| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,996 |
| تعداد مقالات | 33,568 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 44,197,466 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 20,557,049 |
اثرات روش کاشت بر عملکرد کمی و کیفی چغندرقند در نظام‌های خرده مالکی | ||
| چغندرقند | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 37، شماره 2، مهر 1400، صفحه 207-222 اصل مقاله (1.27 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: کامل علمی - پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/jsb.2022.358252.1301 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| ولی اله یوسف آبادی* 1؛ محمد علی جواهری* 2 | ||
| 1استادیار پژوهشی مؤسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه بذر چغندرقند- سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران | ||
| 2- استادیار بخش تحقیقات زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی کرمان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرمان، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| به‌منظور بررسی اثرات روشهای مختلف کشت بر خصوصیات کمی و کیفی محصول چغندرقند در قطعات کوچک (نظام‌های خرده مالکی)، تحقیقی در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی در ایستگاه تحقیقات چغندرقند مهندس مطهری واقع در کرج و مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی استان کرمان طی سال‌های 1388 و 1389 اجرا شد. تیمارهای مورد بررسی شامل کشت سنتی (درهمپاش)، کشت با بذرکار جاندیر با فاصله ردیف 50 سانتی‌متر، کشت با بذرکار نیوماتیک با فاصله ردیف 50 سانتی‌متر، کشت با بذرکار دستی تک ردیفه با فواصل ردیف 30، 40 و 50 سانتی‌متر در زمین صاف و بدون ایجاد جویچه و پشته (فارو) و کشت با بذرکار دستی تک ردیفه با فواصل ردیف 40 و 50 سانتی‌متر بر روی پشته بود. لازم به ذکر است که در حال حاضر فاصله خطوط کشت در مزارع بزرگ که از بذرکارهای چند ردیفه استفاده میشود، 50 سانتی‌متر است. نتایج نشان داد که تیمارهای مورد بررسی و روشهای مختلف کشت بر روی صفات کمی محصول ازجمله تراکم بوته در واحد سطح، عملکرد ریشه، عملکرد شکر و شکرسفید تأثیر معنیدار ولی بر صفات کیفی و ناخالصیهای ریشه تأثیر معنیدار نداشت. در هر دو منطقه کمترین عملکرد ریشه و قند با کشت سنتی (شاهد آزمایش) تولید شد. در کرج کشت با بذرکار دستی یک ردیفه با فاصله ردیف 40 سانتی‌متر و در کرمان کشت با بذرکار دستی یک ردیفه با فاصله ردیف 30 سانتی‌متر بیشترین عملکرد ریشه و شکرسفید را نشان داد. تأثیر مکان بر بیشتر صفات کمی و کیفی معنیدار، ولی بر ناخالصیهای ریشه تأثیر معنیدار نداشت. با توجه به تحلیل دادههای به‌دست آمده می‌توان نتیجه‌گیری کرد که در نظام‌های خرده مالکی و قطعات کوچک، می‌توان با ایجاد فاصله خطوط کمتر کشت نسبت به اراضی بزرگ و متعاقباً با ایجاد تراکم بوته بیشتر و سطح پوشش یکنواخت‌تر با استفاده از دستگاه‌های کوچک، کارائی مصرف نهاده‌ها را افزایش داد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| بذرکار تک ردیفه؛ چغندرقند؛ کشت سنتی؛ کشت مکانیزه؛ مزارع کوچک | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Effect of planting method on quantitative and qualitative yield of sugar beet in smallholder systems | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| V. Yousefabadi1؛ M.A. Javaheri2 | ||
| 1assistant Professor of Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI) - Agricultural Research Education and Extension, Karaj, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor of Seed and Plant Improvement Research Department, Kerman Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Kerman, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| To evaluate the effect of different cultivation methods on the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of sugar beet in small plots (smallholder systems), a study in randomized complete block design was conducted at Motahari research station in Karaj and Kerman Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center for two years (2009-10). The studied treatments included traditional cultivation, cultivation with John Deere seeder with a row spacing of 50 cm, cultivation with pneumatic seeder with a row spacing of 50 cm, single-row manual seeder with row spacing of 30, 40 and 50 cm in flat land and without creating a furrow and planting with single-row manual seeder on furrow with row spacing of 40 and 50 cm. It should be noted that currently, the distance between rows in large fields where multi-row seeders are used is 50 cm. Results showed that the studied treatments and different cultivation methods had a significant effect on the quantitative traits of the crop including plant density per unit area, root yield, sugar yield, and white sugar yield, however no significant effect was observed for qualitative traits and root impurities. In both regions, traditional cultivation resulted in the lowest root yield and sugar yield achievement. The highest root yield and white sugar yield were obtained by single-row manual seeder with row spacing of 40 and 30 cm in Karaj and Kerman, respectively. The effect of location on most quantitative and qualitative traits was significant, but it had no significant effect on root impurities. According to the results, it can be concluded that in small ownership systems and small plots, it is possible to increase the efficiency by creating less distance between rows compared with large lands and subsequently, by creating more plant density and a more uniform germination using small devices which finally increases the efficiency of input consumption. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Mechanized cultivation, One-row manual seeder, Smallholder, Sugar beet, Traditional cultivation | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdollahian noghabi M, Sheikholeslami R, Babaie. B. Terms and definitions of quantity and technological quality of sugar beet. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2005; 21(2): 197-198. (in Persian, abstract in English) Ahmad Z, Shah P, Kakar KM, El-Sharkawi H, Gama PB, Khan EA, Honna T, Yamamoto S. Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris l.) response to different planting methods and row geometries ii: Effect on plant growth and quality. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment. 2010; 8(2): 785-791. Arita T, Kajiyama T, Tezuka M. Effect of increased plant population by narrow row width (50 cm) on directly sown sugar beet. Bull. Hokkaido Prefectural Agric.1999. Exp. Stat, 77: 23-26. Bagherabadi H, Armin M, Filekesh E. The effect of sowing date on yield and yield components of cotton planted in ultranarrow rows and conventional rows. Iranian Journal of Cotton Researches. 2019; 7(1): 1-14. (in Persian, abstract in English) Heidari M, BOrghei AM. Determination of the number of working days of Mechanized planting and semi – mechanized harvesting of sugar beet in Nahavand region. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2013. 29(1): 85-98. Chen Y, Cheng Y, Chen J, Zheng Z ,Hu C, Cao J. Design and experiment of the buckwheat hill-drop planter hole forming device. Agriculture. 2021; 11(11): 1085-1092. Dastorani A, Armin M. Effect of the nitrogen rate and weed control treatments on the quantitative and qualitative yield of sugar beet. Russian Agricultural Sciences. 2019; 45(5): 423-429. Fallahinejad S, Armin M, Asgharipour MR. A survey on the ecological sustainability of introducing new crops in the cropping pattern using energy approach. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability. 2021. 3: 100083 .(in Persian, abstract in English) Findura P, Nozdrovický L, Tóth P, Mrázová Ľ. Evaluation of the work quality of the sugar beet planter in relation to the sugar beet seed parameters. Research in Agricultural Engineering. 2008; 54(3): 148-154. Haghverdi A, Yonts CD, Reichert DL, Irmak S. Impact of irrigation, surface residue covers and plant population on sugar beet growth and yield, irrigation water use efficiency and soil water dynamics. Agricultural Water Management. 2017; 180: 1-12. Khozaei M, Haghighi AAK, Parsa SZ, Sepaskhah AR, Razzaghi F, Yousefabadi VA, Emam Y. Evaluation of direct seeding and transplanting in sugar beet for water productivity, yield and quality under different irrigation regimes and planting densities. Agricultural Water Management. 2020; 238: 106230. (in Persian, abstract in English) Khozaei M, Kamgar Haghighi AA, Zand Parsa S, Sepaskhah AR, Razzaghi F, Yousefabadi V, Emam Y. Effects of plant densities and irrigation regimes on yield, physiological parameters and gas exchange of sugarbeet under transplanting and direct seeding methods. International Journal of Plant Production. 2021; 15(4): 635-653. (in Persian, abstract in English) Kohansal M, Mansoori H. Socio-economic factors affecting agricultural machines ownership by farmers in Khorasan- razavi province in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization. 2013; 1(1): 53-59. (in Persian, abstract in English) Liu Q, Cui T, Zhang D, Yang L, Wang Y, He X, Wang M. Design and experimental study of seed precise delivery mechanism for high-speed maize planter. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering. 2018; 11(4): 81-87. Lotfi Keyvanlo A, Armin M. The effect of seedlings age and date of transfer on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of sugar beet. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science. 2017; 48(1): 301-319. (in Persian, abstract in English) Machleb J, Peteinatos GG, Sökefeld M, Gerhards R. Sensor-based in trarow mechanical weed control in sugar beets with motorized finger weeders. 2021; 11(8): 1517. Maleki M, Hosein Minekhati H, Zareei S. Design, development and evaluation of a pneumatic planter for sunflower and sugar beet intercropping. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering. 2020; 51(2): 273-283. (in Persian, abstract in English) Mehrandesh M, Galavi M, Ramroudi M, Armin M. Effect of different nutrient system on quantitative and qualitative traits of sugar beet in different cultivation methods. Journal of Crops Improvement. 2021; 23(1): 59-72. (in Persian, abstract in English) Nawaz H, Hussain N, Rehmani MIA, Yasmeen A, Arif M. Comparative performance of cotton cultivars under conventional and ultra-narrow row (unr) spacing. Pure and Applied Biology.2021; 5(1): 15-25. Novikov A, Bartenev I, Podvigina O, Nechaeva O, Gavrin D, Zelikov V, Novikova T, Ivetić V. The effect of low-intensive coherent seed irradiation on germinant growth of scots pine and sugar beet. Journal of Forest Science. 2021; 67(9): 427-435. Raefizadeh A, Armin M, Jamaimoeini M. The critical period of weed control in cotton in conventional and ultra-narrow row spacing condition. Journal of Crops Improvement. 2019; 21(3): 247-258. (in Persian, abstract in English) Rybář R. Analysis of the factors effecting the work quality indicators of the seeders for establishing of the row crop stand with regard to the sugar beet. Mendel agricultural and forestry university in Brno, Brno .2005. Sadeghzadeh Hemayati S, Taleghani D, Kashani A, Siadat SA, Normohamadi G. Effect of sowing date, planting density and cultivar on solar radiation interception indices in sugar beet. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2009; 25(1): 53 – 70. (in Persian, abstract in English) Smith J, Wilson R, Yonts C, Palm K. Sugar beet plant emergence as influenced by planter model. In: American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Meeting (USA).1992. Soleymani A, Shahrajabian MH. Effects of planting dates and row distance on sugar content, root yield and solar radiation absorption in sugar beet at different plant densities. Romanian Agricultural Research. 2017; 34: 145-155. Walsh OS, Liang X, Thornton M, Rogers CW. Uniform plant stand is key to crop yield and quality. Idaho Crop Improvement Association (ICIA). Extension University Idaho bulletin. 2018; 951: 11pp. Yousefabadi V, Alebrahim MT, Tuobe A, Zand E, Abdollahian- Noghabi M. Effect of seedling transplantation and use of herbicides on control of field dodder (cuscuta campestris) in sugar beet. Romanian Agricultural Resaerch. 2017; 34: 377-384. (in Persian, abstract in English) Zare ZA, Asudar MA, Kazemi N, Rahnama M, Mehdizadeh SA. Monitoring of operational parameters of unisem pneumatic planter and modeling of planting uniformity by image processing. Agricultural Mechanization and Systems Research. 2018; 18(69): 31-46. (in Persian with English Summary) Zarifneshat S, Javadi A, Ahmadi M, Khalili A, Ghaffari H, Behfar H. Technical evaluation of three pneumatical and mechanical planters commonly used for sugar beet sowing in Khorasan area. Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production. 2009; 19(2): 45-53. (in Persian, abstract in English) | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 342 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 392 |
||