Evaluation of the morphological, agronomic, and production characteristics of autumn fodder beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars at different planting dates in Golestan province | ||
| چغندرقند | ||
| Article 4, Volume 39, Issue 2, February 2024, Pages 155-164 PDF (533.73 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/jsb.2024.363529.1335 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Alireza Saberi* 1; saeed Yarahmadi2 | ||
| 1Associate Professor of Agriculture and Natural Resources Research and Education Center of Golestan Province, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Gorgan, Iran | ||
| 2Horticulture-Crops Research Department, Golestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Gorgan, Iran | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Cultivation of fodder beet in autumn causes a significant reduction in water consumption for fodder production which is a very important issue. For this purpose, to evaluate the effect of planting date on the yield of different autumn fodder beet cultivars , an experiment was performed in split plot based on randomized complete block design with four replications in Kordkuy region of Golestan province. Factors included the planting date as main plot in three levels of the last of September, the first half of October, and November and three cultivars including the Iranian cultivar called SBSI 051 and two foreign cultivars named Kyros and Griour as sub-plot. The highest root yield and shoot weight were obtained from the planting date of the last of September which was statistically at the same level as the planting date of the first half of October. Among cultivars, Kyros and domestic genotype had the highest and lowest root yield of 97.1 and 62.29 t ha-1, respectively. In total and in the study of mutual effects, the Kyros was the most suitable treatment in the planting date of the last of September with root yield of 104.46 t ha-1. The comparison of the two-year results also indicated the superiority of the Kyros with root yield of 97.1 and 15.69 t ha-1 of fresh and dry matter, respectively | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Autumn planting; bolting percentage; fodder Beet; root yield | ||
| References | ||
|
Albayrak S, Yüksel O. Effects of nitrogen fertilization and harvest time on root yield and quality of fodder beet (Beta vulgaris var. crassa Mansf.). Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 2010; 15(1):59-64. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tjfc/issue/17128/179162 Boudry P, Mccombie H, Van Dijk H. Vernalization requirement of wild beet Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima: among population variation and its adaptive significance. Journal of Ecology. 2002; 1: 693-703. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00704.x. Chakwizira E, de Ruiter JM, Maley S. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer application rate on nitrogen partitioning, nitrogen use efficiency and nutritive value of forage kale. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 2015; 58(3):259–270. doi:10.1093/jxb/erp110. Fasahat P, Rezaei J. Hasanvandi MS. Mirzaei MR. Saberi AR. Nadali F. Evaluation of new fodder beet hybrids for qualitative and quantitative traits. Final report of research project sugar beet seed institute. 2019; 24 pp. [In Persian] Gaivoronskii BA. Tubers in diet for cows. Peferativinyi. Zhrnal, 1981. 58:12-58. Nut Abstr and Rev., 5:768. Hassan KH, Hassany WM. Effect of sowing dates and method on fodder beet productivity under saline conditions at siwa oasis, Egypt. Journal of Plant Production. 2017; 8(11):1121-5. doi:10.21608/jpp.2017.41128. Hosseinian SH, Abdollahian-Noghabi M, Hosseini NM. Effect of bolting on the yield and quality of two sugar beet cultivars in autumn sowing area in Dezful region of Iran. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 2014; 16(4): 265-277. DOI: 20.1001.1.15625540.1393.16.4.1.2 [In Persian] Jaggard KW, Qi A, Ober ES. Capture and use of solar radiation, water, and nitrogen by sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Journal of experimental botany. 2009; 60(7): 1919-25. doi:10.1093/jxb/erp110. Khaembah EN, Maley S, George M, Chakwizira E, de Ruiter J, Zyskowski R, Teixeira E. Crop growth and development dynamics of two fodder beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars sown on different dates in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 2020; 63(3):449-66. doi:10.1080/00288233.2019.1692042. Khan MA, Abdullah Z, Rozema J. fodder beet a new fodder crop for salt affected lands of Pakistan. in prospects for saline agricultural (eds. Ahmad R and KA Malik, klawer Academic publisher, Dordrecht, Netherland, 2002. 215-229. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0067-2_24. Martin RJ. Effect of cultivar, sowing date, and harvest date on yields and sugar contents of beet on a dry land site in Canterbury. New Zealand journal of experimental agriculture. 1983 Jul 1;11(3):191-7. doi:10.1080/03015521.1983.10427753 Milne GD, Direen C, Kitson E, Evans P, Cleland RG, Treder D. Performance of fodder beet cultivars in the South Island. In Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association. 2014; 141-144. doi: 10.33584/jnzg.2014.76.2955. Mutasa-Göttgens ES, Qi A, Zhang W, Schulze-Buxloh G, Jennings A, Hohmann U, Müller AE, Hedden P. Bolting and flowering control in sugar beet: relationships and effects of gibberellin, the bolting gene B and vernalization. Annals of Botany Plants, 2010 (1); plq012. doi:10.1093/aobpla/plq012. Nelsen A, Mikhelsen M, Jensen E. Cultivation of fodder beets for co- ensilage with maize. Danish Agricultural Advisory Service. 2008. doi:10.1093/aobpla/plq012. Roberts DJ. 1987. The effects of feeding fodder beet to dairy cows offered silage and libitum. Grass and Forage Science, 42(4): 391-395. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2009.10.002. Salama H, Zeid M. Fodder beet (Beta Vulgaris L.) yield and quality attributes as affected by sowing date, age at harvest and boron application. Alexandria Science Exchange Journal. 2017 Mar 1;38 (January-March):1-2. doi:10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2017.1613. Sadeghi Shoae M, Ghasemi A, Saberi AR, Sadeghi MR. Crop production capacity of commercial fodder beet cultivars in autumn cultivation. Final report of research project sugar beet seed institute. 2022;18 pp. [In Persian] SAS Institute. 2004. SAS/STAT user's guide. Release 9.0. 4th ed. Statistical Analysis Institute, Cary, NC. Sharifi H, Hosseinpour M. Evaluation and comparison shoot and root yield of 9 fodder beet hybrids in case of wet and dry total crop production for providing forage in Khuzestan dry year condition. Final report of research project sugar beet seed institute. 2009; 47 pp. [In Persian] Stocker N, Saldias B, Brosnahan R, Donnelly L, Gibbs SJ. Effect of sowing date on plant count, true-leaf growth stage and vernalization of fodder beet and sugar beet. Agronomy Society of New Zealand. 2016; 46: 59-70. doi:10.1017/S0021859614001087. Storey TS, Barry P. Yield and quality of fodder beet as affected by cultivar, Sowing date and plant population. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research, 1979; 18(3): 263-277. Taleghani D, Noshad H, Aghashahi AR, Mostofi MR, Saberi AR. The effects of sowing date and variety on autumn fodder beet quantitative and qualitative yield in Mazandaran and Golestan. Final report of research project sugar beet seed institute. 2020; 47 pp. [In Persian] Wickson EJ. The California Vegetables in Garden and Field: A Manual of Practice, With and Without Irrigation, for Semitropical Countries. San Francisco: Pacific Rural Press. 1897. https://digital.library.cornell.edu/catalog/chla2717761 | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 508 PDF Download: 380 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb