News

a.z
Mohammadikia, R., Pasandideh, M. (2026). Multicriteria Analysis of the Effect of Organic Growth Stimulants on Canola. , 40(2), 217-234. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2026.372806.819
Reza Mohammadikia; Mohammad Pasandideh. "Multicriteria Analysis of the Effect of Organic Growth Stimulants on Canola". , 40, 2, 2026, 217-234. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2026.372806.819
Mohammadikia, R., Pasandideh, M. (2026). 'Multicriteria Analysis of the Effect of Organic Growth Stimulants on Canola', , 40(2), pp. 217-234. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2026.372806.819
Mohammadikia, R., Pasandideh, M. Multicriteria Analysis of the Effect of Organic Growth Stimulants on Canola. , 2026; 40(2): 217-234. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2026.372806.819

Multicriteria Analysis of the Effect of Organic Growth Stimulants on Canola

پژوهش های خاک
Article 6, Volume 40, Issue 2, September 2026, Pages 217-234    PDF (1.47 M)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.22092/ijsr.2026.372806.819
Authors
Reza Mohammadikia* ; Mohammad Pasandideh
Soil and Water Research Institute (SWRI), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Canola (Brassica napus L.) is one of the most important oilseed crops, and its production in arid and semi-arid regions is increasingly constrained by water scarcity and drought stress. Improving water productivity and yield stability under limited irrigation conditions is therefore essential for sustainable canola production. Biostimulants as organic growth stimulants have recently gained attention as an eco-friendly strategy to mitigate drought-induced yield losses. In addition, increasing evidence suggests that the effectiveness of biostimulants is closely related to environmental conditions and plant physiological status, particularly under water-limited scenarios. Under drought stress, these compounds can enhance root development, improve nutrient uptake efficiency, and regulate osmotic balance, leading to better maintenance of photosynthetic activity and yield formation. However, their responses are often variable depending on the type of biostimulant, intensity of water stress, and crop genotype, which makes it necessary to evaluate their performance under field conditions using integrated approaches.
Materials and Methods: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of organic growth stimulants on seed yield, seed oil content, and water productivity of canola under normal irrigation and water stress conditions, and to rank treatments using the VIKOR multi-criteria decision-making method. A split-plot experiment based on a randomized complete block design with three replications was conducted over two growing seasons at the Moghan Agricultural Research Station. Irrigation treatments (main plots) included normal irrigation and water stress, while sub-plots consisted of foliar application of amino acids, humic acid, fulvic acid, seaweed extract, and an untreated control. In addition, a Monte Carlo simulation approach with 2000 iterations was applied to assess the stability of the VIKOR ranking under uncertainty in criterion weights.
Results: Mean comparison results showed that water stress reduced seed yield by 5.4%, seed oil content by 9.2%, and water productivity by 4.5% compared with normal irrigation. In contrast, application of growth stimulants increased seed yield by 10.47–15.03%, seed oil content by 5.76–11.26%, and water productivity by 9.84–17.21% compared with the control. Among treatments, amino acid under water stress produced the highest seed yield (3703 kg ha⁻¹) and water productivity (1.79 kg m⁻³), whereas humic acid under normal irrigation resulted in the highest seed yield (3844 kg ha⁻¹) and seed oil content (43.9%). VIKOR analysis indicated that amino acid under water stress had the lowest Q value (Q = 0.022), ranking first as the most desirable compromise solution. Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis further confirmed the robustness of this treatment, which retained the first rank in 82.65% of simulation scenarios.
Conclusion: Overall, the results demonstrate that drought stress significantly reduces canola yield and quality parameters, while organic growth stimulants effectively mitigate these negative effects. In particular, amino acid application under water stress conditions provided the best trade-off among yield, quality, and water productivity, showing both superior performance and high ranking stability. Therefore, integrating organic biostimulants with deficit irrigation management can be considered an effective strategy for improving canola productivity and sustainability in semi-arid environments. Moreover, the multi-criteria decision-making results highlighted that relying solely on individual performance indicators may lead to suboptimal selection of treatments, as different stimulants showed contrasting advantages across yield, oil content, and water productivity. The VIKOR analysis provided a more balanced and integrated ranking by simultaneously considering all evaluated criteria, thereby identifying compromise solutions that best satisfy the conflicting objectives of productivity and resource efficiency.
 

 
Keywords
Amino acid; Decision matrix; Humic acid; Seaweed extract; VIKOR method
References
  1. Alloway, B. J. 2008. Zinc in soils and crop nutrition (2nd ed.). International Zinc Association.
  2. Anjum, S. A., Xie, X. Y., Wang, L. C., Saleem, M. F., Man, C., & Lei, W. 2011. Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(9), 2026–2032. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR10.027
  3. Ashraf, M., & Harris, P. J. C. 2013. Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview. Photosynthetica, 51(2), 163–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-013-0021-6
  4. Brady, N. C., & Weil, R. R. 2016. The nature and properties of soils (15th ed.). Pearson.
  5. Canellas, L. P., & Olivares, F. L. 2014. Physiological responses to humic substances as plant growth promoter. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-014-0011-1
  6. Canellas, L. P., Olivares, F. L., Aguiar, N. O., Jones, D. L., Nebbioso, A., Mazzei, P., & Piccolo, A. 2015. Humic and fulvic acids as biostimulants in horticulture. Scientia Horticulturae, 196, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.013
  7. Craigie, J. S. 2011. Seaweed extract stimuli in plant science and agriculture. Journal of Applied Phycology, 23, 371–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-010-9560-4
  8. du Jardin, P. 2015. Plant biostimulants: Definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Scientia Horticulturae, 196, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.021
  9. Farooq, M., Hussain, M., Wahid, A., & Siddique, K. H. M. 2014. Drought stress in plants: An overview. In R. Aroca (Ed.), Plant responses to drought stress: From morphological to molecular features (pp. 1–33). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32653-0_1
  10. Farooq, M., Wahid, A., Kobayashi, N., Fujita, D., & Basra, S. M. A. 2009. Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29, 185–212. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008021
  11. Garcia-Caparros, P., Ciriello, M., Rouphael, Y., & Giordano, M. 2025. The role of organic extracts and inorganic compounds as alleviators of drought stress in plants. Horticulturae, 11(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11010091
  12. Gavelienė, V., & Jurkonienė, S. 2026. Biostimulants and their role in increasing cereal crops’ resistance to drought stress. Frontiers in Plant Science, 17, Article 1837848. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2026.1837848
  13. Gee, G. W., & Bauder, J. W. 1986. Particle-size analysis. In Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Methods, Vol. 5, pp. 383–411.
  14. Havlin, J. L., Tisdale, S. L., Nelson, W. L., & Beaton, J. D. 2014. Soil fertility and fertilizers: An introduction to nutrient management (8th ed.). Pearson.
  15. Helmke, P. A., & Sparks, D. L. 1996. Lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium, and cesium. In D. L. Sparks (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3. Chemical Properties (pp. 551–575). Madison: Soil Science Society of America.
  16. Henderson, B. C. R., Sanderson, J. M., & Fowles, A. 2025. A review of the foliar application of individual amino acids as biostimulants in plants. Discover Agriculture, 3, 69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-025-00222-7
  17. Islamic Republic of Iran Meteorological Organization. n.d. Meteorological data of Moghan station, Ardabil, Iran. Tehran, Iran: Islamic Republic of Iran Meteorological Organization. (In Persian).
  18. Khan, N., Bano, A., & Babar, M. A. 2019a. The stimulatory effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and plant growth regulators on wheat physiology grown in sandy soil. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 65(3), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2018.1494344
  19. Khan, N., Bano, A., & Babar, M. A. 2019b. Impacts of amino acids application on crop productivity and abiotic stress tolerance: A review. Plant Growth Regulation, 88(2), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-019-00497-w
  20. Lakhawat, S. S., Sharma, V., Singh, T., Patil, P., Priyadevi, S., & Gutam, S. 2024. Effects of pan evaporation-based drip irrigation levels on performance of guava grown in Udaipur and Rewa regions of India. Journal of Agrometeorology, 26(1), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v26i1.2306
  21. Lesk, C., Rowhani, P., & Ramankutty, N. 2016. Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production. Nature, 529(7584), 84–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16467
  22. Lindsay, W. L., & Norvell, W. A. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 42, 421–428. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x
  23. Loeppert, R. H., & Suarez, D. L. 1996. Carbonate and gypsum. In D. L. Sparks (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3. Chemical Methods (pp. 437–474). Madison: Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy.
  24. Ma, X., Kayoumu, M., Yin, Y., Wang, Z., & Duan, G. 2026. Review of amino acid foliar application as a stress mitigation strategy: Unraveling the protective mechanisms against abiotic stress. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment, 5, e70135. https://doi.org/10.1002/sae2.70135
  25. Marschner, P. 2012. Marschner’s mineral nutrition of higher plants (3rd ed.). Academic Press.
  26. Nelson, D. W., & Sommers, L. E. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In D. L. Sparks (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3. Chemical Methods (pp. 961–1010). Madison: Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy.
  27. Olsen, S. R., & Sommers, L. E. 1982. Phosphorus. In A. L. Page, R. H. Miller, & D. R. Keeney (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties (pp. 403–430). Madison: American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America.
  28. Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. 2004. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
  29. Passioura, J. B. 2006. Increasing crop productivity when water is scarce—from breeding to field management. Agricultural Water Management, 80(1–3), 176–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.012
  30. Rahbari, M., Psutka, J., Black, B., & Hesami, M. 2026. Biochemical insights into fulvic acid-driven drought tolerance in canola. Plant Stress, 19, 101210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2025.101210
  31. Rhoades, J. D. 1982. Soluble salts. In A. L. Page, R. H. Miller, & D. R. Keeney (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties (pp. 167–179). Madison: American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America.
  32. Rouphael, Y., & Colla, G. 2020. Editorial: Biostimulants in Agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 40. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00040
  33. Shafik, S., Elshorbagy, A., & Maher, A. 2025. Multi-criteria optimization of water-energy-agriculture nexus using VIKOR approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 103, 105312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105312
  34. Shukla, P. S., Mantin, E. G., Adil, M., Bajpai, S., Critchley, A. T., & Prithiviraj, B. 2019. Ascophyllum nodosum-based biostimulants: Sustainable applications in agriculture for the stimulation of plant growth, stress tolerance, and disease management. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 655. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00655
  35. Taha, A. A., Ibrahim, M. A. M., & Abdelkhalek, A. A. 2011. Irrigation scheduling for pea using evaporation pan under drip irrigation at North Nile Delta region. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 2(2), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.21608/jssae.2011.55426
  36. Taiz, L., & Zeiger, E. 2010. Plant physiology and development (5th ed.). Sinauer Associates.
  37. Thomashow, M. F. 1999. Plant cold acclimation: Freezing tolerance genes and regulatory mechanisms. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 50, 571–599. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.571
  38. Wu, Z., Li, Y., Wang, R., Xu, X., Ren, D., Huang, Q., Xiong, Y., & Huang, G. 2023. Evaluation of irrigation water saving and salinity control practices of maize and sunflower in the upper Yellow River basin with an agro-hydrological model based method. Agricultural Water Management, 278, 108157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108157
  39. Yadav, M., Vashisht, B. B., Jalota, S. K., et al. 2024. Improving water efficiencies in rural agriculture for sustainability of water resources: A review. Water Resources Management, 38, 3505–3526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-024-03836-6
  40. Zhang, S., Kang, Y., Gao, X., Chen, P., Cheng, X., Song, S., & Li, L. 2023. Optimal reservoir operation and risk analysis of agriculture water supply considering encounter uncertainty of precipitation in irrigation area and runoff from upstream. Agricultural Water Management, 277, 108091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108091
  41. Zolfani, S. H., & Saparauskas, J. 2013. New application of SWARA method in prioritizing sustainability assessment indicators of energy system. Engineering Economics, 24(5), 408–414. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.24.5.4526

 

 

Statistics
Article View: 161
PDF Download: 97


counter
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb