تأثیر آموزش با شبکه‌های اجتماعی بر عملکرد تحصیلی دانشجویان کشاورزی.

برآبادی, سیدابوالقاسم; شمس, علی

doi:10.22092/jaear.2020.124307

فهرست نشریات

اعطای مجوز انتشار 2 مجله ترویجی در شورای انتشارات سازمان

اعطای مجوز انتشار 3 مجله ترویجی در شورای انتشارات سازمان

به روز رسانی بخش استخراج به پایگاه‌های علمی (08-04-1401)

به روز رسانی ظاهری سامانه (08-04-1401)

ارتقاء سامانه مدیریت نشریات

وبینار آموزشی آیین نامه نشریات علمی و شیوه نامه ارزیابی و رتبه بندی نشریات علمی در تاریخ 25 شهریور ماه 1398

برگزاری دوره آموزشی ویراستاری متون علمی از طریق وب کنفرانس در تاریخ 1398/2/11

راه اندازی سامانه ارزیابی نشریات

قابل توجه سردبیران و مدیران داخلی نشریات (ساماندهی صفحه اول نشریات در سامانه)

مجوز انتشار دو نشریه توسط شورای انتشارات سازمان در مردادماه 1397

تعداد نشریات	282
تعداد نشریات سازمان	80
تعداد شماره‌ها	3,196
تعداد مقالات	35,423
تعداد مشاهده مقاله	52,240,424
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله	91,774,101

	تأثیر آموزش با شبکه‌های اجتماعی بر عملکرد تحصیلی دانشجویان کشاورزی.
پژوهش مدیریت آموزش کشاورزی
مقاله 6، دوره 12، شماره 54، آذر 1399، صفحه 106-119 اصل مقاله (289.65 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/jaear.2020.124307
نویسندگان
سیدابوالقاسم برآبادی^* ¹؛ علی شمس²
¹عضو هیأت علمی گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، مجتمع آموزش عالی سراوان
²دانشیار گروه ترویج، ارتباطات و توسعه روستایی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زنجان
چکیده
شبکههای اجتماعی به عنوان ابزاری برای انتقال پیامهای آموزشی، جایگاه والایی در نظام آموزش کشاورزی دارند. استفاده از این شبکهها میتواند به روشهای مختلف و بر جنبههای مختلف نظام آموزشی تأثیرگذار باشد. تحقیقات زیادی نیز ارتباط بین استفاده از شبکههای اجتماعی و متغیرهای مختلفی از بروندادهای نظام آموزشی را بررسی نمودهاند. با این وجود یک سوال مهم در این زمینه این است که، آیا ارتباط معنی داری بین استفاده از شبکههای اجتماعی توسط دانشجویان و عملکرد تحصیلی آنان وجود دارد؟ این مطالعه به دنبال این است تا ضمن مشخص کردن عوامل تأثیرگذار در استفاده آموزشی از شبکه های اجتماعی، به روشن نمودن رابطه بین استفاده آموزشی از شبکههای اجتماعی و عملکرد تحصیلی (معدل کل) دانشجویان بپردازد. جامعه آماری شامل 111528 تن دانشجویان دانشکدههای کشاورزی دولتی سراسر کشور بودند که از بین آنها با استفاده از جدول مورگان و بهوسیله روش نمونهگیری چند مرحلهای تصادفی، 400 تن از دانشجویان هشت دانشگاه کشور بررسی شدند. دادهها با استفاده از طیف لیکرت و به وسیله پرسشنامه محقق ساخته که روایی ظاهری آن توسط تعدادی از اساتید رشتههای ترویج کشاورزی و ادبیات فارسی، روایی محتوایی با استفاده از میانگین واریانس استخراج شده و پایایی نیز با استفاده از آلفای کرونباخ و پایایی ترتیبی تأیید شد، جمع آوری گردید. داده ها با آزمونهای t، f و پیرسون تجزیهوتحلیل گردید. نتایج نشان داد که بیشترین کاربرد شبکههای اجتماعی در بین دانشجویان مربوط به برقراری ارتباط با دوستان و خانواده است. بین میزان استفاده آموزشی از این شبکهها توسط دانشجویان دختر و پسر و نیز بین دانشجویان مقاطع مختلف تحصیلی اختلاف معنیداری وجود دارد ولی در بین گرایشهای مختلف اختلاف معنیداری مشاهده نشد. همچنین مشخص گردید که میزان استفاده آموزشی از شبکههای اجتماعی در بین دانشجویانی که از این شبکه ها با اهداف آموزشی استفاده می کردند، تأثیر مثبتی بر عملکرد تحصیلی آنان دارد، لذا پیشنهاد میشود مدیران و برنامهریزان آموزشی و اساتید دانشگاهها توجه بیشتری در خصوص گنجاندن این رسانهها در برنامههای درسی داشته باشند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
مشاوره شغلی؛ دانشجویان کارشناسی کشاورزی؛ مسئولیت‏ پذیری
عنوان مقاله [English]
Effect of Applying Social Media in Agricultural Students’ Edusational Performance in Iran
نویسندگان [English]
Seyed Abolghasem Barabadi¹؛ ali shams²
¹Faculty member, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Saravan Higher Education Complex
²Associate professor, Department of Agricultural Extension, Communication and Rural Development, University of Zanjan,Iran.
چکیده [English]
Social Network Sites (SNSs), as a tool for conveying educational messages, have a high position in the agricultural education system. The use of SNSs can affect different aspects of the educational system. Numerous studies have examined the relationship between the use of SNSs and various variables of educational system outputs. However, an important question in this area is the relationship between students' use of SNSs and their academic performance. This study seeks to identify the factors affecting the educational use of social media and then, to clarify the relationship between educational use of SNSs and students’ academic performance (total GPA). The statistical population included 111,528 students of public agricultural colleges across the country, of which 400 students from eight universities were surveyed using Morgan table and multi-stage random sampling method. Data were collected by a researcher-made questionnaire using Likert Scale whose apparent validity was confirmed by a number of professors in the field of agricultural extension and Persian literature, content validity was confirmed by AVE and reliability was confirmed using Cronbach’s alpha and CR. The data were analyzed by t, f and Pearson tests. The results showed that the most common use of SNSs among students is related to communicating with friends and family. There is a significant difference between the educational use of these networks by male and female students and also between students of different educational levels, but no significant difference was observed between different disciplines. It was also found that the rate of educational use of social networks among students who used these networks for educational purposes, has a positive effect on their academic performance, so it is suggested that educational administrators and planners as well as university professors pay more attention to the inclusion of these media in the curriculum.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Intention to receiving career counseling, Undergraduate agricultural students, Responsibility, Zamhos

مراجع
رضایی، ر.، صفا، ل.، و ادیبی، م. (1395). عوامل مؤثر بر قصد استفاده از شبکه اجتماعی تلگرام در فعالیت‌های آموزشی در بین دانشجویان دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های ارتباطی، 23(3)، 37–64. رضوی، س. (1390). کاربرد رسانه‌های اجتماعی در آموزش. رشد تکنولوژی آموزشی، 3، 4–7. رضوانی, ا., & عجم, ع. ا. (1395). رابطه میزان استفاده از شبکه های اجتماعی مجازی با پیشرفت تحصیلی و اعتماد در روابط بین فردی دانشجویان دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بیرجند. توسعه آموزش در علوم پزشکی, 9(24), 33–44. رضوی, س. (1390). کاربرد رسانه های اجتماعی در آموزش. رشد تکنولوژی آموزشی, 3, 4–7. شاوردی, ت., چیت ساز قمی, م., & حیدری, ح. (1399). تأثیر شبکه های اجتماعی مجازی بر عملکرد تحصیلی دانش آموزان دختر مقطع متوسطه دوم شهر تهران. فناوری آموزشی, 14(4), 801–812. علی آبادی, خ., رجبیان ده زیره, م., & درتاج, ف. (1396). بررسی رابطه بین میزان استفاده از شبکه های اجتماعی مجازی و راهبردهای یادگیری خودتنظیمی در دانش آموزان. راهبردهای آموزش در علوم پزشکی, 10(5), 345–357. - Abreu, M., Grinevich, V.(2013). The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities. Research Policy, 42: 408–422. - Allahar, H., Sookram, R.(2019). Emergence of University-centred Entrepreneurial ecosystems in the Caribbean, Industry & Higher Education, https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422219838220. - Alvedalen, J., Boschma, R.(2017). A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: towards a future research agenda , pp: 887-903, https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694. - Arvanitis, S., Kubli, U. & Woerter, M.(2008). University-industry knowledge and technology transfer in Switzerland: What university scientists think about co-operation with private enterprises. Research Policy, 37: 1865–1883. - Bercovitz, J. & M. Feldman.(2006). Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: a conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1): 175-188. - Bohlander, B., Cordonnier, M., Jonsson, L., Kaiser, L., Lack, J., Mack, J., Matacotta, C., Schwing, T., Sueur, T., Grevenstein, P. V., Bos, L. V. D. & Vonortas, N. S.(2003). Management of Intellectual Property in Publicly-funded Research Organisations: Towards. www.wipo.int. - Brescia, F., Colombo, G. & Landoni, P.(2016). Organizational structures of Knowledge Transfer Offices: an analysis of the world’s top-ranked universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41: 132–151. - Caldera, A. & Debande, O.(2010). Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 39(9): 1160-1173. - Campbell, A.F.(2005). The Evolving Concept of Value add in University Commercialization. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 11(4). - Campbell, T.I.D.(1997). Public policy for the 21st Century: Addressing potential conflicts in university-industry collaboration. Review of Higher Education, 20(4): 357-379. - Carayannis, E.G., Cherepovitsyn, A.Y., Ilinova, A.A.(2016). Technology commercialization in entrepreneurial universities: the US and Russian experience. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41: 1135–1147. - Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Bruneel, J. & Mahajan, A.(2014). Creating value in Ecosystems: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems. Research Policy, 43:1164–1176. - Comacchio, A., Bonesso,S., Pizzi ,C.(2012). Boundary spanning between Industry and University: the role of Technology Transfer Centres. Journal of Technology Transfer, 37: 943-966. - D’Amico A., Abbate T., Coppolino, R.(2012). The contribution of university to territorial development: the role of Technology Transfer Office. Entrepreneurial competency perspective. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40: 782–799. - Escoffier, Luca.(2015). Japan’s Technology Transfer System: Challenges and Opportunities for European SMEs. EU-Japan Centre for Industrial Cooperation. - European_Investment_Fund.(2005). Technology Transfer Accelerator (TTA) Final report evolution of academic spin-offs. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40: 976–1002. - Feldman, M., Feller, I., Bercovitz, J. & Burton, R.(2002). Equity and the technology transfer strategies of American research universities. Management Science, 48: 105–121. - Frederick, H.(2012). Entrepreneurial Universities in Victoria: An Analysis of University-Based Entrepreneurship Ecosystem, International Journal of Business and Technopreneurship, Volume 2, No. 2, June 2012, pp 189-207. - Fernández-Alles, M., Camelo-Ordaz, C. & Franco-Leal, N.(2015). Key resources and actors for the evolution of academic spin-offs. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40: 976–1002. - Fini, R., Fu, K., Mathisen, M.T., Rasmussen, E. & Wright, M.(2016). Institutional determinants of university spin-off quantity and quality: a longitudinal, multilevel, cross-country study. Small Business Economics, 1–31. - Fini, R., Grimaldi, R. & Sobrero, M.(2009). Factors fostering academics to start up new ventures: an assessment of Italian founders’ incentives. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34: 380–402. - Fini, R., Lacetera, N. & Shane, S.(2010). Inside or outside the IP system? Business creation in academia. Research Policy, 39: 1060–1069. - Fini, R., Santoni, S. & Sobrero, M.(2011). Complements or substitutes? The role of universities and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-offs. Research Policy, 40: 1113–1127. - Friedman, J., & Silberman, J.(2003). University technology transfer: the impact of organization and environment. Journal of Technology Transfer, 28: 17–30 - Friedman, J., & Silberman, J.(2003). University Technology Transfer: Do Incentives, Management, and Location Matter?, Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 81–5. - Harman, G. & Stone, Ch.(2006). Australian university technology transfer managers: Backgrounds, work roles, specialist skills and perceptions. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(3): 213–230. - Hayter, C.S.)2011(. In search of the profit-maximizing actor: motivations and definitions of success from nascent academic entrepreneurs. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36: 340–352. - Hayter, C.S.)2015(. Public or private entrepreneurship? Revisiting motivations and definitions of success among academic entrepreneurs. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40: 1003–1015. - Hayter, C.S.)2016a(. Constraining entrepreneurial development: A knowledge-based view of social networks among academic entrepreneurs. Research Policy. 45: 475–490. - Hayter, C.S.)2016b(. A trajectory of early-stage spinoff success: the role of knowledge intermediaries within an entrepreneurial university ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 47: 633–656. - Hayter, C.S., Link, A.N.)2015(. on the economic impact of university proof of concept centers. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40: 178–183. - Hayter, C.S., Lubynsky, R. & Maroulis, S.(2017). Who is the academic entrepreneur? The role of graduate students in the development of university spinoffs. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42: 1–18. - Hayter, C.S., Andrew, J.N., Stephanie, Z., Alan, O.(2018). Conceptualizing academic entrepreneurship ecosystems: a review, analysis and extension of the literature, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43, 1039–1082 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9657-5. - Hellman, T.(2005). The Role of Patents for Bridging the Science to Market Gap. NBER Working Paper, No. 11460, Cambridge, Mass. - Howells, J.(2006). Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35: 715–728. - Hoye, K. & Pries, F.(2009). Repeat commercializers, the habitual entrepreneurs of university–industry Technology transfer, Technovation, 29: 682–689. - Huyghe, A., Knockaert, M. & Obschonka, M.(2016). Unraveling the “passion orchestra in academia. Journal of Business Venturing, 31: 344–364. - Huyghe, A., Knockaert, M., Piva, E. & Wright, M.(2016). Are researchers deliberately bypassing the technology transfer office? An analysis of TTO awareness. Small Business Economics, 47: 589–607. - Huyghe, A., Knockaert, M., Wright, M. & Piva, E.(2014). Technology transfer offices as boundary spanners in the pre-spin-off process: the case of a hybrid model. Small Business Economics, 43: 289–307. - Jensen, B.M., Johnson, H. B., Lorenz, E., Lundvall, B-Å.(2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation, Research Policy 36 (2007) 680–693. - Lach, S., and Schankerman,M. 2004. Royalty Sharing and Technology Licensing in Universities, Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(2–3), 252–64. - Lahikainen, K., Kolhinen, J., Ruskovaara, E., Pihkala, T.(2019). Challenges to the development of an entrepreneurial university ecosystem: The case of a Finnish university campus, Industry and Higher Education, https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422218815806. - Lakhani, K. R. 2008. InnoCentive.com (A). Harvard Business School Case 608–170. - Link, A. N., and Siegel, D. S.(2005). Generating Science-based Growth: An Econometric Analysis of the Impact of Organizational Incentives on University–Industry Technology Transfer, European Journal of Finance, 11(3), 169–82. - Link, N., Scott, T. & Siegel, S.(2003). The economics of intellectual property at universities: an overview of the special issue. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9). - Lipinski, J., Minutolo, M.C. & Crothers, L.M.(2008). The Complex Relationship Driving Technology Transfer: The Potential Opportunities Missed by Universities, Institute of Behavioral and Applied Management. - Llewellyn, D.W.T., Sharapov, D. & Erkko, A.(2017). Linking entrepreneurial and innovation ecosystems: the case of AppCampus. Entrepreneurial ecosystems and the diffusion of startups. - Logar, cyril M,. Ponzurick, Thomas g,. Spears, John R,. France, Karen Russo.(2001). Commercialization Intellectual Property: University – Industry Alliance for New Product development, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 10, 2001, pp: 206-217. - Lowe, R.(2002). Invention, innovation and entrepreneurship: the commercialization of university research by inventor-founded firms. PhD dissertation. University of California at Berkeley. - Macho-Stadler, I., Perez-Castrillo, D., & Veugelers, R.(2007). Licensing of University Inventions: The Role of a Technology Transfer Office. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25: 483-510. - Malecki, E. J.(2017). Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Geography Compass. 12(3), 1-21. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/gec3.12359 - Markman, G., Gianiodis, P., Phan, P.H. & Balkin, D.B.(2004). Entrepreneurship from the ivory tower: do incentive systems matter? Journal of Technology Transfer, 29: 353–364. - Markman, G., Gianiodis, P., Phan, P.H. & Balkin, D.B.(2005a). Innovation speed: Transferring university technology to market. Research Policy, 34: 1058–1075. - Markman, G., Phan P.H., Balkin, D. B. & Gianiodis, P.(2005b). Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. Journal of Business Venturing, 20: 241–263. - Mosey, S. & Wright, M.(2007). From Human Capital to Social Capital: A Longitudinal Study of Technology–Based Academic Entrepreneurs. Journal of Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 6: 909-935. - O’Shea, R.P., Allen, T.J., Chevalier, A. & Roche, F.(2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy, 34: 994–1009. - O’Shea, R.P., Chugh, H., Allen, T.J.(2008). Determinants and consequences of university spin-off activity: a conceptual framework. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33: 653–666. - OECD .(2003). Turning Science into Business: Patenting and Licensing at Public Research Organization. - OECD .(2011). Technology transfer offices. Innovation Policy Platform. on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42: 423–442. - Owen-Smith, J. & Powell, W.W.(2001). To patent or not: faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26: 99–114. - Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, Pirnay, F., Surlemont, B. & Nlemvo, F.(2003). Toward a typology of university spin-offs. Small Business Economics, 21: 355–369. - Rasmussen, E., Wright, M.(2015). How can universities facilitate academic spin-offs? An entrepreneurial competency perspective. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40: 782–799. - Reichelt, K.M.(2007). University technology transfer and national innovation policy: Success stories from Brazil, Colombia and South Africa. Program Attorney. - Rodríguez-Aceves, L., Mojarro-Durán, B., Muñíz-Ávila, E.(2019). University-Based Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: Evidence From Technology Transfer Policies and Infrastructure, Handbook of Research on Ethics, Entrepreneurship, and Governance in Higher Education. - Rogers, E.M., Yin, Y. & Hoffmann, J.(2000). Assessing the effectiveness of technology transfer offices at U.S. research universities. The Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, 12: 47-80. - Sharif, N. & Baark, E.(2005). The tamest of tigers? Understanding Hong Kong’s innovation system and innovation policies. International Journal of Technology and Globalization, 1(3). - Sharif, N. & Baark, E.(2008). Mobilizing technology transfer from university to industry the experience of Hong Kong universities. Journal of Technology Management in China, 3(1). - Sharma, M., Kumar, U. & Lalande, L.(2006). Role of university technology transfer offices in university technology commercialization: case study of the Carleton university foundry program. Journal of Services Research, 6: 109-139. - Sharon, A., Carayannis, G.E., Battista, G., Dagnino & Faraci, R.(2017). Introduction: Entrepreneurial ecosystems and the diffusion of startups. - Siegel, D.S. & Wright, M.(2015). Academic entrepreneurship: Time for a re-think? British Journal of Management, 26: 582–595. - Siegel, D.S., Veugelers, R. & Wright, M.(2007). Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4). - Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D. & Link, A.(2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Research Policy, 32: 27–48. - Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D., Atwater E. L., Link, N.A.(2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration, The Journal of High Technology Management Research, Volume 14, Issue 1, Spring 2003, pp: 111-133. - Spigel, B.(2017). The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol 41, Issue 1, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fetap.12167. - Stephan, P.E.(2001). Educational implications of university-industry technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26: 199-205. - Technology Transfer Process, MIT.(2020). Learn About Intellectual Property, TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROCESS. https://tlo.mit.edu/learn-about-intellectual property/technology-transfer-process. - Thursby, M.C., Thursby, J.G. & Mukherjee, S.(2005). Are There Effects of Licensing on Academic Research? A Life Cycle View, NBER Working Paper No. 11497, Cambridge, Mass. - Todorovic, Z. W., McNaughton, R. B., & Guild, P.(2011). ENTRE-U: An entrepreneurial orientation scale for universities. Technovation, 31(2/3), 128-137. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.009 - Upstill, G. & Symington, D.(2002). Technology transfer and the creation of companies: The CSIRO experience. R&D Management, 32(3): 233-239. - Vorley, T., & Nelles, J.(2010). Gone corporate? The changing face of entrepreneurship in contemporary universities. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 2(2), 201-216. - Wagner, M., Schaltegger, S., Hansen, E., Fichter, K.(2019). University-linked programmes for sustainable entrepreneurship and regional development: how and with what impact?, Small Business Economics, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00280-4. - Weckowska, M. Dagmara.(2015). Learning inuniversity technology transfer offices: transactions-focused and relations-focused approaches to commercialization of academic research. Technovation, 41-42: 62–74. - Young, TA.(2007). Establishing a Technology Transfer Office. In Intellectual Property Management in Health and Agricultural Innovation: A Handbook of Best Practices. - Zhang, H.(2013). University Technology Transfer and Research Portfolio Management. Harvard University.
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,653 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 489

سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب

پیوندهای مفید

اخبار و اعلانات

آمار

تأثیر آموزش با شبکه‌های اجتماعی بر عملکرد تحصیلی دانشجویان کشاورزی.