Economic review and comparison in fattening of Sistani male calves in traditional and industrial conditions of Sistan region | ||
| علوم دامی | ||
| Volume 34, Issue 132, December 2021, Pages 29-40 PDF (1.11 M) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/asj.2020.342992.2068 | ||
| Authors | ||
| M. Mohammad Ghasemi* ; Majid Dahmardeh1; Ahmad Ghasemi2 | ||
| 1payame noor university | ||
| 2Sistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Zabol, Iran | ||
| Abstract | ||
| In this study the profitability of male Sistani calf fattening has been investigated in two industrial and traditional systems by estimating financial and economic characteristics. Sample selection was randomly classified and the questionnaire was completed from 16 industrial and 33 traditional Fattening. Criteria for net present value, internal rate of return, cost-benefit ratio, and sensitivity analysis were calculated for these activities. The results of economic analysis of fattening two cows in traditional conditions showed that the ratio of profit to cost of 1.74, Rials, internal rate of return is 96% and the net present value is also positive, which indicates the economic justification of this activity. Sensitivity analysis of this activity showed that if current expenditures increase by 50%, the ratio of interest to expenditure greater than one, the internal rate of return is higher than the bank interest rate, and the current value of interest is also positive. Also, the results of fattening four cows in traditional conditions showed that this activity has a high economic justification. So that the ratio of profit to cost of 1.75, Rials, internal rate of return is 75% and the net present value is also positive. Sensitivity analysis of this activity showed that if current expenditures increase by 50%, the ratio of interest to expenditure greater than one, the internal rate of return is higher than the bank interest rate, and the current value of interest is also positive. Sensitivity analysis showed that if current expenditures are reduced to 139%, | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Economic Evaluation; Living; Financial Profitability | ||
| References | ||
12- Harberger,Arnold. (2014). Compering BettwinCost-Benefit Analysis Agricultural Production International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, Vol. 2. p18. 11-Marschika، T. W. Obritzhausera، P. Wagnerb، V. Richtera، M. Mayerhoferc, C. Egger-Dannerc، A. Käsbohrera، B. Piniora، (2018). A cost-benefit analysis and the potential trade effects of the bovine viral diarrhoea eradication programme in Styria، Austria، The Veterinary Journal، Volume 231، January 2018، Pages 19–29. 13-Pierre Courtoisa، ، ، Charles Figuieresb، ، Chloe Mulierc، ، Joakim Weilld(، 2018). A Cost–Benefit Approach for Prioritizing Invasive Species، Ecological Economics، Volume 146، April 2018، Pages 607–620. 14- Turor, T., Smith , P . and shallcross , F.(2003). Drought master strees fed hydropncally grown, young sprouted barely foder(autograss) department of agricultuer westren Australia. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 1,104 PDF Download: 499 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb