Identification of prone areas to autumn cultivation of sugar beet in Lorestan and Ilam provinces based on temperature and precipitation | ||
| چغندرقند | ||
| Article 4, Volume 38, Issue 1, September 2022, Pages 37-54 PDF (1.8 M) | ||
| Document Type: Scientific - Research | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/jsb.2022.358534.1305 | ||
| Authors | ||
| M. Azizi1; H. Mazreh* 2; D. F. Taleghani3 | ||
| 1Ph.D. student in Agricultural Meteorology, Kish International Campus, University of Tehran, Kish, Iran. | ||
| 2Professor of Department of Natural Geography, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran. | ||
| 3Associate professor of Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI), Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Since temperature and precipitation are the most important climatic parameters affecting the cultivation of sugar beet , daily temperature data of selected weather stations in a period of 16 years (2004-20) together with annual precipitation data were used for agro-climatic analysis. For this purpose, methods of evaluation of thermal potential, deviation from optimal conditions, and growing degree days (GDD) were used. Evaluation of thermal potential based on 5 and 10 oC thresholds in Lorestan province showed that Poldokhtar and Kuhdasht stations had the highest accumulated thermal unit, while Azna station had the lowest value. In Ilam province, Dehloran and Mehran stations had the highest accumulated thermal unit and Ivan station had the lowest value. According to the analysis of deviation from optimal conditions, Poldokhtar station in Lorestan, and Dehloran station in Ilam had the least deviation from the optimal conditions of -27.73 and -29.17, respectively. Planting date was considered based on autumn temperature in all stations. The optimum germination date based on GDD was 12 October in Poldakhtar and 13 October in Dehloran stations. In terms of suitable cultivation areas in Lorestan, the southern and southeastern regions in Poldakhtar and Kuhdasht were identified as the most suitable regions. In Ilam province, the southern, southeastern and southwestern regions in Dehloran and Mehran were identified as the most suitable regions. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Autumn sugar beet; Precipitation; Temperature; Zoning | ||
| References | ||
|
Adibifard N, Habibi D, Bazrafshan M, Taleghani D, Ilkaee M. Study of the climatic condition of Fars province for the development of autumn-sown sugar beet planting using Geographic Information System (GIS). Journal of Sugar Beet. 2019; 35(1): 13-31. dor:10.22092/JSB.2019.116356.1169. [In Persian] Antunovi´c M; Varga I; Stipeševi´c B; Ranogajec L. Analýza chorvatského cukrovarnického sektoru a produkce cukrové ˇrepy. Listy Cukrov. AˇRepaˇrské 2021, 137, 383–386. Ashabokov BM; Calow HM; Fedchenko LM; Stasenko DV. Some problems and methods of agriculture adaptation to climate change. Regional effects of global climate change (causes, effects, predictions). In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, Voronezh, Russia, 26–27 June 2012; pp. 360–365. Azizi M. Study of agro-climatic potentials of sugar beet cultivation in Ardabil province, Master's thesis, Supervisor, Akbar Shaemi, Department of Geography, Payame Noor University, Central Isfahan. 2013. [In Persian] Centeno Malfaz JA; Morillo-Velarde Pérez-Barquero R. Cómo Realizar un Balance Hídrico; AIMCRA Asociación de Investigación para la Mejora del Cultivo de la Remolacha Azucarera: Valladolid, Spain. 2005; 86: 6–10. Ding R, Kang S, Vargas R, Zhang Y, Hao X. Multiscale spectral analysis of temporal variability in evapotranspiration over irrigated cropland in an arid region. Agricultural Water Management. 2013, 130, 79–89. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2013.08.019. Ernst D, ˇCerný I, Paˇcuta V, Zapletalová A, Rašovský M, Skopal J, Vician T, Šulík R, Gažo J. Yield and sugar content of sugar beet depending on different soil tillage technologies. Listy Cukrov. AˇRepaˇrské. 2021; 137: 319–324. Henson C, Market P, Lupo A, Guinan P. ENSO and PDO-related climate variability impacts on Midwestern United States crop yields. International Journal of Biometeorology. 2016; 61: 857–867. doi:10.1007/s00484-016-1263-3. Hoffmann CM, Kenter C. Yield potential of sugar beet—Have we hit the ceiling? Frontiers in Plant Science. 2018; 9. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00289. Hu Q, Buyanovsky G. Climate effects on corn yield in Missouri. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. 2003; 42: 1626–1635. doi:10.1175/1520-0450. Iglesias A, Garrote L. Adaptation strategies for agricultural water management under climate change in Europe. Agricultural Water Management. 2015; 155: 113–124. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2015.03.014. Ivanov AL. Problems of global manifestation of technogenesis and climate change in agriculture. In Proceedings of the World Conference on Climate Change, Moscow, Russia, 29 September 2003; pp. 339–346. Javaheri M, Ramroudi M, Asgharipour M, Dahmardeh M, Ghaemi A. Agroclimatic zonation for evaluating autumn sugar beet sowing feasibility in Khorasan Razavi and Khorasan-e-Jonobi Provinces. Journal of Sugar Beet, 2015; 31(1): 31-17. doi:10.22092/JSB.2015.101436. [In Persian] Jug D, Jug I, Brozovi´c B, Vukadinovi´c V, Stipeševi´c B; Ður ¯devi´c B. The role of conservation agriculture in mitigation andadaptation to climate change. Poljoprivreda 2018; 24: 35– 44. doi:10.18047/poljo.24.1.5. Juriši´c M, Radoˇcaj D, Plašˇcak I, Rapˇcan I. A Comparison of Precise Fertilization Prescription Rates to a Conventional Approach Based on the Open Source GIS Software. Poljoprivreda 2021, 27, 52–59. doi:10.18047/poljo.27.1.7. Keppenne CL. An ENSO signal in soybean futures prices. Journal of Climate. 1995; 8: 1685–1689. doi:10.1175/1520-0442. Kristek S, Brki´c S, Jovi´c J, Stankovi´c A, ´Cupurdija B, Brica M, Karali´c K. The application of nitrogen-fixing bacteria inorder to reduce the mineral nitrogen fertilizers in sugar beet. Poljoprivreda 2020, 26, 65–71. doi:10.18047/poljo.26.2.8. Lebedeva MG, Lupo AR, Henson CB, Solovyov AB, Chendev YG, Market P. A comparison of bioclimatic potential in two global regions during the late twentieth century and early twenty-first century International Journal of Biometeorology. 2017; 62: 609–620. doi:10.1007/s00484-017-1470-6. Manderscheid R, Pacholski A, Weigel HJ. Effect of free air carbon dioxide enrichment combined with two nitrogen levels on growth, yield and yield quality of sugar beet: Evidence for a sink limitation of beet growth under elevated CO2. European Journal of Agronomy. 2010, 32: 228–239. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2009.12.002. Maximov SA. Weather and agriculture. Leningr. Gidrometeoroizdat. 1963; 19: 203. Moayeri M. Irrigation of autumn sugar beet plantations in Khuzestan province; prepared by the Institute of Agricultural Technical and Engineering Research, Office of Knowledge Network and Extensive Media. 2018. [in Persian] Mohammadzadeh Z, Soltani A, ajamnorozei H, Bazrgar A. Modeling of sugar beet yield gap and potential in Iran. Journal of Sugar Beet, 2020; 36(1): 27-46. doi:10.22092/JSB.2021.352324.1255. [In Persian] Monteith JL, Moss CJ. Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 1977; 281: 277–294. doi:10.1098/rstb.1977.0140. Okom S, Russell A, Chaudhary AJ, Scrimshaw M, Francis R. Impacts of projected precipitation changes on sugar beet yield in eastern England. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. 2017; 24: 52–61. doi:10.1002/met.1604. Qi A, Kenter C, Hoffmann C, Jaggard K. The Broom’s Barn sugar beet growth model and its adaptation to soils with varied available water content. European Journal of Agronomy. 2005; 23: 108–122. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2004.09.007. Rana G, Katerji N. Measurement and estimation of actual evapotranspiration in the field under Mediterranean climate: A review. European Journal of Agronomy. 2000; 13: 125–153. doi:10.1016/S1161-0301(00)00070-8. Rašovský M, Paˇcuta V, ˇCerný I, Ernst D, Michalska-Klimczak B, Wyszyˇnski Z. Monitoring of influence of biopreparates, weather conditions and variety on production parameters of sugar beet. Listy Cukrov. AˇRepaˇrské. 2021; 137: 154. Bocker R, Silva EK. Pulsed electric field assisted extraction of natural food pigments and colorings from plant matrices, Food Chemistry. 2022; 15: 100398. doi:10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100398. Rosenzweig C, Strzepek KM, Major DC, Iglesias A, Yates DN, McCluskey A, Hillel D. Water resources for agriculture in a changing climate: International case studies. Global Environmental Change. 2004: 14: 345–360. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.09.003. Stoši´c M, Brozovi´c B, Vinkovi´c T, Ravnjak B, Kluz M, Zebec V. Soil resistance and bulk density under different tillagesystem. Poljoprivreda. 2020; 26: 17–24. doi:10.18047/poljo.26.1.3. Varga I, Lonˇcari´c Z, Pospišil M, Rastija M, Antunovi´c M. Dynamics of sugar beet root, crown and leaves mass with regard toplant densities and spring nitrogen fertilization. Poljoprivreda. 2020; 26: 32–39. doi:10.18047/poljo.26.1.5 Zhang X, Kang S, Zhang L, Liu J. Spatial variation of climatology monthly crop reference evapotranspiration and sensitivity coefficients in Shiyang river basin of northwest China. Agricultural Water Management. 2010; 97: 1506–1516. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2010.05.004. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 1,111 PDF Download: 494 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb