| تعداد نشریات | 282 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 80 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 3,186 |
| تعداد مقالات | 35,332 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 51,394,428 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 91,299,766 |
اثرات کاربرد کود زیستی و نانوکود پتاسیم بر عملکرد و برخی صفات فیزیولوژیکی کینوا (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) تحت تنش خشکی | ||
| پژوهش های کاربردی زراعی | ||
| دوره 36، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 138، تیر 1403، صفحه 65-42 اصل مقاله (700.32 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/aj.2024.359942.1625 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمد میرطیبی1؛ عبدالامیر بستانی2؛ مرجان دیانت* 3؛ امین ازادی4 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری، دانشکده کشاورزی و صنایع غذایی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2دانشگاه شاهد تهران | ||
| 3دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی- واحد علوم و تحقیقات - دانشکده کشاورزی و صنایع غذایی | ||
| 4استادیار دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی یادگار امام شهر ری، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| به منظور بررسی اثر تنش خشکی، کود زیستی و نانوکود پتاسیم بر عملکرد و صفات فیزیولوژیکی کینوا آزمایشی بهصورت کرت خرد شده-فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوکهای کامل تصادفی در سه تکرار و در سالهای 1397 و 1398 در استان تهران اجرا شد. عوامل مورد مطالعه تنش خشکی (شاهد، 3/0-، 6/0- و 9/0- مگاپاسگال) بهعنوان عامل اصلی و کود زیستی (ترکیبی از باکتریهای تثبیت کننده نیتروژن و قارچ میکوریزا، عدم کاربرد، 1، 2 و 3 درصد) و نانوکود پتاسیم (عدم کاربرد و کاربرد) بهعنوان عوامل فرعی بهصورت فاکتوریل در کرتهای فرعی قرار گرفتند. نتایج نشان داد در شرایط نرمال آبیاری و کاربرد سه درصد کود زیستی بیشترین میزان عملکرد زیستیی و دانه (به ترتیب 8926 و 2809 کیلوگرم در هکتار) حاصل شد که تنها در این سطح تنش با عدم کاربرد کود زیستی تفاوت معنیداری داشت. در تنش شدید خشکی و عدم کاربرد کود زیستی بیشترین میزان پرولین اندام هوایی (526/0 میلیگرم بر گرم وزن تازه) و کمترین آن (256/0 میلیگرم بر گرم وزن تازه) در شرایط نرمال آبیاری و کاربرد سه درصد کود زیستی حاصل شد. کاربرد کود زیستی و نانوکود پتاسیم میزان پروتئین و روغن دانه را بهبود بخشید ( به ترتیب 67/34 درصد و 90/27 درصد). بنابراین کاربرد کود زیستی و نانوکود پتاسیم باعث بهبود رشد و کیفیت دانه کینوا در شرایط تنش خشکی شد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| کلید واژهها: عملکرد دانه؛ غلظت پرولین؛ روغن دانه؛ کربوهیدارات محلول؛ کلروفیل کل | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Effects of application of biofertilizer and potassium nanofertilizer on yield and some physiological traits of quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) under drought stress | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohammad Mirtayebi1؛ Amir Bostani2؛ Marjan Diyanat3؛ Azadi Amin4 | ||
| 1Ph.D Student, Department of Agricultural Sciences and Food Industries, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Shahed University | ||
| 3Science Research Branch, Islamic Azad University | ||
| 4Assistant Professor Islamic Azad University, Yadegar Imam, Shahr Rey, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction Quinoa, with the scientific name Chenopodium quinoa Willd, is an annual plant from the Chenopodiaceae family and has a similar appearance and affinity to lamb’s quarters (Sepahvand et al., 2009). Quinoa has the ability to adapt to different environments and climates. This plant has a high resistance to drought, poor soils and high salinity and can play an important role in eliminating hunger, malnutrition and poverty, for this reason the United Nations named 2013 as the year of quinoa (Fao, 2013). Materials and Methods In order to investigate the effect of drought stress, biofertilizer and potassium nanofertilizer on yield and physiological traits of quinoa, a split-factorial experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with three replications in 2018 and 2019 at Tehran province. The studied factors included drought stress (control, -0.3, -0.6 and -0.9 MPa) as the main factor and two biofertilizer factors (a combination of Nitrogen-fixing bacteria and mycorrhiza fungi (non-application, 1%, 2% and 3%) and potassium nanofertilizer (non-application and application) as sub-factors. Variance analysis of the data obtained from the measurement of traits was done using SAS software (version 9.1) and the comparison of the means was done by the LSD method at a probability level of 5%. Results & Discussion The results showed that under normal irrigation conditions with the application of 3% biofertilizer, the greatest amount of biological yield and grain (8926 and 2809 kgha-1, respectively) was obtained, which was only different with no application of biofertilizer at this level of stress. The greatest amount of proline (0.526 mgg-1 fresh weight) and the least (0.256 mgg-1 fresh weight) were obtained under severe drought stress and lack of application of biofertilizer and normal irrigation condition and the application of 3% biofertilizer, respectively. The mean comparison of the triple interaction effect of drought stress in biofertilizer and potassium nanofertilizer showed that the highest amount of seed protein obtained in severe stress conditions, the use of two percent biofertilizer and the use of potassium nanofertilizer (19.9%) and the lowest one obtained in normal irrigation conditions non-use of biological fertilizer and non-use of potassium nanofertilizer (0.13%) were obtained.The highest amount of seed oil achieved in normal irrigation conditions, the application of 3% biofertilizer and potassium nanofertilizer application (31.7%) and the lowest one was obtained in severe stress conditions, non-use of biological fertilizer and non-use of potassium nano fertilizer (5.27%) Conclusion Relative water content had the highest value in normal irrigation conditions, application of 3% biofertilizer and application of potassium nanofertilizer. The highest amount of chlorophyll a and b in aerial parts was obtained under normal irrigation conditions, application of 3% biofertilizer and application of potassium nanofertilizer. The use of biofertilizers and nano-potassium fertilizer improved the amount of protein and seed oil. Therefore, the application of biofertilizer and potassium nanofertilizer improved the growth of quinoa under drought stress. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Grain yield, proline, seed oil, soluble carbohydrate, total chlorophyll | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Andersen, M.N., Heidman, T., and Plauborg, F. 1996. The effects of drought and nitrogen on light interception, growth and yield of winter oilseed rape. Soil and Plant Science, 46: 55-67. Bates, L.S., Waldren, RP. and Teare, I.D. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant and soil, 39: 205-208. Bhargava, A., Shukla, S., and Ohri, D. 2006. Chenopodium quinoa. An Indian perspective. Inernational Crops Production, 23: 73-87. Bouchereru, A., Clossais-Besnard, N., Bansaoud, A., Leport, L., and Renard, M. 1996. Water stress effects on rapeseed quality. European Journal of Agronomy, 5(1-2): 19-30. Cakmak, I. 2002. The role of potassium in alleviating detrimental effect of abiotic stresses in plants. In: proceeding of the IPI congress on feed the soil to feed the people. The Role of Potash in Sustainable Agriculture. Pp: 8-10. Cho, K.H., Toler, H., Lee, J., and Augé, R.M. 2006. Mycorrhizal symbiosis and response of sorghum plants to combined drought and salinity stresses. Journal of Plant Physiology, 163(5): 517-28 De Rosa, M.R., Monreal, C., Schnitzer, M., Walsh, R., and Sultan, Y. 2010. Nanotechnology in fertilizers. Nature Nanotechnology, 5: 91-92. Elewa, T.A.A., Sadak, M., and Saad, A. 2017. Proline treatment improves physiological responces in quinoa plants under drought stress. Biosience Research, 14: 21-33. Ellouze, W., Hamel, C., Depauw, R., and Singh, A.K. 2014. Potential to breed for mycorrhizal association in durum wheat. Canadian Journal of Microbioogy, 62(3): 263-271. Fanaei, H.R., Galoy, M.V., Shirani Rad, A.H., and Ghanbari Benjar, A. 2011. Mohammad Kafi Effect of drought stress and different amounts of potassium on the accumulation of osmolites and chlorophyll of two species of rapeseed and mustard. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology and Natural Resources, Soil and Water Sciences, 57: 141-156. Fao.org/quinoa-2013/mobile/home/en/ Fatma, A.G., Lobna, A.M., and Osman, N.M. 2008. Effect of compost and bio-fertilizers on growth yield and essential oil of (Majorana hortensis) plant. International Journal of Agricultural and Biology, 10(4): 381-387. Fischer, S., Wilckens, R., Jara, J., and Aranda, M. 2013. Variation in antioxidant capacity of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Will) subjected to drought stress. Industrial Crops Production, 46: 341-349. Fox, R.H., Piekielex, W.P., and Macheal, K.M. 1994. Using a chlorophyll meter to predict nitrogen fertilizer needs of winter wheat. Communication Soil Science Plant Anales, 25(3-4): 171-181. Gan, Y., Campbell , C.A, Liu, L., Basnyat, P., and McDonald, C.L. 2009. Water use and distribution profile under pulse and oilseed crops in semiarid northern high latitude areas. Agricultural Water Management, 96: 337- 348. Guan, Y.J., Hu, J., Wang, X.J., and Shao, C.X. 2009. Seed priming with chitosan improves maize germination and seedling growth in relation to physiological changes under low temperature stress. Zhejiang University-Science, 10: 427-433. Hassanzadeh, A., Qajarspanloo, M., and Bahmaniaram, M.A. 2014. The effect of potassium and manure application on yield and concentration of some of the high nutrient elements in wheat under water stress. Agricultural Engineering, 36(1): 77-85. Heydari, N., Poriosov, M., and Tawakli, A. 2012. Effect of drought stress on photosynthesis, parameters and relative water content of Anise. Plant Research Journal. 27: 829-839. (In Persion with English Summary) Hossain, M.A., Wani, S.H., Hattacharjee, S.B. and Burritt, D.J. 2016. Phan Tran, L. Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants, Vol 1Physiology and Biochemistry. Springer http://www.fao.org/quinoa-2013/iyq/en/?no_mobile=1 Hosseini, N., Jalilian, J., and Gholinejad, A. 2021. The effect of some stress modifiers on morphological characteristics and quantitative and qualitative characteristics of quinoa under water stress conditions. Agricultural knowledge and sustainable production, 31: 111-128. (In Persion with English Summary) Jaleel, C.A., Manivannan, P., Wahid, A., Farooq, M., Al-Juburi, H.J., Somasundaram, R., and Panneerselvam, R. 2009. Drought stress in plants: a review on morphological characteristics and pigments composition. International Journal of Agricultural Biology, 11: 100–105. Keshtkar, A., Ain, A., Taqwa, H., and Najafi Najad, H. 2019. Effect of jasmonic acid branch and leaf application and drought stress on yield and some agronomic and physiological characteristics of quinoa varieties. Environmental stresses in agricultural plants, 14: 403-414. (In Persion with English Summary) Khuldbrin, B., and Islam Zadeh, T. 2017. Nutrition of mineral elements of higher plants. Shiraz University Press. 495 pages Kochert, G. 1978. Carbohydrate determination by the phenol sulfuric acid method in Helebust. In: Handbook physiological methods. (ed. Craig, J. S.) 96-97. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Kumar, A.R. and Kumar, M. 2008. Studies on the efficacy of sulphate of potash on physiological, yield and quality parameters of Banana cv. Robusta (Cavendish- AAA). Asian Journal of Biolgical Science, 2: 102-109. Liang, X., Zhang, L., Natarajan, S.K., and Becker, D.F. 2013. Proline mechanisms of stress survival. Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, 19: 998-1011. Lichtenthaler, H.K., and Buschmann, C. 2001. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: measurement and characterization by UV-VIS spectroscopy. Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry, F4.3.1-F4.3.8. Matysik, J., Alia, B.B. and Mohanty, P. 2002. Molecular mechanisms of quenching of reactive oxygen species by proline under stress in plants. Current Science, 82: 525-532. Naderi, M.R., and Danesh-Shahraki, A. 2013. Nanofertilizers and their roles in sustainable agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Crop Science, 5(19): 2229–2232. Parsa Motlagh, B., Mahmoodi, S., Hassan, M.S.Z., and Naghizadeh, M. 2011. Interaction effect of saline irrigation water, mycorrhiza Fungi and phosphorus fertilizer on yield and yield components of common bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.). Advances in Environmental Biology, 5(8): 2269-2276. Rafiee, M., Lari, H., and Abdipoor, F. 2008. Change of corn cultivars carbohydrate under drought stress. 10th Iranian Cong. of Agron and Plant Breeding Sci. 318p. Razzaghi, F., Plauborg, F., Jacobsen, S.E., Jensen, C.R., and Andersen, M.N. 2012. Effect of nitrogen and water availability of three soil types on Yield, radiation use efficiency and evapotranspiration in field-grown quinoa. Agricultural Water Management, 109: 20-29. Salardini, A. 2012. Principles of plant nutrition. Tehran University Publications. Salek mearaji, H., Tavakoli, A., Sepahvand, N. A. 2020. The effect of cytokinin on physiological and related traits with yield of quinoa under drought stress conditions. Journal of Crop Improvement, 22: 419-432. Sanchez, F.J., De Andres, E.F., Tenorio, J.L., and Ayerbe, L. 2003a. Growth of epicotyls, turgor maintenance and osmotic adjustment in pea plants (Pisum sativum L.) subjected to water stress. Field Crop Research, 86: 81-90. Sanchez, H.B., Lemeur, R., Damme, P.V., and Jacobsen, S.E. 2003b. Ecophysiological analysis of drought and salinity stress of quinoa (Chenopodium Quinoa Willd). Food Reviews International, 19: 111-119. Sephovand, N.H., Tovem, M., and Shahbazi, M. 2009. Quinoa, a useful plant for food security and sustainable agriculture in Iran. 11th Congress of Agriculture and Plant Breeding, Tehran, Iran. Sharifan, H, Jamali, S., and Sajjadi, F. 2018. Investigating the effect of different salinity levels on some morphological characteristics of quinoa plant (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under different irrigation regimes. Journal of Water and Soil Sciences, 22 (2): 15-27. (In Persion with English Summary) Shabala, S. 2003. Regulation of potassium transport in leaves: From molecular to tissue level. Annual of Botany, 92: 627-634. Sinaki, J.M., Majidi Heravan, E., Shirani Rad, A.H., Noormohamadi, G., and Zarei, G. 2007. The effects of water deficit during growth stages of canola (B. napus L.). American- Eurasian Journal of Agriultural Environmental Science, 2(4): 417-422. Smart, R.E. and Bingham, G.E. 1974. Rapid estimates of relative water content. Plant Physiology, 53(2): 258-260. Solimaninya, Z., Mohtadi, A., Movahhedi Dehnavi, M. 2021. Response of some physiological and morphological properties of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) by zinc application under drought stress. Journal of Plant Process and Function, 10 (41): 171-186. (In Persion with English Summary) Tavan, T., Nikan, M., and Norinia, A.A. 2013. Effect of nanopotassium fertilizer on growth factors, photosynthetic system and protein level of N8019 wheat plant. Plant environmental ecophysiology, 35: 61-71. (In Persion with English Summary) Tawfik, K.M. 2008. Effect of Water Stress in Addition to Potassiomag Application on Mungbean. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 2: 42-52. Vance, C.P. 2011. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and phosphorus acquisition. Plant nutrition in world of declining renewable resources. Journal of Plant Physiology, 127: 390-397. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 518 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 383 |
||