News

a.z
Majidi, A., Majidi, A. (2010). Norms Establishment of the Diagnosis and Recommendation Intergrated System (DRIS) and Comparison with DOP Approach for Nutritional Diagnosis of Seedless Grape (Sultana, cv) in Western Azarbaijan Province, Iran. , 24(2), 89-105. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2010.126553
A. Majidi; A. Majidi. "Norms Establishment of the Diagnosis and Recommendation Intergrated System (DRIS) and Comparison with DOP Approach for Nutritional Diagnosis of Seedless Grape (Sultana, cv) in Western Azarbaijan Province, Iran". , 24, 2, 2010, 89-105. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2010.126553
Majidi, A., Majidi, A. (2010). 'Norms Establishment of the Diagnosis and Recommendation Intergrated System (DRIS) and Comparison with DOP Approach for Nutritional Diagnosis of Seedless Grape (Sultana, cv) in Western Azarbaijan Province, Iran', , 24(2), pp. 89-105. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2010.126553
Majidi, A., Majidi, A. Norms Establishment of the Diagnosis and Recommendation Intergrated System (DRIS) and Comparison with DOP Approach for Nutritional Diagnosis of Seedless Grape (Sultana, cv) in Western Azarbaijan Province, Iran. , 2010; 24(2): 89-105. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2010.126553

Norms Establishment of the Diagnosis and Recommendation Intergrated System (DRIS) and Comparison with DOP Approach for Nutritional Diagnosis of Seedless Grape (Sultana, cv) in Western Azarbaijan Province, Iran

پژوهش های خاک
Volume 24, Issue 2, September 2011, Pages 89-105    PDF (1.48 M)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.22092/ijsr.2010.126553
Authors
A. Majidi* ; A. Majidi
Scientific staff member, SWRD,.Agricultural and Natural Resource Researches Center Of West Azarbaijan, Urmia, Iran
Abstract
Diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS) and deviation from optimum percentage (DOP) index can be used as efficient methods to interpret the results of plant analysis and the nutritional diagnosis in crops and fruit trees. To establish DRIS norms in seedless grape (Sultana, cv) and compare them with DOP index, leaf samples were collected from 129 vineyards and analyzed for N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu and B concentrations. The sugar content (brix) of the grape juice was measured as a criterion of yield. On the basis of sugar content, the vineyards were divided into two groups of low and high yielding populations. Standard DRIS norms were established for the different nutrient ratios. DRIS indices were calculated to evaluate nutrients balances and order of nutrients requirements. Sufficiency ranges of macro and micro nutrients were derived by DRIS technique. Means of nutrients concentrations in the high yielding population (high sugar content) were used as reference values for calculating DOP indices. DRIS-derived sufficiency ranges were 2.0-2.8, 0.20-0.27, 1.2-1.7, 1.5-2.1% for,respectively, N, P, K, Ca, and Mg, and 55-138, 40-127, 30-100, 10-20, 30-187 mg/kg for Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, and B, respectively. DRIS indices showed that, among the macro and micro nutrients in all low yielding vineyards, magnesium and zinc had the most negative index values, respectively. The nutritional balance index (NBI) of DRIS and of DOP (SDOP) were much more than zero in all low-yielding vineyards, indicating that there was imbalance between the absorbed nutrients by grape vines. Comparison of the DRIS indices for the macro and micro nutrients with the DOP indices revealed that Mg and Zn were the most deficient elements in all low-yielding vineyards showing that both methods provide similar information in the interpretation of the results of leaf analysis. To validate DRIS norms and verify the efficiency of DRIS and DOP as methods for improving the interpretation of analysis results of grape leaf, fertilizer experiments should be conducted on seedless grape in a low-yielding vineyard.
Keywords
Seedless grape; Leaf analysis; DRIS norms; DOP norms; Nutritional imbalance
References
  1. اسماعیلی، م.، گلچین، ا. و درودی، م. س. 1379. تعیین حد متعادل عناصر غذایی در سیب به روش DRIS، جلد 12، شماره 8، مجله خاک و آب، تهران، ایران.
  2. امامی، ع. 1375. روشهای تجزیه گیاه (جلد اول). نشریه فنی شماره 982. موسسه تحقیقات خاک و آب. تهران. ایران.
  3. توشیح، و. 1371. تعیین حد متعادل عناصر غذایی در گندم با روش DRIS، مجموعه مقالات خاک و آب، موسسه تحقیقات خاک و آب، تهران، ایران.
  4. سجادی، ا. 1371. روش تلفیقی تشخیص و توصیه DRIS، شماره 847، موسسه تحقیقات خاک و آب، تهران، ایران.
  5. سجادی، اشرف السادات. 1375. حد متعادل عناصر غذایی در چغندرقند با روش DRIS، شماره 984، موسسه تحقیقات خاک و آب، تهران، ایران.
  6. گودرزی، ک. و حسینی فرهی، م. 1378. ارزیابی تعادل تغذیه ای در تاکستانهای استان کهگیلویه و بویر احمد با استفاده از روش دریس. جلد 9، شماره 1، مجله علوم و فنون باغبانی. تهران، ایران.
  7. Angeles, D.E., M.E. Sumner and N.W. Barbour. 1990. Preliminary nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium DRIS norms for pineapple. Hort. Sci. 25: 652-655.
  8. Bailey, J. S., J. A. M. Beattie and D. J. Kilpatrck. 1997. The diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS) for diagnosing the nutrient status of grassland swards: I. Model establishment. Plant Soil. 197: 127-135.
  9. Bataglia, O.C., and W.R. dos. 1990. Efeito do procedimento de cálculo e da população de referência nos índices do sistema integrado de diagnose e recomendação (DRIS). Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo. 14: 339-344.
  10. Beaufils, E. R. 1973. Diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS). Pietermaritizburg: University of Natal,. 132 p. (Soil Science Bulletin, 1).
  11. Beverly, R.B. A 1991. Practical guide to the diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS). Athens: Micro-Macro. 87p.
  12. Bhargava, B.S. and K.L. Chadha. 1988. Developing leaf nutrient guide in fruit crops. Fertilizer News. 33: 21–29.
  13. Brakke, F. H. and N. Salih. 2002. Reliability of Foliar analyses of Norway Spruce stands in a Nordic Gradient. Silva Fennica. 36: 489-504.
  14. Davee, D.E., T.L. Righetii, E. Fallahi and S. Robbins. 1986. An evaluation of the DRIS approach for identifying mineral limitations on yield in ‘Napolean’ sweet cherry. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 111:988-993.
  15. Goh, K.M, and M.J. Malakouti. 1992. Preliminary nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, calcium and magnesium DRIS norms and indexes for apple orchards in Canterbury, New Zealand. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 23: 1371-1385.
  16. Hartz, T. K., E. M. Miyao and J. G. Valencia. 1998. Evaluation of the nutritional status of processing tomato. Hort. Sci. Alexandria. 33: 830-832.
  17. Hundal, H.S., D. Singh and J.S. Brar. 2005. Diagnosis and recommendation integrated system for monitoring nutrient status of mango trees in Submountainous area of Punjab, India. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 36: 2085-2099.
  18. Jimenez, S. J., Y. Pinochet, J.A. Gogorcena and M.A. M. Betran. 2007. Influence ofdifferent vigour cherry rootstocks on leaves and shoots mineral composition. Scientia Horticulturae. 112: 73-79.
  19. Jones, W.W. 1981. Proposed modifications of the diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS) for interpreting plant analyses. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 12: 785-794.
  20. Land, M. H., M. A. S. Guillermo, W. R. Dos Santos, E. J. Paioli-Pires, C. V. Pommer and R. V. Botelho. Nutritional Evaluation of the condition of Italia grapevine in the region of Jales, SP, using the diagnosis and recommendation integrated system. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 25: 309-314.
  21. Letzsch, W.S., M.E. Sumner. 1984. Effect of population size and yield level in selection of Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS) norms. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 15: 997-1006.
  22. Letzsch, W.S. 1985. Computer program for selection of norms for use in the diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS). Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 16: 339-347.
  23. Malavolta, E. and M.L. Malavolta. 1989. Diagnose foliar: princípios e aplicações. In: BULL, L.T., ROSOLEM, C.A. Interpretação de análise química de solo e planta para fins de adubação. Botucatu, Fundação de Estudos e Pesquisas Agrícolas e Florestais, Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas, Universidade Estadual Paulista, p. 227-308.
  24. Mourao Filho, F.A.A. 2004. DRIS: Concepts and applications on nutritional diagnosis in fruit crops. Scientia Agricola. 61: 550-560
  25. Montanes, L., L. Heras, J. Abadia and M. Sanz. 1993. Plant analysis interpretation based on a new index: Deviation from Optimum Percentage. Plant  Nutr. 16: 1289-1308
  26. Nick, J.A. 1998. DRIS para cafeeiros podados. Piracicaba: USP/ESALQ,. 86p. (Dissertação - Mestrado).
  27. Pearson R. C. and A. C. Goheen. 1998. Compendium of Grape Diseases. 4th Edition. The American Phytopathological Society, USA.
  28. Reis, R. D. A. and P.H. Monnerat. 2002. Sugarcane nutritional diagnosis with DRIS norms established in Brazil, South Africa, and the United States. J. Plant Nut. 25: 2831-2851.
  29. Salih, N. and F. Andderson. 1999. Nutritional status of a Norway spruce stand in SW Sweden in response to compensatory fertilization. Plant Soil. 209: 85-100.
  30. Sanz, M. 1999. Evaluation of interpretation of DRIS system during growing season of the peach tree: Comparing them with DOP method. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 30: 1025-1036.
  31. Schaller, K. and O. Lohnertz. 1984. Accommodation of DRIS-system to grape nutrition. In: International Colloquium for the Optimization of Plant Nutrition, Montpellier, 4: 1255-1263.
  32. Sharma, J., S.D. Shikhamany, R.K. Singh and H.B. Raghupathi. 2005. Diagnosis of nutrient imbalance in Thompson seedless grape grafted on Dog Ridge rootstock by DRIS. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 36: 2823-2838.
  33. Silveria, C.P., G.R. Nachtigall and F.A. Monteiro. 2005. Norms for the diagnosis and recommendation integrated system for signal grass. Sci. Agric. (Piracicaba, Braz.), 62: 513-519.
  34. Walworth, J. L. and M. E. Sumner. 1987. The diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS). Adv. Soil Sci. 6:149-188.
  35. Walworth, J.L., H.J. Wooddard and M.E. Sumner. 1988. Generation of corn tissue norms from a small, high-yield data base. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 19:
    563-577.
  36. Wolf, T.K., C.W. Heaseler and E.L. Bergman. 1983. Growth and Foliar Elemental Composition of Seyvel Blanc Grapevines as Affected by Four Nutrient Solution Concentration of Nitrogen, Potassium and Magnesium. Am. J. Enol. and Viti. 34: 271-277.
Statistics
Article View: 981
PDF Download: 460


counter
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb