اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات282
تعداد نشریات سازمان80
تعداد شماره‌ها3,168
تعداد مقالات35,197
تعداد مشاهده مقاله50,943,827
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله90,949,003
Rostami, Tayebe, Abbasdokht, Hamid, Makarian, Hassan, Gholipoor, Manoochehr, karimzadeh, khalil. (1403). Phytochemical Properties of Quinoa Seed by Using of Mycorrhizal and Phosphorus Fertilizer in Different Cropping Ratios. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14(1), 9-19. doi: 10.22034/jmpb.2024.365617.1683
Tayebe Rostami; Hamid Abbasdokht; Hassan Makarian; Manoochehr Gholipoor; khalil karimzadeh. "Phytochemical Properties of Quinoa Seed by Using of Mycorrhizal and Phosphorus Fertilizer in Different Cropping Ratios". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14, 1, 1403, 9-19. doi: 10.22034/jmpb.2024.365617.1683
Rostami, Tayebe, Abbasdokht, Hamid, Makarian, Hassan, Gholipoor, Manoochehr, karimzadeh, khalil. (1403). 'Phytochemical Properties of Quinoa Seed by Using of Mycorrhizal and Phosphorus Fertilizer in Different Cropping Ratios', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14(1), pp. 9-19. doi: 10.22034/jmpb.2024.365617.1683
Rostami, Tayebe, Abbasdokht, Hamid, Makarian, Hassan, Gholipoor, Manoochehr, karimzadeh, khalil. Phytochemical Properties of Quinoa Seed by Using of Mycorrhizal and Phosphorus Fertilizer in Different Cropping Ratios. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1403; 14(1): 9-19. doi: 10.22034/jmpb.2024.365617.1683

Phytochemical Properties of Quinoa Seed by Using of Mycorrhizal and Phosphorus Fertilizer in Different Cropping Ratios

Journal of Medicinal plants and By-products
مقاله 2، دوره 14، شماره 1، فروردین و اردیبهشت 2025، صفحه 9-19    اصل مقاله (1.27 M)
نوع مقاله: Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/jmpb.2024.365617.1683
نویسندگان
Tayebe Rostami1؛ Hamid Abbasdokht* 1؛ Hassan Makarian2؛ Manoochehr Gholipoor1؛ khalil karimzadeh2
1Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran
2Medicinal Plants and By-products Research Division, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran
چکیده
Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.), is currently attracting worldwide attention because of its substantial nutritional value, is currently attracting worldwide attention. This study was conducted to evaluate the use of mycorrhizal and different concentrations of phosphorus fertilizer on phytochemical traits of Quinoa seed intercropped with Maize. The study was done separately in two Locations (Shahrood and Mayamey, Iran). Use of mycorrhizal (AMF) in two levels (unused and use of mycorrhizal), Cropping ratios (CR) have three levels (100, 75, and 50%), and Phosphorus fertilizer (P), has three levels (0, 50, and 100 kg/ha). Results show the highest ash (4.43 %), Tartaric acid (13.39 %), Lactic acid (1.17 %), and Soluble carbohydrates (76.37%), were observed in Mayamey location by 50 % CR and use of 50 kg/ha P fertilizer and AMF inoculated in Mayamey location. The measured values were higher than the Shahrood location. Our findings showed that AMF display essential roles in optimizing plant strategies for phosphorus uptake and the efficient utilization of phosphorus in the intercropping system. Application of AMF in a 50 % ratio could be proposed to farmers as a friendly method to obtain favorable biochemical traits, mainly when using 50 kg/ha of P fertilizer. In general, the use of AMF inoculation and 50 kg p/ha in 50% CR has increased the biochemical traits of Quinoa seed.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Bioactive compound؛ Cropping ratio؛ Phytochemical؛ Mycorrhiza؛ Phosphorus fertilizer
مراجع
  1. Bazile D., Jacobsen S.E., Verniau A. The Global Expansion of Quinoa: Trends and Limits. Frontiers in Plant Science 2016; 7:622.
  2. Abdelaleem M.A., Elbassiony K.R.A. Evaluation of phytochemicals and antioxidant activity of gamma irradiated quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa). Brazilian Journal of Biology 2020; 81: 806-813.
  3. Sayed A., Abdellatif A. Chemical and technological evaluation of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivated in Egypt. Acta Scientific Nutritional Health 2018; 2(7): 42 –53.
  4. Babiker E.E., Uslu N., Ghafoor K., AL Juhaimi F., Özcan M.M., Ahmed I.A.M. Variations in bioactive properties, fatty acid compositions, and phenolic compounds of quinoa grain and oils roasted in a pan. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 2022; 46(1): e16161.
  5. Tang Y., Li X., Chen P.X., Zhang B., Hernandez M., Zhang H., Marcone M.F., Liu R., Tsao R. Characterization of fatty acid, carotenoid, tocopherol/tocotrienol compositions and antioxidant activities in seeds of three Chenopodium quinoa Willd. Genotypes. Food Chemistry 2015; 174:502-508.
  6. Food U.N. Agriculture Organization of the, WHO Sustainable healthy diets: guiding principles, Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN. World Health Organization, Rome. 2019.
  7. Mohamed Ahmed I.A., Al Juhaimi F., Özcan M.M. Insights into the nutritional value and bioactive properties of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa): Past, present and future prospective. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2021; 56(8): 3726-3741.
  8. Fernnandez-Lopez J., Viuda-Martos M., Perez-Alvarez J.A. Quinoa and chia products as ingredients for healthier processed meat products: technological strategies for their application and effects on the final product. Current Opinion in Food Science 2021; 40: 26–32.
  9. Efthymiou A., Grønlund M., Müller-Stöver D.S., Jakobsen I. Augmentation of the phosphorus fertilizer value of biochar by inoculation of wheat with selected Penicillium strains. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2018; 116: 139-147.
  10. Gupta A., Rico-Medina A., Caño-Delgado A.I. The physiology of plant responses to drought. Science 2020; 368(6488): 266-269.
  11. Wan Y., Zhou M., Le L., Gong X., Jiang L., Huang J., Zou L., et al. Evaluation of morphology, nutrients, phytochemistry and pigments suggests the optimum harvest date for high-quality quinoa leafy vegetable. Scientia Horticulturae 2022; 304: 111240.
  12. Huang C.D., Liu Q.Q., Li X.L., Zhang C.C. Effect of intercropping on maize Arachidic and yield components. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2019; 18(8): 1690-1700.
  13. Qin Y., Yan Y., Cheng L., Lu Y., Chen J., Liu F., Tan J. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobium facilitate nitrogen and phosphate availability in soybean/maize intercropping systems. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 2023; 1-9.
  14. Amani Machiani M., Javanmard A., Habibi Machiani R., Sadeghpour A. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and changes in primary and secondary metabolites. Plants 2022; 11(17): 2183.
  15. Portes T.A., Carvalho S.I.C., Oliveira I.P., Kluthcouski J. Growth analysis of brachiaria cultivar sole and intercropped cereals. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 2000; 35: 1349 1358.
  16. Li M., Cai L. Biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi play different roles in enabling maize to uptake phosphorus. Sustainability 2021; 6: 3244.
  17. Gupta A., Sharma S., Reddy Surasani V.K. Quinoa ash isolate supplemented pasta: Nutritional, physical, textural and morphological characterization. LWT 2021; 135: 110045.
  18. Richardson A.E. Prospects for using soil microorganisms to improve the acquisition of phosphorus by plants. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 2001; 28(9): 897-906.
  19. Fischer S., Wilckens R., Jara J., Aranda M., Valdivia W., Bustamante L., Obal I. Ash and antioxidant composition of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) sprout from seeds submitted to water stress, salinity and light conditions. Industrial Crops and Products 2017; 15: 558-564.
  20. Fletcher M.J. A colorimetric method for estimation of serum triglycerides. Clinica Chimica Acta 1968; 22: 393-397.
  21. Metcalfe L.D., Schmitz A.A., Pelka J.R. Rapid preparation of fatty acids esters from lipids for gas chromatographic analysis Analytical Chemistry 1966; 38(3): 514-515.
  22. Vundavalli R., Vundavalli S., Nakka M., Rao D. Biodegradable nano-hydrogels in agricultural farming -alternative source for water resources. Procedia Materials Science 2015; 10: 548-554.
  23. Gong Y., Liu L., Xie B., Liao Y., Yang E., Sun Z. Ameliorative effects of lotus seedpod proanthocyanidins on cognitive deficits and oxidative damage in senescence-accelerated mice. Behavioral Brain Research 2008; 194(1): 100- 107.
  24. Nagata M, Yamashita I. Simple method for simultaneous determination of chlorophyll and carotenoids in tomato fruit. Nippon Shokuhin Kogyo Gakkaish 1992; 39: 925–928.
  25. Portes TA., Carvalho S.I.C., Oliveira I.P. Kluthcouski J. Growth analysis of Brachiaria cultivar sole and intercropped cereals. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 2000; 35 1349-1358.
  26. Sardans J., Gargallo Garriga A., Urban O., Klem K., Holub P., Janssens I.A., Peñuelas J., et al. Ecometabolomics of plant–herbivore and plant–fungi interactions: a synthesis study. Ecosphere 2021; 12(9): e03736.‏
  27. Benafari W., Boutasknit A., Anli M., Ait-El-Mokhtar M., Ait-Rahou Y., Ben-Laouane R., Ben Ahmed H., Mitsui T., Baslam M., Meddich A. The native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and vermicompost-based organic amendments enhance soil fertility, growth performance, and the drought stress tolerance of quinoa. Plants 2022; 11: 393.
  28. Hussain S., Liu T., Iqbal N., Brestic M., Pang T., Mumtaz M., Yang W., et al. Effects of lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose, sucrose and monosaccharide carbohydrates on soybean physical stem strength and yield in intercropping. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences 2020; 19: 462-472.
  29. Liu W.G., Ren M. L., Ting L. I. U., Du Y.L., Tao Z. H.O.U., Liu X. M., Yang W.Y., et al. Effect of shade stress on lignin biosynthesis in soybean stems. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2018; 17(7): 1594-1604.
  30. Deng Y.C., Liu W.G., Yuan X.Q., Yuan J., Zou J. L., Du J. B., Yang WY. Relationship between cellulose synthesis metabolism and lodging resistance in intercropping soybean at seedling stage. The Journal of Applied Ecology. 2016; 27(2): 469-476.
  31. Zhao B., Zhang S.L., Yang W.Q., Li B.Y., Lan C., Zhang J.L, Zhang X.B., et al. Multi-omic dissection of the drought resistance traits of soybean landrace LX. Plant Cell and Environment 2021; 44(5): 1379-1398.
  32. Xia M., Suseela V., McCormack M.L., Kennedy P.G., Tharayil N. Common and lifestyle specific traits of mycorrhizal root metabolome reflect ecological strategies of plant–mycorrhizal interactions. Journal of Ecology 2023; 111(3): 601-616.
  33. Adolfsson L., Nziengui H., Abreu I. N., Šimura J., Beebo A., Herdean A., Spetea C., et al. Enhanced secondary-and hormone metabolism in leaves of arbuscular mycorrhizal Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiology 2017; 175(1): 392-411.
  34. Gerlach N., Schmitz J., Polatajko A., Schlüter U., Fahnenstich H., Witt S., Bucher M., et al. An integrated functional approach to dissect systemic responses in maize to arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Plant Cell and Environment 2015; 38(8): 1591-1612.
  35. Schweiger R., Müller C. Leaf metabolome in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2015; 26, 120-126.‏
  36. Begum N., Ahanger M.A., Su Y., Lei Y., Mustafa N.S.A., Ahmad P., Zhang L. Improved drought tolerance by AMF inoculation in maize (Zea mays) involves physiological and biochemical implications. Plants 2019; 8(12): 579.
  37. Takao T., Watanabe N., Yuhara K., Itoh S., Suda S., Tsuruoka Y., Nakatsugawa K. Konishi Y. Hypocholesterolemic effect of ash isolated from Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Seeds 2005; 11: 161-167.
  38. Dang Y., Ren J., Guo Y., Yang Q., Liang J., Li R., Du S.K. Structural, functional properties of ash and characteristics of tofu from small-seeded soybeans grown in the Loess Plateau of China. Food Chemistry 2023; 18: 100689.
  39. Qin Z., Jin J., Liu L., Zhang Y., Du Y., Yang Y., Zuo S. Reuse of soil-like material solidified by a biomass fly ash-based binder as engineering backfill material and its performance evaluation. Journal of Cleaner Production 2023; 402: 136824.
  40. Li M., Cai L. Biochar and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Play Different Roles in Enabling Maize to Uptake Phosphorus. Sustainability 2021; 6: 3244.
