. and Miri, S.M. 2021. Identification of the pollinizer for a new almond genotype ‘Karaj 33’. Journal of Horticulture and Postharvest Research, 4(4), pp.521-528. DOI: 10.22077/jhpr.2021.4477.1226
Kodad, O., Halász, J., Hegedus, A., Messaoudi, Z., Pedryc, A. and Socias i Company, R. 2013. Self-(in)compatibility and fruit set in 19 local Moroccan apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) genotypes. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 88(4), pp.457-461. DOI:10.1080/14620316.2013.11512991
Lichou, J., Audubert, A., Jay, M. and Costes, E. 1995. Influence of floral fertility and pollination on fruit drop and productivity of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.). Acta Horticulturae, 384, pp.333-338. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1995.384.51
Liu, M., Hou, P., Zhang, L., Dong, Y. and Zong, W. 2018. S-genotype characterization of 10 Kernel-apricots native to China. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 94(2), pp.237-242. DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2018.1478679
McLaren, G.F., Fraser, J.A. and Grant, J.E. 1996. Some factors influencing fruit set in ‘Sundrop’ apricot. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 24(1), pp.55-63. DOI: 10.1080/01140671.1996.9513935
Milatović, D., Nikolić, D., Fotirić-Akšić, M. and Radović, A. 2013. Testing of self-(in)compatibility in apricot cultivars using fluorescence microscopy. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus, 12(6), pp.103-113. DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2007.11512215
Molaei, S., Soleimani, A., Zeinolabedini, M. and Maleki, B. 2014. Study of self-incompatibility in some apricot genotypes (Prunus armeniaca L.) using classical and molecular methods. Seed and Plant Improvement, 30-1(4): pp.777-790.
Nejatian, M.A., 2008. Iranian apricot. Nashr-e-Amoozesh Keshavarzi. Karaj, Iran. 441 pp. (in Persian).
Nekounam, F., Fattahi Moghaddam, M. and Ebadi, A. 2011. An evaluation of the states of incompatibility and sterility in four Iranian commercial apricot cultivars. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science, 42(1), pp. 1-9.
Pedryc, A., Ruthner, Sz. Hermán, R. Krska, B. Hegedű, A. and Halász, J. 2009. Genetic diversity of apricot revealed by a set of SSR markers from linkage group G1. Scientia Horticulturae, 121, pp.19–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.01.014
Rizzo, M., Marcuzzo, M., Zangari, A., Gasparetto, A. and Albarelli, A. 2023. Fruit ripeness classification: a survey. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture, 7, pp.44-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.aiia.2023.02.004
Ruiza, D. and Egea, J. 2008. Analysis of the variability and correlations of floral biology factors affecting fruit set in apricot in a Mediterranean climate. Scientia Horticulturae, 115(2), pp.154-163. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2007.08.016
Westwood, M. N. 1993. Temperate-zone pomology: physiology and culture. 3rd Edition. Portland, OR: Timber Press. 523 pp.
Yaman, M. and Turan Sirke, S. 2021. Determination of pollen viability and germination ratios in Mersin ecology of some early apricot. Current Trends in Natural Sciences 10(19), pp.166-169. DOI: 10.47068/ctns.2021. V10i19.021
Zarrinbal, M., Soleimani, A., Baghban Kohnehrouz, B. and Dejampour, J. 2018. Self-compatibility in some apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) genotypes. Crop Breeding Journal, 8(1 & 2), pp.49-59. DOI: 10.22092/cbj.2018.122435.1025
Zarrinbal, M., Baghban Kohnevarz, B., Soleymani A. and Dejampour J. 2019. Assessment of fruit set percentage and pollen compatibility status in different apricot cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 29(2), pp.205-221 (in Persian). | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 13 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3 |
||