| تعداد نشریات | 282 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 80 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 3,188 |
| تعداد مقالات | 35,336 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 51,466,147 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 91,333,637 |
بررسی تمایز و یکنواختی صفات مرفولوژیکی ارقام گوجه فرنگی در شرایط گلخانه | ||
| علوم و فناوری بذر ایران | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 13، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 34، تیر 1403، صفحه 63-78 اصل مقاله (556.01 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ijsst.2023.363695.1502 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| لیلا یاری* 1؛ محمد رضا جزائری2؛ سعید امینی2 | ||
| 1محقق، مؤسسه ثبت و گواهی بذر و نهال، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران. | ||
| 2استادیار، مؤسسه ثبت و گواهی بذر و نهال، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| گوجه فرنگی (Solanum lycopersicum L.) یکی از مهمترین و محبوب ترین سبزیجات میوه ای در جهان است، هم در فضای باز و هم گلخانه قابل کشت است. برای ورود یک رقم جدید گوجه فرنگی به فهرست ملی ارقام گیاهی ایران ویا دریافت حق بهنژادگر انجام آزمون تمایز، یکنواختی وپایداری یک الزام قانونی است. به همین منظور بررسی تمایز،یکنواختی تهیه شناسنامه مورفولوژیک تعداد 19 رقم گوجه فرنگی با تیپ رشد نامحدود(15مورد جدید و 4 رقم شاهد) درسالهای 1400و 1401 درگلخانه، بر پایه طرح کاملا تصادفی و با دو تکرار و طی دوسال مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. ارقام بر اساس صفات شانه سبز میوه، شکل میوه دربرش طولی، سفتی میوه، نوع گل آذین، بر جستگی دمگاه میوه، تاول زنی برگ، اندازه اثر شکوفه درگلگاه، اندازه اثر دمگل در دمگاه، عمق دمگاه میوه، رنگیزه آنتوسیانین یک سوم بالایی ساقه، وضعیت برگ، شدت رنگ سبز برگ، شدت رنگ سبز میوه وتعداد حفره میوه ازیکدیگر متمایز گردیدند، اما رقم سامورای ازرقم شاهد لیزا متمایز نگردید. نتایج حاصل ازتجزیه واریانس داده ها نشان داد که برای صفات طول میوه، قطر میوه، نسبت طول به قطر میوه، ضخامت پریکارپ، قطرکل میوه، قطر هسته و وزن میوه از نظرآماری تفاوت معنی داری بین ارقام درسطح احتمال یک درصد مشاهده گردید. بررسی یکنواختی ارقام گوجه فرنگی دراین آزمون براساس شمارش بوتههای خارج از تیپ انجام گردید ونتایج نشان دادکه ارقام جدید متقاضی تجاری شدن گوجه فرنگی براساس استاندارد اتحادیه بین المللی حمایت از از ارقام گیاهی ازیکنواختی لازم برخوردار بودند، چون بوته خارج از تیپ بین آنها دیده نشد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| ارقام گوجه فرنگی؛ تمایز؛ یکنواختی؛ صفات مرفولوژیکی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Study of Distinctness and Uniformity of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Varieties Under Greenhouse Conditions Using Morphological Characteristics | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Leila Yari1؛ Mohammad Reza Jazayeri2؛ Saeed Amini2 | ||
| 1Researcher, Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Research Institute (SPCRI), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Research Institute (SPCRI), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is one of the most important and popular fruit vegetables, to enter a new variety of tomato in the national list of plant varieties of Iran or to obtain the right of a breeder, it is a legal requirement to perform a Distinctness, Uniformity and Stability examination. In order to provide morphological description and evaluation of Distinctness and Uniformity19 tomato varieties (15newvarieties and 4check varieties) were examined under greenhouse conditions in 2021and 2022.The experiment was carried out using a completely randomized design with two replications. Varieties were distinguished based on qualitative, pseudo qualitative and quantitative traits such as green shoulder in fruit, fruit shape in longitudinal section, fruit firmness ,Inflorescence type, ribbing at peduncle end in fruit, blistering of leaf, size of blossom scar, size of peduncle scar, depression at peduncle end in fruit, anthocyanin coloration in the upper part of the stem, leaf attitude, intensity of green color in leaf, intensity of green color excluding shoulder (before maturity)in fruit and number of locules in fruit, But Sumurai variety was not distinguished based on qualitative, pseudo qualitative and quantitative traits with compared of Lisa (check) variety. Analysis of variance quantitative traits indicated that evaluated traits such as fruit length and diameter, length to diameter of fruit, pericarp thickness, total diameter of fruit, diameter of core and fruit weight were significantly different at the α=1 % probability level. Also length of leaflets, width of leaflets, width of leaf, diameter of core in cross section in relation to total diameter and peduncle length were significantly different at the α=5 % probability level. These results showed that new varieties had essential uniformity according to standard of International Union for the Protection Of new Varieties of plants. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| tomato varieties, Distinctness, Uniformity, Morphological characteristics | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Anonymus, 2023. Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute. [Online] Available at https://spcri.ir/page-Main/fa/0/form/pId388. [In Persian] Anonymus, 2022. Iran's rank in the production of 20 agricultural products. Donya-e-eqtesad. Newspaper number: 5459. 25 May 2022. News no. 3868295. Tehran, Iran. [In Persian] Anonymus. (2009). National protocol of distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) in tomato. Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Research Institute. Agricultural Research and Education Organization, Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute, Karaj, Iran. [In Persian] Bahrami, H. (2003). Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative traits of new tomato cultivars. Project of Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture. Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization, Iran. [In Persian] Bai, Y., & Lindhout, P. (2007). Domestication and breeding of tomatoes: What have we gained and what can we gain in the future. Annals of Botany, 100, 1085–1094. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm150 Bhattarai, K., Sharma, S., & Panthee, D. R. (2018). Diversity among modern tomato genotypes at different levels in fresh-market breeding. International Journal of Agronomy, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4170432 Blanca, J., Cañizares, J., Cordero, L., Pascual, L., Diez, M. J., & Nuez, F. (2012). Variation revealed by SNP genotyping and morphology provides insight into the origin of the tomato. PLoS ONE, 7, e48198. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048198 Borys, J., Kowalczyk, B., & Waszak, J. (2000). Distinctness, uniformity and stability testing of tomato varieties in Poland. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 22, 225-229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-000-0016-3 Figàs, M. R., Prohens, J., Raigón, M. D., Pereira-Dias, L., Casanova, C., García-Martínez, M. D., Rosa, E., Soler, E., Plazas, M., & Soler, S. (2018). Insights into the adaptation to greenhouse cultivation of the traditional Mediterranean long shelf-life tomato carrying the alc mutation: A multi-trait comparison of landraces, selections, and hybrids in open field and greenhouse. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01774 García-Gusano, M., García-Martínez, S., & Ruiz, J. J. (2004). Use of SNP markers to genotype commercial hybrids and Spanish local cultivars of tomato. TGC Report, 54. Univ. Florida, Gulf Coast Research and Education Center. Giovannucci, E. A., Ascherio, A. B., Rimm, M. J., Stampfer, G. A., Golditz, G. A., & Willett, W. C. (1995). Intake of carotenoids and retinol in relation to risk of prostate cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 87, 1767–1776. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/87.23.1767 Jenkins, J. A. (1948). The origin of the cultivated tomato. Economic Botany, 2, 379–392. Kouam, E. B., Dongmo, J. R., & Djeugap, J. F. (2018). Exploring morphological variation in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum): A combined study of disease resistance, genetic divergence and association of characters. Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica, 51, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.2478/ats-2018-0008 Lin, T., Zhu, G., Zhang, J., Xu, X., Yu, Q., Zheng, Z., Zhang, Z., Lun, Y., Li, S., Wang, X., Huang, Z., Li, J., Zhang, C., Wang, T., Zhang, Y., Wang, A., Zhang, Y., Lin, K., Li, C., … Huang, S. (2014). Genomic analyses provide insights into the history of tomato breeding. Nature Genetics, 46, 1220–1226. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3117 Lopez, M.R., Santiaguillo, J. F. H., Lomeli Pena, A., Guevas, J. A. S., & Sahagun-Castollanos, J. (1994). Evaluations of 60 accessions of husk tomato in Chapingo, Mexico. Revista Chapingo: Serie Horticultura, 1, 131–134. Maria, L. L. G., Óscar, J. G., Juan, J. L. G., Paola, H. C., & Carlos, E. O. V. (2014). Quality parameters and bioactive compounds of red tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) cv Roma VF at different postharvest conditions. Journal of Food Research, 3, 8–18. https://doi.org/10.5539/jfr.v3n5p8 Nowicki, M., Kozik, E. U., & Foolad, M. R. (2013). Late blight of tomato. In R. Varshney & R. Tuberosa (Eds.), Translational Genomics for Crop Breeding (pp. 241–265). John Wiley & Sons. Parthasarathy, V. A., & Aswath, C. (2002). Genetic diversity among tomato genotypes. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 59, 162–166. Patwary, M. M. A., Rahman, M. M., Ahmad, S., Miah, M. A. K., & Barua, H. (2013). Study of heterosis in heat tolerant tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) during summer. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research, 38, 531–544. https://doi.org/10.3329/BJAR.V38I3.16980 Peralta, I. E., Spooner, D. M., & Knapp, S. (2008). Taxonomy of wild tomatoes and their relatives (Solanum sect. Lycopersicoides, sect. Juglandifolia, sect. Lycopersicon; Solanaceae). Systematic Botany Monographs, 84, 1-186. https://doi.org/10.2307/25027972 Rahman, M. A., Ahmad, M. S., Khan, Q. N., & Abdullah-Al-Mahbub, M. A. I. (2003). Genetic analysis on yield and its component traits of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). The Agriculturists, 1, 21–26. Razavi, V., Khandan, A., & Sadegi, L. (2016). Evaluation of morphological traits for distinctness, uniformity, and stability (DUS) of 26 tomato cultivars. Research Project, Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Research Institute, Karaj, Iran. Project no. 4-08-08-92126. [In Persian] Rick, C. M., Zobel, R. W., & Fobes, J. F. (1974). Four peroxidase loci in red-fruited tomato species: genetics and geographic distribution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 71, 835–839. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.71.3.835 Sacco, A., et al. (2015). Exploring a tomato landraces collection for fruit-related traits by the aid of a high-throughput genomic platform. PLoS ONE, 10, e0137139. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137139 Salim, M. M. R., Rashid, M. H., Hossain, M. M., & Zakaria, M. (2020). Morphological characterization of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) genotypes. Journal of Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 19, 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2018.11.001 Shafiei Ajpesha, R. (2000). Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative traits of new tomato cultivars. Project of Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Karaj, Iran. [In Persian] Terzopoulos, P., & Bebeli, P. (2010). Phenotypic diversity in Greek tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum L.) landraces. Scientia Horticulturae, 126, 138–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.06.022 UPOV. (2019). Test guidelines. [Online] Available at http://www.upov.int/en/publications/tg-rom/tg_index.htm Vishwanath, K., Rajendra, P. S., Pallavi, H. M., & Prasanna, K. P. R. (2014). Characterization of tomato cultivars based on morphological traits. Annals of Plant Sciences, 3, 854–862. Yesmin, L., Islam, M. S., Rahman, M. M., Uddin, M. N., & Ahmad, S. (2014). Inbred and hybrid seed production potentiality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) genotypes and their yield performance during summer. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research, 39, 13–21. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v39i1.20057 Yazdi Samadi, B., Rezaei, A., & Valei Zada, M. (2006). Statistical designs in agricultural research. Tehran University Press, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian] | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 604 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 594 |
||