The effect of partial and total replacement of alfalfa hay with Alhagi maurorum on growth performance of fattening camel | ||
| علوم دامی | ||
| Volume 36, Issue 139, September 2023, Pages 57-70 PDF (1.71 M) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/asj.2022.358818.2227 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Navid Ghavipanje* 1; Mohammad Hasan Fathi Nasri1; Mojtaba Afshin2; Seyyed Ahmad Hosseini2; Seyyed Homayoun Farhangfar3 | ||
| 1Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran | ||
| 2Camel and Range Species Research Station of South Khorasan, Birjand, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Birjand, Iran | ||
| Abstract | ||
| The worldwide population growth leads to an increase in livestock production that along with the challenges caused by climate change and water scarcity highlights the importance of raising resistance livestock such as camels. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of partial and total replacement of dietary alfalfa with camelthorn. Total 18 fattening Sandi growing dromedary camels (9 to 10 months old with an average initial weight of 115±7.7 kg) were randomly assigned to one of three experimental treatments in a completely randomized design, with 6 replicates for each treatment. Experimental diets included: 1- control diet (without camelthorn), 2- diets containing 25% camelthorn, and 3- diets containing 50% camelthorn (dry matter basis). The feed intake was recorded daily and the animals were weighed monthly (on days 0, 30, 60, 90, and 150 of the experiment). The results showed that dry matter intake was increased with increasing camelthorn inclusion in the diet (P ≤ 0.05). Although, the average daily gain was reduced in the diet containing 50% DM camelthorn (P ≤ 0.05), but no significant difference was observed between the treatment containing 25% DM camelthorn and control. Feed cost per kilogram weight gain and profit per kilogram of weight gain tended to increase (P = 0.01) with increasing the inclusion of camelthorn in the diet. Overall, the findings of this study showed that feeding camels with camelthorn up to 50% of dietary DM, not only did not have severe deleterious effects on growth performance, but also reduced the production costs. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Camelthorn; Growth Performance; Economic Indicators; Fattening Camel; Rangeland Species | ||
| References | ||
|
احمدی، ع. و سندگل، ع. (1389). ارزیابی ارزش غذایی گونههای شورپسند موجود در جیره گوسفند زندی چراکننده در مراتع بیابانی عباس آباد قم. مرتع و آبخیزداری، 63(3)، 277-287. امیری، ب.، افشاری، ا.، قره داغی، ح. و رسولی ب. (1395). بررسی امکان معرفی منابع جدید علوفهای از طریق ترکیب Halocnemum strobilaceum و Alhagi camelarumسیلوکردن در استان بوشهر. پژوهش تحقیقات مرتع و بیابان ایران . 22 (3): 478-498. باشتینی ج، فضائلی، ح. و فیضی، ر. (1386). امکان سیلو کردن گیاه خارشتر و مقایسة ارزش غذایی آن با خارشتر خشک شده و یونجة خشک. گزارش نهایی طرح تحقیقاتی، مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خراسان باشتینی، ج. (1394). اثر مصرف علف خشک خارشتر در جیره غذایی بر عملکرد گوسفندان بلوچیو نشریه علوم دامی (پژوهش و سازندگی). 28 (106): 169-178. بینام، (1400). آمارنامههای کشاورزی، وزارت جهاد کشاورزی. دفتر فناوری و اطلاعات تهران، ایران. فیاض، م.، عامری، ح.، یزدانشناس، ح. و یگانه، ح. (1394). بررسی ارزش رجحانی گونه های مرتعی برای شتر در مراتع ییلاقی و قشلاقی سمنان طی سه سال متوالی. 794-802. قهرمان، ا. (1392). فلور رنگی ایران. دانشگاه تهران، پردیس علوم پایه جلد 27، صفحه 125. کرمشاهی امجزی، خ.، دیانی، ا.، طهماسبی، ر. و خضری، ا. (1396). تأثیر تغذیه سیلاژ خارشتر و ضایعات خرما بر مصرف ماده خشک، قابلیت هضم مواد مغذی و فراسنجه های خونی در گوسفند. پژوهشهای تولیدات دامی. 8(16): 103-110. Abd El-Hack, M. E., Samak, D. H., Noreldin, A. E., Arif, M., Yaqoob, H. S. and Swelum, A. A. (2018). Towards saving freshwater: halophytes as unconventional feedstuffs in livestock feed: a review. Environmental science and pollution research international, 25(15), 14397-14406. Abri, M. A. A. and Faye, B. (2019). Genetic improvement in dromedary camels: challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in genetics, 10, 167. Adel, E. M. and El-Metwaly, H. (2012). Effect of feed additive “exogenous enzymes” on growth performance of Maghraby camels. Life Sci. 9:4830–65. AOAC. (2015). Official methods of analysis, 17th ed. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD, USA. El Shaer, H. M. (2021). Potential use of halophytes and salt-tolerant forages as animal feed in the arab region: an overview. Handbook of Halophytes: From Molecules to Ecosystems towards Biosaline Agriculture, 2479-2498. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2015). E-conference: utilization of food loss and waste as well as non-food parts as livestock feed, FAO, Rome, Italy. Retrieved on 17 December from http://www.fao.org/save-food/news-andmultimedia/ events/detail/fr/c/325893/. Hendrickson, R., and Asmussen, L. (1981). The voluntary intake, digestibility and rotation time day cattle and sheep of leaf and stem fraction of Tropical legume. Australian Journal of Agriculture, 24, 875-888. Iranian Council of Animal Care. Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals. Isfahan: Isfahan University of Technology (1995). Kadim, I. T. (2012). Camel meat and meat products. CABI. Kamoun, M. (1993). Reproduction and production of Maghrabi dromedaries kept on pastures of the Mediterranean type. Etudes et Synthesrs de l`lEMVT. (1993), no. 41, 117- 130; Actes de l`Atelier “Peut on ameliorer les performances de reproduction des camelins” Paris, France, 10-12 September. Kazemi, M. and Bezdi, K. G. (2021). An investigation of the nutritional value of camelthorn (Alhagi maurorum) at three growth stages and its substitution with part of the forage in Afshari ewes’ diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 271, 114762. Khatibi, A. ,Tahmasbi, R., Dayani,O. and Khezri, A. (2017). The effect of level of feed intake on digestibility, nitrogen balance and microbial protein synthesis in sheep. Research on Animal Production. 15: 18-24. Makkar, H. P. S. (2017). Opinion paper: Food loss and waste to animal feed. Animal, 11(7), 1093-1095. Mohamed, M. I., Maareck, Y. A., Abdel-Magid, S. S. and Awadalla, I. M. (2009). Feed intake, digestibility, rumen fermentation and growth performance of camels fed diets supplemented with a yeast culture or zinc bacitracin. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 149(3-4), 341-345. Moore, J. E., Brant, M. H., Kunkle, W. E., and Hopkins, D. I. (1999). Effects of supplementation on voluntary forage intake, diet digestibility, and animal performance. Journal of Animal Science, 77(suppl_2), 122-135. Rezvani-moghaddam, P. and Kochaki, A. (2004). History of research on salt-affected lands of iran, present status and future prospects: Halophytic ecosystems. Pp 83-95. Richard, D. (1989). lngestibilité et digestibilité des aliments par le dromadaire Options Méditerranéennes (CIHEAM). Série A (2): 55-59. Tibary, A. and El Allali, K. (2020). Dromedary camel: A model of heat resistant livestock animal. Theriogenology, 154, 203-211. Towhidi, A., Saberifar ,T. and Dirandeh, E. (2011). Nutritive value of some herbage for dromedary camels in the central arid zone of Iran. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 43:617- 622. Van Soest, P. J. (1994). Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. United States. Comstock Publication, Ithaca. Wei, F., Yang, X., Pang, K. and Tang, H. (2021). Traditional Uses, Chemistry, Pharmacology, Toxicology and Quality Control of Alhagi sparsifolia Shap. A Review. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2810. Wilson, R.T. (1984). The Camel. Longman Group Limited, Essex, UK. Zarrin, M., Riveros, J. L., Ahmadpour, A., de Almeida, A. M., Konuspayeva, G., Vargas-Bello-Pérez, E. & Hernández-Castellano, L. E. (2020). Camelids: new players in the international animal production context. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 52(3), 903-913. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 1,034 PDF Download: 449 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb