| تعداد نشریات | 282 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 80 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 3,208 |
| تعداد مقالات | 35,560 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 53,002,069 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 92,287,678 |
بررسی مقدماتی اثر چند حشرهکش روی برخی از دشمنان طبیعی کرم ساقهخوار نواری، Chilo supprassalis Walker در زیست بوم شالیزار | ||
| مهار زیستی در گیاهپزشکی | ||
| دوره 11، شماره 1، شهریور 1402، صفحه 19-33 اصل مقاله (691.93 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/bcpp.2024.364738.359 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| فرزاد مجیدی شیل سر* 1؛ مهرداد عمواقلی طبری2 | ||
| 1دانشیار، موسسه تحقیقات برنج کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترو یج کشاورزی، رشت، ایران. | ||
| 2استادیار، موسسه تحقیقات برنج کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترو یج کشاورزی، آمل، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| بیش از 50 سال از ظهور ساقهخوار نواری برنج، Chilo supprassalis Walker در کشور میگذرد و طی این مدت به طور عمده تحت کنترل شیمایی بهویژه با سموم گرانوله بوده است. اخیرا کاربرد حشرهکشهای مایع برای کنترل این آفت در حال رواج است، اما، تاثیر آنها بر دشمنان طبیعی کمتر مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. این پژوهش، اثر سه حشرهکش شامل، فیپرونیل (SC5%)، دیازینون (EC60%)، فنیتروتیون (EC50%) در مقایسه با شاهد (آبپاشی) روی مهمترین دشمنان طبیعی مزارع برنج، آسیابک، Orthetrum sabina L. (Odonata: Libellulidae)، سن آندرالوس، Andrallus spinidens F. (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)، سوسک دراکولا، Paederus fuscipes Curtis (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)، عنکبوت آرجیوپه ( Araneae: (Araneidae Doleschall Argiope catenulata، عنکبوت تتراگناتا،Tetragnatha sp. (Araneae: Tetragnathidae) و زنبور تریکوگراما Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) طی 2، 7 و 14 روز بعد از سمپاشی مورد مطالعه قرار گرفت. نتایج حاصل نشان داد که حشرهکشهای فوق در 2 و 14 روز بعد از سمپاشی به ترتیب بیشترین و کمترین تاثیر سوء روی دشمنان طبیعی داشتند. در مجموع بر اساس نتایج حاضر و استاندارد قوانین سازمان بینالمللی کنترل بیولوژیک، حشرهکش فیپرونیل مایع Sc5% از میان سه حشرهکش، با ایجاد 78/3 %کاهش جمعیت، کمترین تاثیر روی دشمنان طبیعی مزارع برنج داشت و در رتبه کمخطر تا خطر متوسط قرارگرفت. با گذشت زمان، تاثیر حشرهکشهای مورد استفاده بهویژه فیپرونیل مایع روی دشمنان طبیعی شیب نزولی داشت. با توجه به سابقه مصرف طولانی مدت حشرهکشهای شیمیایی نظیر دیازینون گرانول علیه کرم ساقهخوار نواری برنج در زیست بوم شالیزارهای شمال کشور (بالغ بر پنج دهه) و نیز به دلیل پرخطر بودن، سمیت بالا و تبعات منفی دیگر برای کشاورزان و زیست بوم شالیزار، معرفی حشرهکشهای جدید سهم بهسزایی در کاهش خطرات فوق خواهند داشت. بنابراین، به نظر میرسد حشرهکش فپیرونیل مایع به مقدار یک لیتر در هکتار مخاطرات کمتری نسبت به سایر حشرهکشهای آزمایش شده در این تحقیق برای حشرات مفید در اکوسیستم زراعی برنج داشته باشد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| آفات؛ برنج؛ دشمنان طبیعی؛ شکارگر؛ شبه انگل؛ کنترل شیمیایی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Preliminary investigation of the effect of several insecticides on some natural enemies of rice striped stem borer, Chilo supprassalis Walker in rice field | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Farzad Majidi-Shilsar1؛ Farzad Majidi-Shilsar2 | ||
| 1Associate Professor, Rice Research Institute of Iran, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Rasht, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Rice Research Institute of Iran, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Amol, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| More than 50 years have passed since the appearance of the rice stem borer, Chilo supprassalis Walker in the country, and during this period it has been mainly under chemical control, especially with granular poisons. Recently, the use of liquid insecticides is used to control this pest, but their effect on natural enemies has been less investigated. In this research, the effect of three liquid insecticide, including fipronil (SC5%), diazinon (EC60%), fenitrothion (EC50%) and control (spraying) investigated on the most important natural enemies in rice fields, (Orthetrum sabina L. Odonata: Libellulidae), Andrallus spinidens F. Hemiptera: Pentatomidae, Dracula (Paederus fuscipes Curtis Coleoptera: Staphylinidae), Argiope spider (Argiope catenulata Doleschall Araneae: Araneidae( (Tetragnatha sp. Araneae: Tetragnathidae) and parasitoid wasps Trichogramma (Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) were studied during 2, 7 and 14 days after spraying. The results showed that the above–mentioned insecticides had the highest and lowest adverse effects on natural enemies in 2 and 14 days after spraying, respectively. According to the present results and the standard rules of the International Organization for Biological Control, liquid fipronil SC5% insecticide among the three insecticides had the least effect on the natural enemies of rice fields by causing 3.78% mortality and ranked low risk to moderate risk. With the passage of time, the effect of the used insecticides, especially liquid fipronil, on natural enemies had a downward slope. Considering the history of long–term use of chemical insecticides such as diazinon granules against the rice striped stem borer in the paddy field of the north of the country (over five decades) and also because of its high toxicity, high toxicity and other negative consequences. For the farmers and the rice paddy ecosystem, the introduction of new insecticides will contribute significantly to reducing the above risks. Therefore, the use of liquid fepironil at a concentration of one liter per hectare, seems to have less adverse effects on beneficial insects in rice fields. . | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Pests, rice, field, predator, parasitoid, chemical method | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahmadi, K., Ebadzadeh, H.R., Hatami, F., Abdshah, H. & Kazemian, A. 2019. Agricultural Agricultural statistics for the crop year 2017–2018, first volume, crops. Ministry of Agricultural Jihad, Deputy of Planning and Economy, Information and Communication Technology Center, 97 p. Aajoud, A., Ravanel, P. & Tissut, M. 2003. Fipronil metabolism and dissipation in a simplified aquatic ecosystem. Journal Agriculture Food. Chemical, 51: 1347–1352. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf025843j. Ashtari, S. 2022. Toxicity of tetraniliprole, chlorantraniliprole, lufenuron and thiocyclam insecticides on Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko and T. evanescens Westwood (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) under laboratory and semi–field conditions. Plant Protection (Scientific Journal of Agriculture), 45(3): 91–103. https://doi.org/ 10.22055/ppr.2022.17829. Bacci, L., Picanco, M.C., Silva, E. M., Martins, J.C., Chediak, M. & Sena, M.E. 2009. Insecticide physiological selectivity to natural enemies of Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) in Brassicae. Ciencia Agrotecnologia Federal University of Lavras, 33: 2045–2051. DOI;10.1590/S1413–70542009000700058. Bobe, A., Cooper, J.F., Coste, C.M. & Muller, M.A .1998. Behavior of fipronil in soil under Sahelian plain field conditions. Pesticide Science, 52: 275–281. DOI: 10.1002/etc.17. Bueno, A.F. & Freitas, S. 2004. Effect of the insecticides abamectin and lufenuron on eggs and larvae of Chrysoperla externa under laboratory conditions. BioControl, 49: 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BICO.0000025375.07428.0b. Cardwell, G., Larry, D. & William, E. 2005. Various novel insecticides are less toxic to humans, more specific to key pests. California Agriculture, 59: 29–34. Chelliah, S. & Bharahi, M. 1994. Insecticide management in rice. In Biology and management of rice insect. (ed). Heinrichs, E.A. International Rice Research Institute. Los Banos, Philippines, P. 779. Cole, L.M., Nicholson, R.A. & Casida, J.E. 1993. Action of phenylpyrazole insecticides at the GABA–gated chloride channel. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 46: 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1006/pest.1993.1035. Desneux, N., Decourtye, A. & Delpuech, J.M. 2007. The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annual Reviw of. Entomology, 52: 81–106. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091440 Devotto, L., Cisternas, E., Carrillo, R. & Gerding, M. 2008. Non–target effects of Dalaca pallens Blanchard control examined through principal response curves: A guild approach in southern Chile. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 68: 228–237. Fernande, F.L., Bacci, L. & Fernandes, M.S. 2010. Impact and selectivity of insecticides to predators and parasitoids. EntomoBrasilis 3(1):1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12741/ebrasilis.v3i1.52. Gangurde S. 2007. Aboveground arthropod pest and predator diversity in irrigated rice (Oryza sativa L.) production Phytoparasitica; 37:209–215 systems of the Philippines. Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 45: 1–8. Gentz, M.C., Murdoch, G. & King, G.F. 2010. Tandem use of selective insecticides and natural enemies for effective, reduced–risk pest management. Biological control, 52(3): 208–215. DOI:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.07.012. Ghorbani, M., Saber, M., Bagheri, M. & Vaez, N. 2016. Effects of diazinon and fipronil on Different Developmental Stages of Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko (Hym.; Trichogrammatidae). Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, (18): 1267–1278. URL: http://jcp.modares.ac.ir/article–3–31383–en.html. Gonzalez–Zamora, J.E., Castillo, M.L. & Avilla, C. 2013. Side effects of different pesticides used in citrus on the adult stage of the parasitoid Aphytis melinus DeBach (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) and its progeny. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 11(2): 494–504. http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2013112–3556. Gunasekara, A.S., Truong, T., Goh, K.S., Spurlock, F. & Tjeerdema, R.S. 2007. Environmental fate and toxicology of fipronil. Journal of Pesticide Science, 32(3): 189–199. DOI: 10.1584/ jpestics. R 07–02. Han, M.S. 2010. Aquatic invertebrate in paddy ecosystem of Korea. Kwang Monn Dang Press, Suwon. Hassan, S. A. 1992. Guidelines for testing the effects of pesticides on beneficialorganisms: Description of test methods. Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms. IOBC/wprs Bulletin, 15(3): 1–3. Hassan, S.A., Albert, R., Bigler, F., Blaisinger, P., Bogenschüz, H., Boller, E., Brun, J., Chiver‐ ton, P., Edwards, P. & Englert, W.D. 1987. Results of third joint pesticide test side effects of Insecticides on natural enemies and possibility of their integration in plant protection strategies ing progamme by the IOBC/WPRS–working group pesticides and beneficial organisms. Journal of Applied Entomology, 103: 92–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/54199 37. Henderson, C.F. & Tilton. E.W. 1955. Tests with acaricides against the brow wheat mite. Journal of Economic Entomology, 48: 157–161. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/48.2.157. Heinrichs, E.A., Reessing, W.H., Valencia, S. & Chelliah, S. 1984. Rates and effect of resurgence inducing insecticides on populations of Nilaparvata lugens (Homoptera: Delphacidae) and its predators. Entomology, 11:1269–1273. DOI:10.1093/EE/11.6.1269. Ishaaya, I. 2005. Novel insecticides: modes of action and resistance mechanism. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, 58: 191. DOI: 10.1002/arch.20041. Jaafar, W.N.W., Mazlan, N., Adam, N.A. & Omar, D. 2013. Evaluation on the effects of insecticides on biodiversity of arthropod in rice ecosystem. Acta Biologica Malaysiana, 2(3): 115–123. Jinguji, H., Ue´da, T., Goka, K., Hidaka, K. & Matsura, T. 2009. Effects of imidacroprid and fipronil insecticide application on the larvae and adults of Sympetrum frequens, JSIDRE, 259: 355–360. Khosrowshahi, M., Nikkho, F., Dezfulian, A. & Bani Hashemian, A. 1979. Assessing the damage of rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis and control it Journal of Plant Pests and Diseases, 47(2): –107.171 Kogan, M. 1998. Integrated pest management: Historical perspectives and contemporary developments. Annual Review of Entomology, 43:243–270. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.243 Kono, Y. & Shishido, T. 1985. Resistance mechanism of the rice stem borer to organophosphorus insecticides. Journal of Pesticide Science, 10: 285–287. Kono, Y. & Gakkaishi, N.N. 1989. Studies on resistance mechanism and synergism in the OP–resistance rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis Walker, Agrochemical Bioregulators. Biochemistry and Physiology, 46: 47–54. Kumar, L. Yogi, M.K. & Jaba, J. 2013. Habitat manipulation for biological control of insect pest. Research Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Science, 1(10): 27–31. Li, Y.L. 1994. Worldwide use of Trichogramma for biological control on different crops: a survey. In: Wajnberg, E. and Hassan, S. A. (Eds.), Biological Control with Egg Parasitoids. CAB International, Oxon, UK, pp: 37–55. Majidi–Shilsar, F., Kharazi Pakdel, A., Azmayieshfard, P., Pazuki, A. & Heydari, H. 1998. Fauna of damselflies and dragonflies of Anzali region. The 13th Iranian Plant Protection Congress, 6–9 September Karaj, Iran, P. 236. Majidi–Shilsar, F. 2015. Crop loss assessment of rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis Walker on Hashemi rice variety under field conditions. Plant Pests Research, 5(2): 25–37. (In Persian with English summary). Majidi–Shilsar, F., Amouoghli–Tabari, M. & Amini Khalaf Badam, M.A. 2013. Evaluating the effect of fipronil insecticide in the control of rice stem borer Chilo suppressalis Walke rin Paddy field. Journal of Plant Protection 27(3): 333–341. (In Persian with English summary). Majidi–Shilsar, F. & Amouoghli–Tabari, M. 2023. Efficacy of the new insecticide thiocyclam hydrogen oxalate in the control of rice striped stem borer Chilo suppressalis (Lepidoptera: Grambidae) under fieldconditions. Journal of Entomological Society of Iran, 43(3): 301–315. (In Persian with English summary). Doi:10.61186/JESI.43.3.9 Mozaffari, M., Vahedi, H. & Dadpourmoghanloo, H. 2012. Evaluation of side effects of fenitrothion, diazinon and chlorpyrifos insecticides current in rice fields on Trichogramma brassicae. 15th National Rice Conference, 1–4. Nabati, P. 2010. Head of Chemical Industries, Nonmetallic industry office and representative of the ministry of Industries and Mines in the coordination center for science and technology of pesticides. Status report of pest’s industry in the country. Naranjo, S.E. 2001. Conservation and evaluation of natural enemies in IPM systems for Bemisia tabaci. Crop Protection, 20:835–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261–2194(01)00115–6. Nyffeler, M. 1982. Field studies on the ecological role of the spiders as insect preda‐ tors in agroecosystems (abandoned, grassland, meadows, and cereal fields). Ph. D Thesis Swiss Federal Institute of Technol, Zurich. Pasalu, I.C., Krishnaiah, N.V., Katti, G. & Varma, N.R.G. 2002. IPM in rice. IPM News letter, pp. 45–55. Patel, H.M., Patel, P.U., Dodia, J.F., Patel, M.C., Korat, P.M. & Mehta, K.G. 1997. Effects of insecticides on natural enemies of major insect pests of paddy. Gujarat Agricultural University Research Journal, 22: 147–151. Rola, A.C. & Pingali, P.L. 1993. Pesticides, rice productivity and farmers’ health an economic assessment, Los Banos the Philippines: World Resources Institute and International Rice Research Institute, 9–17. Roubos, C.R., Rodriguez–Saona, C. & Rufus, R. 2014.Mitigating the effects of insecticides on arthropod biological control at field and landscape scales. Biological Control, 75: 28–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2014.01.006. Rubia, E.G., Shepard, B.M., Yambao, E.B., Ingram, K.T., Arida, G.S. & Penning de Vries, F. 1989. Stem borer damage and grain yield of flooded rice. Journal of Plant Protection in the Tropics, 6: 205–211 Saber, M., Ghorbani, M., Vaez, N. & Armak A. 2020. Effects of diazinon and fipronil on functional response of Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko (Hym.; Trichogrammatidae) in the laboratory conditions. Journal of Crop Protection, 9(2): 275–283. DOR: 20.1001.1.22519041.2020.9.2.5.4. Sahu, S., Sing, R. & Kumar, P. 1996. Host preference and feeding potential of spiders predaceous in insect pests of rice. Journal of the Entomological Research, 20: 145–150. Samiyyan, K. & Chandrasekaran, B. 1998. Prey potential and preference of three Rice Dwelling spiders. Madras Agricultural Journal, 85: 429–438. Sehgal, M., Malik, M., Singh, R.V., Kanojia1, A.K. & Singode, A. 2018. Integrated pest management in rice and its future scope. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(6): 2504–2511. Seni, A. & Naik, B.S. 2017. Efficacy of some insecticides against major insect pests of rice, Oryza sativa L. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 5: 1381–85. Shafaghi, F., Fourouzan, M., Mahdavi, V. & Attaran, M.R. 2023. Effect of chlorantraniliprole, Flubendiamide, and Indoxacarb against tomato leaf miner, and side effects of chlorantraniliprole on the parasitoid wasp, Trichogramma brassicae. Plant Pest Research, 13(1): 39–49. Doi:10.22124/IPRJ.2023.6643. Simon–Delso, N., Amaral–Rogers, Belzunces, V.L.P., Bonmatin, J.M., Chagnon, M., Downs, C., Furlan, L., Gibbons, D.W., Giorio, C., Girolami, V., Goulson, D., Kreutzweiser, D.P., Krupke, C.H., Liess, M., Long, E., McField, M., Mineau, P., Mitchell, E.A.D., Morrissey, C.A., Noome, D.A., Pisa, L., Settele, J., Stark, J.D., Tapparo, A., Van Dyck, H., Van Praagh, J., Van der Sluijs, J. P., Whitehorn, P.R., & Wiemers, M. 2015. Systemic insecticides (neonicotinoids and fipronil): trends, uses, mode of action and metabolites .Environmental Science Pollution Research, 22: 5–34. DOI 10.1007/s11356–014–3470–y Singh, P., Singh, R., Dhaka, S.S., Kumar, D., Kumar, H. & Kumar, N. 2015. Bioefficacy of insecticides and bio–pesticides against yellow stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas Walker and their effect on spiders in rice crop. South Asian Journal of Food Technology and Environment, 1(2): 179–183. DOI:10.46370/sajfte.2015.v01i02.14. Sparks, T.C. 2013. Insecticide discovery: An evaluation and analysis. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 107: 8–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2013.05.012. Sugimura, M., Ishida, S., Kojima, K., Ishida K. & Aoki, H. 1999. Dragonflies of the Japanese archipelago in color. Hokkaido University Press, Sapporo. Varma, G.C. & Singh, P.P. 1987. Effect of insecticides on the emergence of Trichogramma brasiliensis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) from parasitized host eggs. Entomphaga, 32: 443–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02373512. Volkmar, C. & Schier, A. 2005. Effekte von Maisanbauregime auf epigäische Spinnen. Effects of reduced soil tilage on spider communities. Phytomedizin, 35: 17–18. Yazdi, Z., Sarreshtedari, M. & Zohal, M.A. 2010. Respiratory disease in workers exposed to organophosphate materials. Journal of Mashhad University of Medical Science, 53(4): 206–213. Doi:10.22038/MJMS.2010.5366. Yousefi Porshokouh, A., Mohaghghegh Neishabouri, J., Karimpour, Y. & Shirazi, J. 2018. Investigation the effect of six recommended pesticides in rice fields on the productivity and survival of the predator Andrallus spinidens in laboratory conditions. Biocontrol in Plant Protection, 7(1): 29–38. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 431 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 322 |
||