Role of humic acid pretreatment on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) seed germination characteristics and early seedling growth | ||
| علوم و فناوری بذر ایران | ||
| Article 6, Volume 12, Issue 1 - Serial Number 29, May 2023, Pages 79-89 PDF (1.17 M) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/ijsst.2022.360071.1455 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Saeed Sadeghzadeh Hemayati* 1; Reza Shariari2; Ali Saremirad3 | ||
| 1Associate Professor of Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI) - Agricultural Research Education and Extension, Karaj, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Agronomy, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran. | ||
| 3Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Suitable germination and crops establishment are one of the most significant and fundamental issues that overshadow the economic performance of the product. Improving the quality of seeds by relying on their pre-treatment is one of the issues that can be considered. Accordingly, the present study was performed to investigate the effect of pretreatment of sugar beet seeds using humic in factorial experiment in 2017. The first factor was humic acid including four levels of zero, 8.33, 12.50, and 25.00 mg per 100 g of seed, and the second factor, cultivar included two levels of Ekbatan and Paya. According to the results of the analysis of variance, the main effects of humic acid and cultivar had a significant effect on all evaluated characteristics except root dry weight at one and five percent probability levels. Humic acid-cultivar interaction was significant only for the three characteristics of mean germination time, root dry weight, and shoot dry weight. Based on the mean comparison results, the seed vigor (87.87%), germination rate (6.27 bud/day), seedling vigor length index (3.52) and seedling vigor weight index (1269.96) were assigned to seed pretreatment using 12.50 mg of humic acid per 100 grams of seeds. Seed pretreatment without significant difference in the amount of coating material increased the uniformity of seed germination. Among the two studied cultivars, the Ekbatan cultivar was superior to the Paya cultivar in terms of all studied characteristics. In general, the use of humic acid improved the germination characteristics and early growth of seedlings. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Cultivar; Establishment; Pretreatment; Sugar beet | ||
| References | ||
|
Reference Abdul‐Baki, A.A., and J.D. Anderson. 1973. Vigor determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria. Crop Sci. 13:630-633. Aguiar, N., L. Medici, F. Olivares, L. Dobbss, A. Torres‐Netto, S. Silva, E. Novotny, and L. Canellas. 2016. Metabolic profile and antioxidant responses during drought stress recovery in sugarcane treated with humic acids and endophytic diazotrophic bacteria. Ann. Appl. Biol. 168:203-213. Ali, I.N. 2014. Assessment of various humic acid and sulfur levels for higher yields in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Sarhad J. Agric. 30:47-52. Amini, B., M. Farahbakhsh, and M. Kianirad. 2018. Study on the effects of humic acid-urea fertilizaers application on some agronomic characteristics of maize (Zea mys L.). Appl. Soil Res. 5:31-40. Asgharipour, M., and M. Rafiei. 2011. The effect of different concentrations of humic acid on seed germination behavior and vigor of barley. Australian J. Basic Appl. Sci. 5:610-613. Casenave, E., and M. Toselli. 2007. Hydropriming as a pre-treatment for cotton germination under thermal and water stress conditions. Seed Sci. Technol. 35:88-98. Clark, L., W. Whalley, J. Ellis-Jones, K. Dent, H. Rowse, W. Finch-Savage, T. Gatsai, L. Jasi, N. Kaseke, and F. Murungu. 2001. On-farm seed priming in maize: a physiological evaluation, 7th Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conf. 5–11 February, 2001. Ebrahimi Koulaei, H., H. Mansouri, J. Soltani, S.B. Mahmoudi, M. Aghaeezadeh, M. Hasani, M.R. Orazizadeh, and A. Pedram. 2019. Ekbatan: The First Iranian Sugar beet Cultivar with Resistance to Rhizoctonia and Tolerance to Rhizomania. Res. Ach. for Field and Horticulture Crops. 8:117-134. Ebrahimi, M., and E. Miri Karbasak. 2016. Investigation effect of humic acid on germination, seedling growth and photosynthesis pigments of medicinal plant Isabgol (Plantago ovata Forssk). Iranian J. Seed Sci. Res. 3:35-46. (In Persian) Ghaffari Nejad, S.A., F. Nourgholipour, and M.N. Gheybi. 2020. Biostimulants and their Roles in Plant Physiology, Nutrient Absorption, and Tolerance to Abiotic Stresses. Land Manage. J. 8:47-67. Ghorbani, S., M. Khajeh Hosseini, and A. Ishi Rezaei. 2013. Effect of pretreatment of humic acid on germination and early seedling growth of maize (Zea mays L.). Agron. Plant Breed. 9:37-43. (In Persian) Gooding, M., A. Murdoch, and R. Ellis. 2000. The value of seeds. Seed technol. biol. basis:1-41. Ilkaee, M.N., A. Saremirad, B. Abbaszadeh, and H. Salehi. 2020. Role of Maternal Plant Nutrition with Chemical and Biological Fertilizers on Germination Characteristics of Nepeta racemosa. Seed Res. J. 10:54-64. (In Persian) ISTA. 1985. International rules for seed testing. Rules 1985. Seed Sci. Technol. 1-3: 299-513. ISTA. 2018. ISTA rules changes in seed germination testing at the beginning of the 21st century. The International Seed Testing Association (ISTA), Bassersdorf, Switzerland. Kaya, M.D., G. Okçu, M. Atak, Y. Cıkılı, and Ö. Kolsarıcı. 2006. Seed treatments to overcome salt and drought stress during germination in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Eur. J. Agron. 24:291-295. Majidi, A., G. Khalilzadeh, and F. Rejali. 2021. Grain Yield and Some Agronomic Traits of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Influenced by Glycinebetaine and Humic Acid Application under dryland farming condition. J. Agric. Sci. Sust. Prod. 31:235-253. (In Persian) Mirzaei, M.R., and A. Rajabi. 2021. Relationship of seed pericarp color with seed quality in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L. var. altissima Döll). Genet. Resour.Crop Evol. 68:2093-2105. Moghbeli, T., and M.J. Arvin. 2015. Effect of Seed Pretreatment on Germination Parameters, Growth, and Fruit Yield of Muskmelon (Cucumis melo var reticulates L.). J. Crop Prod. Process. 4:23-34. Monteiro, F., L. Frese, S. Castro, M.C. Duarte, O.S. Paulo, J. Loureiro, and M.M. Romeiras. 2018. Genetic and genomic tools to asssist sugar beet improvement: the value of the crop wild relatives. Front. Plant Sci. 9:74-85. Orazizadeh, M., A. Rajabi, D. Fatholah Taleghani, M. Ahmadi, S. Vahedi, M. Aghaeizadeh, S. Sadeghian- Motahar, M. Chageni, V. Yosefabadi, S. Sadeghzadeh-Hemayati, M. Abdollahian-Noghabi, R. Mohammadian, M. Mirzaee, H. Ebrahimi-Koulaie, A. Jalilian, M. Fathi, S. Khodadadi, A. Nouroozi, and M. Rahnamaian. 2015. Paya, The First Sugar Beet Monogerm Variety Tolerant to Drought in Iran. Res. Achievements Field Hortic. Crops. 4:31-42.(In Persian, with English Abstract) Orsi, M. 2014. Molecular dynamics simulation of humic substances. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 1:1-14. Ozfidan-Konakci, C., E. Yildiztugay, M. Bahtiyar, and M. Kucukoduk. 2018. The humic acid-induced changes in the water status, chlorophyll fluorescence and antioxidant defense systems of wheat leaves with cadmium stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safe. 155:66-75. Ranal, M.A., and D.G.d. Santana. 2006. How and why to measure the germination process? Brazilian J. Bot. 29:1-11. Ribeiro, I.C., C. Pinheiro, C.M. Ribeiro, M.M. Veloso, M.C. Simoes-Costa, I. Evaristo, O.S. Paulo, and C.P. Ricardo. 2016. Genetic diversity and physiological performance of Portuguese wild beet (Beta vulgaris spp. maritima) from three contrasting habitats. Front. Plant Sci. 7:1293. Soltani, A., S. Galashi, E. Zeinali, and N. Latifi. 2001. Germination, seed reserve utilization and seedling growth of chickpea as affected by salinity and seed size. Seed Sci. 30:51-60. (In Persian) Soltani, A., and V. Maddah. 2010. Applied, Simple programs for Education and Research in Agronomy. Iranian Society Ecological Agriculture, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian) Tahir, M., M. Khurshid, M. Khan, M. Abbasi, and M. Kazmi. 2011. Lignite-derived humic acid effect on growth of wheat plants in different soils. Pedosphere. 21:124-131. Turan, M.A., B.B. Aşık, A.V. Katkat, and H. Celik. 2011. The effects of soil-applied humic substances to the dry weight and mineral nutrient uptake of maize plants under soil-salinity conditions. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 39:171-177. Unlu, H.O., U. Husnu, and Y. Karakurt. 2011. Changes in fruit yield and quality in response to foliar and soil humic acid application in cucumber. Sci. Res. Essays. 6:2800-2803. Yildirim, E. 2007. Foliar and soil fertilization of humic acid affect productivity and quality of tomato. Acta Agric.Scand. 57:182-186. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 684 PDF Download: 605 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb