| تعداد نشریات | 282 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 80 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 3,168 |
| تعداد مقالات | 35,197 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 50,932,190 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 90,937,576 |
ارزیابی تغییرپذیری جوانهزنی بذر کینوا (Chenopodium quinoa var. Titicaca) در پاسخ به دما، تنش شوری و خشکی | ||
| علوم و فناوری بذر ایران | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 10، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 24، آذر 1400، صفحه 57-67 اصل مقاله (297.89 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ijsst.2021.353918.1388 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| آرش مامدی1؛ فرزاد شریف زاده* 2؛ رضا معالی امیری3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری-گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران | ||
| 2پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران | ||
| 3گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در این تحقیق تغییرپذیری مولفههای جوانهزنی بذر کینوا (Chenopodium quinoa) به دما و تعیین دماهای کاردینال با آزمون جوانهزنی بذر در سطوح مختلف دمایی 1- تا 45 درجه سانتیگراد مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. نتایج مدل دندان-مانند نشان داد که دمای پایه و دمای سقف کینوا بهترتیب 04/3- و 45/45 درجه سانتیگراد و دمای بهینه از 20 تا 35 درجه سانتیگراد بودند. برای بررسی اثر تنش شوری و خشکی بر جوانهزنی در دمای مطلوب میانی 25 درجه سانتیگراد، بذور در معرض پتانسیلهای اسمزی صفر تا 28- بار قرار گرفتند که برای القای تنشها به ترتیب از مادههای سدیمکلرید (NaCl) و پلیاتیلنگلایکول (PEG) استفاده گردید. نتایج نشان داد که کاهش پتانسیل اسمزی تا 12- بار قادر به کاهش معنیداری مولفههای جوانهزنی نسبت به شرایط نرمال (بدون تنش) نداشت. اما با کاهش پتانسیل اسمزی به 18- و 24- بار درصد جوانهزنی به طور معنیداری کاهش یافت. به طوریکه در پتانسیل 24- بار تنش القایی-خشکی جوانهزنی به طور کامل متوقف گردید، اما 24% جوانهزنی در همان نقطه از پتانسیل اسمزی ناشی از تنش شوری مشاهده گردید. بنابراین، جوانهزنی بذرها تحت تنش القایی-شوری نسبت به تنش القایی-خشکی در همه سطوح پتانسیلهای اسمزی متحملتر بودند. به احتمال زیاد، به دلیل هالوفیت بودن کینوا، با جذب عناصر یونی نمک موجب منفیتر شدن پتانسیل درون سلولی شده که در نهایت منجر به مقاومت بیشتر به تنش شوری میگردد. بدینترتیب کینوا از پتانسیل زیادی برای کشت در بسیاری از مناطق از جمله استانهای دارای اقلیم خشکتر را دارا خواهد بود. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| جوانهزنی بذر؛ دماهای کاردینال؛ تنش شوری؛ تنش خشکی و کینوا | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Evaluation of quinoa seed germination variability in response to temperature,, drought and salinity stresses | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Arash Mamedi1؛ F. Sharifzadeh2؛ Reza Maali Amiri3 | ||
| 1PhD student-Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding-Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources-University of Tehran | ||
| 2UTCAN | ||
| 3Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding-Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources-University of Tehran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Quinoa has attracted a lot of attention in recent years due to its low ecological needs and rich nutritional value. Therefore, the variability of germination components to temperature and determination of cardinal temperatures were performed by seed germination test at different constant temperatures from -1 to 45°C.The results of the dent-like model showed that the base temperature and ceiling temperature of quinoa were -03.04 and 45.45°C, respectively, and the optimum temperature was from 20 to 35°C. To investigation the effect of salinity and drought stress on germination at 25°C, the seeds were exposed to osmotic potentials from 0 to -28 bar, which were made of sodium chloride (NaCl) and polyethylene glycol (PEG), respectively, to induce stresses. The results showed that the reduction of osmotic potential up to -12 bar was not able to significantly reduce the germination components compared to normal conditions. However, with decreasing osmotic potential to -18 and -24 bar, the germination percentage decreased significantly. The germination was completely stopped at -24 bar of drought-induced, while 24% germination was observed at the same point of the salinity-induced osmotic potential. Therefore, seed germination capacity under salinity-induced stress was more tolerant than drought-induced stress at all levels of osmotic potentials. Most likely, due to the fact that quinoa is halophyte, by absorbing the ionic elements of salt, required for the maintenance of the cell turgor, which concurrent increase in cytosolic osmolality. Thus, this species has a great potential for distribution to other areas such as provinces with dry climate. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| seed germination, cardinal temperatures, drought stress, salinity stress and quinoa | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aboulhasani, M., A. Lakzian, G.H. Haghnia, and M. Sarcheshmehpoor. 2006. The study of salinity and drought tolerance of Sinorhizobium meliloti isolated from province of Kerman in vivo condition. J. Crops Res. 4(2): 183-193. (In Persian) Alvarado, V., and K.J. Bradford. 2002. A hydrothermal time model explains the cardinal temperatures for seed germination. Plant Cell Environ. 25: 1061-1069. Biswas, S., A.K. Biswas, and B. De. 2020. Influence of sodium chloride on growth and metabolic reprogramming in nonprimed and haloprimed seedlings of blackgram (Vigna mungo L.). Protoplasma. 257(6):1559-1583. Causin, H.F., D.A. Bordón, and H. Burrieza. 2020. Salinity tolerance mechanisms during germination and early seedling growth in Chenopodium quinoa Wild. genotypes with different sensitivity to saline stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 172: 103995. Cavallaro, V., A.C. Barbera, C. Maucieri, G. Gimma, C. Scalisi, and C. Patanè. 2016. Evaluation of variability to drought and saline stress through the germination of different ecotypes of carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.) using a hydrotime model. Ecol. Eng. 95: 557-566. Ellis, R.H., S. Covell, E.H. Roberts, and R.J Summerfield. 1986. The influence of temperature on seed germination rate in grain legumes. II. Intraspecific variation in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) at constant temperatures. J. Exp. Bot. 37: 1503-1515. Ellis R.H. and E.H. Roberts. 1980. Towards a rational basis for testing seed quality. Pp. 605- 635. In: P. Hebblethwaite(ed.). Seed Product. Butterworths, London. Fazlali, R., D.E. Asli, and P. Moradi. 2013. The effect of seed priming by ascorbic acid on bioactive compounds of naked Seed pumpkin (Cucurbita pepovar) under salinity stress. Int. J. Sci. 2: 587-590. Ford, R. 2015. Demonstrating Osmotic Potential: One Factor in the Plant Water Potential Equation. Article 29 in Tested Studies for Laboratory Teaching, Volume 36 (K. McMahon, Editor). Proc. 36th Conf. Assoc. Biol. Lab. Educ. (ABLE). Gupta, B., and B. Huang. 2014. Mechanism of salinity tolerance in plants: physiological, biochemical, and molecular characterization. Int. J. Genomics. 2014. Hubbard, M., J. Germida, and V. Vujanovic. 2012. Fungal endophytes improve wheat seed germination under heat and drought stress. Bot. 90(2): 137-149. Hariadi, Y., K. Marandon, Y. Tian, S.E. Jacobsen, and S. Shabala. 2011. Ionic and osmotic relations in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) plants grown at various salinity levels. J. Exp. Bot. 62(1): 185-193. Hatfield, J.L. and J.H. Prueger. 2015. Temperature extremes: Effect on plant growth and development. Weather Clim. Ext. 10:4-10. Ibrahim, E.A. 2016. Seed priming to alleviate salinity stress in germinating seeds. J. Plant Physiol. 192: 38-46. Ikic, I., M. Maric evic, S. Tomasovic, J. Gunjaca, Z.S. Atovic, and H.S. Arcevic. 2012. The effect of germination temperature on seed dormancy in Croatian-grown winter wheats. Euphytica.188:25-34. Jacobsen, S. E. 1998. Developmental stability of quinoa under European conditions. Ind. Crops Prod. 7(2): 169-174. Jacobsen, S.E., F. Liu, and C.R. Jensen, C. R. 2009. Does root-sourced ABA play a role for regulation of stomata under drought in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)? Sci. Hortic. 122(2): 281-287. Jacobsen, S.E., A. Mujica, C.R. Jensen. 2003. The resistance of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to adverse abiotic factors. Food Agric. Immunol. 19 (1 and 2): 99–109. Jami Al-Ahmadi, M. and M. Kafi. 2007. Cardinal temperatures for germination of Kochia scoparia (L.). J. Arid Environ. 68: 308–314. Ganjeali, A., M. Parsa, and M. Khatib. 2006. Quantifying seed germination response of Chickpea genotypes under temperature and drought stress regimes. J. Agric. 8(1): 25-89. Kaya, C., and D, Higgs. 2003. Response of salt‐stressed strawberry plants to supplementary calcium nitrate and/or potassium nitrate. J. Plant Nutr. 26(3): 543-560. Kaboli, M., and M. Sadeghi. 2001. Effect of drought stress on germination of three Onobrochis species. Pajohesh va Sazandegi. 64(2): 51-57.(In Persian) Koyro, H.W., and S.S. Eisa. 2008. Effect of salinity on composition, viability and germination of seeds of Chenopodium quinoa Willd. Plant Soil. 302(1): 79-90. Liang, W., X. Ma, P. Wan, and L. Liu. 2018. Plant salt-tolerance mechanism: A review. Biochem. Physiol. 495(1): 286-291. Maraghni, M., M. Gorai, and M. Neffati. 2010. Seed germination at different temperatures and water stress levels, and seedling emergence from different depths of Ziziphus lotus. J. Bot. 76(3): 453-459. Michel, B.E. and Kaufmann, M.R., 1973. The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000. Plant Physiol. 51: 914-916. Mobli, A., A. Ghanbari, and M. Rastgoo. 2018. Determination of cardinal temperatures of flax-leaf alyssum (Alyssum linifolium) in response to salinity, pH, and drought stress. Weed Sci. 66(4): 470-476. Munns, R., and M, Tester. 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59: 651-681. Mwale, S.S., S.N. Azam-Ali, J.A. Clark, R.G. Bradley, and M.R. Chatha. 1994. Effect of temperature on germination of sunflower. Seed Sci. Technol. 22: 565–571. Nonogaki, H., G.W. Bassel, and J.D. Bewley. 2010. Germination- Still a mystery. Plant Sci. 179(6): 574-581. Risi, J., and N.W. Galwey. 1984. The Chenopodium grains of the Andes Inca crops for modern agriculture. Adv. Appl. Biol. 10: 145–216. Sen, A., and J.T. Puthur. 2020. Influence of different seed priming techniques on oxidative and antioxidative responses during the germination of Oryza sativa varieties. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants. 25: 1-15. Soliman, M., A. Elkelish, T. Souad, H. Alhaithloul, and M. Farooq. 2020. Brassinosteroid seed priming with nitrogen supplementation improves salt tolerance in soybean. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants. 26(3): 501-511. Tabrizi, L., M. Nasiri Mahalati, and A. Kochaki. 2004. Investigation on the cardinal temperature for germination of Plantago ovate and Plantago psyllium. J. Crops Res. 2(4): 143-151. (In Persian) Tang, X., Mu, X., Shao, H., Wang, H., & Brestic, M. 2015. Global plant-responding mechanisms to salt stress: physiological and molecular levels and implications in biotechnology. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 35(4): 425-437. Thiam, M., A. Champion, D. Diouf, and M. Ourèye. 2013. NaCl effects on in vitro germination and growth of some senegalese cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) cultivars. J. biol. 34:45-65. Thygerson, T., J.M. Harris, B.N. Smith, L.D. Hansen, R.L. Pendleton and D.T. Booth. 2002. Metabolic response to temperature for six populations of winterfat (Eurotia lanata). Therm. Acta. 394(1-2): 211-217. Vega-Gálvez, A., M. Miranda, J. Vergara, E. Uribe, L. Puente, and E.A. Martínez. 2010. Nutrition facts and functional potential of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.), an ancient Andean grain: a review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 90(15): 2541-2547. Wang, W., B. Vinocur, and A. Altman. 2003. Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta. 218(1): 1-14. Yadav, P.V., M. Kumari, and Z. Ahmed. 2011. Seed priming mediated germination improvement and tolerance to subsequent exposure to cold and salt stress in capsicum. J. Seed Sci. 4(3): 125-136. Yan, M. 2015. Seed priming stimulate germination and early seedling growth of Chinese cabbage under drought stress. South. J. Bot. 99: 88-92. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 664 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 540 |
||