Specialists’ views on local communities’ participation in the biodiversity conservation interventions of the Sorkhabad Protected Area in the Zanjan Province | ||
| تحقیقات حمایت و حفاظت جنگلها و مراتع ایران | ||
| Article 12, Volume 20, Issue 2 - Serial Number 40, March 2023, Pages 362-378 PDF (581.61 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Article | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/ijfrpr.2023.360284.1556 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Parvaneh Safarialamouti1; Esmail Karamidehkordi* 2 | ||
| 1PhD Graduate of Agricultural Development, Department of Agricultural Extension, Communication and Rural Development, Faculty of Agriculture, the University of Zanjan, Iran | ||
| 2Associate Prof., Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Participatory management is one of biodiversity conservation approaches. This research assesses specialists’ views on local communities’ participation in biodiversity conservation activities using a mixed quantitative and qualitative methodology. Before quantitative research, an exploratory qualitative stage was conducted and a sample of 32 specialists from the Environment Administration, the Natural Resources and Watershed Management Administration, the Agriculture-Jahad Organization, and the Research and Education Center of Agriculture and Natural Resources in the Zanjan Province, Zanjan and Tarom Townships, and their relevant counties and sub-counties of the Sorkhabad Protected Area, were selected through the purposeful sampling technique. Qualitative data collection was done through semi-structured interviews about indicators of biodiversity conservation activities in the region. In quantitative part, a descriptive-correlational survey was conducted to collect data by a self-completion questionnaire. The results showed that the communities have mostly participated in biodiversity conservation activities in a passive way (manipulated involvement) and at the informing level, while the higher levels of participation have been neglected. Moreover, a significantly positive relationship existed between participation in knowledge-improving measures and its implementation, and between the participation in diversification and livelihood-improving measures and its implementation. It is essential to implement biodiversity conservation and management by a comprehensive and multi-dimensional governance, strengthening local communities’ participation, and coordinating the activities of various organizations and actors to conserve and restore ecosystems and species of protected areas. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Environment; Participation; Zanjan | ||
| References | ||
|
- Augustine, D., Davidson, A., Dickinson, K., & Van Pelt, B. 2019. Thinking Like a Grassland: Challenges and Opportunities for Biodiversity Conservation in the Great Plains of North America. Rangeland Ecology & Management.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2019.09.001
-Bélanger, J., & Pilling, D. 2019. The state of the world’s biodiversity for food and agriculture. Rome: FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Assessments.
- Bodin, Ö., & Crona, B. I. (2009). The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 366-374. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.002
- Borg, R., Toikka, A., & Primmer, E. 2015. Social capital and governance: a social network analysis of forest biodiversity collaboration in Central Finland. Forest Policy and Economics, 50, 90-97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.06.008
- Darvishi, A., Ghorban, M., Fakheran, S., & Soffianian, A. 2014. Network Analysis and Key Actors Toward Wildlife Management (Case Study: Habitat of Caucasian Black Grouse, Arasbaran Biosphere Reserve) Applied Ecology Isfahan University Of Technology, 3(9), 29-41. (In Persian)
- Estelaji, A. (2012). Examining the model of rural management in Iran with an emphasis on the local and cooperative management of Dehyari. Journal of Geography, 10(32), 239-258. (In Persian)
- Gatiso, T. T., Kulik, L., Bachmann, M., Bonn, A., Bösch, L., Freytag, A., . . . Kühl, H. S. 2022. Sustainable protected areas: Synergies between biodiversity conservation and socioeconomic development. People and Nature, 4(4), 893-903. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10326
- Ghorbani, M., Salari, F., Hamidian, A., & Nasri, M. 2016. The Analysis of Local Benefesheries’ Network Toward Improvement of Resilience and Sustainable Natural Ecosystems Management (Case Study: Gor-Gu Region, Boyer Ahmad District). Journal of Natural Environment, 69(2), 469-486. doi:10.22059/jne.2016.59759. (In Persian)
- Htay, T., Htoo, K. K., Mbise, F. P., & Røskaft, E. 2022. Factors Influencing Communities’ Attitudes and Participation in Protected Area Conservation: A Case Study from Northern Myanmar. Society & Natural Resources, 35(3), 301-319. doi:10.1080/08941920.2022.2032515
- Karamidehkordi, E., Mansori Nejad, R., & Rahimian, J. 2017. Participation of Rural Communities in Decision Making, Monitoring and Evaluation of the Oak Forest trees Dieback Management in the Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province. Forest and Range Protection Research, 15(2), 156-175. doi:10.22092/ijfrpr.2018.115707 (In Persian)
- Karimi, K., & Karamidehkordi, E. 2015. Rangeland Use and Necessity of Diversification of Rural Households’ Livelihoods, a case study in the Mahneshan Township Rangeland Use and Necessity of Diversification of Rural Households’ Livelihoods. Rural Research, 6(2), 343-368. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2015.54911(In Persian)
- Lindsay. C, S., & Jouni, P. 2013. Participation in environmental conservation and protected area management in Romania: A review of three case studies. Environmental Conservation, 40(2), 138-146. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892913000039.
- Méndez-López, M. E., García-Frapolli, E., Pritchard, D. J., Sánchez González, M. C., Ruiz-Mallén, I., Porter-Bolland, L., & Reyes-Garcia, V. 2014. Local participation in biodiversity conservation initiatives: A comparative analysis of different models in South East Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management, 145, 321-329. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.06.028
- Naderi, M., Ghorbani, M., & Yavari, A. 2016. Network analysis and organizational cohesion in Sorkheh Hesar National Park Co-management Natural Environment, 69(2), 519-530. doi:10.22059/jne.2016.59762. (In Persian)
- Renner, I., Emerton, L., & Kosmus, M. 2018. Integrating Ecosystem Services into Development Planning A stepwise approach for practitioners (A. v. Bertrab & L. Emerton Eds.). Bonn and Eschborn, Germany: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH.
- Schultz, M. 2016. Social-Ecological Assessments–examples of processes, tools, indicators and metrics. swed: Stockholm Resilience Center.
- Stringer, L. C., Scrieciu, S. S., & Reed, M. S. 2009. Biodiversity, land degradation, and climate change: Participatory planning in Romania. Applied Geography, 29(1), 77-90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.07.008
- UN. 2018. Sustainable Development Goal 15. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg15.
- United Nations. 2021. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2021. Retrieved from New York: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2021
- Villamor, G. B., Palomo, I., Santiago, C. A. L., Oteros-Rozas, E., & Hill, J. 2014. Assessing stakeholders' perceptions and values towards social-ecological systems using participatory methods. Ecological Processes, 3(1), 22. doi:10.1186/s13717-014-0022-9
- Ward, C., Holmes, G., & Stringer, L. 2018. Perceived barriers to and drivers of community participation in protected-area governance. Conservation Biology, 32(2), 437-446. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13000 | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 1,104 PDF Download: 471 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb