شناسایی و تشخیص مولکولی هرپس ویروس گوسفندی تیپ ۲ در نشخوارکنندگان کوچک، منطقه سیستان، ایران

1.Introduction
Malignant catarrhal fever [MCF) is a systemic, lymphoproliferative, and usually fatal disease that infects a wide range of Artiodactyla species such as cattle, water buffaloes, deer, bison, and pigs [1]. Currently, some members of the genus Macavirus, belonging to the Gammaherpesvirinae subfamily of the orthoherpesviridae family [2], have been identified as the causative agents of the disease. Ovine herpesvirus-2 (OvHV-2) and alcelaphine herpesvirus-1 (AlHV-1) are the most well-researched members of the genus, causing unapparent infection in sheep and wildebeests, respectively. Reservoir hosts can transmit viruses to susceptible animals, which may cause MCF [3]. Direct contact between susceptible animals and asymptomatic reservoirs is the most common route of virus transmission [4] ; therefore, mixed grazing systems represent a significant potential risk factor for viral transmission [4]. Sheep-associated MCF (SA-MCF) is a fatal disease induced by OvHV-2, primarily affecting susceptible hosts such as cattle, water buffalo, and deer [2]. The virus is maintained in reservoir hosts, mainly sheep and goats, without causing clinical signs [3]. Transmission occurs mainly through aerosolized viral particles in nasal secretions, with lambs shedding the virus at high rates between 5-6 months of age [5]. The prevalence of OvHV-2 varies geographically and is influenced by husbandry practices and livestock density [6]. Mixed farming systems, where reservoir and susceptible hosts are kept together, significantly increase the risk of SA-MCF outbreaks [4]. Additionally, climate conditions, flock size, and cross-border livestock movements play crucial roles in virus circulation [7, 8]. The disease is economically significant due to its high fatality rate and lack of an effective vaccine [9]. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based molecular techniques are widely used for the diagnosis and epidemiological investigation of OvHV-2 infections [10]."
To date, several cases of MCF occurrence have been reported in wild and domesticated animals in Iran [11–13]. Sistan and Baluchestan Province is situated in the south-eastern part of the country, where mixed farming is common in these districts, susceptible and reservoir hosts of MCF are usually kept together. To best of our knowledge, this is the first study of MCF prevalence in blood samples from reservoir hosts (sheep and goats) in the Sistan region using PCR. 

2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study area and sample collection
Blood samples were collected over a one-year period (February 2023–2024) from 21 randomly selected traditional husbandry sites across the Sistan region including Zabol, Zahak, Nimruz, Hamun, and Hirmand districts in northern Sistan and Baluchestan Province. In these flocks, sheep and goats were kept together, with cows occasionally be included. The animals ranged in age from six months to three years. A total of 5 mL of blood samples (sheep: n=48; goats: n=52) were randomly collected through the jugular vein. The samples were collected from apparently healthy animals, as confirmed by approved veterinarians, and relevant data were recorded using structured questionnaire. All blood samples were collected in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-containing tubes and transferred on ice to the virology laboratory at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zabol. The samples were subsequently stored at 4 °C for further analysis.

2.2. Sample processing and DNA isolation
The samples were centrifuged at 1600 r/min for 15 minutes. The Buffy coat layer was subsequently removed and used for DNA extraction. Total DNA was extracted using SinaPure™ DNA extraction Kit (Tehran, Iran) according manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration (ng/mL) of the extracted DNA was measured using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer. The DNA samples were then stored at -20 °C until further analysis.

2.3. PCR method
A Hemi-nested PCR was used to amplify the OvHV-2 POL gene, following the protocol described by Flach et al. [14]. Briefly, the primer sets used were as follows:
POL1 (5’-GGC (CT)CA (CT)AA (CT)CT ATG CTA CTC CAC-3’),POL2 (5’-ATT (AG)TC CAC AAA CTG TTT TGT-3’) and OHVPOL (5’-CCA AAA TGA AGA CCA TCT TA-3’). 
At the primary stage, the primers POL1 and POL2 were used to amplify a 386bp fragment. All PCR reactions, with a total volume of 50 μL, contained 1 μM of each primer, 4 μL of template DNA, 25 μL of 2x Master Mix RED (Ampliqon, Denmark), and nuclease-free water to reach a total volume to 50 μL. The thermal cycling conditions consisted of an initial denaturation 95 °C for 15 minutes, followed by 94 °C for 1 minute, annealing at 60 °C for 1 min, and extension at 72 °C for 1 minute, for 25 cycles, with a final extension step at 72 °C for 10 minutes. 
A positive sample, previously verified by Sanger sequencing in our study, was used as a positive control, while nuclease-free water was used for the negative control instead of DNA. In the second stage,the primers OHVPOL and POL2 were used to amplify a 172bp fragment. For this stage, 2 μL of primary amplification products were used as template DNA in the second stage. Thermal cycling conditions were same as the first stage, except that 34 cycles were performed. Subsequently, 5 μL of the secondary reactions were run in 1.8% agarose gel. Hemi-nested PCR was conducted on the positive samples of OvHV-2 POL gene to amplify the ORF75 tegument protein gene. The primer sets employed for this amplification were:
556(5′-AGTCTGGGTATATGAATCCAGATGGCTCTC-3′), 755(5′-AAGATAAGCACCAGTTATGCATCTGATAAA-3′) and 555(5′-TTCTGGGGTAGTGGCGAGCGAAGGCTTC-3′) that described previously [10].
For the primary amplification of a 422- bp fragment, primer 556 and primer 755 were utilized. In the subsequent stage, primers 556 and 555 were employed to amplify a 238- bp fragment. The PCR conditions were same as those used for amplifying the OvHV-2 POL gene. The PCR products were then run on a 1.8% agarose gel.

2.4. Sequencing and phylogeny analysis
Three positive PCR products of the ORF75 tegument protein gene from the second reactions(randomly selected from positive sheep samples) were submitted to Microsynth AG, Switzerland for Sanger sequencing. A 238 -bp fragment of the ORF75 tegument protein gene was sequenced using primer 555. Derived sequences and obtained sequences from GenBank were aligned by running the CLUSTAL_W method. The maximum likelihood method was used to construct the phylogenetic tree by MEGA 7 software [15]. Group confidence was estimated using bootstrap involving 1000 replications. The sequences have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers PP824398, PP824399, and PP824400.

2.5. Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, version 25. The overall prevalence of OvHV-2 infection was calculated with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The associations between infection prevalence and independent variables (species, age, gender, flock size, and location) were assessed using logistic regression to calculate odds ratios and P-values. A significance level of P<0.05 was applied.

3. Results
3.1. Prevalence and risk factors of Ovhv-2
Among 100 sampled animals, 15% (n:15) (95% CI (8.6%, 23.5%) were positive for OvHV-2 using hemi-nested PCR detecting the OvHV-2 POL and ORF75 tegument protein gene, as recommended by World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) [16]. Representative hemi-nested PCR amplification products of the OvHV-2 POL and ORF75 genes are shown in Figure 1.

The prevalence of infection with the virus in sheep and goats was 16.7% (8/48) and 13.5% (7/52), respectively. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of OvHV-2 infection between sheep and goats (P=0.654). Three samples collected from lambs less than one year were identified as positive for OvHV-2. While the virus was identified in all districts of Sistan; prevalence in the Zabol and Nimruz districts was lower compared to others. Statistical analysis revealed no significant relationship between the OvHV-2 virus prevalence and the age, gender, or location of livestock. However, flock size was significantly associated with the prevalence of the virus, as shown in Table 1.

In the invariable logistic regression, only flock size showed a significant association with OvHV-2 infection. 

3.2. Molecular and phylogenetic analysis
Three out of the fifteen positive samples were sequenced, and BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) analysis through the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) indicated 100% identity among them. Furthermore, BLAST results showed 100% identity to isolates reported from Pakistan (MK852172), Brazil (OP121121), Turkey (MN419921), Egypt (ON952534), and India (OR762746). Additionally, >99% similarity was observed with sequences from Mongolia (LC203437), India (MK059980) and Russia (P669276), as well as the RefSeq reference genome (NC007646). Phylogenetic analysis of the sequences obtained in this study shows close similarity to other global ORF75 tegument gene sequences. However, when compared to specific isolates,the obtained sequences (PP824398, PP824399, and PP824400) exhibited genetic divergence from certain strains reported in India (DQ229939), Turkey (JN991056), Germany (HM216478) and Brazil (KC123170). The phylogenetic relationships between the sequences obtained in this study and reference OvHV-2 isolates are presented in Figure 2.

