| In this study, to overcome some limitations, the AquaCrop model was used together with field measurements of Leaf Sheath Volumetric Water Content (VWC) and Landsat 8 and 9 images to determine the upper and lower bounds of Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI) more accurately. This research was conducted at Debal Khuzaei Sugarcane Cultivation and Industry Company from March 2022 to October 2022.The results showed a significant negative relationship between CWSI and VWC; that is, as the plant water content decreased, CWSI increased (R2=0.71). The effect of field age during the mid-growth stage on this relationship was not significant. Based on the linear regression between CWSI and VWC, the plant water status was classified into five classes: water stress, irrigation time, moderate, moist, and very moist. Spatial analyses also showed that the spatial distribution of CWSI extracted from satellite imagery was consistent with actual variations in plant moisture, enabling dynamic monitoring of water stress and precise irrigation timing. Overall, the integration of the AquaCrop simulation model, ground-based data, and the thermal CWSI offers a more accurate and innovative approach than the methods based on hot and cold pixels, and it can be used for smart irrigation management of sugarcane in arid and semi-arid regions. |
- فیضی زاده بختیار، دیده بان خلیل و غلام نیا خلیل، 1395. برآورد دمای سطح زمین با استفاده از تصاویر ماهواره لندست 8 و الگوریتم پنجره مجزا. فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی اطلاعات جغرافیایی سپهر، (98)25، صص. 171- DOI: 10.22034/SEPEHR.2016.27017
- محمدی معله زاده، جمال، ناصری، عبدعلی و هوشمند، عبدالرحیم، 2019. بررسی کارایی مدل AquaCrop در تعیین زمان آبیاری گیاه نیشکر و پایش آن با شاخص تنش آبی گیاه. نشریه آبیاری و زهکشی ایران 13(5)، صص. 1439-1450. DOI: 10.22059/IJWRED.2019.270058.1140
- Doorenbos, J., & Kassam, A. H. 1979. Yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage 33, Rome. DOI: 10.1017/S002185960007204X
- Idso, S. B., Jackson, R. D., & Reginato, R. J., Remote-Sensing of Crop Yields: Canopy temperature and albedo measurements have been quantitatively correlated with final harvests of wheat. Science, 196(4285), pp. 19-25. DOI: 10.1126/science.196.4285.19
- Movahedi, A., Karimi, S., & Jafari, R., 2021. Assessment of Plant Water Stress Based on Remote Sensing Techniques: A Review. Journal of Water Resource and Hydraulic Engineering, 10(1), pp. 1-15. DOI: 10.1126/science.196.4285.19
- Najafi, E., Zand-Parsa, S., Kamkar, B., & AghaAlikhani, M., 2019. Mapping drought stress using vegetation indices and meteorological data in wheat fields. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 21(3), pp. 655-669. DOI: 22091/AEST.2019.4714.1348
- Ramanian, H., Darvishzadeh, R., Homayouni, S., & Gholizadeh, H., 2021. Assessment of vegetation water stress using multi-temporal Sentinel-2 data and machine learning techniques. Geocarto International, 36(6), pp. 634-648.
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2019.1654678
- Russo D and Bakker D. 1986. Crop water production function for sweet corn and cotton irrigated and saline water. Soil science society and American journal. 51, pp. 1554-1562.
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1987.03615995005100060024x
- Ritchie, J. C., & McCarty, G. W., 2003. Remote Sensing of Surface Temperature. Remote Sensing of Environment, 85(3), pp. 313-324. DOI: 1016/S0034-4257(03)00057-0
- Sund, J.M., & Clements, R.O., 1974. A method for determining the moisture content of leaf sheaths in plants. Plant and Soil, 41(2), pp. 335-345. DOI: 1007/BF00015064
- Turner, N.C., 1996. Adaptation to Water Deficits: A Changing Perspective. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 23, pp. 213-226. DOI: 1071/PP9960213
- Veysi, S., A. A. Naseri, S. Hamzeh and H. Bartholomeus 2017. A satellite-based crop water stress index for irrigation scheduling in sugarcane fields. Agricultural water management 189: pp. 70-86. DOI: 1016/j.agwat.2017.04.004
- Wang, W., Huang, D., Wang, X. G., Liu, Y. R., & Zhou, F. 2011. Estimation of soil moisture using trapezoidal relationship between remotely sensed land surface temperature and vegetation index. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(5), pp. 1699-1712.
DOI: 10.5194/hess-15-1699-2011
|