اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات282
تعداد نشریات سازمان80
تعداد شماره‌ها3,227
تعداد مقالات35,745
تعداد مشاهده مقاله53,903,478
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله93,104,940
یاوری, مرتضی, واعظی, علی‏‏ رضا, عسکری, محمدصادق. (1405). روابط کمی بین ماده آلی خاک و ویژگی‏های فیزیکی و شیمیایی در یک منطقه ‏نیمه‏ خشک. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 40(2), 127-146. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2026.372526.816
مرتضی یاوری; علی‏‏ رضا واعظی; محمدصادق عسکری. "روابط کمی بین ماده آلی خاک و ویژگی‏های فیزیکی و شیمیایی در یک منطقه ‏نیمه‏ خشک". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 40, 2, 1405, 127-146. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2026.372526.816
یاوری, مرتضی, واعظی, علی‏‏ رضا, عسکری, محمدصادق. (1405). 'روابط کمی بین ماده آلی خاک و ویژگی‏های فیزیکی و شیمیایی در یک منطقه ‏نیمه‏ خشک', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 40(2), pp. 127-146. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2026.372526.816
یاوری, مرتضی, واعظی, علی‏‏ رضا, عسکری, محمدصادق. روابط کمی بین ماده آلی خاک و ویژگی‏های فیزیکی و شیمیایی در یک منطقه ‏نیمه‏ خشک. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1405; 40(2): 127-146. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2026.372526.816

روابط کمی بین ماده آلی خاک و ویژگی‏های فیزیکی و شیمیایی در یک منطقه ‏نیمه‏ خشک

پژوهش های خاک
دوره 40، شماره 2، شهریور 1405، صفحه 127-146    اصل مقاله (1.39 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ijsr.2026.372526.816
نویسندگان
مرتضی یاوری* ؛ علی‏‏ رضا واعظی؛ محمدصادق عسکری
گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران.
چکیده
ماده آلی خاک می­تواند نقش کلیدی در بهبود ساختمان خاک، افزایش ظرفیت نگهداری آب و عناصر غذایی داشته باشد. این پژوهش به‌منظور بررسی ارتباط ویژگی‌های فیزیکی و شیمیایی خاک با محتوای ماده آلی خاک در استان زنجان انجام شد. بدین‏منظور 68 نقطه براساس نقشه‌های مطالعات خاک‌شناسی و تنوع بافتی انتخاب گردید. ویژگی­های مختلف فیزیکی (رس، سیلت، شن، سنگریزه، جرم مخصوص ظاهری، تخلخل‏ کل، میانگین هندسی و وزنی خاک‏دانه‏ها در حالت تر و خشک و رطوبت اولیه) و شیمیایی (ظرفیت تبادل کاتیونی، کربنات کلسیم، واکنش خاک و قابلیت هدایت الکتریکی) در خاک­ها اندازه­گیری شد. تحلیل داده‌ها با روش­های همبستگی پیرسون، رگرسیون خطی، تحلیل واریانس و تشخیصی انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد ظرفیت تبادل کاتیونی (R2 = 0.31, p < 0.01)، جرم مخصوص ظاهری (R2 = 0.28, p < 0.01)، میانگین وزنی (R2 = 0.25, p < 0.01) و هندسی قطر خاک‏دانه‌های پایدار در آب (R2 = 0.24, p < 0.01) و میانگین هندسی قطر خاک‏دانه‏ها با الک خشک (R2 = 0.22, p < 0.01)، نسبت به سایر ویژگی‏های خاک، با محتوای ماده آلی همبستگی بیشتری داشتند. تحلیل واریانس برای چهار گروه از مقدار ماده آلی خاک (1 >، 2-1، 3-2 و 4 < درصد) نیز نشان داد که میان گروه‏ها تفاوت‏های اساسی از نظر ویژگی‏های ساختمانی و ظرفیت تبادل کاتیونی وجود داشت. همچنین بکارگیری تحلیل تشخیص نشان داد که وابستگی ویژگی‏های فیزیکی به ماده آلی بیشتر از ویژگی‏های شیمیایی بود. به‌طورکلی، میانگین وزنی و هندسی قطر خاک‏دانه‌ها و ظرفیت تبادل کاتیونی به‌ترتیب بیشترین ارتباط را با ماده آلی خاک نشان دادند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
پایداری خاک‏دانه ‏ها؛ تحلیل تشخیص؛ چگالی ظاهری؛ ظرفیت تبادل کاتیونی؛ مدیریت خاک
عنوان مقاله [English]
Quantitative Relationships between Soil Organic Matter and Physicochemical Properties in a Semi-Arid Region
نویسندگان [English]
Mortaza Yavari؛ Ali Reza Vaezi؛ mohammad-Sadegh Askari
Department of Soil Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran.
چکیده [English]
Background and Objectives: Soil organic matter is a critical component of productive soils. It influences a wide range of physical, chemical, and biological attributes and processes, including the formation and stabilization of soil aggregates, nutrient cycling, water retention, disease suppression, and cation exchange capacity. The relationships between soil organic matter (SOM) and soil physicochemical properties are profound and multifaceted. One of the main research gaps is the lack of comprehensive, integrated, and quantitative studies that simultaneously investigate the relationships between a wide range of soil physical and chemical properties and SOM under semi-arid climatic conditions. Most previous studies have focused on one or two properties and do not provide a holistic understanding of this complex system. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to examine the relationships between SOM and selected soil physical and chemical properties, including particle size distribution, structural attributes, salinity, sodium content, and fertility. 
Materials and Methods: This study was conducted in the semi-arid region of Zanjan. Sixty-eight sampling points were selected from different land uses using available soil maps to examine the relationships between SOM and various physical and chemical soil properties. Standard physical and chemical laboratory methods were used to measure particle size distribution, aggregate stability, bulk density, electrical conductivity, pH, organic matter content, and cation exchange capacity. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, linear regression, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and discriminant analysis were employed to analyze the relationships between SOM and soil properties, and variables showing significant correlations with SOM were further analyzed using ANOVA and discriminant analysis to investigate differences among SOM classes (<1%, 1–2%, 2–3%, and >3%). All statistical analyses, data visualizations, and mean comparison procedures were carried out using Microsoft Excel (2016) and Python (version 3.x).
Results: The results showed that cation exchange capacity (R² = 0.31, p < 0.01), bulk density (R² = 0.28, p < 0.01), wet aggregate mean weight diameter (MWDwet) (R² = 0.25, p < 0.01), wet aggregate geometric mean diameter (GMDwet) (R² = 0.24, p < 0.01), and dry aggregate geometric mean diameter (GMDdry) (R² = 0.22, p < 0.01) exhibited stronger relationships with SOM than the other soil properties examined. One-way ANOVA performed for four SOM classes (<1%, 1–2%, 2–3%, and >3%) revealed substantial differences among the groups in terms of soil structural properties and cation exchange capacity. Specifically, significant differences in GMDwet were observed between the <1% SOM group and the 2–3% and >3% SOM groups, as well as between the 1–2% and >3% SOM groups. For MWDwet, significant differences were detected between the <1% SOM group and the 2–3% and >3% SOM groups, and between the 1–2% SOM group and the 2–3% and >3% SOM groups (p < 0.000001, F = 12.23, and p < 0.000001, F = 12.17, respectively). Furthermore, discriminant analysis indicated that soil physical properties were more strongly associated with SOM than soil chemical properties. 
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that SOM is one of the key factors influencing soil quality, exerting significant effects on both soil physical and chemical properties. The results of correlation, linear regression, and one-way analyses of variance indicated that CEC increased with increasing SOM content. Among all measured soil properties, CEC exhibited the strongest relationship with SOM and showed a significant increase across higher SOM levels. Strong relationships were also observed between SOM and soil physical properties. In particular, increasing SOM was associated with significant improvements in soil aggregate stability, total porosity, and soil moisture content, while bulk density decreased significantly. Furthermore, discriminant analysis revealed that the influence of SOM was more strongly reflected in soil physical properties than in chemical properties. In both stages of the discriminant analysis, structural soil attributes exhibited the highest discriminant coefficients among the SOM groups (<1%, 1–2%, 2–3%, and >3%), highlighting the close association between SOM and soil structural characteristics. Following structural attributes, cation exchange capacity ranked as the second most important discriminating variable.

 
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Aggregate stability, Bulk density, Cation Exchange Capacity, Discriminant Analysis, Soil management
مراجع
  1. Ahmad Abadi, Z., Ghajar Sepanlou, M., Rahimi Alashti., S. 2012 'Effect of vermicompost application on some physical and chemical properties of a clay loam soil', Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 16(60), pp. 195-206. 1001.1.24763594.1390.15.58.13.7. .(In Persian)
  2. Alam, S.I., Hammoda, H., Khan, F., Al Enazi, R. and Goktepe, I., 2020. Electrical conductivity, pH, organic matter and texture of selected soils around the Qatar university campus. Research in Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries, 7(3), pp.403-409. 3329/ralf.v7i3.51359.
  3. 2024 'Organic materials quality to control soil aggregation: a meta-analysis', Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 24, pp. 1857–1870.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-01815-9.
  4. Askari, M.S., & Holden, N.M. 2014. Indices for quantitative evaluation of soil quality under grassland management. Geoderma, 230, pp. 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.04.019.
  5. Azimzadeh, Y., Najafi, N. 2017 'Effect of biochar on physical, chemical and biological properties of soil', Land Management Journal, 5(2), pp. 121-134. 22092/LMJ.2017.109488.(In Persian)
  6. Baveye, P.C., Schnee, L.S., Boivin, P., Laba, M. and Radulovich, R., 2020. Soil organic matter research and climate change: merely re-storing carbon versus restoring soil functions. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 8, p.579904. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.579904.
  7. Ben Ali, A. and Shukla, M. 2024 'Assessment of soil organic and inorganic carbon stocks in arid and semi-arid rangelands of southeastern New Mexico', Ecological Indicators, 166, p. 112398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112398.
  8. Blanco-Canqui, H., and Lal, R. 2008. No‐tillage and soil‐profile carbon sequestration: An on‐farm assessment. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 72(3), 693-701. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2007.0233.
  9. Brady, N.C. and Weil, R.R., 2017. The Nature and Properties of Soils. 15th ed. Harlow: Pearson.
  10. Brady, N.C., Weil, R.R. and Weil, R.R., 2008. The nature and properties of soils (Vol. 13, pp. 662-710). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  11. Bronick, C.J. and Lal, R., 2005. Soil structure and management: a review. Geoderma, 124(1-2), pp.3-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005.
  12. Celestina, C., Hunt  R.,Sale,  P.W.G.,  Franks,  A.E., 2019. Attribution of crop yield responses to application of organic amendments: A critical review. Soil and Tillage Research, 186, pp.135-145. 10.1016/j.still.2018.10.002
  13. Clara, L., Fatma, R., Viridiana, A. and Liesl, W., 2017. Soil organic carbon: the hidden potential. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. ISBN 978-92-5-109681-9
  14. Clark, J. S. et al. 2007. Controls on soil salinity in semi-arid regions. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 71(4), 1120-1128.
  15. Culley, J.L.B. 1993. Density and compressibility. Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Pp: 529-539.
  16. Diacono, M., & Montemurro, F. 2015. Effectiveness of organic wastes as fertilizers and amendments in salt-affected soils. Agriculture, 5(2), pp. 221-230. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture5020221.
  17. Dou, S., Zhang, Y., Shan, J., Wu, M., Ma, R., Guan, S. and Jia, Z. 2025 'Soil organic matter revisited: why humic substances still matter?', Pedosphere, 36(1), pp. 6-11. ISSN 1002-0160/CN 32-1315/P.
  18. Fageria, N.K., 2012. Role of soil organic matter in maintaining sustainability of cropping systems. Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 43(16), pp.2063-2113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2012.697234.
  19. Feifel, M., Durner, W., Hohenbrink, T.L. and Peters, A., 2024. Effects of improved water retention by increased soil organic matter on the water balance of arable soils: A numerical analysis. Vadose Zone Journal, 23(1), p.e20302. https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20302.
  20. Franzluebbers, A.J., 2002. Water infiltration and soil structure related to organic matter and its stratification with depth. Soil and Tillage research, 66(2), pp.197-205.1016/S0167-1987(02)00027-2.
  21. Gee, G.W., And Bauder, J.W. 1979. Particle size analysis by hydrometer: a simplified method for routine textural analysis and a sensitivity test of measurement parameters 1. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 43(5), pp. 1004-1007. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1979.03615995004300050038xDigital Object Identifier (DOI).
  22. Gee, G.W., and Or, D. 2002. 2.4 Particle-size analysis. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part, 4(598), pp. 255-293. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.4.c12.
  23. Guhra, T., Stolze, K. and Totsche, K.U. 2022 'Pathways of biogenically excreted organic matter into soil aggregates', Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 164, p. 108483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108483.
  24. Hamza, A., Karčauskienė, D., Mockevičienė, I., Repšienė, R., Tahir, M.A., Manzoor, M.Z., Kousar, S., Lodhi, S.S., Rasool, N. and Ullah, I., 2025. Soil Aggregate Dynamics and Stability: Natural and Anthropogenic Drivers. Agriculture, 15(23), p.2500. 3390/agriculture15232500. 
  25. Hassani, A., Smith, P. and Shokri, N., 2024. Negative correlation between soil salinity and soil organic carbon variability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(18), p.e2317332121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2317332121.
  26. Helling, C.S., Chesters, G. and Corey, R.B., 1964. Contribution of organic matter and clay to soil cation‐exchange capacity as affected by the pH of the saturating solution. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 28(4), pp.517-520. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1964.03615995002800040020x.
  27. Jafari, S., Golchin, A. and Ghorbani, S. 2016 'Investigating the effect of physical components of organic matter, dispersible clay content on aggregate stability in some lands of Khuzestan province', Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 47(3), pp. 485-495.(In Persian)
  28. Janzen, H.H., 2006. The soil carbon dilemma: shall we hoard it or use it?. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38(3), pp.419-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.10.008.
  29. Jenny, H., 1994. Factors of soil formation: a system of quantitative pedology. Courier Corporation.
  30. Johnson, R. A. and Wichern, D.W. 2007 Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. 6th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  31. Kaddah, M.T. 1974. The hydrometer method for detailed particle-size analysis: 1. Graphical interpretation of hydrometer readings and test of method. Soil Science, 118(2), pp. 102-108.
  32. Kaiser, M., Ellerbrock, R.H. and Gerke, H.H., 2008. Cation exchange capacity and composition of soluble soil organic matter fractions. Soil Science Society of America Journal,72(5), pp.1278-1285. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2007.0340Digital Object Identifier (DOI).
  33. Karami, S., Yasrebi, J., Safarzadeh Shirazi, S., Ronaghi, A. and Ghasemi-Fasaei, R. 2019 'Comparison of the effects of some organic compounds and their biochar on some soil properties', Soil Research Journal (Formerly: Soil and Water Research Institute), 33(2), pp. 267-282. 22092/IJSR.2019.124963.426.(In Persian)
  34. Kemper, W.D. and Rosenau, R.C., 1986. Aggregate stability and size distribution. Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 Physical and mineralogical methods, 5, pp.425-442. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c17.
  35. Kim, H.N. and Park, J.H., 2024. Monitoring of soil EC for the prediction of soil nutrient regime under different soil water and organic matter contents. Applied Biological Chemistry,67(1), p.1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-023-00849-4
  36. King, A.E., Ali, G.A., Gillespie, A.W. and Wagner-Riddle, C., 2020. Soil organic matter as catalyst of crop resource capture. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 8, p.50. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.00050
  37. Lal, R., 2004. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. science, 304(5677), pp.1623-1627.
  38. Lal, R., 2020. Soil organic matter and water retention. Agronomy Journal, 112(5), pp.3265-3277. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20282
  39. Lal, R., Lorenz, K., Huttl, K., Schneider, R.F. and von Braun, B.U. 2013. Ecosystem services and carbon sequestration in the biosphere. Springer, the Netherland.
  40. Lehmann, J. and Kleber, M., 2015. The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature, 528(7580), pp.60-68. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16069.
  41. Mikha, M.M., Jin, V.L., Johnson, J.M., Lehman, R.M., Karlen, D.L. and Jabro, J.D., 2021. Land management effects on wet aggregate stability and carbon content. Soil Science Society of America Journal,85(6), pp.2149-2168. https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20333.
  42. Mohkami, A., Yazdanpanah, N. and Saeidnejad, A. 2024 'The effect of vermicompost and biochar application on morphophysiological characteristics of quinoa under drought stress conditions', Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 55(4), pp. 623-640.
  43. Moradi, F., Khalilmoghadam, B., Jafari, S. and Ghorbani Dashtaki, S. 2014 'Aggregate stability indices and the most effective soil properties affecting them (case study: Sugarcane agro-industries in Khuzestan province)', Water and Watershed Management Research (Formerly: Journal of Watershed Management Research), 5(9), pp. 43-55. 22092/WMEJ.2015.106913.(In Persian)
  44. Murphy, B.W., 2015. Impact of soil organic matter on soil properties—a review with emphasis on Australian soils. Soil research, 53(6), pp.605-635. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR14246.
  45. Naveen, M. 2025 'The role of organic matter in soil for improving crop productivity and soil health', Journal of Experimental Agriculture International, 47(2), pp. 367-375.
  46. Page, A.L., Miller, R.H., & Keeney, D.R. 1982. Methods of Soil Analysis, part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 2. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c33.
  47. Pulido, M., Schnabel, S., Contador, J.F.L., Lozano - Parra, J. and Gomez – Gutierrez, A. 2017. Selecting indicators for assessing soil quality and degradation in rangelands of extremadure (SW Spain). Ecological Indicators, 74, pp.49-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.016.
  48. Ramos, F.T., Dores, E.F.D.C., Weber, O.L.D.S., Beber, D.C., Campelo Jr, J.H. and Maia, J.C.D.S., 2018. Soil organic matter doubles the cation exchange capacity of tropical soil under no‐till farming in Brazil. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 98(9), pp.3595-3602. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8881.
  49. Rengasamy, P., 2010. Soil processes affecting crop production in salt-affected soils. Functional Plant Biology, 37(7), pp.613-620. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP09249.
  50. Saxton, K.E. and Rawls, W.J., 2006. Soil water characteristic estimates by texture and organic matter for hydrologic solutions. Soil science society of America Journal,70(5), pp.1569-1578. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0117.
  51. Schnitzer, M., 1991. Soil organic matter—the next 75 years. Soil science, 151(1), pp.41-58.
  52. Schweizer, S.A., Mueller, C.W., Höschen, C., Ivanov, P. and Kögel-Knabner, I., 2021. The role of clay content and mineral surface area for soil organic carbon storage in an arabletoposequence. Biogeochemistry, 156(3),pp.401-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-021-00850-3.
  53. Shabani Rofchaee, A., Shabanpour, M. and Abrishamkesh, S. 2025 'Aggregate stability and organic carbon distribution in two land uses of pasture and olive orchard: a case study, Rostamabad, Iran', Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 56(2), pp. 235-252. 22059/ijswr.2025.393060.669921.(In Persian)
  54. Shabani, H., Delavar, M.A., Safari, Y., Alamdari, P. 2020. 'Spatial Variability of Some Soil Characteristics in Lands of Zanjan University', Applied Soil Research, 7(4), pp. 164-178. https://sid.ir/paper/397005/en.(In Persian)
  55. Six, J., Bossuyt, H., Degryze, S. and Denef, K., 2004. A history of research on the link between (micro) aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil and tillage research, 79(1), pp.7-31. 1016/j.still.2004.03.008.
  56. Six, J., Conant, R. T., Paul, E. A., & Paustian, K. 2002. Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: Implications for C-saturation of soils. Plant and Soil, 241(2), pp. 155-176. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016125726789.
  57. Six, J., Paustian, K., Elliott, E.T. and Combrink, C., 2000. Soil structure and organic matter I. Distribution of aggregate‐size classes and aggregate‐associated carbon. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64(2), pp.681-689. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.642681x.
  58. Smith, P., 2016. Soil carbon sequestration and biochar as negative emission technologies. Global change biology, 22(3), pp.1315-1324. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13178.
  59. Soil Survey Staff. 2014. Keys to Soil Taxonomy (12th ed.). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service.
  60. Solly, E.F., Weber, V., Zimmermann, S., Walthert, L., Hagedorn, F. and Schmidt, M.W., 2020. A critical evaluation of the relationship between the effective cation exchange capacity and soil organic carbon content in Swiss forest soils. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 3, p.98. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2020.00098.
  61. Song, J., Zhang, H., Razavi, B., Chang, F., Yu, R., Zhang, X., Wang, J., Zhou, J., Li, Y. and Kuzyakov, Y., 2024. Bacterial necromass as the main source of organic matter in saline soils. Journal of Environmental Management, 371, p.123130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123130.
  62. Sparks, D.L. 2003. Environmental soil chemistry academic press. California. USA.
  63. Staff, U.S.L., 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agriculture handbook, 60, pp.83-100.
  64. Stevenson, F.J. 1994. Humus chemistry: genesis, composition, reactions. John Wiley & Sons.
  65. Sumner, M.E. and Miller, W.P., 1996. Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 Chemical methods, 5, pp.1201-1229. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c40.
  66. Teymouri, S., et al. 2023 'Investigation of biochar effect on physical and chemical properties of calcareous soil', Journal of Soil Management and Sustainable Production, 13(2), pp. 89-104.
  67. Thomas, G. W., & Sparks, D. L. 1996. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3-Chemical Methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, 961-1009.
  68. Tisdall, J.M. and OADES, J.M., 1982. Organic matter and water‐stable aggregates in soils. Journal of soil science, 33(2), pp.141-163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01755.x.
  69. Torajzadeh, M. 2024 'Investigating the effect of biochar on the physical and chemical properties of saline soil', Journal of Water and Soil (Formerly: Agricultural Science and Technology), 38(1), pp. 45-58.
  70. Vaezi, A., 2021. Soil and water system (2st ed.). Organization into Soil Press, 241-263.(In Persian)
  71. Vaezi, A., 2022. Soil, water and plant growth (1st ed.). Academic Publishing Center, 1-26.(In Persian)
  72. Vaezi, A., Behtari, M. and Foroumadi, M., 2019. Time variations of rainfall infiltration into the soil under the influence of soil initial moisture. Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage, 13(3), pp.575-587. 1001.1.20087942.1398.13.3.2.2.(In Persian)
  73. Villafuerte, A.B., Soria, R., Rodríguez-Berbel, N., Zema, D.A., Lucas-Borja, M.E., Ortega, R. and Miralles, I., 2024. Short-term evaluation of soil physical, chemical and biochemical properties in an abandoned cropland treated with different soil organic amendments under semiarid conditions. Journal of Environmental Management, 349, p.119372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119372.
  74. von Liebig, J.F., 1843. Chemistry in its application to agriculture and physiology. JM Campbell.
  75. Walkley, A. and Black, I.A., 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil science, 37(1), pp.29-38. 10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003.
  76. Weil, R.R. and Brady, N.C., 2022. The Nature and Properties of Soils. 16th ed. Harlow: Pearson. 3390/pr10040639.
  77. Wu, S., Fu, W., Rillig, M.C., Chen, B., Zhu, Y.G. and Huang, L., 2024. Soil organic matter dynamics mediated by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi–an updated conceptual framework. New Phytologist, 242(4), pp.1417-1425. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.19178.
  78. Xin, S.H.U., ZHANG, J.B. and ZHANG, X.F., 2015. Changes in soil organic carbon and aggregate stability after conversion to conservation tillage for seven years in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of China.Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(6), pp.1202-1211.https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60862-5.
  79. Yang, C., Sainju, U.M., Li, C., Fu, X., Zhao, F. and Wang, J., 2023. Long-term chemical and organic fertilization differently affect soil aggregates and associated carbon and nitrogen in the loess plateau of China. Agronomy, 13(6), p.1466. 3390/agronomy13061466.
  80. Yavari, M., Mohammadi, M.H. and Shahbazi, K., 2021. Comparison of some methods for measuring primary soil particle size distribution and introducing appropriate times for the four-reading method for determining soil texture. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 51(12), pp.2999-3015. 22059/ijswr.2020.310061.668738 (In Persian)
  81. Yudina, A. and Kuzyakov, Y. 2023 'Dual nature of soil structure: the unity of aggregates and pores', Geoderma, 434, p. 116478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116478.
  82. Zandi, L. 2022 'An introduction to the relative importance of processes protecting organic matter and aggregate stability', Iranian Journal of Dryland Agriculture, 8(2), pp. 17-32.(In Persian)
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 111
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 17


counter
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب