Evaluation of the internal defaults and decay in old timber in building using non-destructive ground penetration radar (GPR) method | ||
| تحقیقات علوم چوب و کاغذ ایران | ||
| Article 4, Volume 37, Issue 3 - Serial Number 80, September 2022, Pages 217-228 PDF (987.31 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/ijwpr.2022.357593.1709 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Mehrab Madhoushi* 1; Hamid Hatefnia2 | ||
| 1Associate Professor, Department of Wood Engineering and Technology, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran | ||
| 2PhD, Wood Composites, Department of Wood Engineering and Technology, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran | ||
| Abstract | ||
| In this study, ground penetration radar (GPR) was used to assess the internal defects and decay of structural old timber in buildings and compare it with the sound wood. For this purpose, twelve samples of three wood species of beech, oak and yew with dimensions of 120 × 60 × 400 mm, and as flat sawn were selected. Two samples from beech species with severe decay and two samples from oak species with mild decay were selected from old buildings. Sound and completely dry samples of these species (two samples from each species) were also obtained from forest trees as an indicator. Four yew samples without decay were selected only from the old buildings. Holes with a diameter of 2 and 8 mm were drilled in decayed and also two yew samples. The samples were scanned perpendicular to the fibers direction using a HF antenna of 2.3 GHz. The condition of data collection and processing were the same for all samples. After the initial data collection, in order to increase the resolution and better interpretation of the image, different filtration process was applied using image processing software Reflexw. The results showed that the relative dielectric coefficient was higher in decayed wood, and due to the difference in reflection coefficient between sound and decayed wood, they can be distinguished from each other. It was also possible to detect holes of 8 mm in oak and yew species. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Non-destructive testing; Decay; Ground penetration radar; Old structural timber | ||
| References | ||
|
-Butnor, J. R., Pruyn, M. L., Shaw, D. C., Harmon, M. E., Mucciardi, A. N., and Ryan, M. G., 2009. Detecting defects in conifers with ground penetrating radar: applications and challenges. Forest pathology, 39(5): 309-322.
-Bucur, V. 2003. Nondestructive Characterization and Imaging of Wood. Springer.
-Devaru, D., Halabe, U.B., Gopalakrishnan, B., Agrawal, S., and Grushecky Sh. (2005). Algorithm for detecting defects in wooden logs using ground penetrating radar. Intelligent Systems in Design and Manufacturing VI. 59990B.
-Goodman, D., and Piro, S. (2013). Basic Processing GPR. In: GPR Remote Sensing in Archaeology. 37-62.
-Halabe, U. B., Agrawal, S., and Gopalakrishnan, B., 2009. Nondestructive evaluation of wooden logs using ground penetrating radar. Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation, 24(4): 329-346.
-Hellier, C. 2003. Handbook of Nondestructive Evaluation. McGraw-Hill.
-Hernandez, J. E., and Duwadi, S. R., 2000. A nondestructive impulse radar tomographic imaging system for timber structures. Public Roads, 64(3): Nov/Dec., No. 00-0558.
-Hoegh, K., Khazanovich, L., Dai, S., and Yu, T., 2015. Evaluating asphalt concrete air void variation via GPR antenna array data. Case Studies in Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation, 3: 27-33.
-Hübschen, G., Altpeter, I., Tschuncky, R., and Herrmann, H. G., 2016. Materials characterization using Nondestructive Evaluation (NDE) methods. Woodhead Publishing.
-Khakiev, Z., Shapovalov, V., Kruglikov, A., and Yavna, V., 2014. GPR determination of physical parameters of railway structural layers. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 106: 139-145.
-Kloiber, M., Tippner, J., Heřmánková, V., and Štainbruch, J., 2012. Comparison of results of measuring by current NDT methods with results obtained through a new device for wood mechanical resistance measuring. In: 8th Int. Con. Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions, October.
-Laurens, S., Balayssac, J. P., Rhazi, J., Klysz, G., and Arliguie, G., 2005. Non-destructive evaluation of concrete moisture by GPR: Experimental study and direct modeling. Materials and Structure, 38: 827–832.
-Lualdi, M., and Zanzi, L., 2002. GPR investigations to reconstruct the geometry of the wooden structures in historical buildings. In: Ninth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Vol. 4758: 63-68. April. International Society for Optics and Photonics.
-Madhoushi, M., Ebrahimi, S., Omidvar, A., 2021. Structural health assessment of a historical building by using in situ stress wave NDT: a case study in Iran. Cerne, 27: e-102535.
-Madhoushi, M., 2016. Species and mechanical strengths of wood members in a historical timber building in Gorgan (North of Iran). BioResources, 11(2): 5169-5180.
-Madhoushi, M., Hatefnia, H., Ebrahimi, Gh., and Amini, N., 2017. Application of GPR technique in evaluation of internal defects in hardwood species. Iranian Journal of Wood and Paper Industries, 8(2): 225-239.
-Martínez-Sala, R., Rodríguez-Abad, I., Barra, R. D., and Capuz-Lladró, R., 2013. Assessment of the dielectric anisotropy in timber using the nondestructive GPR technique. Construction and Building Materials, 38: 903-911.
-Martinho, E., and Dionísio, A., 2014. Main geophysical techniques used for non-destructive evaluation in cultural built heritage: a review. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 11: 053001.
-Muller, W. (2003). Timber girder inspection using ground penetrating radar. Insight-Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, 45(12): 809-812.
-Reci, H., Maï, T. C., Sbartaï, Z.M., Pajewski, L., and Kiri, E., 2016. Non-destructive evaluation of moisture content in wood using ground-penetrating radar. Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems, 5(2): 575-581.
-Riggio, M., Anthony, R. W., Augelli, F., Kasal, B., Lechner, T., Muller, W., and Tannert, T., 2014. In situ assessment of structural timber using non-destructive techniques. Materials and Structures, 47(5): Sbartaï, M. (2010). Ground penetrating radar. In: In Situ Assessment of Structural Timber. 25-37. Springer, Dordrecht.
-Rodríguez-Abad, I., Martínez Sala, R. M., García García, F., and Capuz Lladró, R., 2010. Non-destructive methodologies for the evaluation of moisture content in sawn timber structures: ground-penetrating radar and ultrasound techniques. Near Surface Geophysics. 8(6): 475-482.
-Schultz, J. J., 2007. Using ground-penetrating radar to locate clandestine graves of homicide victims: forming forensic archaeology partnerships with law enforcement. Homicide Studies.
-Senalik, Ch. A., Wacker, J., Wang, X., and Jalinoos, F., 2016. Assessing the ability of ground-penetrating radar to detect fungal decay in Douglas-fir beams. In: 25th Research Symposium, New Orleans: 110-116. Columbus, OH: American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Forest Products Laboratory.
-Xu, X., Peng, S., Xia, Y., and Ji, W., 2014. The development of a multi-channel GPR system for roadbed damage detection. Microelectronics Journal, 45(11): 1542-1555.
| ||
|
Statistics Article View: 1,997 PDF Download: 485 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb