اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات282
تعداد نشریات سازمان80
تعداد شماره‌ها3,262
تعداد مقالات36,060
تعداد مشاهده مقاله55,204,053
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله94,197,079
رئیسی, شکیبا, علیخانی, حسینعلی, فلاح نصرت آباد, علیرضا, خوشرو, بهمن, پوربابائی, احمدعلی. (1405). توسعه و اعتبارسنجی یک روش نوین ارزیابی سریع و سه‌بعدی انحلال فسفات در باکتری‌های گرم‌مثبت اسپوردار. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14(1), 81-103. doi: 10.22092/sbj.2026.372945.294
شکیبا رئیسی; حسینعلی علیخانی; علیرضا فلاح نصرت آباد; بهمن خوشرو; احمدعلی پوربابائی. "توسعه و اعتبارسنجی یک روش نوین ارزیابی سریع و سه‌بعدی انحلال فسفات در باکتری‌های گرم‌مثبت اسپوردار". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14, 1, 1405, 81-103. doi: 10.22092/sbj.2026.372945.294
رئیسی, شکیبا, علیخانی, حسینعلی, فلاح نصرت آباد, علیرضا, خوشرو, بهمن, پوربابائی, احمدعلی. (1405). 'توسعه و اعتبارسنجی یک روش نوین ارزیابی سریع و سه‌بعدی انحلال فسفات در باکتری‌های گرم‌مثبت اسپوردار', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14(1), pp. 81-103. doi: 10.22092/sbj.2026.372945.294
رئیسی, شکیبا, علیخانی, حسینعلی, فلاح نصرت آباد, علیرضا, خوشرو, بهمن, پوربابائی, احمدعلی. توسعه و اعتبارسنجی یک روش نوین ارزیابی سریع و سه‌بعدی انحلال فسفات در باکتری‌های گرم‌مثبت اسپوردار. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1405; 14(1): 81-103. doi: 10.22092/sbj.2026.372945.294

توسعه و اعتبارسنجی یک روش نوین ارزیابی سریع و سه‌بعدی انحلال فسفات در باکتری‌های گرم‌مثبت اسپوردار

زیست شناسی خاک
دوره 14، شماره 1، شهریور 1405، صفحه 81-103    اصل مقاله (1.81 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/sbj.2026.372945.294
نویسندگان
شکیبا رئیسی1؛ حسینعلی علیخانی1؛ علیرضا فلاح نصرت آباد* 2؛ بهمن خوشرو* 2؛ احمدعلی پوربابائی1
1گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران.
2مؤسسه تحقیقات خاک و آب کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران.
چکیده
این پژوهش با هدف طراحی و ارزیابی یک محیط کشت جدید  (FKR) همراه با یک بستر سه‌بعدی نیمه‌جامد برای غربالگری کمی و کیفی PSB، عمدتاً از جنس Bacillus، انجام شد. 299 جدایه گرم‌مثبت، عمدتاً Bacillus از ریزوسفر ذرت، روی محیط‌های جامد FKR و سه محیط استاندارد Pikovskaya (PVK)، NBRIP و (Sperber (SP کشت داده شدند. سپس جدایه‌ها در لوله‌های حاوی FKR–BCP نیمه‌جامد بر اساس شاخص عمق (SD) و حجم انحلال (SV)، الگوهای رشد در گرادیان اکسیژن و  ویژگی‌های متابولیکی ثانویه بررسی شدند. محیط FKR به‌تنهایی 55 درصد سویه‌ها را به عنوان PSB شناسایی کرد، در حالی‌که میانگین سه محیط استاندارد تنها 19/3 درصد (۲۰، ۲۰ و ۱۸ درصد) بود (P<0.05)، که بیانگر افزایش حدود 2/95 برابری کارایی غربالگری است. سهم نتایج منفی کاذب در محیط‌های استاندارد حدود ۸۰–۸۲ درصد و در FKR فقط ۴۵ درصد بود. در سامانه سه‌بعدی، طی ۲۴ ساعت نخست، بیش از ۷۵ درصد سویه‌های فعال، ناحیه زرد مشخص در ستون نیمه‌جامد ایجاد کردند، در حالی‌که در همان بازه، کمتر از ۵ درصد روی پلیت FKR هاله قابل‌اعتماد داشتند (P<0.05). سویه‌های برتر موفق به ایجاد عمق انحلالی بیش از ۴۰ میلی‌متر شدند. بررسی‌ها نشان داد که با تغییر رویکرد از ارزیابی دوبعدی (SI) به سه‌بعدی (SV)، جایگاه حدود ۱۵ درصد از سویه‌ها تغییر می‌کند. در مجموع، ۶ سویه (3/8 درصد) الگوی انحلال قلیایی، حدود ۷ درصد تولید گاز و حدود ۲ درصد مایع‌سازی  محیط نیمه‌جامد را نشان دادند. ترکیب فرمولاسیون FKR با روش سه‌بعدی نیمه‌جامد و کمی‌سازی حجمی (SV)، ابزاری کارآمد برای انتخاب هدفمند سویه‌های مناسب توسعه کودهای زیستی فسفاته در خاک‌های آهکی و قلیایی فراهم می‌کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
باسیلوس؛ غربالگری میکروبی؛ کود زیستی؛ محیط کشت نیمه‌جامد؛ هاله انحلال
عنوان مقاله [English]
Development and Validation of a Novel Rapid Three-Dimensional Assay for Phosphate Solubilization in Spore-Forming Gram-Positive Bacteria
نویسندگان [English]
Shakiba Reisi1؛ Hossein Ali Alikhani1؛ Alireza Fallah Nosrat-Abad2؛ Bahman Khoshrou2؛ Ahmad Ali Pourbabaei1
1Department of Soil Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
2Soil and Water Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.
چکیده [English]
Background and Objectives: Insoluble phosphates are among the major factors limiting phosphorus nutrition in calcareous soils, and the accurate selection of efficient phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) is essential for the development of P biofertilizers. This study aimed to design and evaluate a new culture medium formulation (FKR), in combination with a semi solid three dimensional platform, for quantitative and qualitative screening of PSB, mainly belonging to the genus Bacillus.
Materials and Methods: A collection of 299 Gram positive bacterial isolates, predominantly Bacillus spp. obtained from the rhizosphere of maize plants under different field conditions and cultivars, was first grown on the FKR medium and on three standard media, Pikovskaya (PVK), NBRIP and Sperber (SP). The percentage of positive isolates, halo diameter and two dimensional solubilization index (SI) on plates were measured and evaluated using appropriate statistical tests (one way ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test at 5% probability, as well as suitable tests for comparison of proportions such as chi square or Fisher’s exact test). The performance of the same isolates was then assessed in semi solid three dimensional FKR tubes (with and without the BCP pH indicator), based on solubilization depth (SD) and solubilization volume (SV) indices, growth patterns along the oxygen gradient, and secondary metabolic traits (gas production, liquefaction, and medium alkalization).




Results: The FKR medium alone identified 164 isolates as PSB (55% of the 299 isolates), whereas the mean percentage of positive isolates on the three standard media PVK, NBRIP and SP was only 19.3% (20, 20 and 18%, respectively). This difference in the proportion of positive isolates was statistically significant (P<0.05), indicating that the FKR formulation increased screening efficiency by approximately 2.95 fold compared with the average of the three standard media. At the same time, the proportion of false negative results on the standard media was about 80–82% (239–245 isolates without halos), whereas this proportion decreased to 45% (135 isolates) on FKR, revealing part of the hidden phosphate solubilizing potential under nutrient limited standard conditions. In terms of qualitative differentiation based on SI, the FKR medium detected eight isolates in the very strong class (class A; SI ≥ 2.5), while the three standard media together detected only two isolates in this class and NBRIP did not detect any class A isolate, highlighting a systematic limitation of minimal formulations in detecting high performance strains. In the three dimensional evaluation, the semi solid FKR–BCP tube method exhibited a clear advantage over plate assays in terms of speed and clarity of response: within the first 24 h, more than 75% of the solubilizing isolates produced a distinct yellow zone along the semi solid column, whereas in the same period fewer than 5% of these isolates formed a reliable clear halo on solid FKR plates (P ≤ 0.05). Three dimensional quantification based on SD showed that top performing isolates could generate solubilization depths exceeding 40 mm along the column, and calculation of the volumetric SV index (mm³) provided a more comprehensive picture of the intensity and spatial extent of activity. Comparison of the ranking of the ten best isolates according to SI and SV revealed substantial changes in the relative position of some strains. For instance, isolate FKR S10, with the highest SI (3.50), ranked first in two dimensional assays but dropped to rank 61 in terms of SV (2,031 mm³), whereas isolate FKR S94, with a moderate SI (2.47; rank eight), showed the highest SV (10,244 mm³) and ranked first in three dimensional assays. Overall, about 15% of ranks were markedly shifted between the two approaches, indicating that two dimensional evaluation may underestimate the true potential of isolates with invasive and deep growth. From a metabolic perspective, the three dimensional system led to the discovery of phenomena that were not visible in plate assays. In total, six isolates (≈3.8% of the population evaluated in tubes) exhibited an alkalinizing solubilization pattern and produced a dark purple halo in FKR–BCP due to local pH increase, likely associated with alkaline phosphatase activity or secretion of calcium chelating and other complexing agents. Moreover, about 7% of active isolates produced gas (fine bubbles along the diffusion path) and around 2% liquefied the semi solid matrix, indicating the production of extracellular hydrolytic enzymes. Finally, three main growth patterns along the oxygen gradient of the semi solid column surface (pellicle/ring), continuous vertical, and banded (layered) were recorded, providing valuable qualitative information on the ecophysiology and respiratory preferences of the isolates.




Conclusion: The results demonstrate that combining the FKR chemical formulation with a semi solid three dimensional system markedly increases the sensitivity and resolution of detection, quantification and functional differentiation of Bacillus PSB compared with classical plate based methods. By substantially reducing false negatives, enabling volumetric quantification (SV), revealing both acidic and non acidic solubilization mechanisms, and capturing secondary metabolic activities and growth patterns along oxygen gradients, this platform provides an efficient and exploratory tool for targeted selection of robust, high performance strains for the development of phosphate biofertilizers, particularly for calcareous and alkaline soils.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Bacillus, Microbial screening, Biofertilizer, Semi-solid medium, Solubilization halo
مراجع

    1. Alewell, C., Ringeval, B., Ballabio, C., Robinson, D.A., Panagos, P. and Borrelli, P., 2020. Global phosphorus shortage will be aggravated by soil erosion. Nature Communications, 11, pp.4546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18326-7
    2. Alori, E.T., Glick, B.R. and Babalola, O.O., 2017. Microbial phosphorus solubilization and its potential for use in sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8, pp.971. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00971
    3. Atlas, R.M., 2010. Handbook of Microbiological Media. 4th ed. CRC Press.
    4. Bakker, P.A.H.M., Berendsen, R.L., Doornbos, R.F., Wintermans, P.C.A. and Pieterse, C.M.J., 2020. The rhizosphere revisited: Root microbiomics. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, pp.581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00165
    5. Bargaz, A., Lyamlouli, K., Chtouki, M., Zeroual, Y. and Dhiba, D., 2018. Soil microbial resources for improving fertilizers efficiency in an integrated plant nutrient management system. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9, pp.1606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01606
    6. Bashan, Y., Kamnev, A.A. and de-Bashan, L.E., 2013. Tricalcium phosphate is inappropriate as a universal selection factor for isolating and testing phosphate-solubilizing bacteria. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 49, pp.465-479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-012-0737-7
    7. Behera, B.C., Singdevsachan, S.K., Mishra, R.R., Dutta, S.K. and Thatoi, H., 2017. Diversity, mechanism and biotechnology of phosphate solubilising microorganism in mangrove—a review. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 8, pp.130-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2013.09.008
    8. Berg, H.C., Brown, D.A. and Turner, L., 2002. Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by three-dimensional tracking. Nature, 239, pp.500-504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/239500a0
    9. Castanheira, N.L., Dourado, M.N., Pais, I. and Moreira, H., 2021. Microbial-based bioproducts as a sustainable approach to improve phosphorus availability in agricultural soils. Journal of Environmental Management, 287, pp.112322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112322
    10. Chen, Y.P., Rekha, P.D., Arunshen, A.B., Lai, W.A. and Young, C.C., 2006. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria from subtropical soil and their tricalcium phosphate solubilizing abilities. Applied Soil Ecology, 34, pp.33-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.12.002
    11. Collavino, M.M., Sansberro, P.A., Mroginski, L.A. and Aguilar, O.M., 2010. Comparison of in vitro phosphate-solubilizing activity and phosphorus uptake by soybean plants inoculated with efficient and inefficient phosphate-solubilizing bacteria. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 46, pp.427-438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-010-0480-x
    12. Crank, J., 1975. The Mathematics of Diffusion. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.
    13. Edi-Premono, M., Moawad, A.M. and Vleck, P.L.G., 1996. Effect of phosphate solubilizing Pseudomonas putida on the growth of maize and its survival in the rhizosphere. Indonesian Journal of Crop Science, 11, pp.13-23.
    14. Glick, B.R., 2012. Plant growth-promoting bacteria: mechanisms and applications. Scientifica, 2012, pp.963401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6064/2012/963401
    15. Gupta, G., Parihar, S.S., Ahirwar, N.K., Snehi, S.K. and Singh, V., 2015. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): current and future prospects for development of sustainable agriculture. Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology, 7(2), pp.96-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/1948-5948.1000187
    16. Hinsinger, P., 2001. Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: a review. Plant and Soil, 237, pp.173-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013351617532
    17. Hinsinger, P., Bengough, A.G., Vetterlein, D. and Young, I.M., 2009. Rhizosphere: biophysics, biogeochemistry and ecological relevance. Plant and Soil, 321, pp.117-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9797-1
    18. Hinsinger, P., Herrmann, L., Lesueur, D., Robin, A., Trap, J., Waithaisong, K. and Plassard, C., 2011. Impact of roots, microorganisms and microfauna on the fate of soil phosphorus in the rhizosphere. In: Bünemann, E.K., Oberson, A. and Frossard, E. (eds.) Phosphorus in Action. Springer, pp.177-199.
    19. Illmer, P. and Schinner, F., 1995. Solubilization of inorganic phosphates by microorganisms isolated from forest soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 27, pp.257-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(94)00190-C
    20. Jones, D.L., 1998. Organic acids in the rhizosphere—a critical review. Plant and Soil, 205, pp.25-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004356007312
    21. Khoshru, B., Fallah Nosratabad, A., Mitra, D., Chaithra, M., et al., 2023. Rock phosphate solubilizing potential of soil microorganisms: Advances in sustainable crop production. Bacteria, 2(2), pp.98-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bacteria2020008
    22. Khoshru, B., Mitra, D., Khoshmanzar, E., Myo, E. M., Uniyal, N., Mahakur, B., et al., 2020. Current scenario and future prospects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: An economic valuable resource for the agriculture revival under stressful conditions. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 43(20), pp.3062-3092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2020.1799004
    23. Khosravi, H., Khoshru, B., Fallah Nosratabad, A., and Mitra, D., 2024. Exploring the landscape of biofertilizers containing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in Iran: Progress and research prospects. Current Research in Microbial Sciences, 7, pp.100268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2024.100268
    24. Kim, K.Y., Jordan, D. and McDonald, G.A., 1997. Solubilization of hydroxyapatite by Enterobacter agglomerans and cloned Escherichia coli in culture medium. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 24, pp.347-352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050256
    25. Kuzyakov, Y. and Blagodatskaya, E., 2015. Microbial hotspots and hot moments in soil: Concept & review. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 83, pp.184-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.01.014
    26. Malusá, E. and Vassilev, N., 2014. A contribution to set a legal framework for biofertilisers. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 98, pp.6599-6607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-5828-y
    27. Malusá, E., Sas-Paszt, L. and Ciesielska, J., 2016. Technologies for beneficial microorganisms inocula used as biofertilizers. The Scientific World Journal, 2016, pp.1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4910412
    28. Mendes, G.O., Freitas, A.L.M., Pereira, O.L., da Silva, I.R. and Vassilev, N.B., 2021. Biochar enhances Aspergillus niger rock phosphate solubilization by increasing organic acid production and alleviating fluoride toxicity. Applied Soil Ecology, 158, pp.103809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103809
    29. Mendes, R., Garbeva, P. and Raaijmakers, J.M., 2014. The rhizosphere microbiome: Significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 37, pp.634-663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6976.12028
    30. Menezes-Blackburn, D., Giles, C., Darch, T., George, T.S., Blackwell, M., Stutter, M., Shand, C., Lumsdon, D., Cooper, P., Wendler, R., Brown, L., Almeida, D.S., Wearing, C., Mezeli, M.M. and Haygarth, P.M., 2018. Opportunities for mobilizing recalcitrant phosphorus forms in soil as a fertilizer resource. Frontiers in Earth Science, 6, pp.140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00140
    31. Nannipieri, P., Giagnoni, L., Landi, L. and Renella, G., 2011. Role of phosphatase enzymes in soil. In: Bünemann, E.K., Oberson, A. and Frossard, E. (eds.) Phosphorus in Action. Springer, pp.215-243.
    32. Nautiyal, C.S., 1999. An efficient microbiological growth medium for screening phosphate solubilizing microorganisms. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 170, pp.265-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13383.x
    33. Pande, A., Pandey, P., Mehra, S., Singh, M. and Kaushik, S., 2017. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria: Mechanisms and their role in phosphate solubilization and uptake. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 17, pp.1128-1147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-951620170004000XX
    34. Pereira, S.I.A. and Castro, P.M.L., 2014. Phosphate-solubilizing rhizobacteria enhance Zea mays growth in agricultural P-deficient soils. Ecological Engineering, 73, pp.526-535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.060
    35. Pikovskaya, R.I., 1948. Mobilization of phosphorus in soil in connection with vital activity of some microbial species. Mikrobiologiya, 17, pp.362-370.
    36. Rao, N.S.S., 1999. Soil Microorganisms and Plant Growth. 2nd ed. Oxford & IBH Publishing.
    37. Rawat, P., Das, S., Shankhdhar, D. and Shankhdhar, S.C., 2021. Phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms: mechanism and their role in phosphate solubilization and uptake. In: Rakshit, A., Singh, H.B. and Sen, A. (eds.) Nutrient Use Efficiency: From Basics to Advances. Springer, pp.137-162.
    38. Reisi, S., Alikhani, H., Fallah Nosratabad, A., Pourbabaee, A.A. and Khoshru, B., 2025. Development and evaluation of a new culture medium for effective screening of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria: A case study on Gram-positive bacteria isolated from soil. In: 19th Iranian Soil Science Congress, 16-18 September 2025, Karaj, Iran. (In Persian).
    39. Richardson, A.E., Lynch, J.P., Ryan, P.R., Delhaize, E., Smith, F.A., Smith, S.E., Harvey, P.R., Ryan, M.H., Veneklaas, E.J., Lambers, H., Oberson, A., Culvenor, R.A. and Simpson, R.J., 2009. Plant and microbial strategies to improve the phosphorus efficiency of agriculture. Plant and Soil, 321, pp.305-339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-9895-2
    40. Rodríguez, H. and Fraga, R., 1999. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnology Advances, 17, pp.319-339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-9750(99)00014-2
    41. Rouphael, Y., Franken, P., Schneider, C., Schwarz, D., Giovannetti, M., Agnolucci, M., De Pascale, S., Bonini, P. and Colla, G., 2015. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi act as biostimulants in horticultural crops. Scientia Horticulturae, 196, pp.91-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.002
    42. Satyaprakash, M., Nikitha, T., Reddi, E.U.B., Sadhana, B. and Vani, S.S., 2017. Phosphorus solubilizing microbes: Sustainability boon for agricultural production. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(10), pp.1304-1315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.610.XXX
    43. Schisler, D.A., Slininger, P.J., Behle, R.W. and Jackson, M.A., 2004. Formulation of Bacillus spp. for biological control of plant diseases. Phytopathology, 94, pp.1267-1271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.11.1267
    44. Sharma, S.B., Sayyed, R.Z., Trivedi, M.H. and Gobi, T.A., 2013. Phosphate solubilizing microbes: sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils. SpringerPlus, 2, pp.587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-587
    45. Sonenshein, A.L., Hoch, J.A. and Losick, R. (eds.), 2002. Bacillus subtilis and Its Closest Relatives: From Genes to Cells. ASM Press.
    46. Sperber, J.I., 1958. Solution of apatite by soil microorganisms producing organic acids. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 9, pp.782-787.
    47. Timmusk, S., Behers, L., Muthoni, J., Muraya, A. and Aronsson, A.-C., 2017. Perspectives and challenges of microbial application for crop improvement. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, pp.49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00049
    48. van der Bom, F., Nunes, I., Raymond, N.S., Hansen, V., Bonnichsen, L., Magid, J. and Nybroe, O., 2018. Long-term fertilisation form, level and duration affect the diversity, structure and functioning of soil microbial communities in the field. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 122, pp.91-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.04.001
    49. Vessey, J.K., 2003. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant and Soil, 255, pp.571-586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026037216893
    50. Yadav, B.K. and Verma, A., 2018. Phosphate solubilization and mobilization in soil through microorganisms under arid ecosystems. In: Rakshit, A., Singh, H.B. and Sen, A. (eds.) Nutrient Use Efficiency: From Basics to Advances. Springer, pp.199-212.
    51. Zhang, X., Li, Y., Liu, X., Wang, C. and Chen, Q., 2024. Screening and characterization of phosphate-solubilizing Bacillus strains for improving phosphorus availability in calcareous soils. Applied Soil Ecology, 190, pp.104918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.104918

 

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 149
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 132


counter
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب