| تعداد نشریات | 282 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 80 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,266 |
| تعداد مقالات | 36,103 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 55,408,160 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 94,352,609 |
اثر تاریخ برداشت بر صفات رشدی، عملکرد و تجمع اینولین در سه رقم کاسنی ریشه‌ای (.Cichorium intybus L) | ||
| چغندرقند | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 41، شماره 2، اسفند 1404، صفحه 267-282 اصل مقاله (938.29 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/jsb.2026.372442.1404 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمد کافی* 1؛ نازنین میری2؛ علی معصومی3؛ جواد رضایی3 | ||
| 1گروه اگروتکنولوژی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد | ||
| 2گروه اگروتکنولوژی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، | ||
| 3مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خراسان رضوی، مشهد، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| کاسنی ریشه‌ای (چیکوری) منبع غنی از اینولین است. با توجه به ارزش اقتصادی بالای اینولین، تعیین ارقام با عملکرد مطلوب و تاریخ برداشت بهینه ضروری است. این پژوهش در مزرعه مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خراسان رضوی (دشت مشهد) در سال زراعی ۱۴۰۴، به‌صورت کرت‌های خرد‌شده بر پایه بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی، ارقام کرومیت، اورچیز و سلنیت (به‌عنوان کرت اصلی) و پنج تاریخ برداشت (به‌عنوان کرت فرعی شامل اول و ۱۵ مهر، اول و ۱۵ آبان، اول آذر) را مورد ارزیابی قرار داد. صفات مورد ارزیابی شامل درصد ماده خشک ریشه، عملکرد اینولین (با در نظر گرفتن روش‌های آماده‌سازی نمونه)، شاخص برداشت، طول ریشه، قطر ریشه، نشت الکترولیت برگ بود. ماتریس همبستگی بین صفات رسم گردید و به‌منظور بررسی الگوی شباهت بین تیمارها، از تجزیه خوشه‌ای سلسله‌مراتبی بر پایه فاصله اقلیدسی و روش اتصال کامل استفاده و نتایج در قالب نقشه حرارتی ارائه شد. نتایج حاکی از آن است که درصد ماده خشک ریشه با پیشرفت فصل رشد افزایش یافت، به‌طوری که بیشترین مقادیر در برداشت‌های چهارم (۱۵ آبان) و پنجم (اول آذر) مشاهده شد و تفاوت آماری معنی‌داری بین این دو زمان برداشت وجود نداشت. عملکرد اینولین نیز روند مشابهی را دنبال کرد. بیشترین عملکرد اینولین در نمونه‌های هواخشک و آون‌خشک در برداشت پنجم (اول آذر) و در نمونه‌های تر در برداشت چهارم و پنجم (به‌ترتیب 15 آبان و اول آذر) به‌دست آمد. شاخص برداشت در برداشت پنجم (۹۲ درصد) به حداکثر مقدار خود رسید، در حالی که طول ریشه الگوهای متفاوتی را نشان داد و بیشترین آن در رقم کرومیت در برداشت ۱۵ آبان بود. نشت الکترولیت برگ با تأخیر در برداشت افزایش یافت و بیشترین میزان آن در رقم کرومیت در برداشت‌های چهارم و پنجم مشاهده شد. تجزیه خوشه‌ای سلسله‌مراتبی نشان داد که عملکرد ریشه، شاخص برداشت و عملکرد اینولین در یک خوشه قرار گرفتند که بیانگر شباهت الگوی پاسخ این صفات در بین تیمارهای مورد بررسی است. همچنین، همبستگی قوی بین این صفات مشاهده شد که می‌تواند نشان‌دهنده ارتباط نزدیک آن‌ها باشد. در مجموع، نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که تفاوت در تیمارهای مورد بررسی بر عملکرد ریشه، شاخص برداشت و تجمع اینولین تأثیرگذار بوده و بهینه‌سازی این عوامل می‌تواند به افزایش عملکرد و تجمع اینولین کمک کند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| رقم اورچیز؛ رقم سلنیت؛ رقم کرومیت؛ فروکتان؛ کاسنی ریشه‌ای | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Effects of Harvest Date on Growth Traits, Root Yield, and Inulin Accumulation in Three Root Chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) Cultivars | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohammad Kafi1؛ Nazanin Miri2؛ Ali Masoumi3؛ Javad Rezaie3 | ||
| 1Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Iran | ||
| 2Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Mashhad, Iran. | ||
| 3Department of Research center and trainng Agriculture and Natural Resources of Khorasan Razavi, Mashhad, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction Root chicory (Cichorium intybus L.), a perennial herbaceous species belonging to the family Asteraceae, is recognized as one of the major natural sources of inulin. Its roots contain storage carbohydrates, including sucrose, glucose, fructose, fructooligosaccharides, and inulin, with an average inulin content of approximately 21% of fresh root weight. Since inulin is the principal economic product of root chicory, extraction conditions, particularly extraction method, temperature, and pH, are critical for maximizing its yield and quality. Root yield and inulin accumulation are influenced by the interaction of genetic, environmental, and management factors, particularly genotype and harvest date. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the growth and yield performance of three root chicory cultivars (Chromite, Orchies, and Selenit) and to evaluate the effects of harvest date and sample preparation methods on growth, physiological traits, root yield, and inulin yield under the climatic conditions of Mashhad, Iran. Materials and Methods The experiment was conducted during the 2025 growing season at the Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center of Khorasan Razavi Province, Mashhad, Iran. A split-plot experiment based on a randomized complete block design with three replications was employed. Three root chicory cultivars (Chromite, Orchies, and Selenit) were assigned to the main plots, while five harvest dates (23 September, 7 October, 23 October, 6 November, 22 November) were allocated to the subplots. Seeds were sown on May 14 in plots measuring 8 m× 1.5 m with 50 cm row spacing and 15 cm plant spacing within rows. Irrigation was supplied weekly through a drip irrigation system. At each harvest date, plants were sampled from a 0.75 m² area in each experimental plot. Root yield, root length, root diameter, fresh biomass, harvest index, root dry matter percentage, and leaf electrolyte leakage were determined using standard agronomic and physiological procedures. Leaf electrolyte leakage was measured as an indicator of membrane stability during late-season growth. To evaluate inulin yield, three sample preparation methods were compared, including fresh roots, air-dried roots, and oven-dried roots. Inulin was extracted from all samples using a hot-water extraction procedure (80–85°C), followed by centrifugation and filtration. Inulin concentration was determined using the anthrone–sulfuric acid colorimetric method, and inulin yield was subsequently calculated from root yield. The experimental data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Minitab software. Treatment means were compared using the least significant difference (LSD) test at the 5% probability level. Pearson correlation analysis and Hierarchical clustering analysis with heatmap visualization were performed in R Studio to investigate the relationships among measured traits and classify variables according to their similarity patterns. Results and discussion Harvest date was the major factor influencing root growth, p hysiological characteristics, and inulin production in root chicory. Root yield increased progressively throughout the growing season, reaching its maximum value (approximately 62–63 t ha⁻¹) at the fourth and fifth harvests (6 November, 22 November). Likewise, root dry matter percentage, harvest index, root diameter, and inulin yield increased toward the end of the growing season, indicating continuous assimilate partitioning and carbohydrate accumulation in the storage roots. In contrast, shoot biomass gradually declined during the late harvests, suggesting the translocation of assimilates from shoots to the storage roots accompanied by leaf senescence. These findings are consistent with previous studies reporting that delayed harvesting promotes dry matter accumulation, root development, and inulin production in root chicory. The sample preparation method considerably affected the measured inulin yield. Fresh root samples produced the highest inulin yield, followed by air-dried samples, whereas oven-dried samples consistently resulted in lower values. These findings suggest that drying conditions influence fructan stability during sample preparation and consequently affect the measured inulin yield. Similar observations were reported that oven drying reduced inulin recovery because of partial fructan degradation. Cultivar effects were not significant for most of the measured traits. However, the interaction between cultivar and harvest date was significant for leaf electrolyte leakage and root length. Electrolyte leakage increased during the late harvests, particularly in the Chromite cultivar, indicating reduced membrane stability under end-of-season environmental conditions. Although delayed harvesting enhanced root yield and inulin accumulation, further delaying harvest may increase physiological stress, particularly in the Chromite cultiv .Similar genotype-dependent responses to harvest date have previously been reported in root chicory. Pearson correlation analysis revealed strong positive relationships among root yield, harvest index, and inulin yield, confirming that greater assimilate allocation to the storage roots was directly associated with increased inulin production. Conclusion The present study demonstrated that harvest date is the principal management factor affecting root yield, root dry matter, harvest index, and inulin production in root chicory under the climatic conditions of Mashhad, Iran. Harvesting from early to late November maximized root yield and inulin accumulation, with no significant differences between the final two harvest dates. Cultivar effects were not significant for most agronomic traits. However, the interaction between cultivar and harvest date was significant for leaf electrolyte leakage, indicating that cultivars responded differently across harvest dates. Furthermore, the sample preparation method significantly influenced the measured inulin yield, with fresh and air-dried samples producing higher values than oven-dried samples. Therefore, optimizing both harvest date and sample preparation method is essential for maximizing inulin production and obtaining reliable estimates of root and inulin yield. Moreover, because cultivars differed in their physiological responses to harvest date, genotype-specific characteristics should be considered in crop management strategies and future research. Further multi-year and multi-location studies are recommended to validate these findings under different environmental conditions. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Chromite Cultivar, Fructan, Orchies Cultivar, Root chicory, Selenit Cultivar | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdollahian Noughabi M, Sheikholeslami R, Babaee B. Technical terms related to yield and quality of sugar beet. Sugar Beet Journal. 2005; 21(1): 101. (In Persian with English abstract). Doi: https://doi.org/ 10.22092/jsb.2005.8201 Aly EFA, Khalil SRA. Effect of harvest age on growth, yield and quality of two root chicory varieties (Cichorium intybus L.) under Egyptian conditions. Journal of Plant Production Mansoura University. 2017; 8(8): 887-893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/jpp.2017.40887 Amaducci S, Pritoni G. Effect of harvest date and cultivar on Cichorium intybus yield components in north Italy. Industrial Crops and Products. 1998; 7: 345–349. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6690(97)00067-8 Anonymous. Iranian Meteorological Organization (IRIMO). Daily maximum and minimum temperature data from Toroqh Weather Station, Mashhad, Iran. 2025. Available from: https://data.irimo.ir Chandra S, Kumar M, Dwivedi P, Arti K. Studies on industrial importance and medicinal value of chicory plant (Cichorium intybus L.). International Journal of Advanced Research. 2016; 4(1): 1060-1071. Chaplin MF, Kennedy JF. Carbohydrate Analysis: A Practical Approach. Oxford University Press. 1994; pp.324 Doi :https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199634491.001.0001 Foroughi Manesh F, Habibi H, Abdolhian Noghabi M. The effect of plant density and harvesting time on the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of chicory roots (Cichorium intybus L.). Iranian Journal of Crop Plant Sciences. 2013; 44(3): 529-537. In Persian. Ghoulam C, Foursy A, Fares K. Effects of salt stress on growth, inorganic ions and proline accumulation in relation to osmotic adjustment in five sugar beet cultivars. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2002; 47(1): 39-50. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(01)00109-5 Leyva A, Quintana A, Sánchez M, Rodríguez E, Cremata J, Sánchez JC. Rapid and sensitive anthrone–sulfuric acid assay in microplate format to quantify carbohydrate in biopharmaceutical products: Method development and validation. Biologicals. 2008; 36(2): 134-141. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biologicals.2007.09.001 Mathieu AS, Lutts S, Vandoorne B, Descamps C, Périlleux C, Dielen V, Van Herck JC, Quinet M. High temperatures limit plant growth but hasten flowering in root chicory (Cichorium intybus) independently of vernalization. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2014; 171(2): 109-118. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2013.09.011 Meijer WJM, Mathijssen EWJM. Crop characteristics and inulin production in chicory. European Journal of Agronomy. 1992; 1(2): 99-108. Doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S1161-0301(14)80007-5 Milani E, Poorazarang H, Khah SV, Vakilian H. Optimization of inulin extraction from Helianthus tuberosus using response surface methodology (RSM). Iranian Food Science & Technology Research Journal. 2010; 6(3): 176-183. Doi:https://doi.org/10.22067/ifstrj.v6i3.9100 Monti A, Amaducci MT, Pritoni G, Venturi G. Growth, fructan yield, and quality of chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) as related to photosynthetic capacity, harvest time, and water regime. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2005; 56(415): 1389-1395. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri140 Pal Bais H, Ravishankar GA. Cichorium intybus L. – cultivation, processing, utility, value addition and biotechnology, with an emphasis on current status and future prospects. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2001; 81: 467-484. Perović J, Tumbas Šaponjac V, Kojić J, Krulj J, Moreno DA, García-Viguera C, Bodroža-Solarov M, Ilić N. Chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) as a food ingredient – nutritional composition, bioactivity, safety, and health claims: A review. Food Chemistry. 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127676 Pourmoradi SA, Aalami A, Esfahani M. Evaluation of percentage and degree of inulin polymerization and yield in 15 cultivars and accessions of chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) in northern plains of Iran. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research. 2020; 36(3): 243-254. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22092/ijmapr.2020.342178.2738. Roustakhiz J, Majnabadi JT. Cultivation of chicory (Cichorium intybus L.), an extremely useful herb. International Journal of Farming and Allied Science. 2017; 6(1): 14-23. Shoorideh H, Peyghambari SA, Omidi M, Naghavi MR, Maroufi A, Balandari A. Investigation on morphological traits and root yield of Iranian chicory genotypes. Iranian Journal of Rangelands and Forests Plant Breeding and Genetic Research. 2015; 23(2): 226-236. Doi: https://doi.org/ 10.22092/ijrfpbgr.2015.102283 Smart RE, Bingham GE. Rapid estimates of relative water content. Plant Physiology. 1974; 53(2): 258-260. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.53.2.258 Street RA, Sidana J, Prinsloo G. Cichorium intybus: Traditional uses, phytochemistry, pharmacology, and toxicology. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine; 2013: 579319. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/579319 Tavakoli Kordelar S, Ramezan Y, Abdollahian Noughabi M. Investigation of inulin extraction conditions from the roots of chicory (Cichorium intybus L.). Journal of Innovation in Food Science and Technology. 2017; 9(3): 111-117.( In Persian). Vakili H, Hojjatoleslami M. Study of the effect of drying on the extraction of inulin from chicory roots (Cichorium intybus L.). Herbal Medicines. 2014; 6(3): 143-148. Available from: http://www.jhd.iaushk.ac.ir. In Persian. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 94 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 168 |
||