4. Discussion 
In the present study, the overall prevalence of OvHV-2 was 15%, with specific rates of 16.7% in sheep and 13.5% in goats, as determined by Hemi-nested PCR. Our findings identify flock size as a significant factor in OvHV-2 infection in the Sistan region. Specifically, large flocks exhibited higher infection rates compared to medium and small flocks. This correlation could be due to increased interactions among animals within large-sized flocks, facilitating virus transmission. However, the difference in infection rates between medium and small flocks was not statistically significant. The prevalence of OvHV-2 in sheep and goats in the Sistan region was notably lower than that those reported in other parts of Iran and neighbouring countries [7, 8, 13, 17, 18]. This discrepancy could be attributed to regional variations, including climatic conditions and husbandry practices. Paradoxically, fluctuations or reductions in small ruminant flock sizes may also influence the epidemiological dynamics of OvHV-2. 
Numerous studies have documented the prevalence of OvHV-2 in Iran and its neighbors. According to Momtaz et al. (2009) and Seyfi Abad Shapouri et al. (2014), the prevalence of OvHV-2 in healthy sheep in central and western Iran was 100% and 82%, respectively, using PCR methods [12, 17]. In a study on wild ruminants in Iran, Hemmatzadeh et al. (2016) identified a 31% positivity for OvHV-2 using PCR [11]. In Pakistan, prevalence rates reached 48% in sheep and 44% in goats in 2021 [8], while Pekmez et al. (2022) found a 34% prevalence in sheep in Turkey using PCR on blood, organs, and aborted foetuses [18]. Additionally, Khudhair et al. (2020) reported a prevalence of 100% in sheep and 86.6% in goats in Iraq’s Al-Qadisiyah Province [7].While goats are the primary natural hosts of caprine herpesvirus 2 (CpHV-2) [1]), our detection of OvHV-2 in goats supports growing evidence that they also serve as reservoir hosts for OvHV-2 [8, 12, 19], because mixed farming is common in this region, OvHV-2 may be transmitted between sheep and goats without any specific clinical signs. However, some studies have suggested that OvHV-2 can lead to subclinical infection in goats in addition to exhibiting clinical signs, such as fever and central nervous system disorders, including ataxia and head tremors [20].
The detection of positive samples in the lambs during this study corroborates the findings of Li et al. (1998), who reported that OvHV-2 could be transmitted horizontally within flock with lambs shedding the virus at 5-6 months old [5]. Additionally, Li et al. (2001) indicated that OvHV-2 can infect fetuses during pregnancy [19], as reported by Pekmez et al. (2022) [18]. Based on the BLAST results and phylogenetic analysis, the sequences obtained in this study exhibited approximately 98–100% similarity to other published sequences of the ORF75 tegument protein gene internationally. These findings support other researchers findings that there is no major difference between OvHV-2 sequences globally [6-8]. Besides, the inclusion of the RefSeq sequence (NC007646) in the phylogenetic analysis, highlights the significant similarity with the obtained sequences (>99%). Confirming the high genetic conservation of the virus.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to document the prevalence of OvHV-2 in sheep and goats and to confirm the presence of the disease in the Sistan region, southeast Iran. A key finding was that the prevalence of OvHV-2 was significantly lower in small and medium -sized flocks compared to large flocks. Given that most flocks in the Sistan region are currently small- sized due to prolonged drought conditions, this may explain the lower prevalence of the infection in this region. Considering the cross-border trade and livestock movement with neighboring countries, especially Pakistan, the consequences of both legal and illegal livestock transport within international borders should be closely monitored by authorities. Because of the difference in OvHV-2 prevalence according to reports in different locations, these movements could potentially affect virus circulation.

Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the staff of Virology Laboratory of at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zabol, for their technical assistance.

Compliance with ethical guidelines
The present research is an observational study. The protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran (Code: IR.UOZ.REC.1403.001). All procedures were performed on sheep and goat blood samples with the informed consent of the livestock owners, and all personal identities remained strictly confidential. 

Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy concerns and confidentiality agreements with livestock owners. However, aggregated or general data may be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request via email.

Funding
This research was financially supported by the Vice Chancellor of Research and Technology, University of Zabol (Grants No.: IR-UOZ-GR-2478).

Authors' contributions
Conceptualization and study design: Dariush Saadati; Data acquisition: Arya Abdollahi; Analysis, data interpretation, and writing the original draft: Arya Abdollahi and Dariush Saadati; Statistical analysis: Dariush Saadati; Supervision: Dariush Saadati and Mehdi Rasekh; Review and editing: Mohsen Najimi; Project administration, technical, and material support: Mohsen Najimi and Dariush Sargazi.

Conflict of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.

References

1. Stahel ABJ, Baggenstos R, Engels M, Friess M, Ackermann M. Two different Macaviruses, ovine herpesvirus-2 and caprine herpesvirus-2, behave differently in water buffaloes than in cattle or in their respective reservoir species. Plos One. 2013; 8 (12) :e83695. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0083695][PMID]
2. Lefkowitz EJ, Dempsey DM, Hendrickson RC, Orton RJ, Siddell SG, Smith DB. Virus taxonomy: The database of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV). Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46 (D1) :D708-17. [DOI:10.1093/nar/gkx932][PMID]
3. Li H, Cunha CW, Taus NS, Knowles DP. Malignant catarrhal fever: Inching toward understanding. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2014; 2:209-33. [DOI:10.1146/annurev-animal-022513-114156][PMID]
4. Li H, Karney G, O’Toole D, Crawford TB. Long distance spread of malignant catarrhal fever virus from feedlot lambs to ranch bison. Can Vet J. 2008; 49 (2) :183-5. [PMID]
5. Li H, Snowder G, O’Toole D, Crawford TB. Transmission of ovine herpesvirus 2 in lambs. J Clin Microbiol. 1998; 36 (1) :223-6. [DOI:10.1128/jcm.36.1.223-226.1998][PMID]
6. Mananguit IR, Bartolome NDF, Tubalinal GASP, Mingala CN. Molecular detection and genetic characterization of ovine gammaherpesvirus-2 (OvHV-2) in sheep in the Philippines. Small Rumin Res. 2021; 199:1 [DOI:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2021.106383]
7. Khudhair YI, Al-Husseiny SH, Jawad AA. Molecular detection and phylogenetic analysis of ovine herpesvirus-2 in sheep and goats of Al-Qadisiyah province, Iraq. Bulg J Vet Med. 2020; 23 (4) :424-31. [DOI:10.15547/bjvm.2019-0017]
8. Riaz A, Dry I, Dalziel R, Rehman SU, Shah MA, Akhtar HMN, et al. Molecular detection and characterization of ovine herpesvirus-2 using heminested PCR in Pakistan. J Vet Sci. 2021; 22 (4) :e51. [DOI:10.4142/JVS.2021.22.E51][PMID]
9. Lankester F, Lugelo A, Kazwala R, Keyyu J, Cleaveland S, Yoder J. The economic impact of malignant catarrhal fever on pastoralist livelihoods. Plos One. 2015; 10 (1) :e0116059.[DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0116059][PMID]
10. Baxter SI, Pow I, Bridgen A, Reid HW. PCR detection of the sheep-associated agent of malignant catarrhal fever. Arch Virol. 1993; 132 (1-2) :145-59. [DOI:10.1007/BF01309849][PMID]
11. Hemmatzadeh F, Boardman W, Alinejad A, Hematzade A, Moghadam MK. Molecular and serological survey of selected viruses in free-ranging wild ruminants in Iran. Plos One. 2016; 11 (12) :e0168756. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0168756][PMID]
12. Momtaz H, Hemmatzadeh F, Keyvanfar H, Abbasian B. PCR for detection of Ovine Herpesvirus-2 in cow and sheep of Iran. Res J Biol Sci. 2009; 4 (5) :558-61. [Link]
13. Kojouri GA, Mahmoodi P, Momtaz H. Identification of SA-MCFV DNA in blood, lymph node, and spleen of adult sheep, healthy cattle, and MCF cattle by PCR. Comp Clin Path. 2009; 18 (2) :113-8. [DOI:10.1007/s00580-008-0770-y]
14. Flach EJ, Reid H, Pow I, Klemt A. Gamma herpesvirus carrier status of captive artiodactyls. Res Vet Sci. 2002; 73 (1) :93-9. [DOI:10.1016/s0034-5288 (02) 00094-2][PMID]
15. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger d Mol Biol Evol. 2016; 33 (7) :1870-4. [DOI:10.1093/molbev/msw054][PMID]
16. World Organization for Animal Health. malignant catarrhal fever. Paris: World Organization for Animal Health; 2018. [Link]
17. Seyfi-Abad-Shapouri MR, Rashno M, Mansouri S, Sabbaghan M, Haghghi-Karamollah M, Beladi-Moosavi M, et al. [A survey of ovine herpesvirus-2 (OvHV-2) infection among Ahvaz sheep population by PCR (Persian)]. Iran Vet J. 2014; 10(3):49-54. [Link]
18. Pekmez K, Kaplan M, Özkan B, Kalayci G. Investigation of OvHV-2 virus in small ruminants in Western Turkey. Etlik Vet Microbiol J. 2022; 33 (1) :12-16. [DOI:10.35864/evmd.1008860]
19. Li H, Keller J, Knowles DP, Crawford TB. Recognition of another member of the malignant catarrhal fever virus group: an endemic gammaherpesvirus in domestic goats. J Gen Virol. 2001; 82 (Pt 1) :227-32. [DOI:10.1099/0022-1317-82-1-227][PMID]
20. Jacobsen B, Thies K, von Altrock A, Förster C, König M, Baumgärtner W. Malignant catarrhal fever-like lesions associated with ovine herpesvirus-2 infection in three goats. Vet Microbiol. 2007; 124 (3-4) :353-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.04.037][PMID]