  41. Richardson A.E. Prospects for using soil microorganisms to improve the acquisition of phosphorus by plants. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 2001; 28(9): 897-906.
  42. Gupta A., Sharma S., Reddy Surasani V.K. Quinoa ash isolate supplemented pasta: Nutritional, physical, textural and morphological characterization. LWT 2021; 135: 110045.
  43. Fischer S., Wilckens R., Jara J., Aranda M., Valdivia W., Bustamante L., Obal I., et al. Ash and antioxidant composition of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) sprout from seeds submitted to water stress, salinity and light conditions. Industrial Crops and Products 2017; 15: 558-564.
  44. Turk J. Determination of the forage yield and growth parameters of maize (Zea mays L.) with quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) intercropping at different plant mixtures. Field Crops 2021; 26(1): 44-53.
  45. Prasad R., Shivay S.Y. Phosphorus × Other plant nutrient interactions, reaction products, anion exchange and phosphate fixation in soil and strategies to increase availability of the native and applied p to crop plants-A mini review and critique. Agricultural Reviews 2021; 42(2): 220-224.
  46. Nino Gutiérrez N.S., Valencia Gutiérrez M.D.C., García Ramírez M.D.J. Sustainibility, Rurality and Society. Handbook T-IV. 2022.
  47. Wu S., Li M., Zhang C., Tan Q., Yang X., Sun X., Hu C., et al. Effects of phosphorus on fruit soluble sugar and citric acid accumulations in citrus. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 2021; 160: 73-81.
  48. Amani Machiani M., Javanmard A., Morshedloo M.R., Aghaee A., Maggi F. Funneliformis mosseae inoculation under water deficit stress improves the yield and phytochemical characteristics of thyme in intercropping with soybean. Scientific Reports 2021; 11(1): 15279. ‏
  49. Amani Machiani M., Javanmard A., Habibi Machiani R., Sadeghpour A. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and changes in primary and secondary metabolites. Plants 2022; 11(17): 2183. ‏
  50. Maccready R.M., Goggolz J., Silviera V., Owenc H.S. Determination of starch and amylase in vegetables. Analytical Chemistry 1950; 22: 1156- 1158.
  51. Shin YK., Bhandari R.R, Jo J.S., Song J.W., Cho M.C., Yang E.Y., Lee J.G. Response to salt stress in lettuce: changes in chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, phytochemical contents, and antioxidant activities. Agronomy 2020; 10(11): 1627.
  52. Bates L.S., Waldren R.P., Teare I.D. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil 1973; 39(1): 205-207.
  53. Mousavizadeh S.J., Gil J., Moreno R., Mashayekhi K. Asparagus ploidy distribution related to climates adaptation in Iran. Environmental Development and Sustainability 2022; 24: 5582–5593.
  54. Sharma L.K., Agarwal D., Rathore S.S., Malhotra S.K. Saxena S.N. Effect of cryogenic grinding on volatile and fatty oil constituents of Quinoa (Cuinoaum cyminum L.) genotypes. Journal of Food Science and Technology 2016; 53(6): 2827-2834.
  55. Reddy A.R., Chaitanya K.V., Vivekanandan M. Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. Journal of Plant Physiology 2004; 161: 1189-1202.
  56. Ayuso-Yuste M.C., González-Cebrino F., Lozano-Ruiz M., Fernández-León A.M., Bernalte-García M.J. Influence of ripening stage on quality parameters of five traditional tomato varieties grown under organic conditions. Horticulturae 2022; 8(4): 313.
  57. Khormali A., Savadkohi F., Oskoueiyan R., Mehregan I., Mousavizadeh S.J. Multivariate analysis of Asparagus antioxidant properties in relation to environmental factors. Journal of Vegetable Science 2022; 4(1): 99-112.
  58. Saad-Allah K.M., Youssef M.S. Phytochemical and genetic characterization of five quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) genotypes introduced to Egypt. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 2018; 24(4): 617-629.
  59. Waisundara V.Y., Grichar W. J. Pseudocereals: Recent Advances and New Perspectives. 2024.
  60. Yaakob M.A., Mohamed R.M.S.R., Al-Gheethi A., Aswathnarayana Gokare R., Ambati R.R. Influence of nitrogen and phosphorus on microalgal growth, biomass, lipid, and fatty acid production: an overview. Cells 2021; 10(2): 393.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 507
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 476


counter
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب