| تعداد نشریات | 282 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 80 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 3,228 |
| تعداد مقالات | 35,754 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 53,967,977 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 93,136,581 |
شناسایی ارقام برتر و صفات اصلی ارقام خربزه (Cucumis melo L.) با استفاده از آزمون تمایز، یکنواختی و پایداری (DUS) | ||
| علوم و فناوری بذر ایران | ||
| مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 21 شهریور 1405 اصل مقاله (1.46 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ijsst.2025.366978.1541 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سعید امینی* 1؛ زهرا طاهرنژاد2؛ شکوفه قیوم اصغری2؛ محمدرضا جزایری نوش آبادی2؛ لیلا زارع3؛ اکرم طلوع تکمهداش2 | ||
| 1موسسه ثبت و گواهی بذر و نهال، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران | ||
| 2مؤسسه ثبت و گواهی بذر و نهال، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران | ||
| 3سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، مؤسسه تحقیقات ثبت و گواهی بذر و نهال، کرج، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| خربزه (Cucumis melo L.) گیاهی از جنس کوکوربیتاسه است که بهعنوان میوه استفاده میشود. شناسایی ارقام از طریق آزمایش تمایز، یکنواختی و پایداری (DUS) نقش اساسی در حفظ مالکیت معنوی ارقام جدید دارد. این پژوهش در فصل رشد سالهای 1401 و 1402 انجام شد و 67 صفت فنوتیپی مندرج در دستورالعمل اتحادیه بین المللی حمایت از ارقام جدید گیاهی در 31 رقم هیبرید C. melo L. ارزیابی شد. تنوع قابل توجهی در صفات بررسی شده در این پژوهش مشاهده شد. بطوریکه شاخصهای تنوع شانون-وینر ('H) و سیمپسون (D) بهترتیب از 0 تا 3.71 و 0 تا 0.990. متغییر بود. نتایج تجزیه و تحلیل مؤلفههای اصلی (PCA) ارقام را بطور موثر متمایز کرد. بیست صفت اصلی، از جمله پانزده صفت در میوه، بر اساس شاخص Score PCA برای بهبود کارایی ارزیابی و شناسایی مزرعهای انتخاب شد، بطوریکه مهمترین صفت تشکیل چوبپنبه در میوه بود که 11/13 درصد از واریانس فنوتیپی را توجیه کرد. نمودار پراکندگی (Scatter plot) بر اساس دادههای فنوتیپی DUS چهار گروه متمایز شامل تیپهای خربزه گالیا،آناناسی، طالبی ، American Eastern، American Western را تفکیک کرد. Marko، JANNA و Omid سه رقم برتری هستند که با استفاده از روش M-TOPSIS بر اساس ده صفت اندازهگیریشده رتبهبندی شدند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| خربزه (Cucumis melo L.)؛ آزمون تمایز؛ یکنواختی و پایداری صفات مورفولوژیک؛ همبستگی؛ تجزیه به مولفههای اصلی (PCA)؛ M-TOPSIS | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Identification of top-notch resources and core traits of melon (Cucumis melo L.) varieties associated with distinctness, uniformity, and stability (DUS) examination | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| saeed amini1؛ Zahra Tahernezhad2؛ Shokoufeh Ghayoom-Asghari2؛ MohammadReza Jazayeri Noushabadi2؛ Leila Zare3؛ Akram Toulou-Tokmehdash2 | ||
| 1seed and plant certification and registration institute (SPCRI), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran | ||
| 2SPCRISeed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute (SPCRI), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran | ||
| 3Agriculture, Research, Education and Extension Organization(AREEO), Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute(SPCRI), Karaj, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Melon (Cucumis melo L.) is a popular crop from the Cucumis genus that could be used as a fruit. Variety identification via distinctness, uniformity, and stability (DUS) testing plays an essential role in preserving the intellectual property of new varieties. This investigation was conducted in the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons and, evaluates the 67 phenotypic characters of thirty-one C. melo hybrid varieties using quantitative trait measurement and qualitative trait visual inspection. The study found considerable character diversity, with Shannon-Wiener (H′) and Simpson diversity indices ranging from 0 to 3.71 and 0 to 0.990, respectively. The results of principal component analysis (PCA) effectively distinguished all varieties. Twenty core characters, including fifteen fruit characters, have been selected based on the PCA score to improve field identification efficiency. The most significant characteristic was the fruit cork formation, which explained 13.11% of the phenotypic variance. Interestingly, the scatter plot based on phenotypic DUS data revealed four categories: Galia, Talebi, American eastern, American western and Ananas types. Marko, JANNA, and Omid were the top three varieties evaluated using the M-TOPSIS approach based on ten measured characters. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Melon, Morphological DUS test, Core DUS characters, Correlation, Principal component analysis (PCA), M-TOPSIS | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abd El-Wahab, M. M., Abdel-Lattif, H., Emara, K. S., Mosalam, M., Aljabri, M., & El-Soda, M. (2023). Identifying SNP markers associated with distinctness, uniformity, and stability testing in Egyptian fenugreek genotypes. PLOS ONE, 18(9), e0291527. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291527 Abootalebi, S., Hadi-Vencheh, A., & Jamshidi, A. (2019). Ranking the alternatives with a modified TOPSIS method in multiple attribute decision making problems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(5), 1800–1805. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2933593 Bagherzadeh, A., & Gholizadeh, A. (2016). Modeling land suitability evaluation for wheat production by parametric and TOPSIS approaches using GIS, northeast of Iran. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0177-8 Ali-Shtayeh, M. S., Jamous, R. M., Shtaya, M. J., Mallah, O. B., Eid, I. S., & Zaitoun, S. Y. A. (2017). Morphological characterization of snake melon (Cucumis melo var. flexuosus) populations from Palestine. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 64(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-015-0329-0 Ansari, W. A., Atri, N., Yang, L., Singh, B., & Pandey, S. (2020). Genetic diversity in muskmelon based on SSR markers and morphological traits under well-watered and water-deficit condition. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 26, 101630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101630 Arens, P., Mansilla, C., Deinum, D., Cavellini, L., Moretti, A., Rolland, S., & Vosman, B. (2010). Development and evaluation of robust molecular markers linked to disease resistance in tomato for distinctness, uniformity and stability testing. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 120(3), 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-009-1183-2 Can, H., & Türkmen, Ö. (2022). Collection of local Kyrgyzstan melon genotypes and determination of morphological relationships between some Anatolian melons. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 46(2), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-011X.2976 Chikh-Rouhou, H., Mezghani, N., Mnasri, S., Mezghani, N., & Garcés-Claver, A. (2021). Assessing the genetic diversity and population structure of a Tunisian melon (Cucumis melo L.) collection using phenotypic traits and SSR molecular markers. Agronomy, 11(6), 1121. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061121 Choudhary, B. R., Pandey, S., Rao, E. S., & Sharma, S. K. (2015). DUS characterization of muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) varieties. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 85(12), 1597–1601. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i12.54316 Divakara, B. N., & Das, R. (2011). Variability and divergence in Pongamia pinnata for further use in tree improvement. Journal of Forestry Research, 22(2), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-011-0149-9 Divsalar, M., Hasani, F., & Shakeri, M. (2012). Technical guideline of melon (Cucumis melo L.) cultivation. Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute. [In Persian]. Escribano, S., & Lázaro, A. (2009). Agro-morphological diversity of Spanish traditional melons (Cucumis melo L.) of the Madrid provenance. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 56(4), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-008-9380-4 FAOSTAT. (2022). Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC Grumet, R., Katzir, N., & Garcia-Mas, J. (Eds.). (2017). Genetics and genomics of Cucurbitaceae. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49332-9 Guliyev, N., Sharifova, S., Ojaghi, J., Abbasov, M., & Akparov, Z. (2018). Genetic diversity among melon (Cucumis melo L.) accessions revealed by morphological traits and ISSR markers. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 42(6), 393–401. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1707-18 Hong, Y., Pandey, M. K., Lu, Q., Liu, H., Gangurde, S. S., Li, S., & Chen, X. (2021). Genetic diversity and distinctness based on morphological and SSR markers in peanut. Agronomy Journal, 113(6), 4648–4660. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20671 Jolliffe, I. T., & Cadima, J. (2016). Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2065), 20150202. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202 Kato, K., Tanaka, K., Sugiyama, M., Shigita, G., Murakami, R., Duong, T. T., & Nishida, H. (2022). Fruit trait and seed size measurements and molecular phylogenetic analysis of Kazakhstan melon as an example of melon development on the Silk Road. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1439317/v1 Kerje, T., & Grum, M. (2000). The origin of melon, Cucumis melo: A review of the literature. In VII Eucarpia Meeting on Cucurbit Genetics and Breeding (Vol. 510, pp. 37–44). International Society for Horticultural Science. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.510.5 Koca, N., & Paksoy, M. (2023). Some morphological characteristics of Kirikkale province local melon (Cucumis melo L.) genotypelerinin bazı morfolojik özellikleri. Bahçe, 52(1), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.53471/bahce.1277246 Kong, Q., Chen, J., Liu, Y., Ma, Y., Liu, P., Wu, S., Huang, Y., & Bie, Z. (2014). Genetic diversity of Cucurbita rootstock germplasm as assessed using simple sequence repeat markers. Scientia Horticulturae, 175, 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.06.009 Kwon, Y. S., Lee, J. M., Yi, G. B., Yi, S. I., Kim, K. M., Soh, E. H., & Kim, B. D. (2005). Use of SSR markers to complement tests of distinctiveness, uniformity, and stability (DUS) of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) varieties. Molecules and Cells, 19(3), 428–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1016-8478(23)13189-X Lei, Q., Zhou, J., Zhang, W., Luo, J., Wu, K., & Long, C. (2018). Morphological diversity of panicle traits in Kam fragrant glutinous rice (Oryza sativa). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 65(3), 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-017-0570-9 Liu, H., Rao, D., Guo, T., Gangurde, S. S., Hong, Y., Chen, M., & Chen, Z. (2022). Whole genome sequencing and morphological trait-based evaluation of UPOV Option 2 for DUS testing in rice. Frontiers in Genetics, 13, 945015. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.945015 Liu, L., Kakihara, F., & Kato, M. (2004). Characterization of six varieties of Cucumis melo L. based on morphological and physiological characters, including shelf-life of fruit. Euphytica, 135, 305–313. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.945015 Lamrini, L., Abounaima, M. C., & Talibi Alaoui, M. (2023). New distributed-TOPSIS approach for multi-criteria decision-making problems in a big data context. Journal of Big Data, 10(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-023-00788-3 Mahapatra, S., Sureja, A. K., Behera, T. K., & Verma, M. (2022). Assessment of genetic diversity of ninety-one bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.] genotypes from fourteen different agro-climatic zones of India using agro-morphological traits and SSR markers. Molecular Biology Reports, 49(7), 6367–6383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-022-07446-6 Mallikarjuna, K. N., Tomar, B. S., Mangal, M., Singh, N., Singh, D., Kumar, S., & Jat, G. S. (2024). Qualitative and quantitative genetic variations in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 71(7), 3745–3763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-024-01860-4 McCreight, J. D., Nerson, H., & Grumet, R. (1993). Melon: Cucumis melo L. In Genetic improvement of vegetable crops (pp. 267–294). Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-040826-2.50024-2 Merheb, J., Pawełkowicz, M., Branca, F., Bolibok-Brągoszewska, H., Skarzyńska, A., Pląder, W., & Chalak, L. (2020). Characterization of Lebanese germplasm of snake melon (Cucumis melo subsp. melo var. flexuosus) using morphological traits and SSR markers. Agronomy, 10(9), 1293. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091293 Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Tools for composite indicators building. European Commission, Joint Research Centre. Nayak, P. P., & Datta, A. K. (2025). An entropy-based TOPSIS approach for selecting best suitable rice husk for potential energy applications: Pyrolysis kinetics and characterization of rice husk and rice husk ash. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 15(15), 21789–21806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02824-3 Naznin, P. M., Imoh, O. N., Tanaka, K., Sreynech, O., Shigita, G., Sophea, Y., & Kato, K. (2024). Analysis of genetic diversity and population structure in Cambodian melon landraces using molecular markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 71(3), 1067–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-023-01677-7 Nhi, P. T. P., Akashi, Y., Hang, T. T. M., Tanaka, K., Aierken, Y., Yamamoto, T., & Kato, K. (2010). Genetic diversity in Vietnamese melon landraces revealed by the analyses of morphological traits and nuclear and cytoplasmic molecular markers. Breeding Science, 60(3), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.60.255 Pitrat, M. (2016). Melon genetic resources: Phenotypic diversity and horticultural taxonomy. In Genetics and genomics of Cucurbitaceae (pp. 25–60). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/7397_2016_10 Pourabed, E., Jazayeri Noushabadi, M. R., Jamali, S. H., Moheb Alipour, N., Zareyan, A., & Sadeghi, L. (2015). Identification and DUS testing of rice varieties through microsatellite markers. International Journal of Plant Genomics, 2015(1), 965073. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/965073 Rizvi, A., Marker, S., & Bahadur, V. (2022). DUS characterization in snap melon landraces of Vindhayan region of eastern UP India as per muskmelon PPV & FRA guidelines. Plant Archives, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.51470/PLANTARCHIVES.2022.v22.no2.055 Shigita, G., Dung, T. P., Pervin, M. N., Duong, T. T., Imoh, O. N., Monden, Y., & Kato, K. (2023). Elucidation of genetic variation and population structure of melon genetic resources in the NARO Genebank, and construction of the World Melon Core Collection. Breeding Science, 73(3), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.22071 Sobhany, A., & Kiani, M. R. (2017). Orphological evaluation and classification of melon genotypes in Khorasan provinces (Razavi, North and South). Journal of Horticultural Science, 30(4), 605–615. https://doi.org/10.22067/jhorts4.v0i0.22989 Soltani, F., Akashi, Y., Kashi, A., Zamani, Z., Mostofi, Y., & Kato, K. (2010). Characterization of Iranian melon landraces of Cucumis melo L. groups Flexuosus and Dudaim by analysis of morphological characters and random amplified polymorphic DNA. Breeding Science, 60(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.60.34 Srinivasan, A., Chellappa, J., Varadaraju, A., Veerasamy, A., & Ramaiyan, K. (2023). Genetic diversity analysis in tropical sugarcane genotypes using morphometric traits. Sugar Technology, 25(2), 430–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-022-01215-2 Szamosi, C., Solmaz, I., Sari, N., & Bársony, C. (2010). Morphological evaluation and comparison of Hungarian and Turkish melon (Cucumis melo L.) germplasm. Scientia Horticulturae, 124(2), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2009.12.024 UPOV TG/104/5. (2019). Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity, and stability of melon. International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants. https://www.upov.int/edocs/tgdocs/en/tg104.pdf Wang, J., Yao, J., & Li, W. (2008). Construction of a molecular map for melon (Cucumis melo L.) based on SRAP. Frontiers of Agriculture in China, 2(4), 451–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11703-008-0051-1 Whitaker, T. W., & Davis, G. N. (1962). Cucurbits. Interscience Publishers. Xu, S., Liu, W., Liu, X., Qin, C., He, L., Wang, P., & Ma, W. (2023). DUS evaluation of nine intersubgeneric hybrids of Paeonia lactiflora and fingerprint analysis of the chemical components in the roots. Frontiers in Chemistry, 11, 1158727. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2023.1158727 Yildiz, M., Akgul, N., & Sensoy, S. (2014). Morphological and molecular characterization of Turkish landraces of Cucumis melo L. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 42(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha4219452 Yu, J., Bai, X., Zhang, K., Feng, L., Yu, Z., Jiao, X., & Guo, Y. (2024). Assessment of breeding potential of foxtail millet varieties using a TOPSIS model constructed based on distinctness, uniformity, and stability test characteristics. Plants, 13(15), 2102. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202406.1245.v1 Yusuf, A. B., Wibowo, W. A., & Daryono, B. S. (2022). Genetic stability of melon (Cucumis melo L. cv. Meloni) based on inter-simple sequence repeat and phenotypic characteristics. Biodiversitas: Journal of Biological Diversity, 23(6), 3042–3049. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d230631 Zhang, J., Ren, J., Yang, J., Fu, S., Zhang, X., Xia, C., & Wen, C. (2023). Evaluation of SNP fingerprinting for variety identification of tomato by DUS testing. Agriculture Communications, 1(1), 100006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrcom.2023.100006 Zhang, J., Yang, J., Fu, S., Ren, J., Zhang, X., Xia, C., & Wen, C. (2022). Comparison of DUS testing and SNP fingerprinting for variety identification in cucumber. Horticultural Plant Journal, 8(5), 575–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpj.2022.07.002 Zheng, E., Zhu, Y., Hu, J., Zhang, Z., & Xu, T. (2022). Effects of humic acid on japonica rice production under different irrigation practices and a TOPSIS-based assessment on the Songnen Plain, China. Irrigation Science, 40(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-021-00754-y | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 6 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2 |
||
