| تعداد نشریات | 282 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 80 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 3,242 |
| تعداد مقالات | 35,855 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 54,150,632 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 93,342,715 |
اصلاح برای مقاومت به پوسیدگی ریزوکتونیایی ریشه در چغندرقند | ||
| چغندرقند | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 41، شماره 2، مهر 1404، صفحه 175-194 اصل مقاله (1.01 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مروری | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/jsb.2026.372949.1409 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سید باقر محمودی* 1؛ مژده کاکوئی نژاد2؛ مهدی حسنی1؛ پرویز فصاحت3؛ جمشید سلطانی ایدلیکی4؛ حمزه حمزه5؛ مسعود احمدی6 | ||
| 1مؤسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه بذر چغندرقند، سازمان تحقیقات آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران | ||
| 2استادیار مؤسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه بذر چغندرقند سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران. | ||
| 3دانشیارمؤسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه بذر چغندرقند، سازمان تحقیقات آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران | ||
| 4بخش تحقیقات چغندرقند، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خراسان رضوی، سازمان تحقیقات آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، مشهد، ایران | ||
| 5بخش تحقیقات چغندرقند، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی همدان، سازمان تحقیقات آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، همدان، ایران | ||
| 6دانشیار بخش تحقیقات چغندرقند، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان خراسان رضوی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، | ||
| چکیده | ||
| پوسیدگی ریزوکتونیایی ریشه از مهمترین بیماریهای کشت بهاره چغندرقند در ایران به شمار میرود. عامل این بیماری، قارچی خاکزاد است که به دلیل توانایی بقا و پایداری طولانیمدت در خاک، مدیریت بیماری باچالشهای قابلتوجهی همراه است. یکی از روشهای مؤثر کاهش خسارت این بیماری استفاده از ارقام مقاوم به بیمارگر است. اصلاح و تهیه ارقام مقاوم نیازمند دسترسی به منابع ژنتیکی مقاوم، توسعه روشهای دقیق ارزیابی مقاومت و شناسایی لاینهای برتر اصلاحی است. با توجه به وجود تودههای اصلاحی مقاوم به بیمارگر، امکان تهیه لاینهای مقاوم فراهم شد. به منظور دستیابی به این هدف، روش فنوتیپی ارزیابی مقاومت در میکروپلات بهینهسازی شد و لاینهای مقاوم شناسایی و توسعه یافتند. بررسی مطالعات نشان داد که در ایران بیمارگر Rhizoctonia solani AG-2-2 IIIB شیوع دارد و جدایه با شدت بیماریزایی بالا (Rh133) شناسایی و مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. پژوهشهای انجامشده منجر به معرفی ارقام تجاری مقاوم به پوسیدگی ریزوکتونیایی شد و اولین رقم مقاوم بهنام اکباتان معرفی شد. با توجه به اینکه در کشت بهاره چغندرقند، بیماری ریزومانیا نیز یکی از تهدیدهای مهم به شمار میرود و اگر رقمی صرفاً به بیمارگر ریزوکتونیا مقاوم باشد، در عرصه تولید موفق نخواهد بود، متخصصان اصلاح نباتات مقاومت به هر دو بیماری را در لاینها تثبیت و ارقام سینا، دنا و دنیا را معرفی نمودند. این مقاله ضمن مرور فعالیتهای پیشین، مسیر توسعه و تولید ارقام جدید سازگار با شرایط ایران را تبیین کرده و راهکارهایی برای مدیریت پوسیدگی انتهای فصل در کشت پاییزه چغندرقند را نیز ارائه میدهد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Rhizoctonia solani؛ ارزیابی بیماری؛ مقاومت ژنتیکی؛ نشانگرهای مولکولی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Breeding for resistance to rhizoctonia root rot in sugar beet- A review | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Seyed Bagher Mahmoudi1؛ Mozhdeh Kakueinezhad2؛ Mehdi Hasani1؛ Parviz Fasahat3؛ Jamshid Soltani Idliki4؛ Hamze Hamze5؛ M. Ahmadi6 | ||
| 1Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI), Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant professor of Seed and Plant Improvement Institute- Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran. | ||
| 3Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI), Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran | ||
| 4Sugar Beet Research Department, Mashhad Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Khorasan Razavi, Iran | ||
| 5Sugar Beet Research Department, Hamedan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization (AREEO), Hamedan, Iran | ||
| 6Associate professor of Sugar Beet Research Department, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Mashhad, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
Introduction Rhizoctonia root rot is one of the most important diseases limiting sugar beet production, particularly in spring-sown sugar beet in Iran. The disease is mainly caused by the soil-borne fungus Rhizoctonia solani Kühn, especially anastomosis group AG-2-2 IIIB. Its long-term survival in soil as sclerotia and mycelium, together with its broad host range, makes effective disease management difficult. Depending on environmental conditions and pathogen pressure, disease severity may range from minor damage to more than 60% reduction in root yield loss and a 5–10% reduction in extractable white sugar. Under severe disease pressure, the disease can lead to complete crop failure. Symptoms include seedling damping-off during early growth stages and crown and root rot in later growth stages. Therefore, the development and deployment of genetically resistant cultivars represent an essential component of sustainable disease management. Materials and Methods A comprehensive review and synthesis of research conducted in Iran and other countries on the genetic resistance of sugar beet to R. solani were undertaken. Studies involving conventional breeding, artificial inoculation, field and greenhouse screening, microplot evaluation, genetic mapping, QTL analysis, and molecular marker development were critically examined. Particular attention was given to the inheritance of resistance, resistant germplasm, evaluation methodologies, development of O-type and pollinator lines, hybrid breeding, and the application of molecular markers for marker-assisted selection. The optimized field microplot method, involving artificial inoculation with R. solani- colonized maize kernels and disease assessment using a 1–9 rating scale, was considered as a reliable approach for screening breeding materials for resistance to Rhizoctonia root rot. Results and Discussion Resistance to R. solani in sugar beet is generally considered a quantitative and polygenic trait, with incomplete dominance and the involvement of at least two major genes together with minor genes having variable effects. QTL mapping studies have identified important resistance loci on chromosomes four, five, and seven, which together account for approximately 71% of the observed phenotypic variation. In addition, the SNP marker RsBv1 on chromosome six has been validated across different genetic backgrounds. An allele-specific molecular marker associated with resistance has also recently been developed in Iran, providing an opportunity to accelerate the selection of resistant genotypes. Reliable and standardized phenotyping is essential for successful resistance breeding. Conventional field trials based on artificial inoculation are affected by environmental variation and are generally limited to one evaluation cycle per year. Greenhouse screening methods, including toothpick inoculation and the use of infected millet or barley seeds, provide controlled conditions for resistance as sessment. Among field-based approaches, the optimized microplot method has demonstrated particular value for precise screening. In this method, plots are inoculated with infected maize kernels colonized by R. solani, regularly irrigated, and evaluated approximately two months after inoculation using a 1–9 disease severity scale. Disease and harvest indices can subsequently be calculated, with roots scoring 1–3 generally classified as resistant. This method is routinely applied at the Hamedan and Kermanshah research stations for screening O-type and pollinator lines. Breeding efforts in Iran have resulted in the development and identification of resistant full-sib (S1) pollinator lines from resistance-gene-carrying populations available in the gene bank of the Sugar Beet Seed Institute. Screening programs have identified superior resistant lines and base populations. Resistant O-type lines have also been identified under artificial inoculation and incorporated into the production of maternal single crosses. Resistant hybrids are generally developed through three-way crosses involving a resistant pollinator parent and a resistant or partially resistant maternal single-cross parent. The combination of resistance in both parental components is expected to provide more stable resistance in commercial hybrids. Given the diversity of fungal and fungus-like pathogens responsible for root rot in Iranian soils, identifying lines resistant to Rhizoctonia could provide a basis for developing lines with resistance or tolerance to other soil-borne pathogens as well. Several Iranian cultivars with relative resistance to R. solani have been released, including Ekbatan, in which resistance was mainly contributed by the pollinator parent, as well as Sina, Dena, and Donya. The latter cultivars combine resistance to rhizoctonia root rot and rhizomania with improved yield performance. Because rhizomania is widely prevalent in Iran, cultivars possessing resistance only to rhizoctonia, such as Ekbatan, have experienced limited adoption. Consequently, simultaneous incorporation of resistance to both pathogens is considered an important breeding objective. Among licensed imported cultivars, approximately 22% (60 cultivars) possess resistance to rhizoctonia root rot, and most of these also carry resistance to rhizomania. Conclusion The availability of resistant germplasm, standardized phenotyping methods, particularly the microplot technique, and molecular markers has created favorable conditions for the development of rhizoctonia-resistant sugar beet cultivars. Integrating molecular markers with conventional selection can accelerate the identification of resistant genotypes and reduce the time required for cultivar development and release. Given the increasing challenges associated with drought and climate change in spring cultivation and the expansion of autumn sowing, particularly in Khuzestan where late-season root rot has become increasingly important, resistance to R. solani should be incorporated into breeding programs for both spring- and autumn-sown sugar beet. The use of resistant commercial cultivars as sources of resistance genes and the establishment of appropriate resistant gene pools are recommended as key strategies for future breeding programs. Genetic resistance should also be complemented by integrated disease management practices, including appropriate crop rotation, avoidance of highly susceptible preceding crops such as soybean and maize, timely chemical control, and biological control | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Disease evaluation, Genetic resistance, Molecular markers, Rhizoctonia solani | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aeini M, Khodakaramian G. Rhizosphere bacterial composition of the sugar beet using SDS-PAGE methodology. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology. 2018; 60:1-13. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4324-2017160374 Aghaeezadeh M and Sadeghzadeh Hemayati S. Sugar beet breeding. Technical Report, Sugar Beet Seed Institute, 2020; No. 56864;. (In Persian) Ajayi-Oyetunde OO, Bradley CA. Rhizoctonia solani: Taxonomy, population biology and management of rhizoctonia seedling disease of soybean. Plant Pathology. 2018; 67:3-17. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12733 Barreto A, Paulus S, Varrelmann M, Mahlein AK. Hyperspectral imaging of symptoms induced by Rhizoctonia solani in sugar beet: comparison of input data and different machine learning algorithms. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection. 2020; 127:441-451. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-020-00344-8 Benker M. Rhizoctonia root rot - Can resistant sugar beet varieties contribute to control the disease. Sugar Industry. 2000; 125(9):693-697 Biancardi E. History of sugar beet breeding In: Biancardi E, Campbell LG, Skaracis GN, De Biaggi M, (Eds.) Genetics and breeding of sugar beet. Enfield (NH): Science Publishers; 2005; p. 38-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479705283540 Bolton MD, Panella L, Campbell L. Temperature, moisture, and fungicide effects in managing Rhizoctonia root and crown rot of sugar beet. Phytopathology. 2010; 100:689-697. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-100-7-0689 Brantner JR, Chanda AK. Effects of inoculum density and cultivar susceptibility on Rhizoctonia damping-off and crown and root rot in sugar beet. Plant Diseases. 2021; 105:1019-1025. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-02-20-0336-re Büttner G, Führer Ithurrart ME, Buddemeyer J. Späte rübenfäule (Rhizoctonia solani) – verbreitung, wirtschaftliche bedeutung und integrierte bekämpfungskonzepte. Zuckerindustrie. 2002; 127:856-866. Büttner G, Pfähler B, Märländer B. Greenhouse and field techniques for testing sugar beet for resistance to rhizoctonia root and crown rot. Plant Breeding. 2004; 123(2):158-166. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0523.2003.00967.x Büttner G, Pfahler B, Petersen J. Rhizoctonia root rot in Europe—incidence, economic importance and concept for integrated control. In: Proceedings of the 66th IIRB-ASSBT Congress; 2003. p. 897-901. Campbell CL, Altman J. Rapid laboratory screening of sugar beet cultivars for resistance to Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology.1976; 66: 1373-1374. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-66-1373 Campbell LG, Bugbee WM. Pre-breeding for root-rot resistance. Journal of Sugar Beet Research. 1993;30(4). Carling DE, Kuninaga S, Brainard KA. Hyphal anastomosis reactions, rDNA-internal transcribed spacer sequences, and virulence levels among subsets of Rhizoctonia solani anastomosis Group-2 (AG-2) and AG-BI. Phytopathology. 2002; 92(1):43-50. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto.2002.92.1.43 Cornelissen JHC. An experimental comparison of leaf decomposition rates in a wide range of temperate plant species and types. Journal of Ecology. 1996; 84:573-582. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2261479 Dadkhah A. Evaluation resistance of sugar beet varieties to rhizoctonia root rot in Isfahan. (MSc thesis). Tarbiat Modares University. 1999. p. 120 (In Persian) Das S, Pattanayak S. Soil-borne pathogen-mediated root rot diseases of sugar beet and their management. pp. 591-606. In: Misra V, Srivastava S, Mall AK. (Eds.) Sugar Beet Cultivation, Management, and Processing. Cham: Springer; 2022. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2730-0_28 Davey JW, Hohenlohe P.A, Etter PD, Boone JQ, Catchen JM, Blaxter ML. Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nature Reviwes Genetics. 2011; 12(7):499-510. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3012 Ebrahimi Koulaee H, Mahmoudi SB, Hasani M. Evaluation of the resistance of sugar beet breeding lines to rhizoctonia root and crown rot. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2010; 26(1):31-42. doi:10.22092/JSB.2010.758. (In Persian with English abstract). Doi: https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2010.758 Ebrahimi Koulaei H, Mahmoudi SB. Evaluation of resistance of sugar beet genotypes to rhizoctonia root and crown rot in microplot conditions. In: Proceedings of the 18th Iranian Plant Protection Congress; 2008. p. 24-27. Ebrahimi Koulaei H, Mansouri H, Soltani J, Mahmoudi SB, Aghaeezadeh M, Hassani M, Orazizadeh MR, Pedram A. Ekbatan, The first Iranian sugar beet cultivar resistant to rhizoctonia and tolerant to rhizomania. Research Findings in Field and Horticultural Crops. 2019; 8(1):117-134. (In Persian). Doi: https://doi.org/10.22092/rafhc.2019.115382.1095 Ebrahimi Koulaei H, Mansouri H, Aghaeezadeh M, Mohammadian R, Soltani J, Fotouhi K, Sharifi M. Evaluation of yield potential and resistance to Rhizoctonia (Rhizoctonia solani) disease of new sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) hybrids. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 2019; 21(2):173-187. Doi: https://doi.org/10.29252/abj.21.2.173 Engelkes CA, Windels CE. Susceptibility of sugar beet and beans to Rhizoctonia solani AG-2-2 IIIB and AG-2-2 IV. Plant Disease. 1996; 80:1413-1417. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1094/pd-80-1413 Farhaoui A, El Alami N, Khadiri M, Ezrari S, Radouane N, Baala M, et al. Biological control of diseases caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG-2-2 in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) using plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology. 2023; 124:101966. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2023.101966 Fasahat P, Khayamim S, Soltani IJ, Darabi S, Pedram A, Hasanai M, Jalilian A, Babaei B. Stability analysis of genotype× environment interaction effect on sugar yield in sugar beet hybrids. Journal of Crop Breeding. 2019. 11(32), 33-40. Doi: https://doi.org/10.29252/jcb.11.32.33 Garvin MR, Saitoh K, Gharrett AJ. Application of single nucleotide polymorphisms to non-model species: a technical review. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2010; 10(6):915-934. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02891.x Gaskill JO, Mumford DL, Ruppel EG. Preliminary report on breeding sugar beet for combined resistance to leaf spot, curly top, and Rhizoctonia. Journal of the American Society of Sugar beet Technologist. 1970; 16: 207-213. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5274/jsbr.16.3.207 Hamze H, Hassani M, Mansouri H. Screening O-type lines of sugar beet in terms of resistance to Rhizoctonia root rot. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2021; 37(2):153-165. (In Persian with English abstract) Doi: https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2022.357181.1296 Hassani M, Heidari B, Mahmoudi SB, Taleghani DF, Stevanato P. Identification of Owen -Type male sterility maintainers carrying resistance against Rhizoctonia crown and root rot (Rcrr) disease in sugar beet germplasm. Sugar Tech. 2019; 21(6):959-965. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12355-019-00733-w Hecker RJ, Ruppel EG. Inheritance of resistance to rhizoctonia root rot in sugar beet. Crop Science. 1975; 15:487-490. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1975.0011183X001500040011x Hecker RJ, Ruppel EG. Polyploid and maternal effects on rhizoctonia root rot resistance in sugar beet. Euphytica. 1976; 25:419-423. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00041575 Hecker RJ, Ruppel EG. Rhizoctonia root rot resistance in sugar beet: breeding and related research. Journal of Sugar beet Research. 1977; 19(3): 246-256. Ithurrart ME, Büttner G, Petersen J. Rhizoctonia root rot in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. altissima)-epidemiological aspects in relation to maize (Zea mays) as a host plant. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection. 2004; 111(3):302-312. Kakueinezhad M, Taheri P, Mahmoudi SB, Tarighi S. Sources of resistance to Phytophthora root rot within the genus Beta. Euphytica. 2017; 213(8):193–209. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-017-1985-2. Kakueinezhad M, Taheri P, Mahmoudi SB, Tarighi S. Resistance assessment and biochemical responses of sugar beet lines against Pythium aphanidermatum, causing root rot. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 2018; 151(2):307-19. Doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10658-017-1373-8 Kalika-Singh S, Del Rio Mendoza L, Khan M. Rhizoctonia crown and root rot in sugar beet: A review on biology, epidemiology, and sustainable management. South Asian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2025; 5(2):238-242. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22271/27889289.2025.v5.i2c.215 Khan AF, Liu Y, Khan MF. Efficacy and safety of generic azoxystrobin in controlling Rhizoctonia solani in sugar beet. Crop Protection. 2017; 93:77-81. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.11.024 Khan MFR and Bolton MD. Management of rhizoctonia root and crown rot of sugar beet. NDSU Agriculture; 2021. Available from: https://www.ndsu.edu/agriculture/ag-hub/publications/management-Rhizoctonia-root-and-crown-rot-sugarbeet Khan MR, Haque Z, Rasool F, Salati K, Khan U, Mohiddin FA, et al. Management of root-rot disease complex of mungbean caused by Macrophomina phaseolina and Rhizoctonia solani through soil application of Trichoderma spp. Crop Protection. 2019; 119:24-29. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2019.01.014 Kiewnick S, Jacobsen BJ, Braun-Kiewnick A, Eckhoff JL, Bergman JW. Integrated control of Rhizoctonia crown and root rot of sugar beet with fungicides and antagonistic bacteria. Plant Disease. 2001; 85(7):718-722. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis.2001.85.7.718 Lein JC, Sagstetter CM, Schulte D, Thurau T, Varrelmann M, Saal B, et al. Mapping of rhizoctonia root rot resistance genes in sugar beet using pathogen response‐related sequences as molecular markers. Plant Breeding. 2008; 127(6):602-611. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2008.01525.x Liu Y, Khan MFR. Penthiopyrad applied in close proximity to Rhizoctonia solani provided effective disease control in sugar beet. Crop Protection. 2016; 85:33-37. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.03.017 Luterbacher MC, Asher MJC, Beyer W, Mandolino G, Scholten OE, Frese L, et al. Sources of resistance to diseases of sugar beet in related Beta germplasm: II. Soil-borne diseases. Euphytica. 2005; 141(1):49-63. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-5231-y Mahmoudi B, Mesbah M, Alizadeh A, Ebrahimi-koulaii H. Comparison of different methods for evaluation of resistance to rhizoctonia root and crown rot in selected genotypes of sugar beet. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2003; 19(1):1-22. (In Persian with English abstract). Doi: https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2003.7149 Mahmoudi SB, Ghashghaie S. Reaction of sugar beet S1 lines and cultivars to different isolates of Macrophomina phaseolina and Rhizoctonia solani AG-2-2IIIB. Euphytica. 2012; 190:439-445. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-012-0832-8 Mahmoudi SB, Mesbah M, Alizadeh A. Pathogenic variability of sugar beet isolates of Rhizoctonia solani. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology. 2004. 40(3-4)253- 280. ((In Persian with English abstract).) Mahmoudi SB, Noruzi P, Khayamim S, Bazarafshan M, Mansouri H, Ahmadi M, Sadeghzadeh S, Aghaeezadeh M. Identification of proper maternal parent for producing sugar beet cultivars resistant to major soil-borne diseases. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2020; 36(1):1-13. (Persian with English abstract). Doi: https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2021.351187.1244 Mansouri H, Hamze H, Hassani M. Determining the appropriate time for evaluating the resistance of sugar beet roots to rhizoctonia rot under microplot conditions based on growing degree days (GDD). Journal of Sugar Beet. 2023; 39(1):67-76. (In Persian with English abstract). Doi: https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2024.364027.1336 Mansouri H, Hamze H, Hassani M. Identification of resistant pollinator lines to soil-borne Rhizoctonia solani J.G. Kühn, 1858 in sugar beet using SIIG technique. Agricuiturae Conspectus Scientificus. 2024; 89(3):199-208. McGrath JM, Hanson LE, Panella L. Registration of SR98 sugar beet germplasm with resistances to rhizoctonia seedling and crown and root rot diseases. Journal of Plant Registrations. 2015; 9(2):227-231. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3198/jpr2013.08.0052crg Misra V, Mall AK, Singh D. Rhizoctonia root-rot diseases in sugar beet: Pathogen diversity, pathogenesis and cutting-edge advancements in management research. The Microbe. 2023; 1:1-17. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microb.2023.100011 Nagendran S, Hammerschmidt R, Mitchell McGrath J. Identification of sugar beet germplasm EL51 as a source of resistance to post-emergence rhizoctonia damping-off. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 2009. 123: 461–471. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-008-9384-0 Noor A, Khan MFR. Efficacy and safety of mixing azoxystrobin and starter fertilizers for controlling Rhizoctonia solani in sugar beet. Phytoparasitica. 2014; 43:51-55. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-014-0416-3 Norouzi P, Tork N, Kakueinezhad M, Mahmoudi SB, Maleki M. Development of a repulsive molecular marker linked to rhizoctonia resistance gene(s) in sugar beet. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2025; 40(1):13-30. (In Persian). Doi: https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2024.365710.1360 Ogoshi A. Introduction — the Genus Rhizoctonia. In: Sneh B, Jabaji-Hare S, Neate S, Dijst G. (Eds.) Rhizoctonia Species: Taxonomy, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Pathology and Disease Control. Dordrecht: Springer; 1996. p. 1-9 Panella L, Frese L, Srivastava HM, Lange W. Screening and utilizing Beta genetic resources with resistance to rhizoctonia root rot and cercospora leaf spot in a sugar beet breeding programme. In: International Beta Genetic Resources Network. A report on the 4th International Beta Genetic Resources Workshop and World Beta Network Conference; 1996 Feb 28–Mar 3; Izmir, Turkey. Rome: IPGRI; 1998. Vol. 12. Panella L, Hanson LE. Registration of FC723 and FC723CMS monogerm sugar beet germplasm resistant to rhizoctonia root rot and moderately resistant to cercospora leaf spot. Journal of Plant Registrations. 2007;1(1):66-67. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3198/jpr2006.12.0771crg Panella L, Ruppel EG. Availability of germplasm for resistance against Rhizoctonia spp. In: Sneh B, Jabaji-Hare S, Neate S, Dijst G. (Eds.) Rhizoctonia species: Taxonomy, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Pathology and Disease Control. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 1996. p. 515-527. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2901-7_47 Panella L. Registration of FC709-2 and FC727 sugar beet germplasms resistant to rhizoctonia root rot and cercospora leaf spot. Crop Science. 1999; 39:298-299. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183x003900010071x Pourrahim R, Najafi H, Farzadfar Sh, Ardeh MJ, Sheikholeslami M, Fatemy S, Ghasemi A, Arbabi M. Sugar beet handbook (Plant Protection). Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Iran, Registration No. 50954. 2016; p. 157 (In Persian). Rafiei V, Velez H, Dixelius C, Tzelepis G. Advances on molecular interactions on the Rhizoctonia solani-sugar beet pathosystem. Fungal Biology Reviews. 2023; 44:100297. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbr.2022.11.005 Rajabi A, Aghaeezadeh M, Taleghani D, Noruzi P, Yousefabadi V, Mahmoudi SB, Jalilian A, Pedram A, Bazarafshan M. "Sina" a monogerm sugar beet cultivar resistant to rhizomania and root rot. Tat Reflection. 2020; 3(10):8-9. (In Persian). Ravi S, Hassani M, Heidari B, Deb S, Orsini E, Li J, Richards CM, Panella LW, Srinivasan S, Campagna G, Concheri G, Squartini A, Stevanato P. Development of an SNP assay for marker-assisted selection of soil-borne Rhizoctonia solani AG-2-2-IIIB resistance in sugar beet. Biology. 2022; 11(1):49. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11010049 Ruppel SC. Conodonts from the lower mississippian fort payne and tuscumbia formations of northern Alabama. Journal of Paleontology. 1979; 55-70. Schneider C, Newman RA, Sutherland DR, Asser U, Greaves MF. A one-step purification of membrane proteins using a high efficiency immunomatrix. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1982; 257(18):10766-10769. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)33889-4 Scholten OE, Panella LW, De Bock TS, Lange W. A greenhouse test for screening sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) for resistance to Rhizoctonia solani. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 2001; 107(2):161-166. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011208903344 Schuster ML, Jensen SG, Sayre RM. Toothpick method of inoculating sugar beets for determining pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia solani. Journal of the American Society of Sugar beet Technologist. 1958; 10:142-149. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5274/jsbr.10.2.142 Shahbazi H, Aghaeezadeh M, Sadeghian SY, Ahmadi M, Soltani J, Ghaemi A, Ashraf Mansouri G, Bazarafshan M, Hassani M, Fotouhi K, Pedram A, Orazizadeh MR, Fathi MR, Matloobi F, Vahedi S, Sadeghzadeh S, Kakueinezhad M. Motahar, A multigerm sugar beet cultivar resistant to rhizomania disease. Research Achievements for Field and Agricultural Crops. 2015; 1(1):73-84. (In Persian). Sherwood RT. Anastomosis in relation to morphology and physiology of Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology. 1967; 57:830-836. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520318243-008 Smith GA, Gaskill JO. Inheritance of resistance to cercospora leaf spot in sugar beet. Journal of the American Society of Sugar beet Technologist. 1970; 16(2):172-180. Soltaninezhad S, Mahmoudi SB, Farokhi NR. Characterization of sugar beet rhizoctonia isolates in Iran. Journal of Sugar Beet. (In Persian with English abstract) 2008; 23(2):135-150. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2007.1315 Stevanato P, Trebbi D, Panella L, Richardson K, Broccanello C, Pakish L, Fenwick AL, Saccomani M. Identification and validation of a SNP marker linked to the gene for nematode resistance in sugar beet. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. 2015; 33:474–479. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-014-0763-8 Varshney RK, Nayak SN, May GD, Jackson SA. Next-generation sequencing technologies and their implications for crop genetics and breeding. Trends in Biotechnology. 2009; 27(9):522-530. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.05.006 Windels CE, Kuznia RA, Call J. Characterization and pathogenicity of Thanatephorus cucumeris from sugar beet in Minnesota. Plant Disease. 1997; 81:245-249. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis.1997.81.3.245 Würschum T. Mapping QTL for agronomic traits in breeding populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2012; 125(2):201-210. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-012-1887-6
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 11 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 4 |
||